Through the Lens of Clarity: Perceived Organizational Tightness Boosts Creativity for Men, but Not for Women

References

• Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A (2003) The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(1):18–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acar OA, Tarakci M, van Knippenberg D (2019) Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. J. Management 45(1):96–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TD, Rush MC (1998) The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 83(2):247–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1985) Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(2):393–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Staw B, Cummings L, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1993) What does a theory of creativity require? Psych. Inquiry 4(3):179–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996a) Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard Business School Background Note 396-239, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996b) Creativity in Context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity” (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnett JJ (1995) Broad and narrow socialization: The family in the context of a cultural theory. J. Marriage Family 57(3):617–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Wood R (1989) Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(5):805–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barczak G, Lassk F, Mulki J (2010) Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity Innovation Management 19(4):332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartol KM, Liu W, Zeng X, Wu K (2009) Social exchange and knowledge sharing among knowledge workers: The moderating role of perceived job security. Management Organ. Rev. 5(2):223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg JM, Yu A (2021) Getting the picture too late: Handoffs and the effectiveness of idea implementation in creative work. Acad. Management J. 64(4):1191–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhave DP, Kramer A, Glomb TM (2010) Work–family conflict in work groups: Social information processing, support, and demographic dissimilarity. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):145–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair CS, Mumford MD (2007) Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? J. Creative Behav. 41(3):197–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burris ER, McClean EJ, Detert JR, Quigley TJ (2023) The agency to implement voice: How target hierarchical position and competence changes the relationship between voice and individual performance. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1695–1715.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA (1998) Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):749–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Gully SM, Eden D (2001) Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organ. Res. Methods 4(1):62–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Wang X, Zang H, Guinote A (2021) Being a tough person in a tight world: Cultural tightness leads to a desire for muscularity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 96:104183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Wang X, Zang H, Guinote A (2023) We need tough brothers and sisters in a tight world: Cultural tightness leads to a preference for dominant and muscular leaders. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 50(11):1563–1580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi Y, Ingram P, Han SW (2023) Cultural breadth and embeddedness: The individual adoption of organizational culture as a determinant of creativity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(2):429–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RYJ, Huang KG, Jin M (2019) Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(14):6720–6725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RYJ, Lim JH, Wiruchnipawan W (2022) Unlocking the creativity potential of dialectical thinking: Field investigations of the comparative effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles. J. Creative Behav. 56(2):258–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RYJ, Morris MW, Mor S (2012) Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(2):116–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RYJ, Roth Y, Lemoine JF (2015) The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):189–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua R, Zhao N, Han M (2024) Cultural tightness in organizations: Investigating the impact of formal and informal cultural tightness on employee creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 184:104338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropley A (2006) In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Res. J. 18(3):391–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies PG, Spencer SJ, Quinn DM, Gerhardstein R (2002) Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(12):1615–1628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devine PG (1989) Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2006) Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313(5787):665–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW (2010) Human creativity: Reflections on the role of culture. Management Organ. Rev. 6(3):437–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck CS (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. Amer. Psych. 41(10):1040–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck C (2000) Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development (Psychological Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Heilman ME (2016) Gender and leadership: Introduction to the special issue. Leadership Quart. 27(3):349–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W (2012) Social role theory. Van Lange P, Kruglanski A, Higgins E, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (SAGE Publications Ltd., London), 458–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Lorenz MP, Ramsey JR (2023) The innovation paradox of global work: Does cultural tightness shape or constrain innovative behaviour? J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 97(1):104–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Tierney P, Kung-Mcintyre K (2003) Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Acad. Management J. 46(5):618–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S (1998) Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, London), 357–411.Google Scholar
• Flipo C, Mannucci PV, Yong K (2023) The impact of cultural tightness on the relationship between structural holes, tie strength, and creativity. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 54(2):332–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gedik Y, Ozbek MF (2020) How cultural tightness relates to creativity in work teams: Exploring the moderating and mediating mechanisms. Creativity Innovation Management 29(4):634–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ, Nishii LH, Raver JL (2006) On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. J. Appl. Psych. 91(6):1225–1244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Nishii L, Leslie LM, Lun J, Lim BC, Duan L, et al. (2011) Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332(6033):1100–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM, Zhou J (2001) When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):513–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goncalo JA, Staw BM (2006) Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(1):96–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goncalo JA, Chatman JA, Duguid MM, Kennedy JA (2015) Creativity from constraint? How the political correctness norm influences creativity in mixed-sex work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Huang JC, Farh JL (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad. Management J. 52(4):765–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB (2003) A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J. Res. Personality 37(6):504–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin RW (1983) Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2):184–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrington JR, Gelfand MJ (2014) Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(22):7990–7995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Okimoto TG (2007) Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Zhou J (2009) A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 52(2):280–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G, Bond MH, Luk CL (1993) Individual perceptions of organizational cultures: A methodological treatise on levels of analysis. Organ. Stud. 14(4):483–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hora S, Badura KL, Lemoine GJ, Grijalva E (2022) A meta-analytic examination of the gender difference in creative performance. J. Appl. Psych. 107(11):1926–1950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson JC, Gelfand M, De S, Fox A (2019) The loosening of American culture over 200 years is associated with a creativity–order trade-off. Nature Human Behav. 3(3):244–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janssen O, van de Vliert E, West M (2004) The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. J. Organ. Behav. 25(2):129–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang WY, Wrzesniewski A (2022) Misaligned meaning: Couples’ work-orientation incongruence and their work outcomes. Organ. Sci. 33(2):785–809.Link, Google Scholar
• Jin M, Chua R (2024) Which idea to pursue? Gender differences in novelty avoidance during creative idea selection. Organ. Sci. 35(6):2223–2248.Link, Google Scholar
• Jończyk R, Dickson DS, Bel-Bahar TS, Kremer GE, Siddique Z, van Hell JG (2022) How stereotype threat affects the brain dynamics of creative thinking in female students. Neuropsychologia 173:108306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Toh SM (2019) Stuck in the past? The influence of a leader’s past cultural experience on group culture and positive and negative group deviance. Acad. Management J. 62(3):944–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis RS, Beal DJ, Tesluk PE (2000) A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organ. Res. Methods 3(2):186–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lebuda I, Karwowski M (2013) Tell me your name and I’ll tell you how creative your work is: Author’s name and gender as factors influencing assessment of products’ creativity in four different domains. Creativity Res. J. 25(1):137–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie SJ, Cimpian A, Meyer M, Freeland E (2015) Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347(6219):262–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li R, Gordon S, Gelfand MJ (2017) Tightness–looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 27(3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim GJH, Pitesa M, Vadera AK (2023) Cheating constraint decisions and discrimination against workers with lower financial standing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 174:104211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim JH, Tai K, Kouchaki M (2021) Ambivalent bosses: An examination of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on subordinate task engagement. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 165:139–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling 9(2):151–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luksyte A, Unsworth KL, Avery DR (2018) Innovative work behavior and sex-based stereotypes: Examining sex differences in perceptions and evaluations of innovative work behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 39(3):292–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV (2000) Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Rev. Psych. 51(1):93–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV, Milne AB, Castelli L, Schloerscheidt AM, Greco S (1998) On activating exemplars. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(4):330–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madjar N, Greenberg E, Chen Z (2011) Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. J. Appl. Psych. 96(4):730–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin J (1992) Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin J (2002) Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain (SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClean EJ, Martin SR, Emich KJ, Woodruff CT (2018) The social consequences of voice: An examination of voice type and gender on status and subsequent leader emergence. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1869–1891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGlone MS, Pfiester RA (2007) The generality and consequences of stereotype threat. Sociol. Compass 1(1):174–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta R, Zhu M (2016) Creating when you have less: The impact of resource scarcity on product use creativity. J. Consumer Res. 42(5):767–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran S (2010) The roles of creativity in society. Kaufman J, Sternberg R, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, New York), 74–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RE, Gopalan S (2003) Do organizational cultures replicate national cultures? Isomorphism, rejection and reciprocal opposition in the corporate values of three countries. Organ. Stud. 24(7):1115–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng TW, Feldman DC (2012) A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity. Human Relations 65(8):1021–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus. Rev. 69(6):96–104.Google Scholar
• Ogbeibu S, Senadjki A, Gaskin J (2018) The moderating effect of benevolence on the impact of organisational culture on employee creativity. J. Bus. Res. 90:334–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Hansen MT (2020) How Apple is organized for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 98(6):86–95.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proudfoot D, Kay AC, Koval CZ (2015) A gender bias in the attribution of creativity. Psych. Sci. 26(11):1751–1761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Runco MA, Acar S (2012) Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Res. J. 24(1):66–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2):224–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Macey WH (2013) Organizational climate and culture. Annual Rev. Psych. 64(1):361–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Gilson LL (2004) What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quart. 15(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Acad. Management J. 46(6):703–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J (2007) When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1709–1721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stamkou E, Homan AC, van Kleef GA, Gelfand MJ (2022) The spatial representation of leadership depends on ecological threat: A replication and extension of Menon et al. (2010). J. Personality Soc. Psych. 123(3):e1–e22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM (1997) A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Amer. Psych. 52(6):613–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Hargadon A (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ter Wal ALJ, Criscuolo P, McEvily B, Salter A (2020) Dual networking: How collaborators network in their quest for innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):887–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (2002) Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psych. Rev. 109(3):451–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM (2002) Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1137–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM (2004) The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. J. Management 30(3):413–432.Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM (2011) Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. J. Appl. Psych. 96(2):277–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh SM, Leonardelli GJ (2012) Cultural constraints on the emergence of women as leaders. J. World Bus. 47(4):604–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis HC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psych. Rev. 96(3):506–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandewalle D (1997) Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Ed. Psych. Measurement 57(6):995–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chen H, Shi J, Chen Z (2022) Threatened humanity in a tight world: Cultural tightness results in self-objectification. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 25(8):2003–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman N, Tröster C, Grimes M, Roberson Q, Rink F, Gruber M (2023) Publishing multimethod research in AMJ: A review and best-practice recommendations. Acad. Management J. 66(4):1007–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Anderson SE (1991) Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J. Management 17(3):601–617.Google Scholar
• Xin KR, Pelled LH (2003) Supervisor–Subordinate conflict and perceptions of leadership behavior: A field study. Leadership Quart. 14(1):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yong K, Mannucci PV, Lander MW (2020) Fostering creativity across countries: The moderating effect of cultural bundles on creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 157:1–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bartol KM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Management J. 53(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, George JM (2001) When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Acad. Management J. 44(4):682–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Shalley CE (2003) Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Martocchio J, Ferris G, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 165–217.Crossref, Google Scholar