Bridging the Gap: Evidence from the Return Migration of African Scientists

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1580

References

  • Abraham M (2020) Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):151–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Cockburn I, McHale J (2006) Gone but not forgotten: Labor flows, knowledge network benefits and enduring social capital. J. Econom. Geography 6(5):571–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Kapur D, McHale J, Oettl A (2011) Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. J. Urban Econom. 69(1):43–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H, Herker D (1977) Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad. Management Rev. 2(2):217–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anik L, Norton M (2014) Matchmaking promotes happiness. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(6):644–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Sampat BN (2012) The diffusion of scientific knowledge across time and space: Evidence from professional transitions for the superstars of medicine. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 107–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Zivin JG, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG (2000) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Networks 21(4):375–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass DJ (2009) Connecting to broker: Strategies for acquiring social capital. Bartkus VO, Davis JH, eds. Social Capital: Reaching Out, Reaching In (Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 260–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):339–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1998) The gender of social capital. Rationality Soc. 10(1):5–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2002) Bridge decay. Soc. Networks 24(4):333–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2007) Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Management J. 50(1):119–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2010) Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G, Ferriani S, Allison PD (2014) Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):258–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P (2015) Return migration and geography of innovation in MNEs: A natural experiment of knowledge production by local workers reporting to return migrants. J. Econom. Geography 16:585–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clauset A, Arbesman S, Larremore DB (2015) Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Sci. Adv. 1(1):e1400005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clement J, Shipilov A, Galunic C (2018) Brokerage as a public good: The externalities of network hubs for different formal roles in creative organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):251–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL, Zuckerman EW, Jank S, Jordan-Bloch S, Nakagawa S (2017) It’s the conventional thought that counts: How third-order inference produces status advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):297–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez RM, Gould RV (1994) A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6):1455–1491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez-Mateo I (2007) Who pays the price of brokerage? Transferring constraint through price setting in the staffing sector. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72:291–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fry CV (2022) Crisis and the trajectory of science: Evidence from the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Rev. Econom. Statist. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Galunic C, Ertug G, Gargiulo M (2012) The positive externalities of social capital: Benefiting from senior brokers. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1213–1231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ganguli I (2015) Immigration and ideas: What did Russian scientists “bring” to the United States? J. Labor Econom. 33(S1):S257–S288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh R, Reio TG (2013) Career benefits associated with mentoring for mentors: A meta-analysis. J. Vocational Behav. 83(1):106–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Imbens GW (2013) Social networks and the identification of peer effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 31(3):253–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould RV, Fernandez RM (1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodology 19:89–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halatin TJ, Knotts RE (1982) Becoming a mentor: Are the risks worth the rewards. Supervisory Management 27(2):27–29.Google Scholar
  • Halevy N, Halali E, Cohen TR (2019a) Brokering orientations and social capital: Influencing others’ relationships shapes status and trust. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 119(2):293–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevy N, Halali E, Zlatev J (2019b) Brokerage and brokering: An integrative review and organizing framework for third party influence. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):215–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents R&D relationship. Econometrica 52:909–938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang K (2008) International collaboration in multilayered center-periphery in the globalization of science and technology. Sci. Tech. Human Values 33(1):101–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):44–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1999) International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 8:105–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108:577–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones CI (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. J. Political Econom. 103(4): 759–784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn S, MacGarvie M (2016a) How important is US location for research in science? Rev. Econom. Statist. 98(2):397–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn S, MacGarvie M (2016b) Do return requirements increase international knowledge diffusion? Evidence from the Fulbright program. Res. Policy 45(6):1304–1322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Milde J, Cowan R (2017) Symbiont practices in boundary spanning: Bridging the cognitive and political divides in interdisciplinary research. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1387–1414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr WR (2008) Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):518–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (1994) Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 37(1):87–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolympiris C, Hoenen S, Klein PG (2019) Learning by seconding: Evidence from NSF rotators. Organ. Sci. 30(3):528–551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kram KE (1985) Mentoring at Work (Scott, Foresman & Co., Glenview, IL).Google Scholar
  • Levin SG, Stephan PE (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81:114–132.Google Scholar
  • Leydesdorff L, Wagner CS (2008) International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. J. Informetrics 2(4):317–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lopez-Sanders L (2014) Embedded and external brokers: The distinct roles of intermediaries in workplace inequality. Amer. Behav. Sci. 58(2):331–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maoret M, Tortoriello M, Iubatti D (2020) Big fish, big pond? The joint effect of formal and informal core/periphery positions on the generation of incremental innovations. Organ. Sci. 31(6): 1538–1559.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Mohnen M (2021) Stars and brokers: Peer effects among medical scientists. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Mors ML, Rogan M, Lynch SE (2018) Boundary spanning and knowledge exploration in a professional services firm. J. Professions Organ. 5(3):184–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mullen EJ (1994) Framing the mentoring relationship as an information exchange. Human Resource Management Rev. 4(3):257–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nanda R, Khanna T (2010) Diasporas and domestic entrepreneurs: Evidence from the Indian software industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(4):991–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quintane E, Carnabuci G (2016) How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1343–1360.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR, Scandura TA (1999) Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. J. Organ. Behav. Internat. J. Indust. Occupational Organ. Psych. Behav. 20(4):493–509.Google Scholar
  • Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Google Scholar
  • Reagans RE, Zuckerman EW (2008) A shortcut to efficiency? Implications of the small but stratified world. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  • Rider CI (2009) Constraints on the control benefits of brokerage: A study of placement agents in US venture capital fundraising. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):575–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5, part 2):S71–S102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A (2002) Silicon Valley’s new immigrant high-growth entrepreneurs. Econom. Development Quart. 16(1):20–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A (2005) From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Stud. Comparative Internat. Development 40(2):35–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A (2006) International mobility of engineers and the rise of entrepreneurship in the periphery. WIDER research paper, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  • Scellato G, Franzoni C, Stephan P (2015) Migrant scientists and international networks. Res. Policy 44(1):108–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J (1942) Creative destruction. Capitalism Socialism Democracy 825:82–85.Google Scholar
  • Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, vol. 92892 (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simon SJ (2019) Hollywood power brokers: Gender and racial inequality in talent agencies. Gender Work Organ. 26(9):1340–1356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Rogan M (2014) (When) do organizations have social capital? Annual Rev. Sociol. 40:261–280.Google Scholar
  • Stovel K, Golub B, Milgrom E (2011) Stabilizing brokerage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(4):21326–21332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Scanlan TJ (1981) Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Management J. 24(2):289–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vasudeva G, Zaheer A, Hernandez E (2013) The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):643–663.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner CS, Leydesdorff L (2005) Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res. Policy 34(10):1608–1618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang D (2015) Activating cross-border brokerage: Interorganizational knowledge transfer through skilled return migration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(1):133–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao Z, Tsui AS (2007) When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zelnio R (2012) Identifying the global core-periphery structure of science. Scientometrics 91(2):601–615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.