Entrepreneurship Through a Unified Sociological Neoinstitutional Lens

References

• Aldrich H (1999) Organizations Evolving (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Cliff JE (2003) The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 18(5):573–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Fiol MC (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Kim PH (2007) Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 1(1‐2):147–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2007) Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 1:11–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Spicer A (2019) Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis? Organ. Stud. 40(2):199–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armanios DE, Eesley CE (2021) How do institutional carriers alleviate normative and cognitive barriers to regulatory change? Organ. Sci. 32(6):1415–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Assenova VA, Sorenson O (2017) Legitimacy and the benefits of firm formalization. Organ. Sci. 28(5):804–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D, Boente W, Tamvada J (2007) Religion and entrepreneurship. Working paper, Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
• Barkin JS, Cronin B (1994) The state and the nation: changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations. Internat. Organ. 48(1):107–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Angus RW (2019) Optimal distinctiveness, strategic categorization, and product market entry on the Google Play app platform. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1219–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Google Scholar
• Berger P, Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, 1st ed. (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Besharov M, Brickson S (2016) Organizational identity and institutional forces. Pratt MG, Schultz M, Ashforth BE, Ravasi D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 396–414.Google Scholar
• Bird M, Zellweger T (2018) Relational embeddedness and firm growth: Comparing spousal and sibling entrepreneurs. Organ. Sci. 29(2):264–283.Link, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A, Haack P (2015) The ‘macro’ and the ‘micro’ of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1):49–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei D, Lafferty J (2009) Topic models. Srivastava A, Sahami M, eds. Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications (Chapman and Hall/CRC, London), 71–94.Google Scholar
• Blei D, Ng A, Jordan M (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Block F (2018) High-net-worth Americans pursue wealth for ‘emotional well-being.’ Barrons (June 11), https://www.barrons.com/articles/high-net-worth-americans-pursue-wealth-for-emotional-wellbeing-1528754714.Google Scholar
• Boone C, Özcan S (2020) Oppositional logics and the antecedents of hybridization: A country-level study of the diffusion of Islamic banking windows, 1975–2017. Organ. Sci. 31(4):990–1011.Link, Google Scholar
• Bornmann L, Marx W (2013) The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis. J. Informetrics 7(1):84–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Leydesdorff L (2018) Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield’s publications. Scientometrics 114(2):439–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broom L, Selznick P (1963) Sociology, 3rd ed. (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Calás MB, Smircich L, Bourne KA (2009) Extending the boundaries: Reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):552–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canales R (2016) From ideals to institutions: Institutional entrepreneurship and the growth of Mexican small business finance. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1548–1573.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Christensen CM (2005) The Cycles of Theory Building in Management Research (Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Carlos WC, Lewis BW (2018) Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):130–169.Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E, Kovács B (2015) The categorical imperative and structural reproduction: Dynamics of technological entry in the semiconductor industry. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1734–1751.Link, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Negro G, Perretti F (2008) The structure of consensus: Network ties, legitimation, and exit rates of US feature film producer organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):145–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chafetz J, Pozen DE (2018) How constitutional norms break down. UCLA Law Rev. 65:1430.Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (2006) The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. J. Production Innovative Management 23(1):39–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen BD, Dean TJ (2005) Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management J. 26(7):683–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cordero AM, Miller SR (2019) Political party tenure and MNE location choices. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 50(6):973–997.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cordero A, Montiel E, Sanz L, Severino I (2011) Transgenerational issues in the financing of entrepreneurial family firms. Nordqvist M, Marzano G, Brenes E, Jiménez G, Fonseca-Parédes M, eds. Understanding Entrepreneurial Family Businesses in Uncertain Environments: Opportunities and Resources in Latin America (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 237–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortell AP, Davis JW Jr (1996) How do international institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms. Internat. Stud. Quart. 40(4):451–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuervo-Cazurra A, Gaur A, Singh D (2019). Pro-market institutions and global strategy: The pendulum of pro-market reforms and reversals. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 50(4):598–632.Google Scholar
• Cuervo-Cazurra A, Inkpen A, Musacchio A, Ramaswamy K (2014). Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(8):919–942.Google Scholar
• David RJ, Sine WD, Haveman HA (2013) Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organ. Sci. 24(2):356–377.Link, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Sine WD, Serra CK (2017) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Taking stock and moving forward. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage Publications, London), 671–688.Google Scholar
• Davidsson P (2003) The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. Katz J, Shepherd DA, eds. Cognitive Approaches to Entrepreneurship Research, vol. 6 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 315–372.Google Scholar
• Davidsson P (2015) Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. J. Business Venturing 30(5):674–695.Google Scholar
• Davidsson P, Gruenhagen JH (2021) Fulfilling the process promise: A review and agenda for new venture creation process research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 45(5):1083–1118.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis S, Lee M, Ramarajan L, Battilana J (2017) Blurring the boundaries: The interplay of gender and local communities in the commercialization of social ventures. Organ. Sci. 28(5):819–839.Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Dowd TJ (1997) How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:501–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Barnett WP (2005) Organizational roles and transition to entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 48(3):433–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Ozdemir SZ, Teo AC (2006) The ecological interdependence of emergent and established organizational populations: Legitimacy transfer, violation by comparison, and unstable identities. Organ. Sci. 17(5):577–597.Link, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllstrom A (2017) From Categories to Categorization: A Social Perspective on Market Categorization. From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Armanios De, Desai JD (2022) Beyond spatial proximity: The impact of enhanced spatial connectedness from new bridges on entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Eberhart RN, Armanios DE (2021) Certification relics: Entrepreneurship amidst discontinued certifications. Organ. Sci. 33(2):746–765.Link, Google Scholar
• Eberhart RN, Eesley CE, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk, and new firm growth. Organ. Sci. 28(1):93–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Eckhardt JT, Shane SA (2003) Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J. Management 29(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C (2016) Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1290–1306.Link, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Jian BL, Yang D (2016) Does institutional change in universities influence high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985. Organ. Sci. 27(2):446–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Ozcan S, Reichstein T (2019) Falling not far from the tree: Entrepreneurs and organizational heritage. Organ. Sci. 30(2):337–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Kotha S, Lahiri A (2016) Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Acad. Management Rev. 41(3):383–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foot R, Walter A (2013) Global norms and major state behaviour: The cases of China and the United States. Eur. J. Internat. Relations 19(2):329–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Klein PG, Bjørnskov C (2019) The context of entrepreneurial judgment: Organizations, markets, and institutions. J. Management Stud. 56(6):1197–1213.Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. WW Powell, PJ DiMaggio, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Grimes M (2017) Hidden badge of honor: How contextual distinctiveness affects category promotion among certified B corporations. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2294–2320.Google Scholar
• Georgallis P, Dowell G, Durand R (2019) Shine on me: Industry coherence and policy support for emerging industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):503–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Grodal S, Woolley JL (2013) Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organ. Sci. 24(2):395–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21(2):521–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Gregoire D, Barr P, Shepherd DA (2010) Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organ. Sci. 21(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Gehman J, Cao K (2018) Positively deviant: Identity work through B corporation certification. J. Bus. Venturing 33(2):130–148.Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Kahl SJ (2017) The discursive perspective of market categorization: Interaction, power, and context. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllstrom A, eds. Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Higgins MC (2003) Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. 24(2):127–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Havercroft J, Wiener A, Kumm M, Dunoff JL (2018) Donald Trump as global constitutional breaching experiment. Global Constitutionalism 7(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Yoo Y (2014) The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 25(3):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Carlos WC, Sine WD (2018) Manu militari: The institutional contingencies of stakeholder relationships on entrepreneurial performance. Organ. Sci. 29(4):633–652.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Gulati R (2006) Stacking the deck: The effect of upper echelon affiliations for entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Management J. 27(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho B (2014) Understanding Chinese exceptionalism: China’s rise, its goodness, and greatness. Alternatives 39(3):164–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Lim K (2014) Knowledge brokering and organizational innovation: Founder imprinting effects. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1134–1153.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang KG-L, Geng X, Wang H (2017) Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China. Organ. Sci. 28(2):355–377.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ (2013) Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):664–683.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Younkin P (2017) The paradox of breadth: The tension between experience and legitimacy in the transition to entrepreneurship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):731–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keenan S, Johnston C (2011) Concise Dictionary of Library and Information Science (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Khaire M (2010) Young and no money? Never mind: The material impact of social resources on new venture growth. Organ. Sci. 21(1):168–185.Link, Google Scholar
• King BG, Clemens ES, Fry M (2011) Identity realization and organizational forms: Differentiation and consolidation of identities among Arizona’s charter schools. Organ. Sci. 22(3):554–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Klüppel LM, Pierce L, Snyder JA (2018) Perspective—The deep historical roots of organization and strategy: traumatic shocks, culture, and institutions. Organ. Sci. 29(4):702–721.Link, Google Scholar
• Lanahan L, Armanios D (2018) Does more certification always benefit a venture? Organ. Sci. 29(5):931–947.Link, Google Scholar
• Lanahan L, Armanios DE, Joshi AM (2021) Inappropriateness penalty, desirability premium: what do more certifications actually signal? Organ. Sci. 33(2):854–871.Google Scholar
• Leaptrott J (2005) An institutional theory view of the family business. Family Bus. Rev. 18(3):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M, Huang L (2018) Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organ. Sci. 29(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Leicht EA, Newman MEJ (2008) Community structure in directed networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(11):118703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis AC, Cordero AM, Xiong R (2021) Too red for crowdfunding: The legitimation and adoption of crowdfunding across political cultures. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 45(3):471–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li XH, Liang XY (2015) A Confucian social model of political appointments among Chinese private-firm entrepreneurs. Acad. Management J. 58(2):592–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lok J (2020) Theorizing the “I” in institutional theory: Moving forward through theoretical fragmentation, not integration. The Oxford Handbook of Identities in Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 10.Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6‐7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mabey B (2018). pyLDAvis: Python Library for Interactive Topic Model Visualization. Port of the R LDAvis package. Accessed November 15, 2019, https://pyldavis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme.html#pyldavis.Google Scholar
• Marini MM (2001) Social values and norms. Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2nd ed., vol. 4 (Macmillan Reference), 2828–2840.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Battilana J (2009) Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qiao K (2020) Waking from Mao’s dream: Communist ideological imprinting and the internationalization of entrepreneurial ventures in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):795–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx W, Bornmann L, Barth A, Leydesdorff L (2014) Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS). J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 65(4):751–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mata J, Alves C (2018) The survival of firms founded by immigrants: Institutional distance between home and host country, and experience in the host country. Strategic Management J. 39(11):2965–2991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. of Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Google Scholar
• Miller LB-M (2007) Kicking the habit: Broadening our horizons by studying family businesses. J. Management Inquiry 16(1):27–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS, Fein LC (1999) The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Admin. Sci. Quart 44(4):653–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):479–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman D, Bonilla EV, Buntine W (2011) Improving topic coherence with regularized topic models. Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel R, Bartlett P, Pereira F, Weinberger KQ, eds. Proc. 25th Annual Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 2011 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 496–504.Google Scholar
• Negro G, Kocak O, Hsu G (2010) Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Hsu G, Negro G, Koçak O, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, 1st ed. (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingey, UK), 3–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, York JG, Hargrave TJ (2014). The coevolution of industries, social movements, and institutions: Wind power in the United States. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1609–1632.Google Scholar
• Pearson MM (2005) The business of governing business in China: Institutions and norms of the emerging regulatory state. World Politics 57(2):296–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pease DE (2009) The New American Exceptionalism (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Petersen B, Ciravegna L, Rodriguez C (2022). Geographical reconfiguration in global value chains: Search within limited space? Global Strategy J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Petkova AP, Rindova VP, Gupta AK (2013) No news is bad news: Sensegiving activities, media attention, and venture capital funding of new technology organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(3):865–888.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips N, Lawrence TB, Hardy C (2004) Discourse and institutions. Acad. Management Rev. 29(4):635–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisig LM (1962) Statistical bibliography in the health sciences. Bull. Medical Library Assoc. 50(3):450.Google Scholar
• Ramage D, Rosen E, Chuang J, Manning CD, McFarland DA (2009) Topic modeling for the social sciences. Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty J, Williams C, Culotta A, eds. Proc. 23rd Annual Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2009 Workshop on Appl. for Topic Models: Text and Beyond (Neural Information Processing Systems, La Jolla, CA). Accessed November 15, 2019, https://nlp.stanford.edu/dramage/papers/tmt-nips09.pdf.Google Scholar
• Reichardt J, Bornholdt S (2006) Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys. Rev. E 74(1 Pt 2):016110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose PS (1989) Diversification of the banking firm. Financial Rev. 24(2):251–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M (2005) Origins of organizations: The entrepreneurial process. Keister LA, ed. Entrepreneurship, Research in the Sociology of Work, vol. 15 (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 63–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sager LG (1984) State Courts and the strategic space between the norms and rules of constitutional law. Texas Law Rev. 63:959.Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 Cambridge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schaer P (2013) Applied informetrics for digital libraries: An overview of foundations, problems and current approaches. Historical Soc. Res. 38(3):267–281.Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism, Democracy 825:82–85.Google Scholar
• Scissors D (2009) Deng undone: The costs of halting market reform in China. Foreign Affairs 88:24.Google Scholar
• Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (1999) A call for two-way traffic: Improving the connection between social movement and organizational/institutional theory. Presentation, “Zaldfest”: A Conference to Honor Mayer D. Zald, September 17 and 18, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Accessed October 11, 2019, https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/51345/581.pdf;sequence=1.Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2004) Institutional theory. Ritzer G, ed. Encyclopedia of Social Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 408–414.Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, 4th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2014) Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities. M@n@gement 2(17):136–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):217–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Venkataraman S (2001) Entrepreneurship as a field of research: A response to Zahra and Dess, Singh, and Erikson. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):13–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shou H (2013) The myth of Chinese exceptionalism: The case of welfare transition in a globalized economy. J. Chinese Political Sci. 18(2):163–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel DA (2018) Democratic Institutions and Political Networks. Victor JNI, Montgomery AH, Lubell M, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sine WD, David RJ (2010) Institutions and entrepreneurship. Res. Sociol. Work 21(1):1–26.Google Scholar
• Sine WD, David RJ, Mitsuhashi H (2007) From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organ. Sci. 18(4):578–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A (1937) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (The Modern Library, New York).Google Scholar
• Sørensen J (2007) Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soubliere J-F, Gehman J (2020) The legitimacy threshold revisited: How prior successes and failures spill over to other endeavors on Kickstarter. Acad. Management J. 63(2):472–502.Google Scholar
• Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Liu G (2012) Which iron cage? Endo- and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs. Acad. Management J. 55(2):477–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer JW, Murtha TP, Lenway SA (2005) How governments matter to new industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):321–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens K, Kegelmeyer P, Andrzejewski D, Buttler D (2012) Exploring topic coherence over many models and many topics. Tsujii J, Henderson J, Pasca M, eds. Proc. Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Comput. Natural Language Learn. (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 952–961.Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social Structure and Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R (2010) Challenges for institutional theory. J. Management Inquiry 19(1):14–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swedberg R (2016) Before theory comes theorizing or how to make social science more interesting. British J. Sociol. 67(1):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan D, Tan J (2017) Far from the tree? Do private entrepreneurs agglomerate around public sector incumbents during economic transition? Organ. Sci. 28(1):113–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 45(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton P (2004) Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton P, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(3):801–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin-Andersson K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage Publications, London), 99–128.Google Scholar
• Thornton P, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, Coles R (2008) Studying entrepreneurship as an institution. Knowledge and Institutions (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 271–299.Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2011) Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Tonoyan V, Strohmeyer R, Jennings JE (2020) Gender gaps in perceived start-up ease: Implications of sex-based labor market segregation for entrepreneurship across 22 European countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):181–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tost LP (2011) An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):686–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1958) Religious rejections of the world and their directions. Gerth H, Mills CW, eds, From Max Weber (Oxford University Press, New York), 323–362.Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Devereaux Jennings P (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu K, Hitt MA, Miller SR (2020). The ownership structure contingency in the sequential international entry mode decision process: Family owners and institutional investors in family-dominant versus family-influenced firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 51(2):151–171.Google Scholar
• York JG, Hargrave TJ, Pacheco D (2016). Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Acad. Management J. 59(2): 579–610.Google Scholar
• York JG, Vedula S, Lenox MJ (2018). It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1492–1523.Google Scholar
• Zimmerman MA, Zeitz GJ (2002) Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):414–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104:1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E, Kim T (2003) The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Industrial Corporate Change 12:27–67.Crossref, Google Scholar