Coworking: Finding Value Through Work Companions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16202

References

  • Allen TD, Merlo K, Lawrence RC, Slutsky J, Gray CE (2021) Boundary management and work‐nonwork balance while working from home. Appl. Psych. 70(1):60–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M (2003) Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):13–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anglin AH, Kincaid PA, Short JC, Allen DG (2022) Role theory perspectives: Past, present, and future applications of role theories in management research. J. Management 48(6):1469–1502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Caza BB, Meister A (2024) My place: How workers become identified with their workplaces and why it matters. Acad. Management Rev. 49(2):366–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Clark MA, Fugate M (2007) Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. Acad. Management J. 50(1):149–174.Google Scholar
  • Atkinson P, Hammersley M (1998) Ethnography and Participant Observation. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 248–261.Google Scholar
  • Bacevice PA, Spreitzer GM (2023) ‘It’s like, instant respect’: Coworking spaces as identity anchoring environments in the new economy. New Tech. Work Employment 38(1):59–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal P, Corley K (2011) The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Acad. Management J. 54(2):233–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel CA, Wrzesniewski A, Wiesenfeld BM (2012) Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organ. Sci. 23(3):743–757.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berbegal-Mirabent J (2021) What do we know about co-working spaces? Trends and challenges ahead. Sustainability 13(3):1416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blagoev B, Costas J, Kärreman D (2019) ‘We are all herd animals’: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces. Organization 26(6):894–916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Justice in social exchange. Sociol. Inquiry 34(2):193–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouncken RB, Reuschl AJ (2018) Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Rev. Managerial Sci. 12:317–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buengeler C, Piccolo RF, Locklear LR (2021) LMX differentiation and group outcomes: A framework and review drawing on group diversity insights. J. Management 47(1):260–287.Google Scholar
  • Capdevila I (2013) Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. Preprint, submitted March 25, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414121.Google Scholar
  • Cardon MS, Arwine RP (2024) The many faces of entrepreneurial loneliness. Personnel Psych. 77(1):225–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charmaz K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Charmaz K, Thornberg R (2021) The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Res. Psych. 18(3):305–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen T-P (2024) The loneliness of the American worker. The Wall Street Journal Online (May 27), https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/workplace/american-workers-loneliness-research-35793dc4.Google Scholar
  • Chen Z, Takeuchi R, Shum C (2013) A social information processing perspective of coworker influence on a focal employee. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1618–1639.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark SC (2002) Communicating across the work/home border. Community Work Family 5(1):23–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conti A (2022) Do yourself a favor and go find a ‘third place.’ The Atlantic Online (April 4), https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2022/04/third-places-meet-new-people-pandemic/629468/.Google Scholar
  • Coworking Insights (2024) New report shows growth in U.S. coworking space count and declining prices. Coworking Insights Online (January 31), https://coworkinginsights.com/new-report-shows-growth-in-u-s-coworking-space-count-and-declining-prices/.Google Scholar
  • Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crosina E (2024) Co-constructing community and entrepreneurial identity: How founders ascribe self-referential meanings to entrepreneurship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(2):370–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czarniawska B (2007) Shadowing: And Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies (Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
  • Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De Koven B (2013) The coworking connection. Deep Fun Online (August 5), https://www.deepfun.com/the-coworking-connection/.Google Scholar
  • DeGuzman GV, Tang AI (2011) Working in the Unoffice: A Guide to Coworking for Indie Workers, Small Businesses, and Nonprofits (Night Owls Press LLC, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Detert JR, Treviño LK (2010) Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organ. Sci. 21(1):249–270.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duarte V, Liu J (2025) 5 years into the remote work book, the return-to-office push is stronger than ever—Here’s why. CNBC Online (March 23), https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/23/5-years-into-the-remote-work-boom-the-return-to-office-push-is-stronger-than-everheres-why.html.Google Scholar
  • Eagle T, Baltaxe-Admony LB, Ringland KE (2024) “It was something I naturally found worked and heard about later”: An investigation of body doubling with neurodivergent participants. ACM Trans. Accessible Comput. 17(3):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elfenbein HA (2007) Emotion in organizations: A review and theoretical integration. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):315–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ezerins ME, Simon LS, Vogus TJ, Gabriel AS, Calderwood C, Rosen CC (2024) Autism and employment: A review of the “new frontier” of diversity research. J. Management 50(3):1102–1144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris GR, Liden RC, Munyon TP, Summers JK, Basik KJ, Buckley MR (2009) Relationships at work: Toward a multidimensional conceptualization of dyadic work relationships. J. Management 35(6):1379–1403.Google Scholar
  • Foertsch C (2017) More than one million people will work in coworking spaces in 2017. DeskMag Online (January 25), https://www.deskmag.com/en/coworking-news/the-complete-2017-coworking-forecast-more-than-one-million-people-work-from-14000-coworking-spaces-s.Google Scholar
  • Foertsch C, Cagnol R (2013) The history of coworking in a timeline. DeskMag Online (August 16), http://www.deskmag.com/en/the-history-of-coworking-spaces-in-a-timeline.Google Scholar
  • Gajendran RS, Harrison DA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1524–1541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gandini A (2015) The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera 15:193–205.Google Scholar
  • Garrett LE, Spreitzer GM, Bacevice PA (2017) Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organ. Stud. 38(6):821–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Golden TD, Veiga JF, Dino RN (2008) The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1412–1421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonsalves L (2023) Work (un)interrupted: How non-territorial space shapes worker control over social interaction. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1651–1671.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhaus JH, Powell GN (2003) When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(2):291–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guerin B (1986) Mere presence effects in humans: A review. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 22(1):38–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hadley CN, Marks B, Wright S (2023) How coworking spaces impact employee well-being. Harvard Business Review Online (February 9), https://hbr.org/2023/02/research-how-coworking-spaces-impact-employee-well-being.Google Scholar
  • Hardin AE, Schinoff BS, Byron K, Balven RM (2025) A window into coworkers’ worlds: The relational outcomes of learning vivid, unintentional, and nonwork-related information about coworkers. Acad. Management J. 68(2):267–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill EJ, Ferris M, Märtinson V (2003) Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. J. Vocational Behav. 63(2):220–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture and organizations. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 10(4):15–41.Google Scholar
  • Howell T (2022) Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda. Res. Policy 51(2):104447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski P, Bednarek R, Lê JK (2014) Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organ. 12(4):274–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johns T, Gratton L (2013) The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91:66–73.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Orlikowski WJ (2013) Temporal work in strategy making. Organ. Sci. 24(4):965–995.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kauppila OP (2014) So, what am I supposed to do? A multilevel examination of role clarity. J. Management Stud. 51(5):737–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim NK, Lim DS, Monzani L (2025) Communities in coworking spaces: Boundary work and social identity work by community managers. J. Management Stud. 62(8):3461–3500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konrad A (2014) Inside the phenomenal rise of WeWork. Forbes Online (November 5), https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2014/11/05/the-rise-of-wework/?sh=2610e5d06f8b.Google Scholar
  • Kreiner GE (2015) “Tabula Geminus”: A “both/and” approach to coding and theorizing. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, New York), 350–361.Google Scholar
  • Kreiner G, Hollensbe E, Sheep M (2009) Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Acad. Management J. 52(4):704–730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lanaj K, Jennings RE (2020) Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems. J. Appl. Psych. 105(4):355–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemay EP, Clark MS, Feeney BC (2007) Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(5):834–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K, Velamuri SR (2009) The design of member review: Showing what to organization members and why. Organ. Res. Methods 12(3):488–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Methot JR, Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Christian JS (2016) Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personnel Psych. 69(2):311–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Murphy C, Klotz AC, Kreiner GE (2017) Blue skies and black boxes: The promise (and practice) of grounded theory in human resource management research. Human Resource Management Rev. 27(2):291–305.Google Scholar
  • Nippert-Eng CE (1996) Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Driscoll MP, Ilgen DR, Hildreth K (1992) Time devoted to job and off-job activities, interrole conflict, and affective experiences. J. Appl. Psych. 77(3):272–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) 10 coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oldenburg R (1999) The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community (Marlowe & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • O’Leary MB, Mortensen M (2010) Go (con) figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 21(1):115–131.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ollier-Malaterre A, Rothbard NP, Berg JM (2013) When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):645–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozcelik H, Barsade SG (2018) No employee an island: Workplace loneliness and job performance. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2343–2366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parrino L (2015) Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Res. Practice 13(3):261–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):635–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt MG (2016) Crafting and selecting research questions and contexts in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods, 177–185.Google Scholar
  • Pratt MG, Sonenshein S, Feldman MS (2022) Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organ. Res. Methods 25(2):211–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prengler MK, Klotz AC, Murphy C (2025) Place iteration and integration: How digital nomads navigate the mobile worker paradox. Admin. Sci. Quart. 70(2):328–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Razin E (2016) Coworking: A threat to traditional office space? Forbes Online (June 1), https://www.forbes.com/sites/elyrazin/2016/06/01/coworking-a-threat-to-traditional-office-space/?sh=597ac9b73e8b.Google Scholar
  • Reina CS, Kreiner GE, Rheinhardt A, Mihelcic CA (2023) Your presence is requested: Mindfulness infusion in workplace interactions and relationships. Organ. Sci. 34(2):722–753.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockmann KW, Pratt MG (2015) Contagious offsite work and the lonely office: The unintended consequences of distributed work. Acad. Management Discoveries 1(2):150–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers K (2024) The benefits of ‘body doubling’ when you have ADHD, according to experts. CNN Online (May 28), https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/13/health/adhd-body-doubling-productivity-benefits-wellness/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25 (Academic Press, New York), 1–65.Google Scholar
  • Shore LM, Barksdale K (1998) Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: A social exchange approach. J. Organ. Behav. 19(S1):731–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spinuzzi C (2012) Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. J. Bus. Tech. Comm. 26(4):399–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spinuzzi C, Bodrozic Z, Scaratti G, Ivaldi S (2019) Coworking is about community: But what is “community” in coworking? J. Bus. Tech. Comm. 33(2):112–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM, Cameron L, Garrett L (2017) Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Rev. Org. Psych. Org. Behav. 4:473–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Suddaby R (2006) From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Acad. Management J. 49(4):633–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thatcher SMB, Zhu X (2006) Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification and telecommuting. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):1076–1088.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valentine MA (2018) Renegotiating spheres of obligation: The role of hierarchy in organizational learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):570–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verbrugge LM (1979) Multiplexity in adult friendships. Soc. Forces 57(4):1286–1309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West TN, Prinzing MM, Garton C, Berman CJ, Zhou J, Hale J, Gratch J, Fredrickson BL (2025) Improving social connection with weak ties and strangers: Effects of a new micro-intervention on interaction quality and social behavior. J. Positive Psych. 20(4):652–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld BM, Raghuram S, Garud R (2001) Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. J. Management 27(2):213–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu J, Liao Z, Yam KC, Johnson RE (2018) Shared leadership: A state‐of‐the‐art review and future research agenda. J. Organ. Behav. 39(7):834–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.