Incentivizing Effort Allocation Through Resource Allocation: Evidence from Scientists’ Response to Changes in Funding Policy

References

• Adams J (2013) The fourth age of research. Nature 497(7451):557–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J. Tech. Transfer 36(3):316–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR (2009) Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Res. Policy 38(2):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fletcher L (2001) US stem cell policy comes under fire. Nature Biotechnol. 19(10):893–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J, Murray F, Stern S (2012) Growing stem cells: The impact of U.S. policy on the organization of scientific research. J. Policy Anal. Management 31(3):661–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (2005) Incentives between firms (and within). Management Sci. 51(1):2–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Roberts J (2012) Economic theories of incentives in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 56–99.Google Scholar
• Gottweis H (2010) The endless hESC controversy in the United States: History, context, and prospects. Cell Stem Cell 7(5):555–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holden C (2004) NIH report fuels push to alter U.S. stem cell policy. Science 303(5664):1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland S, Lebacqz K, Zoloth L, eds. (2001) The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holm S (2002) Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy. Bioethics 16(6):493–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JA, Williams ED (2007) Stem cell research: Federal research funding and oversight. Report, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2018) Compensation and incentives in the workplace. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine A (2004) Trends in the geographic distribution of human embryonic stem-cell research. Politics Life Sci. 23(2):40–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 22(6):635–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers K (2020) The elasticity of science. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 12(4):103–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (2018) Science and engineering indicators 2018. Report, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Ouchi W (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, McCormick J (2006) An international gap in human ES cell research. Nature Biotechnol. 24(4):391–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2001) Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. Res. Sociol. Work 10(3):109–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G (2010) The evolution of science-based business: Innovating how we innovate. Indust. Corporate Change 19(2):465–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2010) A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy 39(3):422–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Scientific American (2011) Dr. no money: The broken science funding system. Sci. Amer. (May 1), https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dr-no-money/.Google Scholar
• Scott CT, McCormick JB, Owen-Smith J (2009) And then there were two: Use of hESC lines. Nature Biotechnol. 27(8):696–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan P (1996) The economics of science. J. Econom. Lit. 34(3):1199–1235.Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Tartari V, Breschi S (2012) Set them free: Scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university–industry research collaboration. Indust. Corporate Change 21(5):1117–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson J, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro S, Waknitz M, Swiergiel J, Marshall V, Jones J (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282(5391):1145–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vakili K, McGahan AM, Rezaie R, Mitchell W, Daar AS (2015) Progress in human embryonic stem cell research in the United States between 2001 and 2010. PLoS One 10(3):e0120052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel G (1999) Breakthrough of the year: Capturing the promise of youth. Science 286(5448):2238–2239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel G (2001) Bush squeezes between the lines on stem cells. Science 293(5533):1242–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner CS, Park HW, Leydesdorff L (2015) The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS One 10(7):e0131816.Crossref, Google Scholar