Organizing Form, Experimentation, and Performance: Innovation in the Nascent Civilian Drone Industry

References

• Abrami RM, Kirby WC, McFarlan FW (2014) Why China can’t innovate. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(3):107–111.Google Scholar
• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–2375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O, West J, Klapper H, Reitzig M (2017) Surrendering control to gain advantage: Reconciling openness and the resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1704–1727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman EJ, Nagle F, Tushman M (2015) Innovating without information constraints: Organizations, communities, and innovation when information costs approach zero. Shalley CE, Hitt MA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press, New York), 353–379.Google Scholar
• Anderson C (2012) Makers: The New Industrial Revolution (Crown Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Nelson AJ, Tripsas M (2016) Who are you?…I really wanna know: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Strategy Sci. 1(3):161–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity(MIT Press).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1399–1417.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Siggelkow N (2013) Dealing with complexity: Integrated vs. chunky search processes. Organ. Sci. 24(1):116–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm. Yale Law J. 112(3):369–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A (2009) Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management J. 30(2):185–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RY, Roth Y, Lemoine J-F (2015) The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):189–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Wallin MW (2006) A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res. Policy 35(8):1243–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):159–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSantola A, Gulati R (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeYoung CG, Flanders JL, Peterson JB (2008) Cognitive abilities involved in insight problem solving: An individual differences model. Creativity Res. J. 20(3):278–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiBenigno J, Kellogg KC (2014) Beyond occupational differences: The importance of cross-cutting demographics and dyadic toolkits for collaboration in a U.S. hospital. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):375–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards KL, Gordon TJ (1984) Characterization of innovations introduced on the US market in 1982: Final Report. Futures Group, Glastonbury, CT.Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Hsu DH, Roberts EB (2016a) The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1798–1817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Li J, Yang D (2016b) Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985. Organ. Sci. 27(2):446–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989a) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989b) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (2021) What is the “Eisenhardt method” really? Strategic Organ. 19(1):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Superior strategy in entrepreneurial settings: Thinking, doing, and the logic of opportunity. Strategy Sci. 2(4):246–257.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor venture, 1978-1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Kavadias S (2008) Sequential testing of product designs: Implications for learning. Management Sci. 54(5):956–968.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Kudaravalli S, Wasko M (2015) Leading collaboration in online communities. MIS Quart. 39(2):393–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard A-L, Stigliani I, Bechky BA (2017) How nascent occupations construct a mandate: The case of service designers’ ethos. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):270–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Powell TC (2016) Designing organizations for dynamic capabilities. California Management Rev. 58(4):78–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad ØD, Snow CC, Miles RE, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):734–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr N (2019) Product adaptation during new industry emergence: The role of start-up team pre-entry experience. Organ. Sci. 30(5):1076–1096.Link, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Eisenhardt KM (2021) Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. J. Management 47:1915–1935.Google Scholar
• Gans J, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ, Nishii LH, Raver JL (2006) On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. J. Appl. Psych. 91(6):1225–1244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociol. 3(2):269–270.Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halfaker A, Geiger RS, Morgan JT, Riedl J (2013) The rise and decline of an open-collaboration system: How Wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline. Amer. Behav. Sci. 57(5):664–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah DP, Eisenhardt KM (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Carlos WC (2019) From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent US biodiesel market. Strategic Management J. 40(6):865–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R (2002) New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Acad. Management J. 45(5):995–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Chen EL (2008) Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):593–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Shane S (2005) When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Acad. Management J. 48(5):814–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Thomke S (2017) Getting the most out of A/B and other controlled tests. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(5):74–82.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR (2016) Managing communities and contests to innovate with crowds. Harhoff D, Lakhani KR, eds. Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 109–134.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Tushman M (2013) Open innovation and organizational boundaries: Task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organizational Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 355–382.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Fayard AL, Gkeredakis M, Paik JH (2020) OpenIDEO (B) (Harvard Business School Publishing).Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Terwiesch C, Thomke S (2001) Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. 47(5):663–678.Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):483–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Billaud E, Dessain V (2019) Parrot: Navigating the Nascent Drone Industry (Harvard Business School).Google Scholar
• Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation. Adv. Strategic Management 21:45–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagle F (2018) Learning by contributing: Gaining competitive advantage through contribution to crowdsourced public goods. Organ. Sci. 29(4):569–587.Link, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton C (2015) The 3D Robotics Solo may be the smartest drone ever. The Verge. Accessed December 1, 2017, https://www.theverge.com/2015/4/13/8394359/3d-robotics-solo-drone-quadcopter-gopro.Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S (2003) Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy 32(7):1179–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Lakhani KR (2011) Organizations in the shadow of communities. Res. Sociol. Organ. 33:3–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Management J. 41(12):2275–2314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):306–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2019) Idea rejected, tie formed: Organizations' feedback on crowdsourced ideas. Acad. Management J. 62(2):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poetz MK, Schreier M (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? J. Product Innovation Management 29(2):245–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge Tech. Policy 12(3):23–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous” morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Shah S, Nagle F (2021) Why do user communities matter for strategy? Strategic Management Rev. 1(2):305–353.Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Tripsas M (2007) The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1–2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (2003) Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Tidhar R, Hallen BL, Eisenhardt KM (2021) Measure twice, cut once: Scaling novel business models in the nascent online fashion industry. Working paper, Stanford University.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Indust. Corporate Change 6(2):341–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Useem M, Singh H, Liang N, Cappelli P (2017) The Fortune Makers: The Leaders Creating China’s Great Global Companies (Wharton School Press).Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quart. 36(2):649–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisberg RW (2015) Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking Reasoning 21(1):5–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu PC, Lee W (2013) DJI Innovations: Managing the Human Capital in a High-Flying Company (HKUST Business School).Google Scholar
• Yang D, Eesley C, Tian X, Roberts E (2013) Institutional Flexibility and Training for Entrepreneurship?Google Scholar
• Yin R (2009) Case Study Research (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia versus flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar