Roadmap or Compass? The Value of Prior Collaborative Experience in an Unfamiliar Task Environment

References

• Abatzoglou JT, Williams AP (2016) Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(42):11770–11775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbott A (1995) Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Rev. Sociol. 21(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agha L, Ericson KM, Geissler KH, Rebitzer JB (2021) Team relationships and performance: Evidence from healthcare referral networks. Management Sci. 68(5):3735–3754.Link, Google Scholar
• Aisenbrey S, Fasang A (2017) The interplay of work and family trajectories over the life course: Germany and the United States in comparison. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(5):1448–1484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akşin Z, Deo S, Jónasson JO, Ramdas K (2021) Learning from many: Partner exposure and team familiarity in fluid teams. Management Sci. 67(2):854–874.Link, Google Scholar
• Bailey LL, Thompson RC (2000) The effects of performance feedback on air traffic control team coordination: A simulation study. Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Balachandran S, Eklund J (2024) The impact of partner organizational structure on innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(1):80–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beane M (2019) Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):87–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Benishek LE, Lazzara EH (2019) Teams in a new era: Some considerations and implications. Frontiers Psych. 10:1–15.Google Scholar
• Bradley KJ, Aguinis H (2023) Team performance: Nature and antecedents of nonnormal distributions. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1266–1286.Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnen MJ, Ford JR, Bryman AE, Keil ET, Beardsworth AD, Wray K (1986) Labour recruitment strategies and selection practices on construction sites. Construction Management Econom. 4(1):37–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) The social life of information. Harvard Ed. Rev. 71(1):151–152.Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Mariani MM, Mengoli S (2013) Tackling the “Galácticos” effect: Team familiarity and the performance of star-studded projects. Indust. Corporate Change 22(6):1629–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching K, Forti E, Rawley E (2021) Extemporaneous coordination in specialist teams: The familiarity complementarity. Organ. Sci. 32(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching K, Forti E, Rawley E (2024) Competitive familiarity: Learning to coordinate by competing. Organ. Sci. 35(4):1409–1426.Link, Google Scholar
• Clement J (2023) Missing the forest for the trees: Modular search and systemic inertia as a response to environmental change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):186–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clement J, Puranam P (2018) Searching for structure: Formal organization design as a guide to network evolution. Management Sci. 64(8):3879–3895.Link, Google Scholar
• Clement J, Shipilov A, Galunic C (2018) Brokerage as a public good: The externalities of network hubs for different formal roles in creative organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):251–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management 23(3):239–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer J, Garicano L, Prat A (2007) Language and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 122(1):373–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Jong A, De Ruyter K, Wetzels M (2005) Antecedents and consequences of group potency: A study of self-managing service teams. Management Sci. 51(11):1610–1625.Link, Google Scholar
• Duvall PM, Matyas S, Glover A (2007) Continuous Integration: Improving Software Quality and Reducing Risk (Pearson Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Nembhard IM (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. J. Product Innovation Management 26(2):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards PN, Mayernik MS, Batcheller AL, Bowker GC, Borgman CL (2011) Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration. Soc. Stud. Sci. 41(5):667–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. 18(4):613–630.Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FAA (2023) FAA faces controller staffing challenges as air traffic operations return to pre-pandemic levels at critical facilities. Report AV2023035, Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Farh CI, Chen G (2018) Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model. J. Appl. Psych. 103(1):97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M (2016) Routines as process: Past, present, and future. Howard-Grenville J, Rerup C, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 23–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford J, Jepson M, Bryman A, Keil T, Bresnen M, Beardsworth A (1983) Management of recruitment in the construction industry. Internat. J. Project Management 1(2):76–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frake J, Harmon D (2023) Intergenerational transmission of organizational misconduct: Evidence from the Chicago Police Department. Management Sci. 70(6):3856–3878.Link, Google Scholar
• Gabadinho A, Ritschard G, Müller NS, Studer M (2011) Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. J. Statist. Software 40(4):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganiyat IO, Soriyan HA, Ishaya GP (2013) Resolving semantic heterogeneity in healthcare: An ontology matching approach. J. Comput. Sci. Engrg. 17(2):28–34.Google Scholar
• Gardner HK, Gino F, Staats BR (2012) Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Acad. Management J. 55(4):998–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KT, Pentland BT (2019) From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1901–1929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood J (2014) Building a shared picture for tower and approach. National Air Traffic Services (NATS) (October 20), https://web.archive.org/web/20240804075648/https://nats.aero/blog/2014/10/building-shared-picture-tower-approach/.Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1990) Groups That Work (and Those That Don’t): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Wageman R (1995) Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):309–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Koning R (2019) Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1394–1416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hergueux J, Henry E, Benkler Y, Algan Y (2023) Social exchange and the reciprocity roller coaster: Evidence from the life and death of virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2296–2314.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Staats BR (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):310–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.Link, Google Scholar
• Jung H, Vissa B, Pich M (2017) How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Acad. Management J. 60(1):264–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2362–2385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanki BG, Foushee HC (1989) Communication as group process mediator of aircrew performance. Aviation Space Environ. Medicine 60(5):402–410.Google Scholar
• Kelly R, Chipman ML, Higuera PE, Stefanova I, Brubaker LB, Hu FS (2013) Recent burning of boreal forests exceeds fire regime limits of the past 10,000 years. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(32):13055–13060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy J (2023) The unique role of the Tower air traffic controllers. National Air Traffic Services (NATS) blog (July 6), https://nats.aero/blog/2023/07/the-unique-role-of-the-tower-air-traffic-controllers/.Google Scholar
• Kilduff M (1992) Performance and interaction routines in multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 23(1):133–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Song H, Valentine MA (2023) Learning in temporary teams: The varying effects of partner exposure by team member role. Organ. Sci. 34(1):433–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim I, Pentland BT, Frank KA, Wolf JR (2025) Path coherence and disruption in routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 36(2):862–880.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Ziegert JC, Knight AP, Xiao Y (2006) Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):590–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobziar LN, Rocca ME, Dicus CA, Hoffman C, Sugihara N, Thode AE, Varner JM, Morgan P (2009) Challenges to educating the next generation of wildland fire professionals in the United States. J. Forestry 107(7):339–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Puranam P (2022) Separated by a common language: How the nature of code differences shapes communication success and code convergence. Management Sci. 68(7):5287–5310.Link, Google Scholar
• Kremser W, Blagoev B (2021) The dynamics of prioritizing: How actors temporally pattern complex role–routine ecologies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(2):339–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Bachrach DG, Lewis K (2014) Social network ties, transactive memory, and performance in groups. Organ. Sci. 25(3):951–967.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis WE, Veerapillai G (2004) Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement (Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Wibbens PD (2023) Broken effects? How to reduce false positives in panel regressions. Strategy Sci. 8(1):103–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindner T, Puck J, Verbeke A (2020) Misconceptions about multicollinearity in international business research: Identification, consequences, and remedies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 51(3):283–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Littlepage G, Robison W, Reddington K (1997) Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 69(2):133–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lix K, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Valentine MA (2022) Aligning differences: Discursive diversity and team performance. Management Sci. 68(11):8430–8448.Link, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Sengupta K, Ahmad MG (2013) The microevolution of routines: How problem solving and social preferences interact. Organ. Sci. 24(1):99–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Oliveira N (2018) A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):440–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacIndoe H, Abbott A (2004) Sequence analysis and optimal matching techniques for social science data. Hardy M, Bryman A, eds. Handbook of Data Analysis (Sage Publications, Ltd., London), 387–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D, Murnighan JK (2002) The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):534–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York).Google Scholar
• Mathur AP (2013) Foundations of Software Testing, 2nd ed. (Pearson Education India, Noida, India).Google Scholar
• Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(2):262–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Soda G, Tortoriello M (2014) More formally: Rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):299–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S, Stephenson M, Perkowski P (2019) Culture of trust and division of labor in nonhierarchical teams. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1171–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merwin C, Sugiyama M, Mubayi P, Hari T (2018) eSports: From Wild West to mainstream. Report, Goldman Sachs, New York.Google Scholar
• Miner AS (1987) Idiosyncratic jobs in formalized organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(3):327–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL (1999) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Thompson LL, Levine JM, Messick DM, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Psychology Press, New York), 3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Northwood C (2018) The Full Stack Developer: Your Essential Guide to the Everyday Skills Expected of a Modern Full Stack Web Developer (Apress, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orton JD, Weick KE (1990) Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Grosser TJ, Roebuck AA, Mathieu JE (2020) Understanding work teams from a network perspective: A review and future research directions. J. Management 46(6):1002–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patterson PD, Weaver MD, Landsittel DP, Krackhardt D, Hostler D, Vena JE, Hughes AM, Salas E, Yealy DM (2016) Teammate familiarity and risk of injury in emergency medical services. Emergency Medicine J. 33(4):280–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2018) The Microstructure of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Håkonsson DD (2015) Valve’s way. J. Organ. Design. 4(2):2–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Puranam P, Warglien M (2016) Object salience in the division of labor: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 62(7):2110–2128.Link, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R (2020) The role of interdependence in the micro-foundations of organization design: Task, goal, and knowledge interdependence. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):828–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Ring O (2018) Here’s what IceFrog’s bi-weekly patches mean for DOTA 2. Redbull.com eSports (February 15), https://www.redbull.com/us-en/dota2-icefrog-patch-change-analysis.Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2006) Organizing to strategize in the face of interactions: Preventing premature lock-in. Long Range Planning 39(6):591–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanderson E, Windmeijer F (2016) A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables. J. Econom. 190(2):212–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scarlett L (2005) Fire preparedness. Statement of Lynn Scarlett, Assistant Secretary, Policy, Management and Budget, United States Department of the Interior, before Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests, April 26, 2005. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. https://www.doi.gov/ocl/fire-preparedness.Google Scholar
• Selten R, Warglien M (2007) The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(18):7361–7366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senge PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Doubleday Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Sergeeva AV, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1248–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch KA, Kraiger K, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (2009) Do familiar teammates request and accept more backup? Transactive memory in air traffic control. Human Factors 51(2):181–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) A network perspective on organizational architecture: Performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization. Strategic Management J. 33(6):751–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Waguespack DM (2006) Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):560–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Marle F (2013) Assembling creative teams in new product development using creative team familiarity. J. Mech. Design 135(8):081009–081022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stene EO (1940) An approach to a science of administration. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 34(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart N, Brown GD, Chater N (2002) Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 28(1):3–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart GL, Courtright SH, Barrick MR (2012) Peer-based control in self-managing teams: Linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):435–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Technical Working Paper 284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Stout R, Salas E (1993) The role of planning in coordinated team decision making: Implications for training. Proc. Human Factors Ergonomics Soc. Annual Meeting 37(18):1238–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundaresan S, Guler I (2025) Algorithmic recommendation tools and experiential learning in clinical care. Organ. Sci. 36(5):1786–1802.Link, Google Scholar
• Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D (1990) Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. Amer. Psych. 45(2):120–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svensson Å, Ohlander U, Lundberg J (2020) Design implications for teamwork in ATC. Cognition Tech. Work 22(2):409–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sytch M, Wohlgezogen F, Zajac EJ (2018) Collaborative by design? How matrix organizations see/do alliances. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1130–1148.Link, Google Scholar
• Tandon V, Ertug G, Carnabuci G (2020) How do prior ties affect learning by hiring? J. Management 46(2):287–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tangel A (2024) To ease Newark flight delays, the FAA turned to Philly. Here’s why. Wall Street Journal (August 30), https://www.wsj.com/business/airlines/why-the-faa-turned-to-philly-to-ease-new-york-flight-delays-ebe14a92Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Ogden TY, Neale MA (2003) Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. 49(4):464–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tonellato M, Tasselli S, Conaldi G, Lerner J, Lomi A (2024) A microstructural approach to self-organizing: The emergence of attention networks. Organ. Sci. 35(2):496–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Rindova VP (2018) Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1253–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023) Occupational employment and wages, May 2023. 33-2011 Firefighters. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Edmondson AC (2015) Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Vestal A, Danneels E (2024) Unlocking the inventive potential of knowledge distance in teams: How intrateam network configurations provide a key. Organ. Sci. 35(1):195–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber RA, Camerer CF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49(4):400–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1982) Administering education in loosely coupled schools. The Phi Delta Kappan 63(10):673–676.Google Scholar
• Williams L, Kessler RR (2003) Pair Programming Illuminated (Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston).Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Anand J (2009) A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: Evidence from the Chinese automotive industry. Strategic Management J. 30(9):959–983.Crossref, Google Scholar