The Role of Resources in the Success or Failure of Diverse Teams: Resource Scarcity Activates Negative Performance-Detracting Resource Dynamics in Social Category Diverse Teams

References

• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Steisel V, Kay A (1992) The effects of resource distribution, voice, and decision framing on the provision of public goods. J. Conflict Resolution 36(4):665–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McGrath JE (1993) Group processes in organizations: Continuity and change. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. 8:333–389.Google Scholar
• Balliet D, Wu J, Dreu CKW De (2014) Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 140(6):1556–1581.Google Scholar
• Barnes CM, Hollenbeck JR, Jundt DK, DeRue DS, Harmon SJ (2011) Mixing individual incentives and group incentives: Best of both worlds or social dilemma? J. Management 37(6):1611–1635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL (2003) Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. 88(6):989–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beersma B, De Dreu CKW (2002) Integrative and distributive negotiation in small groups: Effects of task structure, decision rule, and social motive. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 87(2):227–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beersma B, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Moon H, Conlon DE, Ilgen DR (2003) Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Acad. Management J. 46(5):572–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billig M, Tajfel H (1973) Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 3(1):27–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bishop CA (1978) Cultural and biological adaptations to deprivation: The Northern Ojibwa case. Laughlin C, Brady IA, eds. Extinction and Survival in Human Populations (Columbia University Press, New York), 280–330.Google Scholar
• Blalock HM (1967) Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations(Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bowles S, Gintis H (2011) A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Branscombe NR, Wann DL, Noel JG, Coleman J (1993) In-group or out-group extemity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 19(4):381–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1995) Managing diversity: The role of social identities. Jackson SE, Ruderman MN, eds. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 69–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M, Brown R (1998) Intergroup relations. Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 554–594.Google Scholar
• Brislin RW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Triandis HC, Berry JW, eds. Handbook Cross-Cultural Psychology: Methodology (Allyn & Bacon, Boston), 389–444.Google Scholar
• Brock TC, Brannon LA (1992) Liberalization of commodity theory. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 13(1):135–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):875–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke CS, Stagl KC, Klein C, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Halpin SM(2006) What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quart. 17(3):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon C, Goldsmith K, Roux C (2019) A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. J. Consumer Psych. 29(1):104–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM, Cummings JN (2012) A theory of subgroups in work teams. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):441–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charafeddine R, Mercier H, Clément F, Kaufmann L, Reboul A, Van der Henst JB (2016) Children’s allocation of resources in social dominance situations. Developmental Psych. 52(11):1843–1857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Margaret A, Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Neale MA (1998) Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):749–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creary S (2020) How to elevate diversity, equity, and inclusion work in your organization. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/elevate-diversity-equity-inclusion-work-organization/.Google Scholar
• Daniels DP, Neale MA, Greer LL (2017) Spillover bias in diversity judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 139:92–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW (2006) When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. J. Management 32(1):83–107.Google Scholar
• De Hoogh AH, Greer LL, Den Hartog DN (2015) Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? An ivestigation of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team performance. Leadership Quart. 26(5):687–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M (1973) The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Wit FRC, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2012) The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl M (1990) The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 1(1):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks R, Armelagos GJ, Bishop CA, Brady IA, Brun T, Copans J, Doherty VS, et al. (1980) Social responses during severe food shortages and famine [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology 21(1):21–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (2010) Intergroup bias. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G., eds. Handbook Soc. Psychol. (Wiley, New York), 1084–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efferson C, Lalive R, Fehr E (2008) The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Sci. 321(5897):1844–1849.Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2020) Getting serious about diversity: Enough already with the business case. Harvard Bus. Rev. 98(6):114–122.Google Scholar
• Esses VM, Jackson LM, Armstrong TL (1998) Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. J. Soc. Issues 54(4):699–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Yan A (2009) Boundary work in knowledge teams. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):604–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folkes VS, Martin IM, Gupta K (1993) When to say when: Effects of supply on usage. J. Consumer Res. 20(3):467–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank MG, Gilovich T (1988) The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(1):74–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatiso TT, Vollan B, Nuppenau EA (2015) Resource scarcity and democratic elections in commons dilemmas: An experiment on forest use in Ethiopia. Ecological Econom. 114:199–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgesen J, Harris MJ (2006) Holding onto power: Effects of powerholders’ positional instability and expectancies on interactions with subordinates. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(4):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Van Bunderen L, Yu S (2017) The dysfunctions of power in teams: A review and emergent conflict perspective. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Van Kleef GA (2010) Equality vs. differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. J. Appl. Psych. 95(6):1032–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Caruso HM, Jehn KA (2011) The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(1):116–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gündemir S, Homan AC, de Dreu CKW, van Vugt M (2014) Think leader, think white? Capturing and weakening an implicit pro-white leadership bias. PLoS One 9(1):e83915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1992) Group influences on individuals in organizations. Dunnette D, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), 199–267.Google Scholar
• Halevy N (2017) Preemptive strikes: Fear, hope, and defensive aggression. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 112(2):224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Chou EY, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK (2012) When hierarchy wins: Evidence from the National Basketball Association. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 3(4):398–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. 41(1):96–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2015) An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behav. Res. 50(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helweg-Larsen P, Hoffmeyer H, Kieler J, Thaysen EH, Thaysen JH, Thygesen P, Wulff MH (1952) Famine Disease in German Concentration Camps, Complications and Sequels (Ejnar Munksgaard, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
• Hewstone M, Rubin M, Willis H (2002) Intergroup bias. Annual Rev. Psych. 53(1):575–604.Google Scholar
• Heyman J, Ariely D (2004) Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. 15(11):787–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill EJ (2005) Work-family facilitation and conflict, working fathers and mothers, work-family stressors and support. J. Family Issues 26(6):793–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill SE, Rodeheffer CD, Griskevicius V, Durante K, White AE (2012) Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 103(2):275–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE (1989) Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Amer. Psychologist 44(3):513–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW(2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR, Van Kleef GA (2008) Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1204–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hur JD, Nordgren LF (2016) Paying for performance: Performance incentives increase desire for the reward object. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 111(3):301–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. 56:517–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson JW (1993) Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psych. Record 43(3):395–413.Google Scholar
• Janis IL (1982) Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):256–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Rispens S, Thatcher SM (2010) The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Acad. Management J. 53(3):596?616.Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52(3):599–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabanoff B (1991) Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Acad. Management Rev. 16(2):416–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanniainen V, Keuschnigg C (2004) Start-up investment with scarce venture capital support. J. Banking Finance 28(8):1935–1959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, Barsade SG (2001) Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86(1):99–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman BL, Rosen B (1999) Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Acad. Management J. 42(1):58–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kniffin KM, Wansink B, Devine CM, Sobal J (2015) Eating together at the firehouse: How workplace commensality relates to the performance of firefighters. Human Performance 28(4):281–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR (2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 7(3):77–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristofferson K, McFerran B, Morales AC, Dahl DW (2017) The dark side of scarcity promotions: How exposure to limited-quantity promotions can induce aggression. J. Consumer Res. 43(5):683–706.Google Scholar
• Kurzban R, Leary MR (2001) Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psych. Bull. 127(2):187–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuwabara K (2011) Cohesion, cooperation, and the value of doing things together: How economic exchange creates relational bonds. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(4):560–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laran J, Salerno A (2013) Life history strategy, food choice, and caloric consumption. Psych. Sci. 24(2):167–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ, Thye SR, Yoon J (2008) Social exchange and micro social order. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(4):519–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Song Y, Koopmann J, Wang M, Chang CHD, Shi J (2017) Eating your feelings? Testing a model of employees’ work-related stressors, sleep quality, and unhealthy eating. J. Appl. Psych. 12(8):1237–1258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lount RB, Phillips KW (2007) Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):214–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lount RB, Sheldon OJ, Rink F, Phillips KW (2015) Biased perceptions of racially diverse teams and their consequences for resource support. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1351–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Loyd DL, Wang CS, Phillips KW, Lount RB (2013) Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organ. Sci. 24(3):757–772.Link, Google Scholar
• Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV (2000) Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Rev. Psych 51:93–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psych. Rev. 50(4):370–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Hollenbeck JR, Van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR (2017) A century of work teams in the journal of applied psychology. J. Appl. Psych. 120(3):452–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch L (2009) Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):535–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Prentice DA (1999) Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. Prentice DA, Miller DT, eds. Cult. Divid. Underst. Overcoming Gr. Confl. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 213–236.Google Scholar
• Molden DC, Hui CM, Scholer AA, Meier BP, Noreen EE, D’Agostino PR, Martin V (2012) Motivational versus metabolic effects of carbohydrates on self-control. Psych. Sci. 23(10):1137–1144.Google Scholar
• Morewedge CK, Krishnamurti T, Ariely D (2014) Focused on fairness: Alcohol intoxication increases the costly rejection of inequitable rewards. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 50:15–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller JS (2012) Why individuals in larger teams perform worse. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 117(1):111–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S, Shafir E (2013) Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much (Times Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Nagel J (1995) Resource competition theories. Amer. Behav. Sci. 38(3):442–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neale MA, Bazerman MH (1991) Negotiator cognition and rationality: A behavioral decision theory perspective. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51:157–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Morrison EL (2005) The symptoms of resource scarcity. Psych. Sci. 16(2):167–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishii LH (2013) The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1754–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver JE, Wong J (2003) Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. Amer. J. Political Sci. 47(4):567–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (1973) The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman, Marshfield, MA).Google Scholar
• Phillips LT, Slepian ML, Hughes BL (2018) Perceiving groups: The people perception of diversity and hierarchy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(5):766–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pickett CL, Brewer MB (2001) Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived in-group and out-group homogeneity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 37(4):341–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piff PK, Kraus MW, Côté S, Cheng BH, Keltner D (2010) Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(5):771–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitesa M, Thau S (2018) Resource scarcity, effort, and performance in physically demanding jobs: An evolutionary explanation. J. Appl. Psych. 103(3):237–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prediger S, Vollan B, Herrmann B (2014) Resource scarcity and antisocial behavior. J. Public Econom. 119:1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489(7416):427–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Boebel RB (1992) Mixed strategies in strictly competitive games: A further test of the minimax hypothesis. Games Econom. Behav. 4(2):261–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richard OC (2000) Racial diversity, Business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Acad. Management J. 43(2):164–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin JZ, Pruitt DG, Kim SH (1994) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement, 2nd ed. (Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Sahlins MD (1965) On the sociology of primitive exchange. Banton M, ed. Relev. Model. Soc. Anthropol. (Tavistock, London), 139–236.Google Scholar
• Shah AK, Mullainathan S, Shafir E (2012) Some consequences of having too little. Sci. 338(6107):682–685.Google Scholar
• Sherif M (1966) In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sidanius J, Pratto F (1999) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha R, Janardhanan NS, Greer LL, Conlon DE, Edwards JR (2016) Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest? J. Appl. Psych. 101(7):1045.Google Scholar
• Sirola N, Pitesa M (2017) Economic downturns undermine workplace helping by promoting a zero-sum construal of success. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1339–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirola N, Pitesa M (2018) The macroeconomic environment and the psychology of work evaluation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 144:11–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44(2):316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Titus W (1985) Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(6):1467–1478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein AA (1976) Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature. Soc. Forces 20:143–172.Google Scholar
• Swann WB, Kwan VSY, Polzer JT, Milton LP (2003) Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(11):1396–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeny TD, Haroz S, Whitney D (2013) Perceiving group behavior: Sensitive ensemble coding mechanisms for biological motion of human crowds. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 39(2):329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Rev. Psych. 33(1):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. Psychol. Intergr. Relations, 2nd ed. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 1(2):149–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarakci M, Greer LL, Groenen PJF (2016) When does power disparity help or hurt group performance? J. Appl. Psych. 101(3):415–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripp TM, Sondak H (1992) An evaluation of dependent variables in experimental negotiation studies: Impasse rates and Pareto efficiency. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):273–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Basil Blackwell, New York).Google Scholar
• van Bunderen L, Greer L, van Knippenberg D (2018) When interteam conflict spirals into intrateam power struggles: The pivotal role of team power structures. Acad. Management J. 61(3):1100–1130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk H, van Engen ML (2013) A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 86(2):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk H, van Engen ML, van Knippenberg D (2012) Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(1):38–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Ginkel WP, van Knippenberg D (2009) Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: When and why does it work? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):218–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wayne SJ, Liden RC (1995) Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Acad. Management J. 38(1):232–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly C (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
• Ybarra O, Ramón AC (2004) Diagnosing the difficulty of conflict resolution between individuals from the same and different social groups. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(6):815–822.Crossref, Google Scholar