A Platform Rating System and Vulnerable Workers: Evidence from Field Experiments in Singapore

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18153

References

  • Abraham M, Burbano V (2022) Congruence between leadership gender and organizational claims affects the gender composition of the applicant pool: Field experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 33(1):393–413.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abraham M, Botelho TL, Carter JT (2025) (Not) Getting what you deserve: How misrecognized evaluators reproduce misrecognition in peer evaluations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 90(3):387–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amengual M, Apfelbaum EP (2021) True motives: Prosocial and instrumental justifications for behavioral change in organizations. Management Sci. 67(8):5032–5051.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armanios DE, Ventresca MJ, Itani MK, McCulloch M (2025) Major program value creation and capture: The S3 framework for mitigating risk propagation to maximize opportunities. California Management Rev. 67(3):117–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barach MA, Golden JM, Horton JJ (2020) Steering in online markets: The role of platform incentives and credibility. Management Sci. 66(9):4047–4070.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barsbai T, Bartos V, Licuanan V, Steinmayr A, Tiongson E, Yang D (2023) Picture this: Social distance and the mistreatment of migrant workers. NBER Working Paper No. 30804, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Benson A, Sojourner A, Umyarov A (2020) Can reputation discipline the gig economy? Experimental evidence from an online labor market. Management Sci. 66(5):1802–1825.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bilodeau A, Dumouchel D (2023) The imprint of autocracy on immigrant political participation: Reluctance to participate or to disclosure? Internat. Migration 61(5):216–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Botelho TL (2024) From audience to evaluator: When visibility into prior evaluations leads to convergence or divergence in subsequent evaluations among professionals. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1682–1703.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Botelho TL, Jun S, Humes D, DeCelles KA (2025) Scale dichotomization reduces customer racial discrimination and income inequality. Nature 639(8054):395–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Platforms Markets Innovation 1:163–191.Google Scholar
  • Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross Cultural Psych. 1(3):185–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burris ER (2012) The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Acad. Management J. 55(4):851–875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral L, Hortacsu A (2010) The dynamics of seller reputation: Evidence from eBay. J. Industry Econom. 58(1):54–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron LD, Rahman H (2022) Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organ. Sci. 33(1):38–58.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron LD, Conzon V, Lam L (2025) Selling the self: Neo-normative control and the platform paradox. Res. Organ. Behav. 45:100230.Google Scholar
  • Campbell I, Tranfaglia MA, Tham JC, Boese M (2019) Precarious work and the reluctance to complain: Italian temporary migrant workers in Australia. Labour Industry 29(1):98–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casilli A, Posada J (2019) The platformization of labor and society. Graham M, Dutton WH, eds. Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication Are Changing Our Lives (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 293–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen L, Tong TW, Tang S, Han N (2022) Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization. J. Management 48(1):147–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua N (2022) Threatening, controlling behaviour towards maids among main types of emotional abuse: Home report. The Straits Times (June 22), https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/community/threatening-controlling-behaviour-towards-maids-among-main-types-of-emotional-abuse-home-report.Google Scholar
  • Chung HD, Zhou YM, Ethiraj S (2024) Platform governance in the presence of within-complementor interdependencies: Evidence from the rideshare industry. Management Sci. 70(2):799–814.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cortes P, Pan J (2013) Outsourcing household production: Foreign domestic workers and native labor supply in Hong Kong. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):327–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cutolo D, Kenney M (2021) Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy. Acad. Management Perspectives 35(4):584–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C (2005) Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):209–230.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Derksen L, McGahan AM, Pongeluppe LS (2025) The lifesaving impact of electronic medical records for HIV patients. Rev. Econom. Statist. 1–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detert JR, Edmondson AC (2011) Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Acad. Management J. 54(3):461–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Distelhorst G, McGahan AM (2021) Socially irresponsible employment in emerging-market manufacturers. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2135–2158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Donati D (2025) The end of tourist traps: The impact of review platforms on quality upgrading. Marketing Sci.Google Scholar
  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eurofound (2025) Living and working in Europe 2024, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  • Favaron SD, Di Stefano G (2025) Let us not speak of them, but look and pass? Organizational responses to online reviews. Organ. Sci. 36(2):651–676.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S (2018a) Social Cognition: Selected Works of Susan Fiske (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST (2018b) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. Social Cognition (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 101–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. 17(12):1068–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon A, Capron L (2023) The firm as an architect of polycentric governance: Building open institutional infrastructure in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. 44(1):48–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawer A (2022) Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation 24(1):110–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawer A, Srnicek N (2021) Online platforms: Economic and societal effects. Report, European Parliamentary Research Service, London.Google Scholar
  • Gu G, Zhu F (2021) Trust and disintermediation: Evidence from an online freelance marketplace. Management Sci. 67(2):794–807.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2018) Doing well by making well: The impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Management Sci. 64(11):4967–4987.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guzman J, Joohyun Oh J, Sen A (2023) Climate change framing and innovator attention: Evidence from an email field experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120(3):e2213627120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui X, Saeedi M, Spagnolo G, Tadelis S (2018) Certification, reputation and entry: An empirical analysis. NBER Working Paper No. 24916, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Iyengar R (2009) Does the certainty of arrest reduce domestic violence? Evidence from mandatory and recommended arrest laws. J. Public Econom. 93(1–2):85–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jue-Rajasingh D, Koo WW (2025) From margins to mainstream: The narrative dilemma in scaling social ventures. Strategic Management J. 46(11):2690–2719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kapoor A, Tucker CE (2017) How do platform participants respond to an unfair rating? An analysis of a ride-sharing platform using a quasi-experiment. Preprint, submitted November 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3061385.Google Scholar
  • Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenney M, Bearson D, Zysman J (2021) The platform economy matures: Measuring pervasiveness and exploring power. Socioeconom. Rev. 19(4):1451–1483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein TJ, Lambertz C, Stahl KO (2016) Market transparency, adverse selection, and moral hazard. J. Political Econom. 124(6):1677–1713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2010) Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. Eur. Management Rev. 7(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koo WW (2024) Hybrid governance of platform entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 53(2):104916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koo WW, Eesley CE (2021) Platform governance and the rural–urban divide: Sellers’ responses to design change. Strategic Management J. 42(5):941–967.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koo WWY, Eesley CE (2025) Take me home, country roads: Return migration and platform-enabled entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 36(3):1202–1220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lammers J, Galinsky AD, Gordijn EH, Otten S (2012) Power increases social distance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 3(3):282–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazzarini SG (2020) The nature of the social firm: Alternative organizational forms for social value creation and appropriation. Acad. Management Rev. 45(3):620–645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee JN, Morduch J, Ravindran S, Shonchoy A, Zaman H (2021) Poverty and migration in the digital age: Experimental evidence on mobile banking in Bangladesh. Amer. Econom. J. 13(1):38–71.Google Scholar
  • Loh J, Kretschmer T (2023) Online communities on competing platforms: Evidence from game wikis. Strategic Management J. 44(2):441–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu SF, Rui H (2018) Can we trust online physician ratings? Evidence from cardiac surgeons in florida. Management Sci. 64(6):2557–2573.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luca M (2016) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of yelp.com. Working Paper No. 12-016, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Luo J, Kaul A (2019) Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues. Strategic Management J. 40(4):476–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massey DS (1986) The settlement process among Mexican migrants to the United States. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(5):670–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ministry of Manpower (2023) Foreign workforce numbers. (May 1), https://www.mom.gov.sg/documents-and-publications/foreign-workforce-numbers.Google Scholar
  • Munoz I, Kim P, O’Neil C, Dunn M, Sawyer S (2024) Platformization of inequality: Gender and race in digital labor platforms. Proc. ACM Human Comput. Interactions 8(CSCW1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Näre L (2011) The moral economy of domestic and care labour: Migrant workers in Naples, Italy. Sociology 45(3):396–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ody-Brasier A, Sharkey A (2019) Under pressure: Reputation, ratings, and inaccurate self-reporting in the nursing home industry. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1517–1544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Panico C, Cennamo C (2022) User preferences and strategic interactions in platform ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 43(3):507–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parreñas RS (2021) Discipline and empower: The state governance of migrant domestic workers. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(6):1043–1065.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paulus TM, Bichelmeyer B, Malopinsky L, Pereira M, Rastogi P (2005) Power distance and group dynamics of an international project team: A case study. Teaching Higher Ed. 10(1):43–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahman HA (2021) The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):945–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahman HA, Karunakaran A, Cameron LD (2024) Taming platform power: Taking accountability into account in the management of platforms. Acad. Management Ann. 18(1):251–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway CL (2014) Why status matters for inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rietveld J, Schilling MA (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivera LA, Tilcsik A (2019) Scaling down inequality: Rating scales, gender bias, and the architecture of evaluation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 84(2):248–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspective 23(3):125–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaerer M, Du Plessis C, Yap AJ, Thau S (2018) Low power individuals in social power research: A quantitative review, theoretical framework, and empirical test. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 149(2018):73–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sharkey A, Kovács B, Hsu G (2023) Expert critics, rankings, and review aggregators: The changing nature of intermediation and the rise of markets with multiple intermediaries. Acad. Management Ann. 17(1):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singapore Department of Statistics (2024) Singstat. Accessed May 19, 2025, https://www.singstat.gov.sg/.Google Scholar
  • Singh J, Teng N, Netessine S (2019) Philanthropic campaigns and customer behavior: Field experiments on an online taxi booking platform. Management Sci. 65(2):913–932.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sokol DD (2019) Rethinking the efficiency of the common law. Notre Dame Law Rev. 95(2019):795–836.Google Scholar
  • Tadelis S (2016) Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Ann. Rev. Econom. 8(1):321–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1642–1672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • WIEGO (2022) Domestic workers. https://www.wiego.org/informal-economy/occupational-groups/domestic-workers.Google Scholar
  • Yeoh BS, Goh C, Wee K (2020) Social protection for migrant domestic workers in Singapore: International conventions, the law, and civil society action. Amer. Behav. Sci. 64(6):841–858.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.