Culture as a Toolkit for Robust Action: Tackling Grand Challenges with Cultural Entrepreneurship

References

• Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2005) How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? J. Management 31(5):776–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB (2003) Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environ. Sci. Tech. 37:94A–101A.Google Scholar
• Ansell C (2011) Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansell CK, Bartenberger M (2016) Varieties of experimentalism. Ecological Econom. 130:64–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augustine G, Soderstrom S, Milner D, Weber K (2019) Constructing a distant future: Imaginaries in geoengineering. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1930–1960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckert J (2016) Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz H, Grothe-Hammer M (2022) From a clash of social orders to a loss of decidability in meta-organizations tackling grand challenges: The case of Japan leaving the International Whaling Commission. Gümüsay AA, Marti E, Trittin-Ulbrich H, Wickert C, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 115–138.Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Gelabert L, Massa-Saluzzo F, Rousseau HE (2016) Understanding community dynamics in the study of grand challenges: How nonprofits, institutional actors, and the community fabric interact to influence income inequality. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1940–1964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomberg (2024) Gates-backed fusion power startup type one raises $53.5 million. Bloomberg (July 30), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-30/gates-backed-fusion-power-startup-type-one-raises-53-5-million.Google Scholar
• Blumer H (1971) Social problems as collective behavior. Soc. Problems 18(3):298–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canales R (2014) Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organ. Sci. 25(1):1–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Canales R, Bradbury M, Sheldon A, Cannon C (2024) Evidence in practice: How structural and programmatic scaffolds enable collaboration in international development. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(3):655–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canales R, Regele MD, Groberg M-G, Eftekhari N (2025) Falling off the unicorn: The maintenance of unrealistic startup labor narratives. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print June 6, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.0013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapple D, Pollock N, D’Adderio L (2022) From pitching to briefing: Extending entrepreneurial storytelling to new audiences. Organ. Stud. 43(5):773–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Ghosh A, Leca B (2023) Double weaving: A bottom-up process of connecting locations and scales to mitigate grand challenges. Acad. Management J. 66(3):797–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke JS, Cornelissen JP, Healey MP (2019) Actions speak louder than words: How figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgments. Acad. Management J. 62(2):335–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claus L, Greenwood R, Mgoo J (2021) Institutional translation gone wrong: The case of villages for Africa in rural Tanzania. Acad. Management J. 64(5):1497–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb JA, Wry T, Zhao EY (2016) Funding financial inclusion: Institutional logics and the contextual contingency of funding for microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 59(6):2103–2131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP (2005) Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Acad. Management Rev. 30:751–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Couture F, Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK (2023) Triggers, traps, and disconnect: How governance obstacles hinder progress on grand challenges. Acad. Management J. 66(6):1651–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crace L, Gehman J, Lounsbury M (2023) An unsettling crisis of collegial governance: Reality breakdowns as antecedents of institutional awareness. Sahlin K, Eriksson-Zetterquist U, eds. Revitalizing Collegiality: Restoring Faculty Authority in Universities, vol. 87 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 77–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Cavotta V (2019) A double-edged sword: Cultural entrepreneurship and the mobilisation of morally tainted cultural resources. Innovation 21(1):214–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diriker D, Porter AJ, Tuertscher P (2023) Orchestrating open innovation through punctuated openness: A process model of open organizing for tackling wicked multi-stakeholder problems. Organ. Stud. 44(1):135–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles RG, Nohria N, Berkley JD (1992) Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME, Sonenshein S (2016) Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1113–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzion D, Ferraro F (2010) The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1092–1107.Link, Google Scholar
• Etzion D, Gehman J, Ferraro F, Avidan M (2017) Unleashing sustainability transformations through robust action. J. Clean Production 140:167–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Azad B (2012) The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Materiality Organizing: Soc. Interaction Tech. World 2371:237–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez S (2020) Fighting malaria, sustainably. The Current (July 27), https://news.ucsb.edu/2020/019977/fighting-malaria-sustainably.Google Scholar
• Feront C, Bertels S (2021) The impact of frame ambiguity on field-level change. Organ. Stud. 42(7):1135–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Etzion D, Gehman J (2015) Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organ. Stud. 36(3):363–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feuls M, Hernes T, Schultz M (2025) Putting distant futures into action: How actors sustain a course of action toward distant-future goals through path enactment. Acad. Management J. 68(2):297–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Kotha S, Lahiri A (2016) Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Acad. Management Rev. 41(3):383–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Kuratko DF, Bloodgood JM, Hornsby JS (2017) Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. J. Bus. Ventures 32(1):52–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flannery M (2007) Kiva and the birth of person-to-person microfinance. Innovations: Tech., Governance, Globalization 2(1–2):31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gariel C, Bartel-Radic A (2024) Tidying up the concept of grand challenges: A bibliometric analysis. Management 27(S1):58–79.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Snihur Y, Thomas LDW, Phillips N (2025) The dark side of entrepreneurial framing: A process model of deception and legitimacy loss. Acad. Management Rev. 50(2):299–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Soublière J-F (2017) Cultural entrepreneurship: From making culture to cultural making. Innovation 19(1):61–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Wry T (2022) Cultural entrepreneurship: Theorizing the dark sides. Lockwood C, Soublière JF, eds. Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship, vol. 80 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Etzion D, Ferraro F (2022a) Robust action: Advancing a distinctive approach to grand challenges. Aslan Gümüsay A, Marti E, Trittin-Ulbrich H, Wickert C, eds. Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges, vol. 79 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 259–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Sharma G, Beveridge (2022b) Theorizing institutional entrepreneuring: Arborescent and rhizomatic assembling. Organ. Stud. 43(2):289–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Fewer TJ, Lazzarini S, McGahan AM, Puranam P (2024) Partnering for grand challenges: A review of organizational design considerations in public–private collaborations. J. Management 50(1):10–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giorgi S, Lockwood C, Glynn MA (2015) The many faces of culture: Making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):1–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser VL, Lounsbury M (2021) Designing legitimacy: Expanding the scope of cultural entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing Design 1(1):100007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Lounsbury M (2022) Two decades of the theory of cultural entrepreneurship: Recollection, elaboration, and reflection. Lockwood C, Soublière JF, eds. Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship, vol. 80 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 241–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray B, Purdy J (2018) Collaborating for Our Future: Multistakeholder Partnerships for Solving Complex Problems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray B, Purdy J, Ansari S (2022) Confronting power asymmetries in partnerships to address grand challenges. Organ. Theory 3(2):1–25. Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• GRI (2022) 25 years as the catalyst for a sustainable future 1997-2022. Retrieved September 17, 2024, https://www.globalreporting.org/media/b15hggfc/gri-25-years-history.pdf.Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Vogus TJ (2021) Inconceivable! Possibilistic thinking and the sociocognitive underpinnings of entrepreneurial responses to grand challenges. Organ. Theory 2(2):1–11.Google Scholar
• Grodal S, O’Mahony S (2017) How does a grand challenge become displaced? Explaining the duality of field mobilization. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1801–1827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Reinecke J (2022) Researching for desirable futures: From real utopias to imagining alternatives. J. Management Stud. 59(1):236–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Reinecke J (2024) Imagining desirable futures: A call for prospective theorizing with speculative rigour. Organ. Theory 5(1):1–23.Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Claus L, Amis J (2020a) Engaging with grand challenges: An institutional logics perspective. Organ. Theory 1(3):1–20.Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Smets M, Morris T (2020b) “God at work”: Engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Acad. Management J. 63(1):124–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Marti E, Trittin-Ulbrich H, Wickert C, eds. (2022) Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanisch M (2024) Prescriptive theorizing in management research: A new impetus for addressing grand challenges. J. Management Stud. 61(4):1692–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannigan TR, Pak Y, Jennings PD (2022) Mapping the multiverse: A cultural cartographic approach to realizing entrepreneurial possibilities. Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship, vol. 80 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haugh HM, Talwar A (2016) Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. J. Bus. Ethics 133(4):643–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedberg LM, Lounsbury M (2021) Not just small potatoes: Cultural entrepreneurship in the moralizing of markets. Organ. Sci. 32(2):433–454.Link, Google Scholar
• Hehenberger L, Mair J, Metz A (2019) The assembly of a field ideology: An idea-centric perspective on systemic power in impact investing. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1672–1704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinings CR, Greenwood R (2002) ASQ forum: Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):411–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J, Spengler J (2022) Surfing the grand challenges wave in management scholarship: How did we get here, where are we now, and what’s next? Gümüsay AA, Marti E, Trittin-Ulbrich H, Wickert C, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 279–295.Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J, Buckle SJ, Hoskins BJ, George G (2014) From the editors: Climate change and management. Acad. Management J. 57(3):615–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J, Nelson AJ, Earle AG, Haack JA, Young DM (2017) “If chemists don’t do it, who is going to?” Peer-driven occupational change and the emergence of green chemistry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):524–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Grodal S (2021) The double-edged sword of oppositional category positioning: A study of the U.S. E-cigarette category, 2007–2017. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(1):86–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasanoff S, Kim SH, eds. (2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaldewey D (2018) The grand challenges discourse: Transforming identity work in science and science policy. Minerva 56(2):161–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kincaid JR (2023) New Tools for Sustainable Synthesis Aimed Toward Greener Routes to Pharmaceuticals (University of California, Santa Barbara).Google Scholar
• Kistruck GM, Slade Shantz A (2022) Research on grand challenges: Adopting an abductive experimentation methodology. Organ. Stud. 43(9):1479–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight E, Grimes MG, Gehman J (2025) The limits of pivoting: A culturally informed model of resource commitments during repeated organizational transformation. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print December 3, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.0314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroeger A, Siebold N, Günzel-Jensen F, Saade FP, Heikkilä J-P (2022) Tackling grand challenges collaboratively: The role of value-driven sensegiving. Gümüsay AA, Marti E, Trittin-Ulbrich H, Wickert C, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 17–42.Google Scholar
• Lashley K, Pollock TG (2020) Waiting to inhale: Reducing stigma in the medical cannabis industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):434–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laszlo C (2021) Prospective theorizing: Researching for social impact. J. Management, Spirituality Religion 18(6):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M, Ramus T, Vaccaro A (2018) From protest to product: Strategic frame brokerage in a commercial social movement organization. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2130–2158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leifer EM (1983) Robust action: Generating joint outcomes in social relationships. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8322398.Google Scholar
• Leifer EM (1991) Actors as Observers: A Theory of Skill in Social Relationships (Garland, New York).Google Scholar
• Lockwood C, Soublière J-F (2022) Two advances in cultural entrepreneurship research. Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockwood C, Soublière J-F, Gehman J (2025) The cogs and wheels of cultural entrepreneurship: The becoming of new possibilities. Acad. Management Ann., ePub ahead of print August 25, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2023.0203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorenzo DD (2024) Novameat raises $19.2 million, launches its new plant-based beef meat. Forbes (Sepetmber 12), https://www.forbes.com/sites/danieladelorenzo/2024/09/12/novameat-raises-192-million-for-its-plant-based-beef-meat/.Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2019) Cultural Entrepreneurship: A New Agenda for the Study of Entrepreneurial Processes and Possibilities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Hannigan T (2022) Field of dreams: Exploration of entrepreneurial possibilities. https://eiexchange.com/content/field-of-dreams-exploration-of-entrepreneurial-possibilities.Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Gehman J, Glynn MA (2019a) Beyond homo entrepreneurus: Judgment and the theory of cultural entrepreneurship. J. Management Stud. 56(6):1214–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Wry T, Jennings PD (2010) The politics of neglect: Path selection and development in nanotechnology innovation. Spanning Boundaries and Disciplines: University Technology Commercialization in the Idea Age, vol. 21 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 27–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Cornelissen J, Granqvist N, Grodal S (2019b) Culture, innovation and entrepreneurship. Innovation 21(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lutsey N, Sperling D (2008) America’s bottom-up climate change mitigation policy. Energy Policy 36(2):673–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mair J, Wolf M, Seelos C (2016) Scaffolding: A process of transforming patterns of inequality in small-scale societies. Acad. Management J. 59(6):2021–2044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margiono A, Kariza A, Heriyati P (2019) Venture legitimacy and storytelling in social enterprises. Small Enterprise Res. 26(1):55–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMullen JS, Shepherd DA (2006) Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):132–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mische A (2014) Measuring futures in action: Projective grammars in the Rio + 20 debates. Theory Soc. 43(3):437–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munk N (2013) The Idealist: Jeffrey Sachs and the Quest to End Poverty (McClelland & Stewart, Toronto).Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):479–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuberger I, Kroezen J, Tracey P (2023) Balancing “protective disguise” with “harmonious advocacy”: Social venture legitimation in authoritarian contexts. Acad. Management J. 66(1):67–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuberger I, Mattioli F, Richards H, Nyilasy G, Tracey P (2024) Intermediated legitimation: How founders build new venture legitimacy among make-or-break audiences. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print December 3, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.1258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D, Ventresca MJ, Fisher G (2020) An assembly perspective of entrepreneurial projects: Social networks in action. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 14(2):149–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ometto MP, Lounsbury M, Gehman J (2023) Beyond the hype: Cultural entrepreneurship in nanotechnology. Organization Theory Meets Strategy (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 11–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6):1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer DA, Jennings PD, Zhou X (1993) Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1):100–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(3):399–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plowman DA, Baker LT, Beck TE, Kulkarni M, Solansky ST, Travis DV (2007) Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. AMJ 50(3):515–543. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter AJ, Tuertscher P, Huysman M (2020) Saving our oceans: Scaling the impact of robust action through crowdsourcing. J. Management Stud. 57(2):246–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raines GW, Polhill PS, Hiatt SR, Coles RS (2024) Cultural norms and the gendered impact of entrepreneurship policy in Mexico. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(4):1006–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Golden-Biddle K, Germann K (2006) Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Acad. Management J. 49(5):977–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuters (2021) Redefine Meat raises $29 million to finance rollout of 3D-printed meat substitute. Reuters (February 16), https://www.reuters.com/article/business/redefine-meat-raises-29-million-to-finance-rollout-of-3d-printed-meat-substitut-idUSKBN2AG0DP/.Google Scholar
• Rhee EY, Lo JY, Durand R (2025) Meating expectations: Category legitimation and transmutation. Organ. Sci. 36(5):1980–2007. Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2022) Futurescapes: Imagination and temporal reorganization in the design of strategic narratives. Strategic Organ. 20(1):200–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruebottom T (2013) The microstructures of rhetorical strategy in social entrepreneurship: Building legitimacy through heroes and villains. J. Bus. Ventures 28(1):98–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabel CF, Zeitlin J (2008) Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur. Law J. 14(3):271–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savaget P, Roulet T, Ventresca M (2024) Experimentation in wicked situations: How activists construct pragmatic action frames. Organ. Stud. 45(10):1493–1521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer KB, Clair JA (2022) Hope cultures in organizations: Tackling the grand challenge of commercial sex exploitation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):289–338. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Sheffield J (1986) Panel discussion on prospects for fusion power. Fusion Power Associates Symposium on Fusion Energy Development: An International Effort, 24–25 Apr. 1986, Washington, DC. OSTI, OSTI Identifier 5705749, https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5705749.Google Scholar
• Singhania V (2023) Tandem chemo- and bio-catalysis enabled by micellar technology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB (1992) Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Res. Organ. Behav. 14:231–266.Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2015) Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ. Sci. 26(2):531–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Snihur Y, Thomas LD, Garud R, Phillips N (2022) Entrepreneurial framing: A literature review and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 46(3):578–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soublière J, Lockwood C (2022) Achieving cultural resonance: Four strategies toward rallying support for entrepreneurial endeavors. Strategic Management J. 43(8):1499–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soublière J-F, Lockwood C (2024) Cultural entrepreneurship: Four domains of inquiry. https://oxfordre.com/business/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-478.Google Scholar
• Stern RN, Barley SR (1996) Organizations and social systems: Organization theory’s neglected mandate. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):146–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stjerne IS, Wenzel M, Svejenova S (2022) Commitment to Grand challenges in fluid forms of organizing: The role of narratives’ temporality. Gümüsay AA, Marti E, Trittin-Ulbrich H, Wickert C, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 139–160.Google Scholar
• Strang D, Meyer JW (1993) Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc. 22(4):487–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Zhao EY, Lounsbury M (2022) Categories and narratives as sources of distinctiveness: Cultural entrepreneurship within and across categories. Strategic Management J. 43(10):2101–2134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talebian M, Fattoum-Guedri A, Molz R (2025) Navigating grand challenges: How environmental dynamism shapes robust action and business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J., ePub ahead of print August 14, https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.70001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, Zucker LG (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Admini. Sci. Quart. 28(1):22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubiana M (2020) Once in orange always in orange? Identity paralysis and the enduring influence of institutional logics on identity. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1739–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend DM, Hunt RA, Rady J (2024) Chance, probability, and uncertainty at the edge of human reasoning: What is Knightian uncertainty? Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 18(3):451–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organ. Sci. 22(1):60–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Überbacher F (2014) Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. J. Management Stud. 51(4):667–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Wijk J, van Wijk J, Drost S, Stam W (2020) Challenges in building robust interventions in contexts of poverty: Insights from an NGO-driven multi-stakeholder network in Ethiopia. Organ. Stud. 41(10):1391–1415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vedula S, Doblinger C, Pacheco D, York JG, Bacq S, Russo MV, Dean TJ (2022) Entrepreneurship for the public good: A review, critique, and path forward for social and environmental entrepreneurship research. ANNALS 16(1):391–425. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataraman H, Vermeulen P, Raaijmakers A, Mair J (2016) Market meets community: Institutional logics as strategic resources for development work. Organ. Stud. 37(5):709–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1984) Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. Amer. Psych. 39(1):40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenzel M, Krämer H, Koch J, Reckwitz A (2020) Future and organization studies: On the rediscovery of a problematic temporal category in organizations. Organ. Stud. 41(10):1441–1455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Zhao EY (2018) Taking trade-offs seriously: Examining the contextually contingent relationship between social outreach intensity and financial sustainability in global microfinance. Organ. Sci. 29(3):507–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings PD (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yunus M (2007) Banker To The Poor: Micro-Lending and the Battle Against World Poverty (PublicAffairs, New York).Google Scholar
• Zhao EY (2022) Optimal Distinctiveness: A New Agenda for the Study of Competitive Positioning of Organizations and Markets (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Glynn MA (2022) Optimal distinctiveness: On being the same and different. Organ. Theory. 3(1):1–15.Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Wry T (2016) Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1994–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Lounsbury M (2013) Overcoming the illegitimacy discount: Cultural entrepreneurship in the US feature film industry. Organ. Stud. 34(12):1747–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul TW (2019) “Matter battles”: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities. Acad. Management J. 62(3):739–764.Crossref, Google Scholar