Who Gives Back? Evidence from India on Successful Entrepreneurial Exit and Involvement in Philanthropy

References

• Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):932–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Yayavaram S (2011) Perspective—Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1631–1652.Link, Google Scholar
• Asgari N, Tandon V, Singh K, Mitchell W (2018) Creating and taming discord: How firms manage embedded competition in alliance portfolios to limit alliance termination. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3273–3299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Jones BF, Kim JD, Miranda J (2020) Age and high-growth entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(1):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol WJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. J. Political Econom. 98(5):893–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Zelditch M Jr (1998) Status, Power, and Legitimacy: Strategies and Theories (Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Berger J, Rosenholtz SJ, Zelditch M Jr (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6(1):479–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle AA, Means GC (1932) The Modem Corporation and Private Property (Commerce Clearing House, New York).Google Scholar
• Bhagwati J, Panagariya A (2013) Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and the Lessons for Other Developing Countries (PublicAffairs, New York).Google Scholar
• Botelho TL, Abraham M (2017) Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multistage evaluation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):698–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandt MJ (2013) Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status–legitimacy hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(5):765–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown WO, Helland E, Smith JK (2006) Corporate philanthropic practices. J. Corporate Finance 12(5):855–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Dobrev SD (2016) A careers perspective on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 40(2):237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30(6):749–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellaneta F, Conti R, Kacperczyk A (2020) The (un)intended consequences of institutions lowering barriers to entrepreneurship: The impact on female workers. Strategic Management J. 41(7):1274–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chacar A, Vissa B (2005) Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and the impact of business group affiliation. Strategic Management J. 26(10):933–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarti U, Mohanty M (2004) Conceptualizing Brahmanical Patriarchy in Early India: Gender, Caste, Class and State (Sage Publications, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Chakravorty S, Kapur D, Singh N (2016) The Other One Percent: Indians in America (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Chen G, Chittoor R, Vissa B (2015) Modernizing without westernizing: Social structure and economic action in the Indian financial sector. Acad. Management J. 58(2):511–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claes K, Vissa B (2020) Does social similarity pay off? Homophily and venture capitalists’ deal valuation, downside risk protection and financial returns in India. Organ. Sci. 31(3):576–603.Link, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Pan Fang T, Vissa B, Wu A (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):240–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Collins R (1979) The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Davis SJ, Haltiwanger JC, Schuh S (1998) Job Creation and Destruction (MIT Press Books, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• DeTienne DR (2010) Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. J. Bus. Venturing 25(2):203–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeTienne DR, Wennberg K (2015) Research Handbook of Entrepreneurial Exit (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Docquier F, Rapoport H (2012) Globalization, brain drain, and development. J. Econom. Literature 50(3):681–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doherty D, Gerber AS, Green DP (2006) Personal income and attitudes toward redistribution: A study of lottery winners. Political Psych. 27(3):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domhoff GW (1979) The Powers That Be: Processes of Ruling-Class Domination in America (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W (1982) Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(5):915–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elder GH Jr (1985) Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions 1968-1980 (Cornell University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Estrin S, Mickiewicz T, Stephan U (2013) Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 37(3):479–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Agency problems and residual claims. J. Law Econom. 26(2):327–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foo M, Vissa B, Wu B (2020) Entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 14(3):289–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1970) The responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (September 13), 17.Google Scholar
• Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Giarratana MS (2010) Organizational attributes and the distribution of rewards in a region: Managerial firms vs. knowledge clusters. Organ. Sci. 21(2):573–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Gautier A, Pache AC (2015) Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. J. Bus. Ethics 126(3):343–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghurye GS (1969) Caste and Race in India (Popular Prakashan, Mumbai, India).Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Wade-Benzoni KA (2009) The hot and cool of death awareness at work: Mortality cues, aging, and self-protective and prosocial motivations. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):600–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R (2006) Expansion of IIMs: Myths, realities and policy choices. Econom. Political Weekly 41(27/28):2971–2974.Google Scholar
• Halvarsson D, Korpi M, Wennberg K (2018) Entrepreneurship and income inequality. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 145:275–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey CR (2017) Presidential address: The scientific outlook in financial economics. J. Finance 72(4):1399–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hechter M, Opp KD (2001) Social Norms (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Hendricks B, Howell T, Bingham C (2019) How much do top management teams matter in founder-led firms? Strategic Management J. 40(6):959–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (2002) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Bus. Ethics Quart. 12(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayachandran S (2015) The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Annual Rev. Econom. 7(1):63–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayal NG (2008) Left behind-women, politics, and development in India. Brown J. World Affairs 14(2):91–102.Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A (2009) With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management J. 30(3):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keister LA (2005) Getting Rich: America’s New Rich and How They Got That Way (Cambridge University Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan RS (2012) The sociology of elites. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:361–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K (2000) Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance 55(2):867–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AD (1970) Elite education and the economy: IIT entrance: 1965-70. Econom. Political Weekly 5(35):1463–1472.Google Scholar
• Kraus MW, Callaghan B (2014) Noblesse oblige? Social status and economic inequality maintenance among politicians. PLoS One 9(1):e85293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll M, Walters BA, Le SA (2007) The impact of board composition and top management team ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1198–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhusudan H, Mantri R (2020) A New Idea of India: Individual Rights in a Civilizational State (Westland Publications, Chennai, India).Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lee M (2013) Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms. Strategic Management J. 34(4):483–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2013) Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):195–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Davis GF, Glynn MA (2013) Golfing alone? Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities. Organ. Sci. 24(1):39–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Mathias BD, Solomon SJ, Madison K (2017) After the harvest: A stewardship perspective on entrepreneurship and philanthropy. J. Bus. Venturing 32(4):385–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J (1977) The effects of education as an institution. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(1):55–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller TL, Grimes MG, Mcmullen JS, Vogus TJ (2012) Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Rev. 37(4):616–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN, Ziedonis AA (2004) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Nelson T (2003) The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management J. 24(8):707–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odendahl TJ (1990) Charity Begins at Home: Generosity and Self-Interest Among the Philanthropic Elite (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Powdthavee N, Oswald AJ (2014) Does money make people right-wing and inegalitarian? A longitudinal study of lottery winners. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7934, Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M (2010) The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Relations, and Collective Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (2005) From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Stud. Comparative Internat. Development 40(2):35–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
• Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):217–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sidanius J, Pratto F (2001) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Silver I (1998) Buying an activist identity: Reproducing class through social movement philanthropy. Sociol. Perspect. 41(2):303–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smeets P, Bauer R, Gneezy U (2015) Giving behavior of millionaires. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(34):10641–10644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M, Omoto AM (2007) Social action: A handbook of basic principles. Kruglanski W, Higgins ET, eds. Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford, New York), 940–961.Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2014) Status and reputation: Synonyms or separate concepts? Strategic Organ. 12(1):62–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Sharkey AJ (2014) Entrepreneurship as a mobility process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):328–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivas MN (1987) Development of sociology in India: An overview. Econom. Political Weekly 22(4):135–138.Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Organizations and social structure. March JP, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
• Taylor ML, Coates T, Strom R, Renz D, Holman R (2008) The entrepreneur’s evolution to philanthropist: Insights from the experience of Ewing Marion Kauffman. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 15(1):79–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas GM, Meyer JW, Ramirez FO, Boli J (1987) Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Van Baaren RB, Holland RW, Kawakami K, Van Knippenberg A (2004) Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psych. Sci. 15(1):71–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villalonga B, Amit R (2020) Family ownership. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 36(2):241–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B (2011) A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Acad. Management J. 54(1):137–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B, Greve HR, Chen WR (2010) Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organ. Sci. 21(3):696–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Choi J, Li J (2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):143–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1922) 1978. Economy and Society. Roth G, Wittich C, eds. (Reprint, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) [translated].Google Scholar
• Wolfe T (1970) Radical chic: That party at Lenny's. New York Magazine (June 8), 26–56Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Wright M (2011) Entrepreneurship’s next act. Acad. Management Perspect. 25(4):67–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Zhou X (2011) Status inconsistency and product valuation in the California wine market. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1435–1448.Link, Google Scholar