Post-M&A Retention of Top Managers: The Role of Structural Knowledge

References

• Agarwal R, Anand J, Bercovitz J, Croson R (2012) Spillovers across organizational architectures: The role of prior resource allocation and communication in post-acquisition coordination outcomes. Strategic Management J. 33(6):710–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert D (2023) What do you mean by organizational structure? Acknowledging and harmonizing differences and commonalities in three prominent perspectives. J. Organ. Design 13(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N (1996) Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management J. 17(5):395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema HG, Schijven M (2008) Toward unlocking the full potential of acquisitions: The role of organizational restructuring. Acad. Management J. 51(4):696–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer F, Matzler K (2014) Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic complementarity, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration. Strategic Management J. 35(2):269–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh DD (2001) Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of organizational tenure. J. Management 27(5):603–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H, Guillén MF, Zhou N (2010) An institutional approach to cross-national distance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(9):1460–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilgili TV, Calderon CJ, Allen DG, Kedia BL (2017) Gone with the wind: A meta-analytic review of executive turnover, its antecedents, and post-acquisition performance. J. Management 43(6):1966–1997.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Bresman H, Håkanson L (2000) Managing the post‐acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. J. Management Stud. 37(3):395–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodner J, Capron L (2018) Post-merger integration. J. Organ. Design 7(3):1–20.Google Scholar
• Boyacıoğlu B, Özdemir MN, Karim S (2024) Acqui‐hires: Redeployment and retention of human capital post‐acquisition. Strategic Management J. 45(2):205–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchholtz AK, Ribbens BA, Houle IT (2003) The role of human capital in post-acquisition CEO departure. Acad. Management J. 46(4):506–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannella AA, Hambrick DC (1993) Effects of executive departures on the performance of acquired firms. Strategic Management J. 14(S1):137–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L (1999) The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 20(11):987–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Mitchell W (1998) Bilateral resource redeployment and capabilities improvement following horizontal acquisitions. Industry Corporate Change 7(3):453–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Dussauge P, Mitchell W (1998) Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management J. 19(7):631–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castanias RP, Helfat CE (2001) The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Management 27(6):661–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti A, Mitchell W (2016) The role of geographic distance in completing related acquisitions: Evidence from US chemical manufacturers. Strategic Management J. 37(4):673–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Coff RW (2002) Human capital, shared expertise, and the likelihood of impasse in corporate acquisitions. J. Management 28(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta DK (1991) Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post‐acquisition integration. Strategic Management J. 12(4):281–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta DK, Grant JH (1990) Relationships between type of acquisition, the autonomy given to the acquired firm, and acquisition success: An empirical analysis. J. Management 16(1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delaney KJ (2006) Google in talks to buy YouTube for $1.6 billion. Wall Street J. (October 7), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116014813857884917.Google Scholar
• Dinneen B, Johnson C, Liu A (2021) Post-close excellence in large-deal M&A. McKinsey & Company Report (June 29), https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/m-and-a/our-insights/post-close-excellence-in-large-deal-m-and-a#/.Google Scholar
• Dinneen B, Johnson C, Kaetzler B, Liu A (2022) In conversation: Four keys to merger integration success. McKinsey & Company (October 12), https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/in-conversation-four-keys-to-merger-integration-success#/.Google Scholar
• Ellis K (2004) Managing the acquisition process: Do differences actually exist across integration approaches. Pablo A, Javidan M, eds. Mergers and Acquisitions: Creating Integrative Knowledge, chap. 7 (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK), 113–132.Google Scholar
• Empson L (2001) Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms. Human Relations 54(7):839–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Fan J, Lang L (2000) The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. J. Bus. 73(4):629–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Kim JH, Milliken FJ (2014) When bad news is sugarcoated: Information distortion, organizational search and the behavioral theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 35(8):1186–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Haleblian J (2002) Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects. Organ. Sci. 13(1):36–47.Link, Google Scholar
• Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S (2016) Examining resource redeployment in multi-business firms. Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S, eds. Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 35 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1102–1119.Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1977) Organization Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME (2004) Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):751–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Heimeriks KH, Huy QN, Vaara E (2017) The process of postmerger integration: A review and agenda for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grind K (2023) Amazon changes at Zappos slowly dismantle Tony Hsieh’s legacy. Wall Street J. (February 11), https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-changes-at-zappos-slowly-dismantle-tony-hsiehs-legacy-5d393647.Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2):422–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (1993) Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Acad. Management J. 36(4):733–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harford J (2005) What drives merger waves? J. Financial Econom. 77(3):529–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD (1991) Synergies and post-acquisition performance: Differences versus similarities in resource allocations. J. Management 17(1):173–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haspeslagh PC, Jemison DB (1991) Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hill CW, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE (1992) Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organ. Sci. 3(4):501–521.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hill CW, Kim H (1993) The multidivisional structure: Organizational fossil or source of value? J. Management 19(2):269–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Klingebiel R, Wilson AJ (2016) Organizational structure and performance feedback: Centralization, aspirations, and termination decisions. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1065–1083.Link, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Rhee L, Wilson AJ (2023) Corporate hierarchy and organizational learning: Member turnover, code change, and innovation in the multiunit firm. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1332–1352.Link, Google Scholar
• Junge S, Luger J, Mammen J (2023) The role of organizational structure in senior managers’ selective information processing. J. Management Stud. 60(5):1178–1204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2006) Modularity in organizational structure: The reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business units. Strategic Management J. 27(9):799–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2012) Exploring structural embeddedness of product market activities and resources within business units. Strategic Organ. 10(4):333–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Capron L (2016) Reconfiguration: Adding, redeploying, recombining, and divesting resources and business units. Strategic Management J. 37(13):E54–E62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Mitchell W (2000) Path‐dependent and path‐breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the US medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1061–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Williams C (2012) Structural knowledge: How executive experience with structural composition affects intrafirm mobility and unit reconfiguration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):681–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A, Wu B (2016) A capabilities‐based perspective on target selection in acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1220–1239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JD (2023) Startup acquisitions as a hiring strategy: Turnover differences between acquired and regular hires. Strategy Sci. 9(2):118–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J-Y, Finkelstein S (2009) The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1989-2001. Strategic Management J. 30(6):617–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King DR, Dalton DR, Daily CM, Covin JG (2004) Meta‐analyses of post‐acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management J. 25(2):187–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King DR, Wang G, Samimi M, Cortes AF (2021) A meta‐analytic integration of acquisition performance prediction. J. Management Stud. 58(5):1198–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Krug JA, Hegarty WH (1997) Post-acquisition turnover among U.S. top management teams: An analysis of the effects of foreign vs. domestic acquisitions of US targets. Strategic Management J. 18(8):667–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krug JA, Wright P, Kroll MJ (2014) Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions: Solid research to date but still much to be learned. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(2):147–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larsson R, Finkelstein S (1999) Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organ. Sci. 10(1):1–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Hom PW, Eberly MB, Li J, Mitchell TR (2017) On the next decade of research in voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Wu B (2010) Opportunity costs and non‐scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. 31(7):780–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Neffke F (2024) Evaluating the principle of relatedness: Estimation, drivers and implications for policy. Res. Policy 53(3):104952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lien L, Klein P (2009) Using competition to measure relatedness. J. Management 35(4):1078–1107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchetti A (2020) Firms of a Feather Merge Together: The Coordination Benefits of Compatible Cultures (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Murphy C (2012) 5 critical tactics in the Wells Fargo-Wachovia integration. InformationWeek (June 1), https://www.informationweek.com/it-sectors/5-critical-tactics-in-the-wells-fargo-wachovia-integration.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Netter J, Stegemoller M, Wintoki MB (2011) Implications of data screens on merger and acquisition analysis: A large sample study of mergers and acquisitions from 1992 to 2009. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(7):2316–2357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng W, Stuart TE (2022) Acquired employees versus hired employees: Retained or turned over? Strategic Management J. 43(5):1025–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy KC, Flanagan DJ (1998) Determinants of layoff announcements following M&As: An empirical investigation. Strategic Management J. 19(10):989–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pablo AL (1994) Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. Acad. Management J. 37(4):803–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6):619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park HD, Howard MD, Gomulya DM (2018) The impact of knowledge worker mobility through an acquisition on breakthrough knowledge. J. Management Stud. 55(1):86–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Chaudhuri S (2009) Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural integration is (un)necessary. Organ. Sci. 20(2):313–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Roland G, Xu C (2006) Coordination and experimentation in M-form and U-form organizations. J. Political Econom. 114(2):366–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragozzino R, Reuer JJ (2011) Geographic distance and corporate acquisitions: Signals from IPO firms. Strategic Management J. 32(8):876–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Wulf J (2006) The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):759–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranft AL (2006) Knowledge preservation and transfer during post-acquisition integration. Adv. Mergers Acquisitions 5:51–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranft AL, Lord MD (2002) Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organ. Sci. 13(4):420–441.Link, Google Scholar
• Rapino M, Fields A (2013) Mega commuting in the U.S.: Time and distance in defining long commutes using the American Community Survey. Working paper, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Robins J, Wiersema MF (1995) A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 16(4):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins J, Wiersema MF (2003) The measurement of corporate portfolio strategy: Analysis of the content validity of related diversification indexes. Strategic Management J. 24(1):39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Steensma HK (2001) The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1149–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Tang L, Zhao M (2023) Light-touch integration: A study on cross-border acquisitions by emerging market multinationals. Strategic Management J. 44(11):2688–2723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tate G, Yang L (2024) The human factor in acquisitions: Cross-industry labor mobility and corporate diversification. Rev. Financial Stud. 37(1):45–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Testoni M, Sakakibara M, Chen K (2022) Face-to-face interactions and the returns to acquisitions: Evidence from smartphone geolocational data. Strategic Management J. 43(13):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vincenty T (1975) Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Survey Rev. 23(176):88–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1988) Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 9(2):173–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang HC, He J, Mahoney JT (2009) Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The roles of economic- and relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1265–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Antitrust Implications (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Winkler R, Ante SE (2014) Google sells handset business to Lenovo. Wall Street J. (January 30), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303743604579351163997405806.Google Scholar
• Winkler R, Barker T (2012) Motorola is now the Apple of Google’s eye. Wall Street J. (May 24), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304065704577422690640855990.Google Scholar
• Wulf J, Singh H (2011) How do acquirers retain successful target CEOs? The role of governance. Management Sci. 57(12):2101–2114.Link, Google Scholar
• Younge KA, Tong TW, Fleming L (2015) How anticipated employee mobility affects acquisition likelihood: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 36(5):686–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Castañer X, Souder D (2013) Synergy sources, target autonomy, and integration in acquisitions. J. Management 39(3):604–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Singh H (2004) Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strategic Management J. 25(13):1233–1256.Crossref, Google Scholar