Knowledge Behind Firewalls: How Rivalry Among Alliance Partners Constrains Innovation Inside Firms

References

• Adams JS (1976) The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. Dunette M, ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Rand McNally, Chicago), 1175–1199.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA (2020) Resource congestion in alliance networks: How a firm’s partners’ partners influence the benefits of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 41(4):627–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH, Wu A (2020) Organizing knowledge production teams within firms for innovation. Strategy Sci. 5(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(3):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Novelli E (2013) The second face of appropriability: Generative appropriability and its determinants. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):248–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Allatta JT, Singh H (2011) Evolving communication patterns in response to an acquisition event. Strategic Management J. 32(10):1099–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Khanna T (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrei AG, Van Oosterhout J, Sauerwald S (2023) Symbolic shareholder democracy: Toward a behavioral understanding of the role of shareholder voting in CEO dismissals. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1736–1758.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres N (1996) Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management J. 17(5):395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Rios LA, Silverman BS (2020) Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 41(11):2015–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1990) Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Industrial Econom. 38(4):361–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2021) Knowledge sharing in alliances and alliance portfolios. Management Sci. 67(3):1569–1585.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021a) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021b) Matching patents to compustat firms, 1980–2015: Dynamic reassignment, name changes, and ownership structures. Res. Policy 50(5):104217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Cassiman B, Gomez JC (2018) Text matching to measure patent similarity. Strategic Management J. 39(1):62–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asgari N, Singh K, Mitchell W (2017) Alliance portfolio reconfiguration following a technological discontinuity. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1062–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asgari N, Tandon V, Singh K, Mitchell W (2018) Creating and taming discord: How firms manage embedded competition in alliance portfolios to limit alliance termination. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3273–3299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bae J, Gargiulo M (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6):843–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Menahem SM, Von Krogh G, Erden Z, Schneider A (2016) Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams: Evidence from early-stage drug discovery. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1308–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2012) Offsetting illegitimacy? How pressures from securities analysts influence incumbents in the face of new technologies. Acad. Management J. 55(1):213–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bos B, Faems D, Noseleit F (2017) Alliance concentration in multinational companies: Examining alliance portfolios, firm structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2298–2309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyacıoğlu B, Özdemir MN, Karim S (2024) Acqui-hires: Redeployment and retention of human capital post-acquisition. Strategic Management J. 45(2):205–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennecke J, Rank O (2017) The firm’s knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors—A multilevel network study. Res. Policy 46(4):768–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer DF, Nash MJ (1989) The Chinese wall security policy. Proc. 1989 IEEE Sympos. Security Privacy (IEEE Computer Society Press, Washinton, DC), 206–214.Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1998) Organizing knowledge. California Management Rev. 40(3):90–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Harvard, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data, 2nd ed., No. 53 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Chatain O (2008) Competitors’ resource-oriented strategies: Acting on competitors’ resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):97–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):100–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen JS, Garg P (2018) Dancing with the stars: Benefits of a star employee’s temporary absence for organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1239–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Griliches Z (1988) Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s value of R&D and patents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(2):419–423.Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Henderson RM (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Industrial Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levin RC (1989) Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook Industrial Organ. 2:1059–1107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui AS (2013) Portfolio dynamics and alliance termination: The contingent role of resource dissimilarity. J. Marketing 77(3):15–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui AS, O’Connor G (2012) Alliance portfolio resource diversity and firm innovation. J. Marketing 76(4):24–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Lev B, Narin F (1999) Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts J. 55(3):20–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Google Scholar
• Dosi G, Nelson RR (2010) Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 51–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz YL, Hamel G (1998) Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnering (Harvard Business Press, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. 21(3):345–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H, Hesterly WS (2018) The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3140–3162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: Advantage of the semi-isolated subgroup structure in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21:625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A (1992) Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Res. Policy 21(5):391–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M, Liu J, Wang H, Yamaguchi S (2024) Strategic restraint: When do human-capital-intensive companies choose (not) to use noncompete agreements? Strategic Management J. 45(13):2696–2726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Perspective—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, vol. 5 (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Rosenkopf L (2015) Perspective—Shrouded in structure: Challenges and opportunities for a friction-based view of network research. Organ. Sci. 26(2):622–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):13–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goerzen A, Beamish PW (2003) Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 24(13):1289–1306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J. Management Stud. 41(1):61–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grigoriou K, Rothaermel FT (2014) Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. J. Management 40(2):586–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I, Nerkar A (2012) The impact of global and local cohesion on innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 33(5):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations: A first look. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S (1995) The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises. Strategic Management J. 16(3):175–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G, Doz YL, Prahalad CK (1989) Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67(1):133–139.Google Scholar
• Hannah DR (2005) Should I keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees’ obligations to protect trade secrets. Organ. Sci. 16(1):71–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Hannah D, Parent M, Pitt L, Berthon P (2019) Secrets and knowledge management strategy: The role of secrecy appropriation mechanisms in realizing value from firm innovations. J. Knowledge Management 23(2):297–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez E, Sanders WG, Tuschke A (2015) Network defense: Pruning, grafting, and closing to prevent leakage of strategic knowledge to rivals. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1233–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G, Prabhala N (2014) Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility. J. Finance 69(1):293–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoehn-Weiss MN, Karim S (2014) Unpacking functional alliance portfolios: How signals of viability affect young firms’ outcomes. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1364–1385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoehn-Weiss MN, Karim S, Lee CH (2017) Examining alliance portfolios beyond the dyads: The relevance of redundancy and nonuniformity across and between partners. Organ. Sci. 28(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann WH (2005) How to manage a portfolio of alliances. Long Range Planning 38(2):121–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann W, Lavie D, Reuer JJ, Shipilov A (2018) The interplay of competition and cooperation. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3033–3052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter SD, Bentzen H, Taug J (2020) On the “missing link” between formal organization and informal social structure. J. Organ. Design 9(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs AZ, Watts DJ (2021) A large-scale comparative study of informal social networks in firms. Management Sci. 67(9):5489–5509.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang RJ, Tao QT, Santoro MD (2010) Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 31(10):1136–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang R, Zaheer A (2018) Determinants of alliance partner choice: Network distance, managerial incentives, and board monitoring. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2745–2769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2009) Business unit reorganization and innovation in new product markets. Management Sci. 55(7):1237–1254.Link, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Capron L (2016) Reconfiguration: Adding, redeploying, recombining, and divesting resources and business units. Strategic Management J. 37(13):E54–E62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Kaul A (2015) Structural recombination and innovation: Unlocking intraorganizational knowledge synergy through structural change. Organ. Sci. 26(2):439–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Kehoe RR, Tzabbar D (2015) Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 36(5):709–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna R, Guler I (2022) Degree assortativity in collaboration networks and invention performance. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1402–1430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna R, Guler I, Nerkar A (2018) Entangled decisions: Knowledge interdependencies and terminations of patented inventions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 39(9):2439–2465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Guler I, Karim S (2024) Who gets redeployed? Inventor characteristics and resource redeployment decisions. Strategic Management J. 1–32.Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Steensma HK, Heidl RA (2021) Clustering and connectedness: How inventor network configurations within incumbent firms influence their assimilation and absorption of new venture technologies. Acad. Management J. 64(5):1527–1552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM (2012) Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):407–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM (2018) Reorganization and tie decay choices. Management Sci. 64(5):2219–2237.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE (2014) Inside the black box of the corporate staff: Social networks and the implementation of corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 35(1):24–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (2014) Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Carley KM, Prietula JM, eds. Computational Organization Theory, 1st ed. (Psychology Press, New York), 107–130.Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Puranam P (2008) Integration through incentives within differentiated organizations. Organ. Sci. 19(6):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Lahiri N, Narayanan S (2013) Vertical integration, innovation, and alliance portfolio size: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management J. 34(9):1042–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Miller SR (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4):623–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Singh H (2012) The evolution of alliance portfolios: The case of Unisys. Industrial Corporate Change 21(3):763–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Haunschild PR, Khanna P (2012) Organizational differences, relational mechanisms, and alliance performance. Strategic Management J. 33(13):1453–1479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Madsen TL (2009) Unbundling competitive heterogeneity: Incentive structures and capability influences on technological innovation. Strategic Management J. 30(7):711–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP (1997) Keeping organizational secrets: Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs. Industrial Corporate Change 6(3):623–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipton M, Mazur RB (1975) The Chinese wall solution to the conflict problems of securities firms. NYUL Rev. 50:459.Google Scholar
• Madhavan R, Gnyawali DR, He J (2004) Two’s company, three’s a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Acad. Management J. 47(6):918–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CD, Toh PK (2022) Complementary components and returns from coordination within ecosystems via standard setting. Strategic Management J. 43(3):627–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreira S, Klueter TM, Tasselli S (2020) Competition, technology licensing-in, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 31(4):1012–1036.Link, Google Scholar
• Moreira S, Markus A, Laursen K (2018) Knowledge diversity and coordination: The effect of intrafirm inventor task networks on absorption speed. Strategic Management J. 39(9):2517–2546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F (2004) The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Res. Policy 33(4):643–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Paruchuri S (2005) Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. 51(5):771–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Roberts PW (2004) Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):779–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Sampson RC (2004) The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):723–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley J, Wada T (2009) Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: Evidence from US-Japan agreements. Management Sci. 55(4):635–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Ozmel U, Yavuz D, Reuer JJ, Zenger T (2017) Network prominence, bargaining power, and the allocation of value capturing rights in high-tech alliance contracts. Organ. Sci. 28(5):947–964.Link, Google Scholar
• Palomeras N, Wehrheim D (2021) The strategic allocation of inventors to R&D collaborations. Strategic Management J. 42(1):144–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Awate S (2017) Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra-organizational inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 38(3):657–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) A Resource Dependence Perspective. Intercorporate Relations. The Structural Analysis of Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Phelps CC (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 53(4):890–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F Jr, Ahuja G, Mitchell W (2011) When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 54(1):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan R, Rosenkopf L (2014) Do ties really bind? The effect of knowledge and commercialization networks on opposition to standards. Acad. Management J. 57(2):515–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawley E, Godart FC, Shipilov A (2018) How and when do conglomerates influence the creativity of their subsidiaries? Strategic Management J. 39(9):2417–2438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed R, DeFillippi RJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 15:88–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Ploog JN (2022) On top of the game? The double-edged sword of incorporating social features into freemium products. Strategic Management J. 43(6):1182–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodan S, Galunic C (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. 25(6):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryu W, McCann BT, Reuer JJ (2018) Geographic co-location of partners and rivals: Implications for the design of R&D alliances. Acad. Management J. 61(3):945–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):364–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2015) Technology shocks, technological collaboration, and innovation outcomes. Organ. Sci. 26(3):668–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27(3):379–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipilov A, Gulati R, Kilduff M, Li S, Tsai W (2014) Relational pluralism within and between organizations. Acad. Management J. 57(2):449–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shippy D, Phipps M (2010) The Race for a New Game Machine (Citadel Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2009) Hiding the evidence of valid theories: How coupled search processes obscure performance differences among organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):602–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh H, Kryscynski D, Li X, Gopal R (2016) Pipes, pools, and filters: How collaboration networks affect innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1649–1666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB (2015) Intraorganizational network dynamics in times of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1365–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Srivastava MK, Gnyawali DR (2011) When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Acad. Management J. 54(4):797–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinhilber S (2008) Strategic Alliances: Three Ways to Make Them Work (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many instruments. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, vol. 6 (Cambridge University Press, New York), 109–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokes J (2009) New book from IBMers: Sony suckered into funding Xbox chip. Accessed December 24, 2021, https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2009/01/new-book-from-ibmers-sony-suckered-into-funding-xbox-chip/.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8):791–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tandon V, Toh PK (2022) Who deviates? Technological opportunities, career concern, and inventor’s distant search. Strategic Management J. 43(4):724–757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tandon V, Asgari N, Ranganathan R (2023) Divestment of relational assets following acquisitions: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 44(4):1013–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tandon V, Ertug G, Carnabuci G (2020) How do prior ties affect learning by hiring? J. Management 46(2):287–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terza JV, Basu A, Rathouz PJ (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. J. Health Econom. 27(3):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Ahuja G (2022) Integration and appropriability: A study of process and product components within a firm’s innovation portfolio. Strategic Management J. 43(6):1075–1109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Miller CD (2017) Pawn to save a chariot, or drawbridge into the fort? Firms’ disclosure during standard setting and complementary technologies within ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2213–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Polidoro F (2013) A competition-based explanation of collaborative invention within the firm. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1186–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M (2015) The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge. Strategic Management J. 36(4):586–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2000) Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(9):925–939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Scanlan TJ (1981) Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Management J. 24(2):289–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vassolo RS, Anand J, Folta TB (2004) Non-additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: A real options-based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 25(11):1045–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Anand J (2011) Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Acad. Management J. 54(3):611–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Rodan S, Fruin M, Xu X (2014) Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 57(2):484–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wassmer U, Li S, Madhok A (2017) Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 38(2):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2015) Control function methods in applied econometrics. J. Human Resources 50(2):420–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia J (2011) Mutual dependence, partner substitutability, and repeated partnership: The survival of cross-border alliances. Strategic Management J. 32(3):229–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao T, Makhija M, Karim S (2022) A knowledge recombination perspective of innovation: Review and new research directions. J. Management 48(6):1724–1777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young-Hyman T, Kleinbaum AM (2020) Meso-foundations of interorganizational relationships: How team power structures shape partner novelty. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1385–1407.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management J. 26(9):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Guler I (2020) How to join the club: Patterns of embeddedness and the addition of new members to interorganizational collaborations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):112–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar