The Dynamism of Daily Justice: A Person-Environment Fit Perspective on the Situated Value of Justice

References

• Akaah IP (1996) The influence of organizational rank and role on marketing professionals’ ethical judgments. J. Bus. Ethics 15(6):605–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alliger GM, Williams KJ (1993) Using signal‐contingent experience sampling methodology to study work in the field: A discussion and illustration examining task perceptions and mood. Personnel Psych. 46(3):525–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay LJ, Bashshur MR, Fortin M (2017) Motivated cognition and fairness: Insights, integration, and creating a path forward. J. Appl. Psych. 102(6):867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay LJ, Skarlicki DP, Pugh SD (2005) Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):629–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Tice DM (2007) The strength model of self-control. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 16(6):351–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ (2015) ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2:383–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Weiss HM (2003) Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 6(4):440–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Weiss HM, Barros E, MacDermid SM (2005) An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1054–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) International justice: communication criteria of fairness. Res. Negotation Organ. 1(1):43–55.Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Wiesenfeld BM, Fortin M, Wheeler-Smith SL (2013) Fairness lies in the heart of the beholder: How the social emotions of third parties influence reactions to injustice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(1):62–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen GV, Schwarz N, Bless H, Wänke M (1995) Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(1):48–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cognitive Sci. 8(12):539–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brebels L, De Cremer D, Sedikides C, Van Hiel A (2013) Self-focus and procedural fairness: The role of self-rumination and self-reflection. Soc. Justice Res. 26(2):151–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J (2006) Why it’s so hard to be fair. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84:122–129.Google Scholar
• Buckner RL (2010) The Role of the Hippocampus in Prediction and Imagination. Annual Rev. Psych. 61:27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushman BJ, Bonacci AM, Pedersen WC, Vasquez EA, Miller N (2005) Chewing on it can chew you up: Effects of rumination on triggered displaced aggression. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(6):969–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, DeRue DS (2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. J. Appl. Psych. 87(5):875–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Edwards JR (2004) Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5):822–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson M, Charlin V, Miller N (1988) Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(2):211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF (1981) Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF (1998) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Ledgerwood A (2011) A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 1 (Sage, Los Angeles), 246–266.Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christian JS, Christian MS, Garza AS, Ellis APJ (2012) Examining retaliatory responses to justice violations and recovery attempts in teams. J. Appl. Psych. 97(6):1218–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y, Byrne ZS (2008) Affect and justice: Current knowledge and future directions. Ashkanasy NM, Cooper CL, eds. Research Companion to Emotion in Organizations (Edward Elgar Publishing), 360–391.Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE (2001) The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86(2):278–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA (2012) Plagiarism policies and screening at AMJ. Acad. Management J. 55(4):749–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Rodell JB (2015) Measuring justice and fairness. Cropanzano RS, Amrbose MS, eds. Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 187–202.Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Greenberg J, Zapata-Phelan CP (2005) What is organizational justice? A historical overview. Greenberg J, Colquitt JA, eds. Handbook of Organizational Justice. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 3–56.Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Long DM, Rodell JB, Halvorsen-Ganepola MDK (2015) Adding the “In” to Justice: a qualitative and quantitative investigation of the differential effects of justice rule adherence and violation. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):278–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Judge TA, Shaw JC (2006) Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(1):110–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter C, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, LePine JA, Piccolo RF, Zapata CP, Rich BL (2012) Explaining the justice-performance relationship: trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer? J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Rodell JB, Long DM, Zapata CP, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ (2013) Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. J. Appl. Psych. 98(2):199–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelis I, Van Hiel A, De Cremer D, Mayer DM (2013) When leaders choose to be fair: Follower belongingness needs and leader empathy influences leaders’ adherence to procedural fairness rules. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(4):605–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Critchley HD, Elliott R, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ (2000) Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 20(8):3033–3040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Bowen DE, Gilliland SW (2007) The management of organizational justice. Acad. Management Perspect. 21:34–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Stein JH, Nadisic T (2011) Social Justice and the Experience of Emotion (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE (2001) Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice . J. Vocational Behav 58(2):164–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Weiss HM, Suckow KJ, Grandey AA (2000) Doing justice to workplace emotion. Askhanasy NM, Hartel CE, Zerbe WJ, eds. Emotions in the Workplace: Research, Theory, and Practice (Quorum Books, Westport, CT), 49–62.Google Scholar
• Damasio AR, Grabowski TJ, Bechara A, Damasio H, Ponto LL, Parvizi J, Hichwa RD (2000) Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature Neurosci. 3(10):1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSteno D, Dasgupta N, Bartlett MY, Cajdric A (2004) Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psych. Sci. 15(5):319–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deyo M, Wilson KA, Ong J, Koopman C (2009) Mindfulness and rumination: does mindfulness training lead to reductions in the ruminative thinking associated with depression? Explore (NY). 5(5):265–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dulebohn JH, Conlon DE, Sarinopoulos I, Davison RB, McNamara G (2009) The biological bases of unfairness: Neuroimaging evidence for the distinctiveness of procedural and distributive justice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 110(2):140–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (1992) A cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 17:238–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (1996) An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Acad. Management J. 39(2):292–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2001) Ten difference score myths. Organ. Res. Methods 4(3):265–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2002) Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. Drasgow F, Schmitt N, eds. Measuring and Analyzing Behavior in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 350–400.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Cable DA (2009) The value of value congruence. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):654–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Parry ME (1993) On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to differences scores in organizational research. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1577–1613.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Rothbard NP (1999) Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 77(2):85–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Van Harrison R (1993) Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. J. Appl. Psych. 78(4):628–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Caplan RD, Van Harrison RV (1998) Person-environment fit theory: conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. Cooper CL, ed. Theories of Organization Stress (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 28–67.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Cable DM, Williamson IO, Lambert LS, Shipp AJ (2006) The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):802–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD, Williams KD (2003) Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Sci. 302(5643):290–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psych. Methods 12:121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engle EM, Lord RG (1997) Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Acad. Management J. 40(4):988–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstude K, Roese NJ (2008) The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 12(2):168–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erez A, Misangyi VF, Johnson DE, LePine MA, Halverson KC (2008) Stirring the hearts of followers: Charismatic leadership as the transferal of affect. J. Appl. Psych. 93(3):602–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JSB (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Rev. Psych. 59:255–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher DM, Bell ST, Dierdorff EC, Belohlav JA (2012) Facet Personality and Surface-Level Diversity as Team Mental Model Antecedents: Implications for Implicit Coordination. J. Appl. Psych. 97(4):825–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R, Cropanzano R (1998) Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R, Cropanzano R (2001) Fairness theory: justice as accountability. Greenberg J, Cropanzano R, eds. Advances in Organizational Justice (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 1–55.Google Scholar
• Foo MD, Uy MA, Baron RA (2009) How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):1086–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forgas JP (1995) Mood and judgment-The affect infusion model (AIM). Psych. Bull. 117(1):39–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French JR, Caplan RD, Van Harrison R (1982) The Mechanisms of Job Stress and Strain (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Gabriel AS, Diefendorff JM, Chandler MM, Moran CM, Gregarus GJ (2014) The dynamic relationships of work affect and job satisfaction with performance of fit. Personnel. Psych. 67:389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel AS, Podsakoff NP, Beal DJ, Scott BA, Sonnentag S, Trougakos JP, Butts MM (2019) Experience sampling methods: a discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organ. Res. Methods 22(4):969–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallagher HL, Frith CD (2003) Functional imaging of “theory of mind”. Trends Cognitive Sci. 7(2):77–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glomb TM, Bhave DP, Miner AG, Wall M (2011) Doing good, feeling good: Examining the role of organizational citizenship behaviors in changing mood. Personnel Psych. 64(1):191–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Scandura TA (1987) Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Res. Organ. Behav. 9:175–208.Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quart. 6:219–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greguras GJ, Diefendorff JM (2009) Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):465–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK (2007) A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad. Management J. 50(2):327–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1987) Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psych. Rev. 94(3):319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliescu D, Ispas D, Sulea C, Ilie A (2015) Vocational fit and counterproductive work behaviors: A self-regulation perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 100(1):21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ispas D, Iliescu D, Ilie A, Sulea C, Askew K, Rohlfs JT, Whalen K (2014) Revisiting the relationship between impression management and job performance. J. Res. Personality 51:47–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen KJ, Shipp AJ (2013) A review and agenda for incorporating time in fit research. Kristof-Brown AL, Billsberry J, eds. Organizational Fit: Key Issues and New Directions (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK ), 195–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RC, Allen TD (2013) Examining the links between employed mothers’ work characteristics, physical activity, and child health. J. Appl. Psych. 98(1):148–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Lord RG (2010) Implicit effects of justice on self-identity. J. Appl. Psych. 95(4):681–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Chang CH, Lord RG (2006a) Moving from cognition to behavior: What the research says. Psych. Bull. 132(3):381–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Chang CH, Yang LQ (2010) Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):226–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Lanaj K, Barnes CM (2014) The good and bad of being fair: Effects of procedural and interactional justice behaviors on actors’ regulatory resources. J. Appl. Psych. 99:635–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Rosen CC, Djurdjevic E (2011) Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. J. Appl. Psych. 96(4):744–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Selenta C, Lord RG (2006b) When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Taing MU, Chang C, Kawamoto CK (2013) A self-regulation approach to person-environment fit. Kristof-Brown AL, Billsberry J, eds. Organizational Fit: Key Issues and New Directions (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK), 74–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joireman JA, Parrott L III, Hammersla J (2002) Empathy and the self-absorption paradox: Support for the distinction between self-rumination and self-reflection. Self Identity 1(1):53–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Cable DM (1997) Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psych. 50(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanfer R, Frese M, Johnson RE (2017) Motivation related to work: A century of progress. J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):338–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerns JG, Cohen JD, MacDonald AW, Cho RY, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2004) Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Sci. 303(5660):1023–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW (2000) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Kline R (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. (Guilford, New York).Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Matta FK, Scott BA, Conlon DE (2015) Ingratiation and popularity as antecedents of justice: A social exchange and social capital perspective. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 131:132–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Lin SH, Lennard AC, Matta FK, Johnson RE (2020a) My coworkers are treated more fairly than me! A self-regulatory perspective on justice social comparisons. Acad. Management J. 63(3):857–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Rosen CC, Gabriel AS, Puranik H, Johnson RE, Ferris DL (2020b) Why and for whom does the pressure to help hurt others? Affective and cognitive mechanisms linking helping pressure to workplace deviance. Personnel Psych. 73(2):333–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Scott BA, Matta FK, Conlon DE, Dennerlein T, Hollensbe ML, Masterson S, Stoverink A (2019) Ethical leadership as a substitute for justice enactment: An information-processing perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 104(9):1103–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreiner GE (2006) Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: a person-environment fit perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 27(4):485–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psych. 58(2):281–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof AL (1996) Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psych. 49(1):1–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert LS, Edwards JR, Cable DM (2003) Breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract: A comparison of traditional and expanded view. Personnel Psych. 56:895–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert LS, Tepper BJ, Carr JC, Holt DT, Barelka AJ (2012) Forgotten but not gone: An examination of fit between leader consideration and initiating structure needed and received. J. Appl. Psych. 97(5):913–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanaj K, Johnson RE, Barnes CM (2014) Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(1):11–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavelle JJ, Rupp DE, Brockner J (2007) Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: the target similarity model†. J. Management 33(6):841–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence JW, Carver CS, Scheier MF (2002) Velocity toward goal attainment in immediate experience as a determinant of affect. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 32(4):788–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine JA, LePine MA, Jackson CL (2004) Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(5):883–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind EA (2001) Thinking critically about justice judgments. J. Vocational Behav. 58(2):220–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind EA, van den Bos K (2002) When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Res. Organ. Behav. 24:181–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord RG, Brown DJ, Freiberg SJ (1999) Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader follower relationship. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 78(3):167–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky S, Nolen-Hoeksema S (1993) Self-perpetuating properties of dysphoric rumination. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(2):339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E (2005) The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psych. Bull. 131(6):803–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky S, Tucker KL, Caldwell ND, Berg K (1999) Why ruminators are poor problem solvers: Clues from the phenomenology of dysphoric rumination. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin LL, Tesser A, McIntosh WD (1993) Wanting but not having: the effects of unattained goals on thoughts and feelings. Wegner DM, Pennebaker JW, eds. Century Psychology Series. Handbook of Mental Control (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 552–572.Google Scholar
• Matta FK, Scott BA, Koopman J, Conlon DE (2015) Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1686–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matta FK, Scott BA, Colquitt JA, Koopman J, Passantino LG (2017) Is consistently unfair better than sporadically fair? An investiation of justice variability and stress. Acad. Management J. 60(2):743–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullough ME, Bono G, Root LM (2007) Rumination, emotion, and forgiveness: Three longitudinal studies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(3):490–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner AG, Glomb TM (2010) State mood, task performance, and behavior at work: A within-persons approach. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 112(1):43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montes SD, Irving PG (2008) Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust. J. Appl. Psychol. 93(6):1367–1381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nitschke JB, Sarinopoulos I, Mackiewicz KL, Schaefer HS, Davidson RJ (2006) Functional neuroanatomy of aversion and its anticipation. Neuroimage 29(1):106–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema S, Davis CG (1999) Thanks for sharing that”: Ruminators and their social support networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(4):801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S (2008) Rethinking rumination. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 3(5):400–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ochsner KN, Bunge SA, Gross JJ, Gabrieli JD (2002) Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 14(8):1215–1229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelphrey KA, Morris JP, Mccarthy G (2004) Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 16(10):1706–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Rev. Psychol. 63:539–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price KH, Lavelle JJ, Henley AB, Cocchiara FK, Buchanan FR (2006) Judging the fairness of voice-based participation across multiple and interrelated stages of decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):212–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raes F, Williams JMG (2010) The relationship between mindfulness and uncontrollability of ruminative thinking. Mindfulness 1(4):199–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roese NJ (1997) Counterfactual thinking. Psych. Bull. 121(1):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Ashforth BE (1997) A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psych. 50(2):395–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanfey AG (2007) Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience. Sci. 318(5850):598–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satpute AB, Lieberman MD (2006) Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition. Brain Res. 1079(1):86–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott BA, Colquitt JA, Paddock EL (2009) An actor-focused model of justice rule adherence and violation: The role of managerial motives and discretion. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):756–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott BA, Garza AS, Conlon DE, Kim YJ (2014) Why do managers act fairly in the first place? A daily investigation of “hot” and “cold” motives and discretion. Acad. Management J. 57:1571–1591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segerstrom SC, Stanton AL, Alden LE, Shortridge BE (2003) A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: What’s on your mind, and how, and how much? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(5):909–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settoon RP, Mossholder KW (2002) Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw JC, Wild E, Colquitt JA (2003) To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. J. Appl. Psych. 88(3):444–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Venkataramani V, Gajendran RS (2019) Too busy to be fair? The effect of workload and rewards on managers’ justice rule adherence. Acad. Management J. 62(2):1–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shockley KM, Ispas D, Rossi ME, Levine EL (2012) A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between state affect, discrete emotions, and job performance. Human Performance 25(5):377–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Folger R (1997) Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 82(3):434–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Kulik CT (2005) Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Staw BM, Kramer RM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, vol. 26, 183–229.Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Rupp DE (2010) Dual processing and organizational justice: the role of rational vs. experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. J. Appl. Psych. 95(5):944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skitka LJ (2003) Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 7(4):286–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ER, DeCoster J (2000) Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 4(2):108–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Semin GR (2007) Situated social cognition. Current Directions Psychol. Sci. 16(3):132–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JM, Alloy LB (2009) A roadmap to rumination: A review of the definition, assessment, and conceptualization of this multifaceted construct. Clinical Psych. Rev. 29(2):116–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Y, Wang M, Lanaj K, Johnson RE, Shi J (2018) A social mindfulness approach to understanding experienced customer mistreatment: A within-person field experiment. Acad. Management J. 61(3):994–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S, Grant AM (2012) Doing good at work feels good at home, but not right away: When and why perceived prosocial impact predicts positive affect. Personnel Psych. 65(3):495–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer S, Rupp DE (2009) Angry, guilty, and conflicted: Injustice toward coworkers heightens emotional labor through cognitive and emotional mechanisms. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):429–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steger MF, Kashdan TB, Oishi S (2008) Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. J. Res. Personality 42:22–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strack F, Deutsch R (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(3):220–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabibnia G, Satpute AB, Lieberman MD (2008) The sunny side of fairness: preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psych. Sci. 19(4):339–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ, Dimotakis N, Lambert LS, Koopman J, Matta FK, Park H, Goo W (2018) Examining follower responses to transformational leadership from a dynamic, person–environment fit perspective. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1343–1368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolman CW (2006) Being human and the need for justice. Taylor AJW, ed. Justice as Basic Human Need (Nova Science Publishers, New York), 13–23.Google Scholar
• Tripp TM, Bies RJ, Aquino K (2002) Poetic justice or petty jealousy? The aesthetics of revenge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 89(1):966–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai WC, Chen CC, Liu HL (2007) Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1570–1583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2000) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement (Psychology Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader (2003) The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 7(4):349–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Labianca G, Brass DJ, Kass E, Scholten L (2003) The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees’ perceptions of organizational justice. Organ. Sci. 14(6):738–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Uy MA, Foo M-D, Aguinis H (2010) Using experience sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organ. Res. Methods 13(1):31–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van den Bos K, Lind EA (2002) Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34:1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijke M, De Cremer D, Mayer DM (2010) The Role of Authority Power in Explaining Procedural Fairness Effects. J. Appl. Psych. 95(3):488–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Dalal RS (2007) Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):952–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel RM, Rodell JB, Sabey TB (2020) Meaningfulness misfit: Consequences of daily meaningfulness work needs-supplies incongruence for daily engagement. J. Appl. Psych. 105(7):760–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang M, Liao H, Zhan YJ, Shi JQ (2011) Daily customer mistreatment and employee sabotage against customers: Examining emotion and resource perspectives. Acad. Management J. 54(2):312–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang M, Liu SQ, Liao H, Gong YP, Kammeyer-Mueller J, Shi JQ (2013) Can’t get it out of my mind: employee rumination after customer mistreatment and negative mood in the next morning. J. Appl. Psych. 98(6):989–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward A, Lyubomirsky S, Sousa L, Nolen-Hoeksema S (2003) Can’t quite commit: Rumination and uncertainty. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1):96–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watkins E, Moulds M (2005) Distinct modes of ruminative self-focus: impact of abstract vs. concrete rumination on problem solving in depression. Emotion 5(3):319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Suckow K, Cropanzano R (1999) Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. J. Appl. Psych. 84(5):786–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Swann WB, Brockner J, Bartel CA (2007) Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1235–1253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson KS, Baumann HM, Matta FK, Ilies R, Kossek E (2018) Misery loves company: An investigation of couples’ interrole conflict congruence. Acad. Management J. 61(2):715–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zapata-Phelan CP, Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Livingston B (2009) Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(1):93–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wang M, Shi JQ (2012) Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Acad. Management J. 55(1):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar