The Mutual Shaping of Boundaries and Boundary Organizations

References

• Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbott A (1995) Things of boundaries. Soc. Res. 62(4):857–882.Google Scholar
• Altman EJ, Nagle F, Tushman ML (2022) The translucent hand of managed ecosystems: Engaging communities for value creation and capture. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):70–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2011) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1971) Intellectual field and creative project. Social Sci. Inform. 8(2):89–119.Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1972) Structures and the habitus. Moore H, Sanders T, eds. Outline of Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 72–91.Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. Richardson J, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Greenwood, Westport, CT), 241–258.Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (2010) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Routledge, Oxon, UK).Google Scholar
• Caine KJ (2016) Blurring the boundaries of environmentalism: The role of Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society as a boundary organization in northern conservation planning. Rural Sociol. 81(2):194–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PRP (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transfering, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Chadwick A (2007) Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Comm. 24(3):283–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Conti A, Peukert C, Roche MP (2024) Beefing IT up for your investor? Engagement with open source communities, innovation and startup funding: Evidence from GitHub. Organ. Sci.Google Scholar
• Edlinger G (2015) Employer brand management as boundary-work: A grounded theory analysis of employer brand managers’ narrative accounts. Human Resource Management J. 25(4):443–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa JA, Cummings JN, Pearce BM, Wilson JM (2002) Research on teams with multiple boundaries. Proc. Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, New York), 3429–3438.Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Fauver L, Fuerst ME (2006) Does good corporate governance include employee representation? Evidence from German corporate boards. J. Financial Econom. 82(3):673–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franks J (2010) Boundary organizations for sustainable land management: The example of Dutch environmental co-operatives. Ecological Econom. 70(2):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frickel S (2004) Building an interdiscipline: Collective action framing and the rise of genetic toxicology. Soc. Problems 51(2):269–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Germonprez M, Kendall JE, Kendall KE, Mathiassen L, Young B, Warner B (2017) A theory of responsive design: A field study of corporate engagement with open source communities. Inform. Systems Res. 28(1):64–83.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Gibbs J (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51:451–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gieryn T (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(6):781–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Laurila J (2011) Rage against self-replicating machines: Framing science and fiction in the US nanotechnology field. Organ. Stud. 32(2):253–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S (2018) Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):783–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groen A (2016) Empires of EVE: A history of the great wars of EVE online (Lightburn Industries). https://www.amazon.com/Empires-EVE-History-Great-Online-ebook/dp/0990972429/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1476751173&sr=8-1&keywords=empires+of+eve.Google Scholar
• Gustafsson KM, Lidskog R (2018) Boundary organizations and environmental governance: Performance, institutional design, and conceptual development. Climate Risk Management 19:1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guston DH (1999) Stabilising the boundary between U.S. politics and science: The role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organisation. Soc. Stud. Sci. 29(1):87–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guston DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Sci., Tech., Human Values 26(4):399–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Headland TN, Pike KL, Harris M (1990) Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate, Frontiers of Anthropology, vol. 7 (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Lindberg K, Mørk BE, Nicolini D, Raviola E, Walter L (2019) Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):704–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leith P, Haward M, Rees C, Ogier E (2016) Success and evolution of a boundary organization. Sci. Tech. Human Values 41(3):375–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Bailey DE, Pierce CS (2019) The coevolution of objects and boundaries over time: Materiality, affordances, and boundary salience. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):665–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Arriaga M (2014) Distinction and status production on user-generated content platforms: Using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural production to understand social dynamics in online fields. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):468–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2):335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quart. 32(2):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Rice R, Malhotra A, King N, Ba S (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24(4):569–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manning S, Massini S, Peeters C, Lewin AY (2012) Global co-evolution of firm boundaries: Process commoditization, capabilities development, and path dependencies. Working paper, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Mikes A (2011) From counting risk to making risk count: Boundary-work in risk management. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 36(4–5):226–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mørk BE, Hoholm T, Maaninen-Olsson E, Aanestad M (2012) Changing practice through boundary organizing: A case from medical R&D. Human Relations 65(2):263–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky B A (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Lakhani KR (2011) Organizations in the shadow of communities. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Communities and Organizations, vols. 11–131 (Emerald Group Publishing), 1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker J, Crona B (2012) On being all things to all people: Boundary organizations and the contemporary research university. Soc. Stud. Sci. 42(2):262–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petzke M (2022) Symbolic revolutions. Mobilizing a neglected Bourdieusian concept for historical sociology. Theory Soc. 51(3):487–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Safadi H, Skousen T, Karahanna E (2024) Firm-sponsored online communities: Building alignment capabilities for participatory governance. Inform. Systems Res.Google Scholar
• Shah SKS (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Walsham G (2011) Grounded theorizing for electronically mediated social contexts. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):9–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim MB, Chudoba KM, Crowston K (2012) Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work. Inform. Systems J. 22(1):29–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wehrens R, Bekker M, Bal R (2014) Hybrid management configurations in joint research. Sci., Tech., Human Values 39(1):6–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wells KJ, Attoh K, Cullen D (2021) “Just-in-place” labor: Driver organizing in the Uber workplace. Environ. Planning A 53(2):315–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeow A, Sia SK, Soh C, Chua C (2018) Boundary organization practices for collaboration in enterprise integration. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):149–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Zobel A-K, Falcke L, Comello SD (2024) A temporal perspective on boundary spanning: Engagement dynamics and implications for knowledge transfer. Organ. Sci. 35(2):474–495.Link, Google Scholar