A Star Is Born: The Relationship Between Performance and Achieving Status Through Certification Contests in the Context of Equity Analysts

References

• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):151–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim YK, Smith EB (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23(2):416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowers AH, Greve HR, Mitsuhashi H (2017) Look at me: Overt status-seeking behavior and competitive emergence among securities analysts. Res. Sociol. Organ. 50:351–382.Google Scholar
• Bowers AH, Greve HR, Mitsuhashi H, Baum JAC (2014) Competitive parity, status disparity, and mutual forbearance: Securities analysts’ competition for investor attention. Acad. Management J. 57(1):38–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LD, Rozeff MS (1978) The superiority of analyst forecasts as measures of expectations: Evidence from earnings. J. Finance 33(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LD, Call AC, Clement MB, Sharp NY (2015) Inside the “black box” of sell-side financial analysts. J. Accounting Res. 53(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LD, Call AC, Clement MB, Sharp NY (2016) The activities of buy-side analysts and the determinants of their stock recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. 62(1):139–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Withers MC, Semadeni M (2017) A tale of two effects: Using longitudinal data to compare within‐and between‐firm effects. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1536–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Hadi AS, Price B (2000) Regression Analysis by Example (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Clement MB (1999) Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? J. Accounting Econom. 27(3):285–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clement MB, Tse SY (2005) Financial analyst characteristics and herding behavior in forecasting. J. Finance 60(1):307–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T, Salter A (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin-Andersson K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 49–77.Google Scholar
• Derfus PJ, Maggitti PG, Grimm CM, Smith KG (2008) The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 51(1):61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Jourdan J (2012) Jules or Jim: Alternative conformity to minority logics. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1295–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Kremp PA (2016) Classical deviation: Organizational and individual status as antecedents of conformity. Acad. Management J. 59(1):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Rao H, Monin P (2007) Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations. Strategic Management J. 28(5):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Castellucci F (2013) Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Acad. Management J. 56(2):407–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2012) The dynamism of indicators. Davis KE, Fisher A, Kingsbury B, Merry SE, eds. Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 86–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang L, Yasuda A (2009) The effectiveness of reputation as a disciplinary mechanism in sell-side research. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(9):3735–3777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun CJ (2001) Corporate reputations as economic assets. Hitt MA, Freeman RE, Harrison JS, eds. Handbook of Strategic Management (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 289–312.Google Scholar
• Fund BR, Pollock TG, Baker T, Wowak AJ (2008) Who’s the new kid? The process of developing centrality in venture capitalist deal networks. Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, eds. Network Strategy (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 563–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Bundy J, Porac JF, Wade JB, Quinn DP (2013) Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):313–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee LE (2010) Star power: Colleague quality and turnover. Indust. Corporate Change 19(3):741–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Balog S, Haimson J (2006) The roller coaster ride: The resignation of a star. Harvard Business School Case 405-031, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Polzer JT, Elfenbein HA (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3):722–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Han JH, Pollock TG (2021) The two towers (or somewhere in between): The behavioral consequences of positional inconsistency across status hierarchies. Acad. Management J. 64(1):86–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward M (2007) Ego Check: Why Executive Hubris Is Wrecking Companies and Careers and How to Avoid the Trap (Kaplan Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik JD, Solomon A (2000) Security analysts’ career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. RAND J. Econom. 31(1):121–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu FB, Goldberg J, Hedeker D, Flay BR, Pentz MA (1998) Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes. Amer. J. Epidemiology 147(7):694–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard TD, Pollock TG, Pfarrer MD, Rindova VP (2018) Safe bets or hot hands? How status and celebrity influence strategic alliance formations by newly public firms. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1976–1999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H (2015) The real Oscar curse: The negative consequences of positive status shifts. Organ. Sci. 26(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Roy A (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. 51(3):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK, Kim H (2011) The importance of status in markets: A market identity perspective. Pearce JL, ed. Status in Management and Organizations (Cambridge University Press, New York), 87–117.Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H, Kim BK (2012) Meeting expectations: A role-theoretic perspective on reputation. Pollock TG, Barnett ML, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 140–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW, King BG (2014) Seeing stars: Matthew effects and status bias in major league baseball umpiring. Management Sci. 60(11):2619–2644.Link, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kucheev YO, Ruiz F, Sorensson T (2017) Do stars shine? Comparing the performance persistence of star sell-side analysts listed by Institutional Investor, The Wall Street Journal, and StarMine. J. Financial Services Res. 52(3):277–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lange D, Lee PM, Dai Y (2011) Organizational reputation: A review. J. Management 37(1):153–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38(5):623–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK (1948) Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action. Media Studies, 18–30.Google Scholar
• Leone AJ, Wu JS (2007) What does it take to become a superstar? Evidence from institutional investor rankings of financial analysts. Preprint, submitted May 23, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313594.Google Scholar
• Love EG, Kraatz M (2009) Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing affected corporate reputation. Acad. Management J. 52(2):314–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace JB, Bundy J, Hambrick DC, Pollock TG (2018) The shackles of CEO celebrity: Sociocognitive and behavioral role constraints on “star” leaders. Acad. Management Rev. 43(3):419–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowengard M (2017) The plot to overthrow the All-America Research Team. Institutional Investor Online (October 6), https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1521gkf3q59ln/the-plot-to-overthrow-the-all-america-research-team.Google Scholar
• Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de) construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malloy CJ (2005) The geography of equity analysis. J. Finance 60(2):719–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1593–1638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG (2018) Order in the court: How firm status and reputation shape the outcomes of employment discrimination suits. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):61–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGeehan P (1999) Analyze this: The Institutional Investor names its all-stars. The New York Times (October 15), C4.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Sci. 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishina Y, Dykes BJ, Block ES, Pollock TG (2010) Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Acad. Management J. 53(4):701–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfarrer MD, Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2010) A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1131–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP, Maggitti PG (2008) Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the U.S. IPO market. Acad. Management J. 51(2):335–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Lashley K, Rindova VP, Han JH (2019) Which of these things are not like the others? Comparing the rational, emotional and moral aspects of reputation, status, celebrity and stigma. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):444–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Lee PM, Jin K, Lashley K (2015) (Un) tangled: Exploring the asymmetric coevolution of new venture capital firms’ reputation and status. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):482–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF (2001) Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Pollock TG, Hayward MLA (2006) Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):50–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL, Srinivas SB, Chandler D (2018) The good, the bad, and the ugly of organizational rankings: A multidisciplinary review of the literature and directions for future research. J. Management 44(6):2175–2208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers JL, Skinner DJ, Van Buskirk A (2009) Earnings guidance and market uncertainty. J. Accounting Econom. 48(1):90–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. Rosch E, Lloyd BB, eds. Cognition and Categorization (Erlbaum, Hillsdale), 27–48.Google Scholar
• Sauder M (2006) Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory Soc. 35(3):299–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen M (2007) How smart is smart money? A two‐sided matching model of venture capital. J. Finance 62(6):2725–2762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart D (2005) Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(5):823–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stickel SE (1992) Reputation and performance among security analysts. J. Finance 47(5):1811–1836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Fiske ST (1975) Point of view and perceptions of causality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 32(3):439–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Sci. 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade JB, Porac JF, Pollock TG, Graffin SD (2006) The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(4):643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washington M, Zajac EJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 48(2):282–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch I (2000) Herding among security analysts. J. Financial Econom. 58(3):369–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS (1988) Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44(4):1049–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar