Where Do Born Globals Come from? A Neoconfigurational Institutional Theory

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1497

References

  • Acedo FJ, Jones MV (2007) Speed of internationalization and entrepreneurial cognition: Insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms. J. World Bus. 42(3):236–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Achidi Ndofor H, Priem RL (2011) Immigrant entrepreneurs, the ethnic enclave strategy, and venture performance. J. Management 37(3):790–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acs ZJ, Amorós JE (2008) Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America. Small Bus. Econom. 31(3):305–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acs ZJ, Szerb L (2007) Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Bus. Econom. 28(2-3):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agostino M, Nifo A, Trivieri F, Vecchione G (2020) Rule of law and regulatory quality as drivers of entrepreneurship. Regional Stud. 54(6):814–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alfaro L, Charlton A (2006) International financial integration and entrepreneurship. CEPDP (755). Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.Google Scholar
  • Alhorr HS, Moore CB, Payne GT (2008) The impact of economic integration on cross‐border venture capital investments: Evidence from the European Union. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 32(5):897–917.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvarez C, Urbano D, Coduras A, Ruiz-Navarro J (2011) Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: A regional comparison in Spain. J. Small Bus. Enterprise Development 18(1):120–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson S, Evangelista F (2006) The entrepreneur in the born global firm in Australia and Sweden. J. Small Bus. Enterprise Development 12(1):642–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anokhin S, Schulze WS (2009) Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. J. Bus. Venturing 24(5):465–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anokhin S, Wincent J (2012) Start-up rates and innovation: A cross-country examination. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(1):41–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arenius P, Minniti M (2005) Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econom. 24(3):233–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autio E, Pathak S, Wennberg K (2013) Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 44(4):334–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey KD (1973) Monothetic and polythetic typologies and their relation to conceptualization, measurement and scaling. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 38(1):18–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey TR (1987) Immigrant and Native Workers: Contrasts and Competition (Westview, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Baron RA (2006) Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(1):104–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barro RJ (1999) Determinants of economic growth: Implications of the global evidence for Chile. Cuad. Econom. 36(107):443–478.Google Scholar
  • Baumol WJ (1996) Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. J. Bus. Venturing 11(1):3–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G (1975) Human Capital (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bell RG, Filatotchev I, Aguilera RV (2014) Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Acad. Management J. 57(1):301–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleaney MF (1996) Macroeconomic stability, investment and growth in developing countries. J. Development Econom. 48(2):461–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bohle D, Greskovits B (2012) Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Bosma N, Stam E, Wennekers S (2013) Institutions and the allocation of entrepreneurship across new and established organizations. Scales Research Reports No. H201213, EIM Business and Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Bowen HP, De Clercq D (2008) Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(4):747–767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brás GR (2020) Determinants of entrepreneurship in Latvia and Baltic countries in general: An empirical approach. Eur. J. Internat. Management 14(5):817–841.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brem A, Borchardt J (2014) Technology entrepreneurship, innovation and intrapreneurship-managing entrepreneurial activities in technology-intensive environments. Therin F, ed. Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship: How Technology and Entrepreneurship Are Shaping the Development of Industries and Companies, 2nd ed. (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 17–38.Google Scholar
  • Bruton GD, Ahlstrom D, Li HL (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 34(3):421–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz LW, Lau CM (1996) A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 20(4):25–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz LW, Gomez C, Spencer JW (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad. Management J. 43(5):994–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardoza G, Fornes G, Farber V, Duarte RG, Gutierrez JR (2016) Barriers and public policies affecting the international expansion of Latin American SMEs: Evidence from Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. J. Bus. Res. 69(6):2030–2039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casson M (1995) Entrepreneurship and Business Culture: Studies in the Economics of Trust (Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT).Google Scholar
  • Casson M, Giusta MD (2007) Entrepreneurship and social capital: Analyzing the impact of social networks on entrepreneurial activity from a rational action perspective. Internat. Small Bus. J. 25(3):220–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cavusgil ST, Knight G (2015) The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(1):3–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen CC, Greene PG, Crick A (1998) Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? J. Bus. Venturing 13(4):295–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi Y, Phan P (2006) A generalized supply/demand approach to national entrepreneurship: Examples from the United States and South Korea. Demougin D, Schade C, eds. Entrepreneurship, Marketing, Innovation: An Economic Perspective on Entrepreneurial Decision Making (Duncker & Humblot Verlag, Berlin), 11–34.Google Scholar
  • Crouch C (2005) Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs (OUP, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlstedt M, Fejes A (2019) Shaping entrepreneurial citizens: A genealogy of entrepreneurship education in Sweden. Critical Stud. Ed. 60(4):462–476.Google Scholar
  • De Clercq D, Hessels J, Van Stel A (2008) New ventures’ export orientation: Outcome and source of knowledge spillovers. Small Bus. Econom. 31(3):283–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Del Sarto N, Di Minin A, Ferrigno G, Piccaluga A (2021) Born global and well educated: Start-up survival through fuzzy set analysis. Small Bus. Econom. 56(2021):1405–1423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Soto H (2000) The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else (Civitas Books).Google Scholar
  • Dib LA, Da Rocha A, Da Silva JF (2010) The internationalization process of Brazilian software firms and the born global phenomenon: Examining firm, network, and entrepreneur variables. J. Internat. Entrepreneurship 8(3):233–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickson PH, Weaver KM, Vozikis GS (2013) The impact of the institutional environment on SME internationalization: An assessment of the environmental assumptions of emerging integrated models of internationalization. J. Appl. Bus. Econom. 15(3):43–55.Google Scholar
  • Drori I, Honig B, Wright M (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 33(5):1001–1022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunning JH (1980) Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 11(1):9–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutia S (2012) Diaspora networks: A new impetus to drive entrepreneurship. Innovations Tech. Governance Globalization 7(1):65–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efrat K, Shoham A (2012) Born global firms: The differences between their short-and long-term performance drivers. J. World Bus. 47(4):675–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fainshmidt S, Smith A, Judge W (2016) National competitiveness and Porter’s diamond model: The roles of MNE penetration and governance quality. Global Strategy J. 6(2):81–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan T, Phan P (2007) International new ventures: Revisiting the influences behind the ‘born global’ firm. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(7):1113–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernández A, Klein MW, Rebucci A, Schindler M, Uribe M (2016) Capital control measures: A new data set. IMF Econom. Rev. 64(3):548–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frambach RT, Fiss PC, Ingenbleek PT (2016) How important is customer orientation for firm performance? A fuzzy set analysis of orientations, strategies, and environments. J. Bus. Res. 69(4):1428–1436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman S, Edwards R, Schroder B (2006) How smaller born global firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints to rapid internationalization. J. Internat. Marketing 14(3):33–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedberg RM, Hunt J (1995) The impact of immigrants on host country wages, employment and growth. J. Econom. Perspect. 9(2):23–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frontera (2014) Latin America’s soon to be entrepreneurial hotbed: Uruguay. Research and Intelligence Marketplace. Retrieved April 5, 2021, https://fronteranews.com/news/latin-americas-soon-to-be-entrepreneurial-hotbed/.Google Scholar
  • Fuchs K, Werner A, Wallau F (2008) Entrepreneurship education in Germany and Sweden: What role do different school systems play? J. Small Bus. Enterprise Development 15(2):365–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabrielsson M, Kirpalani VM (2004) Born globals: How to reach new business space rapidly. Internat. Bus. Rev. 13(5):555–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ginsburg T (2005) International substitutes for domestic institutions: Bilateral investment treaties and governance. Internat. Rev. Law Econom. 25(1):107–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2014) Adult Population Study Global Individual Level Data. Accessed January 3, 2017, http://gemconsortium.org/data/sets#baps.Google Scholar
  • Goergen M, Brewster C, Wood G, Wilkinson A (2012) Varieties of capitalism and investments in human capital. Indust. Relations 51(s1):501–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grandori A, Furnari S (2013) Configurational analysis and organization design: Toward a theory of structural heterogeneity. Fiss PC, Marx A, Cambré B, eds. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 38 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 77–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greckhamer T (2016) CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country‐level institutions. Strategic Management J. 37(4):793–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greckhamer T, Furnari S, Fiss PC, Aguilera RV (2018) Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organ. 16(4):482–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenman A (2013) Everyday entrepreneurial action and cultural embeddedness: An institutional logics perspective. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 25(7-8):631–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. Eur. Econom. Rev. 35(2-3):517–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann P, Heider F, Papaioannou E, Lo Duca M (2007) The role of financial markets and innovation in productivity and growth in Europe. Preprint, submitted September 26, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1005850.Google Scholar
  • Haynie JM, Shepherd DA, McMullen JS (2009) An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. J. Management Stud. 46(3):337–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haynie JM, Shepherd D, Mosakowski E, Earley PC (2010) A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. J. Bus. Venturing 25(2):217–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayton JC, George G, Zahra SA (2002) National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 26(4):33–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hechavarría DM (2016) The impact of culture on national prevalence rates of social and commercial entrepreneurship. Internat. Entrepreneurship Management J. 12(2016):1025–1052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hessels J, Van Stel A (2011) Entrepreneurship, export orientation, and economic growth. Small Bus. Econom. 37(2):255–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt SR, Sine WD (2014) Clear and present danger: Planning and new venture survival amid political and civil violence. Strategic Management J. 35(5):773–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffmann VH, Trautmann T, Hamprecht J (2009) Regulatory uncertainty: A reason to postpone investments? Not necessarily. J. Management Stud. 46(7):1227–1253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang T, Wu F, Yu J, Zhang B (2015) Political risk and dividend policy: Evidence from international political crises. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(5):574–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson G, Deeg R (2008) Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(4):540–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang K, Lepak DP, Hu J, Baer JC (2012) How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1264–1294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johannisson B (2002) Entrepreneurship in Scandinavia. Bridging Individualism & Collectivism (Vaxjo University, Vaxjo, Sweden).Google Scholar
  • Jones MV, Coviello N, Tang YK (2011) International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. J. Bus. Venturing 26(6):632–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Julien PA, Joyal A, Deshaies L (1994) SMEs and international competition: Free trade agreement or globalization? J. Small Bus. Management 32(3):52–64.Google Scholar
  • Kerr SP, Kerr WR (2016) Immigrant entrepreneurship. Haltiwanger J, Hurst E, Miranda J, Schoar A, eds. Measuring Entrepreneurial Businesses: Current Knowledge and Challenges (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 187–249.Google Scholar
  • Keupp MM, Gassmann O (2009) The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: A review and suggestions for developing the field. J. Management 35(3):600–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born global firm. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 35(2):124–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight GA, Liesch PW (2016) Internationalization: From incremental to born global. J. World Bus. 51(1):93–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurtoglu F (2007) Immigrant entrepreneurs in Austria. Dana L-P, ed. Handbook of Research on Ethnic Minority Entrepreneurship: A Co-Evolutionary View on Resource Management (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 425–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois RN, Robertson PL (1995) Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions, vol. 136 (Routledge, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazzarini SG (2015) Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm‐level competitive advantage? Strategic Management J. 36(1):97–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levie J, Autio E (2008) A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Bus. Econom. 31(3):235–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Puma JA, Newbert SL, Doh JP (2013) The effect of institutional quality on firm export performance in emerging economies: A contingency model of firm age and size. Small Bus. Econom. 40(4):817–841.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loane S, Bell J (2006) Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand: An extension to the network approach. Internat. Marketing Rev. 23(5):467–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maas R, Heugens P, Reus T (2015) Born to go abroad: An imprinting perspective on emerging market firm internationalization behavior. Acad. Management Proc. 2015(1):18116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen TK, Servais P (1997) The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? Internat. Bus. Rev. 6(6):561–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGaughey SL (2007) Hidden ties in international new venturing: The case of portfolio entrepreneurship. J. World Bus. 42(3):307–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNaughton RB, Pellegrino J (2014) Policy implications of international entrepreneurship. Fernhaber SA, Prashantham S, eds. The Routledge Companion to International Entrepreneurship (Routledge, London), 235–244.Google Scholar
  • Misangyi V, Greckhamer T, Furnari S, Fiss P, Crilly D, Aguilera R (2017) Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. J. Management 43(1):255–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell RK, Chesteen SA (1995) Enhancing entrepreneurial expertise: Experiential pedagogy and the new venture expert script. Simulation Gaming 26(3):288–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moed J (2018) Start-Up Chile’s impact 2010-2018: Inside the revolutionary startup accelerator. Forbes (November 19), https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanmoed/2018/11/19/start-up-chiles-impact-2010-2018-inside-the-revolutionary-startup-accelerator/?sh=22c974ce6dc5.Google Scholar
  • Moen Ø (2002) The born globals: A new generation of small European exporters. Internat. Marketing Rev. 19(2):156–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan HM, Sui S, Baum M (2018) Are SMEs with immigrant owners exceptional exporters? J. Bus. Venturing 33(3):241–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mudambi R, Zahra SA (2007) The survival of international new ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(2):333–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mueller SL, Thomas AS (2001) Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. J. Bus. Venturing 16(1):51–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noorderhaven N, Thurik R, Wennekers S, Stel AV (2004) The role of dissatisfaction and per capita income in explaining self‐employment across 15 European countries. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 28(5):447–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(5):537–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pajunen K (2008) Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: A fuzzy-set analysis. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(4):652–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelletier KL, Bligh MC (2006) Rebounding from corruption: Perceptions of ethics program effectiveness in a public sector organization. J. Bus. Ethics 67(4):359–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng MW, Yamakawa Y, Lee SH (2010) Bankruptcy laws and entrepreneur friendliness. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 34(3):517–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pezeshkan A, Smith A, Fainshmidt S, Nair A (2020) A neo-configurational institutional analysis of international venture capital attractiveness and performance: Insights for Asia-Pacific. Asia Pacific J. Management, ePub ahead of print July 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09727-9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Portes R, Rey H (2005) The determinants of cross-border equity flows. J. Internat. Econom. 65(2):269–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prange C, Verdier S (2011) Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance. J. World Bus. 46(1):126–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragin CC (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
  • Ragin CC (2006) User’s Guide to Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0 (Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson).Google Scholar
  • Ragin CC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets & Beyond (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragin CC, Fiss PC (2017) Intersectional Inequality: Race, Class, Test Scores, and Poverty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Ragin CC, Sonnett J (2005) Between complexity and parsimony: Limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. Kropp S, Minkenberg M, eds. Vergleichen in der politikwissenschaft (VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany), 180–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramoglou S, Tsang EW (2016) A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities. Acad. Management Rev. 41(3):410–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reuber A, Dimitratos P, Kuivalainen O (2017) Beyond categorization: New directions for theory development about entrepreneurial internationalization. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 4:411–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodrik D (2008) Second-best institutions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):100–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F (2004) Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. J. Econom. Growth 9(2):131–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salaff JW, Greve A, Wong S, Li Ping L (2002) Ethnic entrepreneurship, social networks, and the enclave. Yeoh B, Kiong TC, Charney MW, eds. Approaching Transnationalism: Transnational Societies, Multicultural Contacts, and Imaginings of Home (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 61–82.Google Scholar
  • Sanders J, Nee V, Sernau S (2002) Asian immigrants’ reliance on social ties in a multiethnic labor market. Soc. Forces 81(1):281–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapienza HJ, Autio E, George G, Zahra SA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):914–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S, Locke EA, Collins CJ (2003) Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resources Management Rev. 13(2):257–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmons SA, Wiklund J, Levie J, Bradley SW, Sunny SA (2019) Gender gaps and reentry into entrepreneurial ecosystems after business failure. Small Bus. Econom. 53(2019):517–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simões V, Da Rocha A, De Mello R, Carneiro J (2015) Black swans or an emerging type of firm? The case of borderless firms. Van Tulder R, Verbeke A, Drogendijk R, eds. The Future of Global Organizing. Progress in International Business Research, vol. 10 (Emerald Publishing Group Ltd.), 179–200.Google Scholar
  • Sine WD, David RJ (2010) Institutions and entrepreneurship. Sine WD, David RJ, eds. Institutions and Entrepreneurship: Research in the Sociology of Work (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A, Judge W, Pezeshkan A, Nair A (2016) Institutionalizing entrepreneurial expertise in subsistence economies. J. World Bus. 51(6):910–922.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solomon GT, Weaver KM, Fernald LW (1994) A historical examination of small business management and entrepreneurship pedagogy. Simulation Gaming 25(3):338–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steensma HK, Marino L, Weaver K, Dickson P (2000) The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 43(5):951–973.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stenholm P, Acs ZJ, Wuebker R (2013) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. J. Bus. Venturing 28(1):176–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan U, Uhlaner LM, Stride C (2015) Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(3):308–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suddle K, Beugelsdijk S, Wennekers S (2006) Entrepreneurial culture as determinant of nascent entrepreneurship. SCALES Paper No. N200519, EIM Business and Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Terjesen S, Hessels J (2009) Varieties of export-oriented entrepreneurship in Asia. Asia Pacific J. Management 26(3):537–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terjesen S, Hessels J, Li D (2016) Comparative international entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. J. Management 42(1):299–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas AS, Mueller SL (2000) A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 31(2):287–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton PH (1999) The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25(1):19–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2015) The institutional logics perspective. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 1–22.Google Scholar
  • Tiwari SK, Sen S, Shaik R (2016) Internationalization: A study of small firms from emerging markets. J. Developing Areas 50(6):355–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolbert PS, Coles R (2018) Studying entrepreneurship as an institution. Glückler J, Suddaby R, Lenz R, eds. Knowledge and Institutions, Knowledge and Space, vol. 13 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 271–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2011) Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turró A, Urbano D, Peris-Ortiz M (2014) Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 88:360–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Sluis J, Van Praag M, Vijverberg W (2008) Education and entrepreneurship selection and performance: A review of the empirical literature. J. Econom. Surveys 22(5):795–841.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vandor P (2021) Are voluntary international migrants self-selected for entrepreneurship? An analysis of entrepreneurial personality traits. J. World Bus. 56(2):101142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varblane U, Mets T (2010) Entrepreneurship education in the higher education institutions (HEIs) of post‐communist European countries. J. Enterprising Communities People Places Global Econom. 4(3):204–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varma S (2011) Born global acquirers from Indian IT: An exploratory case study. Internat. J. Emerging Markets 6(4):351–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walter S, Block J (2016) Outcomes of entrepreneurship education: An institutional perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 31(2):216–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weerawarden J, Mort G, Liesch P, Knight G (2007) Conceptualizing Accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. J. World Bus. 42(3):294–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wennekers A (2006) Entrepreneurship at country level: Economic and non-economic determinants. ERIM PhD Series Research in Management Working Paper No. 81, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econom. Literature 38(3):595–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Witt MA, Jackson G (2016) Varieties of capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 47(7):778–806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Witt MA, Lewin AY (2007) Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(4):579–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young SL, Welter C, Conger M (2018) Stability vs. flexibility: The effect of regulatory institutions on opportunity type. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 49(4):407–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra SA (2014) Public and corporate governance and young global entrepreneurial firms. Corporate Governance 22(2):77–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra S, Korri J, Yu J (2005) Cognition and international entrepreneurship: Implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. Internat. Bus. Rev. 14(2):129–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang MY, Dodgson M (2007) “A roasted duck can still fly away”: A case study of technology, nationality, culture and the rapid and early internationalization of the firm. J. World Bus. 42(3):336–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou L (2007) The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and foreign market knowledge on early internationalization. J. World Bus. 42(3):281–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.