Bottoms Up: Microentry Nonmarket Strategies to Change State Policy

References

• Acitelli T (2017) The Audacity of Hops: The History of America’s Craft Beer Revolution (Chicago Review Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Capron L, Lenox M, Yao DA (2018) Strategy and the institutional envelope. Strategy Sci. 3(2):ii–ix. Link, Google Scholar
• Bacq S, Hertel C, Lumpkin GT (2022) Communities at the nexus of entrepreneurship and societal impact: A cross-disciplinary literature review. J. Bus. Venturing 37(5):106231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organ. Sci. 1(3):220–247.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Tolbert PS (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. 18(1):93–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Rev. 37(2):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (2018) Disruptive entrepreneurship and dual purpose strategies: The case of Uber. Strategy Sci. 3(2):439–462.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Jones BD (2010) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2012) Competition and political organization: Together or alone in lobbying for trade policy? J. Internat. Econom. 87(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen H (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Bower J (2016) Vertical and financial ownership: Competition policy and the evolution of the UK pub market. Bus. History 58(5):647–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandtner C (2022) Green American city: Civic capacity and the distributed adoption of urban innovations. Amer. J. Sociol. 128(3):627–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandtner C, Höllerer MA, Meyer RE, Kornberger M (2017) Enacting governance through strategy. Urban Stud. 54(5):1075–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewers Association (2021) The new brewer. Accessed November 1, 2021, http://mydigitalpublication.com/publication/frame.php?i=707563&p=&pn=&ver=html5.Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B, Dubé JP, Joo J (2022) Millennials and the takeoff of craft brands: Preference formation in the U.S. beer industry. Marketing Sci. 41(4):710–732.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown C (2026) The movement to stop data centers. The New York Times Online (June 9), https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/09/climate/data-center-bans.html.Google Scholar
• Burgdorf J (2019) Trouble brewing? Impact of mandated vertical restraints on craft brewery entry and production. Preprint, submitted June 9, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3392392. Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carruthers BG, Lamoreaux NR (2016) Regulatory races: The effects of jurisdictional competition on regulatory standards. J. Econom. Literature 54(1):52–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coen D, Guidi M, Yordanova N, Héritier A (2021) The logic of regulatory venue shopping: A firm’s perspective. Public Policy Admin. 36(3):323–342.Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociol. 13(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Aversa A (2017) Brewing better law: Two proposals to encourage innovation in America’s craft beer industry. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 165(6):1465–1493.Google Scholar
• den Hond F, Rehbein KA, de Bakker FGA, van Lankveld HK (2014) Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). J. Management Stud. 51(5):790–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dioun C, Lashley K, Pamphile V (2026) Market-stigmatized groups and the effectiveness of stigma management strategies: Evidence from Washington’s marijuana market. Acad. Management J. 69(3):651–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougal C, Gao P, Mayew WJ, Parsons CA (2019) What’s in a (school) name? Racial discrimination in higher education bond markets. J. Financial Econom. 134(3):570–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elzinga KG (2011) The U.S. beer industry: Concentration, fragmentation, and a nexus with wine. J. Wine Econom. 6(2):217–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elzinga KG, Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ (2015) Craft beer in the United States: History, numbers, and geography. J. Wine Econom. 10(3):242–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Hirschman D (2017) Beyond nonmarket strategy: Market actions as corporate political activity. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):32–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao C, McDonald R (2022) Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(4):915–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (2009) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Transaction, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Grandy JB, Hiatt SR (2020) State agency discretion and entrepreneurship in regulated markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):1092–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandy JB, Hiatt SR (2024) The radical flank revisited: How regulatory discretion shapes the effectiveness of social activism on business outcomes. Organ. Sci. 35(3):835–852.Link, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Anteby M, Holm AL (2021) Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennessy-Fiske M (2023) Antagonisms flare as red states try to dictate how blue cities are run. The Washington Post Online (November 27), https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/11/27/red-states-blue-cities-preemption-control/.Google Scholar
• Heying CH (1997) Civic elites and corporate delocalization: An alternative explanation for declining civic engagement. Amer. Behav. Sci. 40(5):657–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hjelmar U, Jakobsen ML (2021) Free municipality experiments should (also) be understood using an innovation doctrine. Politica 53(3):218–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoff MM (2023) Why does Minnesota have municipal liquor stores? Star Tribune Online (March 24), https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-municipal-liquor-stores-munis-alcohol-laws/600261607/.Google Scholar
• Holyoke TT, Brown H, Henig JR (2012) Shopping in the political arena: Strategic state and local venue selection by advocates. State Local Government Rev. 44(1):9–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu D (2022) Straight out of Cape Cod: The origin of community choice aggregation and its spread to other states. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 86:102393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huising R, Silbey SS (2011) Governing the gap: Forging safe science through relational regulation. Regulation Governance 5(1):14–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huising R, Silbey SS (2021) Accountability infrastructures: Pragmatic compliance inside organizations. Regulation Governance 15(S1):S40–S62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Rao H (2004) Store wars: The enactment and repeal of anti‐chain‐store legislation in America. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):446–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones B, Baumgartner F (2012) From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Stud. J. 40(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karch A (2009) Venue shopping, policy feedback, and American preschool education. J. Policy History 21(1):38–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz J (1997) Ethnography’s warrants. Emerson R, ed. Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations (Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL), 361–382.Google Scholar
• Kim JH (2019) Is your playing field unleveled? U.S. defense contracts and foreign firm lobbying. Strategic Management J. 40(12):1911–1937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Siegel JI (2024) Paying for legitimacy: Autocracy, nonmarket strategy, and the liability of foreignness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(1):131–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leitzinger J, King BG, Briscoe F (2018) Introduction: Integrating research perspectives on business and society. Briscoe F, King BG, Leitzinger J, eds. Social Movements, Stakeholders and Non-Market Strategy, Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Luo XR, Wang D, Zhang J (2017) Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. Acad. Management J. 60(1):321–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2004) Astroturf: Interest group lobbying and corporate strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 13(4):561–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maciel AF, Fischer E (2020) Collaborative market driving: How peer firms can develop markets through collective action. J. Marketing 84(5):41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T, Lusk JL (2016) Brewing up entrepreneurship: Government intervention in beer. J. Entrepreneurship Public Policy 5(3):325–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markman GD, Waldron TL (2014) Small entrants and large encumbents: A framework of micro entry. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(2):179–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Battilana J (2009) Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathias BD, Fisher G (2022) That’s our beer! Creating the contentious category of collegiate beer. J. Management 48(3):693–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathias BD, Huyghe A, Frid CJ, Galloway TL (2018) An identity perspective on coopetition in the craft beer industry. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3086–3115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullough M, Berning J, Hanson JL (2019) Learning by brewing: Homebrewing legalization and the brewing industry. Contemporary Econom. Policy 37(1):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKay A (2012) Negative lobbying and policy outcomes. Amer. Politics Res. 40(1):116–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1987) Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Rev. Sociol. 13(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (2017) Wet and dry counties. Accessed August 27, 2025, https://www.nabca.org/sites/default/files/assets/publications/white_papers/WetDry%20Counties.pdf.Google Scholar
• Nilsson I, Reid N, Lehnert M (2018) Geographic patterns of craft breweries at the intraurban scale. Professional Geographer 70(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K (2022) Frenemies: Overcoming audiences’ ideological opposition to firm–activist collaborations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):469–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K, Dorobantu S (2021) Contracting beyond the market. Organ. Sci. 32(3):776–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Gurses K (2018) Playing cat and mouse: Contests over regulatory categorization of dietary supplements in the United States. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1789–1820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piore MJ (2011) Beyond markets: Sociology, street-level bureaucracy, and the management of the public sector. Regulation Governance 5(1):145–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poelmans E, Taylor JE (2022) Adjusting the lights: Prohibition was not flipped on and off like a switch. Essays Econom. Bus. Hist. 40:21–43.Google Scholar
• Polanyi K (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Pollman E, Barry JM (2016) Regulatory entrepreneurship. Southern California Law Rev. 90:383–448.Google Scholar
• Preston L, Post J (2012) Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
• Putnam RD (2020) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Rajan R (2019) The Third Pillar: How Markets and the State Leave the Community Behind (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Reid N, Gatrell JD (2017) Creativity, community, and growth: A social geography of urban craft beer. Region 4(1):31–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid N, Pezzi G, Stack M (2020) Space, place, and culture: An applied geography of craft beer. Papers Appl. Geography 6(3):175–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabel C (2012) Dewey, democracy, and democratic experimentalism. Contemporary Pragmatism 9(2):35–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Said Z (2019) Craft beer and the rising tide effect: An empirical study of sharing and collaboration among Seattle’s craft breweries. Lewis Clark Law Rev. 23(1):355–423.Google Scholar
• Saldaña J (2016) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd ed. (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Scherer A, Palazzo G (2008) Globalization and corporate social responsibility. Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel DS, eds. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 413–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M, Goldstein A, Kraatz MS (2023) Embracing market liberalism? Community structure, embeddedness, and mutual savings and loan conversions to stock corporations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 88(1):53–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidl T (2020) The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York. Regulation Governance 16(2):357–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer B (1995) Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. J. Management 21(3):495–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):361–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silbey SS (2022) The new pragmatist sociology. Gross NL, Reed IA, Winship C, eds. The New Pragmatist Sociology: Inquiry, Agency, and Democracy (Columbia University Press, New York), 256–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, David RJ (2003) Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Res. Policy 32(2):185–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small ML (2009) How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10(1):5–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snihur Y, Eisenhardt KM (2022) Looking forward, looking back: Strategic organization and the business model concept. Strategic Organ. 20(4):757–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spicer Z, Eidelman G, Zwick A (2019) Patterns of local policy disruption: Regulatory responses to Uber in ten North American cities. Rev. Policy Res. 36(2):146–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staples AJ, Chambers D, Malone T (2022) How many regulations does it take to get a beer? The geography of beer regulations. Regulation Governance 16(4):1197–1210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strumpf KS, Oberholzer-Gee F (2000) Local liquor control from 1934 to 1970. Heckelman JC, Moorhouse JC, Whaples RM, eds. Public Choice Interpretations of American Economic History (Springer US, Boston), 163–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sytch M, Kallapur A (2026) Legal and regulatory entrepreneurship: A review of organizational tactics and their consequences for organizations and the law. Acad. Management Ann. 20(1):204–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermans S, Tavory I (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol. Theory 30(3):167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremblay VJ, Iwasaki N, Tremblay CH (2005) The dynamics of industry concentration for U.S. micro and macro brewers. Rev. Indust. Organ. 26(3):307–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Treasury Department (2022) Competition in the markets for beer, wine, and spirits. Accessed February 10, 2022, https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Competition-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Watson B (2020) The Geography of Beer: Culture and Economics. Hoalst-Pullen N, Patterson MW, eds. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Watson B (2021) New owner demographic benchmarking data. brewers association. Accessed November 1, 2021, https://www.brewersassociation.org/insights/new-owner-demographic-benchmarking-data/.Google Scholar
• Wen Y, Walker E, Yue LQ (2024) By the people and for the people: The double-edged effects of platform user mobilization on public policies. Acad. Management Discoveries 11(4):521–544.Google Scholar
• Yin R (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Yoffie DB, Kwak M (2001) Judo Strategy: Turning Your Competitors’ Strength to Your Advantage (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yue LQ, Wang J (2024) Policy learning in nascent industries’ venue shifting: A study of the U.S. small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) industry. Bus. Soc. 63(5):1203–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar