Gendered Navigation of Advice and Suboptimal Behavior in Matching Algorithms: Evidence from the Residency Match

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Pathak PA, Roth AE (2009) Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in matching with indifferences: Redesigning the NYC high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1954–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abele AE, Uchronski M, Suitner C, Wojciszke B (2008) Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(7):1202–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender Soc. 4(2):139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja MK, Galvin JE (2003) Socialization in virtual groups. J. Management 29(2):161–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akinola M, Martin AE, Phillips KW (2018) To delegate or not to delegate: Gender differences in affective associations and behavioral responses to delegation. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1467–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angelici M, Profeta P (2024) Smart working: Work flexibility without constraints. Management Sci. 70(3):1680–1705.Link, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Bechky BA, Fayard AL (2023) “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a system view to explore the future of work. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1672–1694.Link, Google Scholar
• Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):496–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakan D (1966) The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion (Rand McNally, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Bamberger P (2009) Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research. Martocchio JJ, Liao H, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 49–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bangerter A, Roulin N, König CJ (2012) Personnel selection as a signaling game. J. Appl. Psych. 97(4):719–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry CM, Lievens F, Zhang C, Sackett PR (2024) Insights from an updated personnel selection meta-analytic matrix: Revisiting general mental ability tests’ role in the validity–diversity trade-off. J. Appl. Psych. 109(10):1611–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya B, Berdahl JL (2023) Do you see me? An inductive examination of differences between women of color’s experiences of and responses to invisibility at work. J. Appl. Psych. 108(7):1073–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, McGinn KL (2005) Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):951–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res. Psych. 3(2):77–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresman H (2013) Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Acad. Management J. 56(1):35–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bullock JG, Green DP, Ha SE (2010) Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(4):550–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron LD (2024) The making of the “good bad” job: How algorithmic management manufactures consent through constant and confined choices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(2):458–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron LD, Rahman H (2022) Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organ. Sci. 33(1):38–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Campero S, Kacperczyk A ( (2024) Network referrals and self-presentation in the high-tech labor market. Organ. Sci. 35(4):1342–1362.Link, Google Scholar
• Campion ED, Campion MA, Johnson J, Carretta TR, Romay S, Dirr B, Deregla A, Mouton A (2024) Using natural language processing to increase prediction and reduce subgroup differences in personnel selection decisions. J. Appl. Psych. 109(3):307–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carvajal D, Franco C, Isaksson S (2025) Will artificial intelligence get in the way of achieving gender equality? Preprint, submitted March 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4759218.Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2022) Gender, race, and network advantage in organizations. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2364–2403.Link, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Poskanzer EJ (2022) Through the front door: Why do organizations (still) prefer legacy applicants? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 87(5):782–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Rho HJ (2023) The gendering of job postings in the online recruitment process. Management Sci. 69(11):6912–6939.Link, Google Scholar
• Cerasoli CP, Alliger GM, Donsbach JS, Mathieu JE, Tannenbaum SI, Orvis KA (2018) Antecedents and outcomes of informal learning behaviors: A meta-analysis. J. Bus. Psych. 33(2):203–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chater N, Loewenstein G (2023) The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behav. Brain Sci. 46:e147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sönmez T (2006) School choice: An experimental study. J. Econom. Theory 127(1):202–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Markus HR (2020) Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psych. Rev. 127(6):1022–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowgill B, Davis J, Montagnes BP, Perkowski P (2021) Stable matching on the job? Theory and evidence on internal talent markets. Preprint, submitted April 5, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3793899.Google Scholar
• Cowgill B, Davis JMV, Montagnes BP, Perkowski P (2025) Stable matching on the job? Theory and evidence on internal talent markets. Management Sci. 71(3):2508–2526.Link, Google Scholar
• Cross SE, Madson L (1997) Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psych. Bull. 122(1):5–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curchod C, Patriotta G, Cohen L, Neysen N (2020) Working for an algorithm: Power asymmetries and agency in online work settings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):644–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher J (2016) The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philos. Tech. 29(3):245–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies M-P, Hakimov R, Kübler D (2026) Aversion to hiring algorithms: Transparency, gender profiling, and self-confidence. Management Sci. 72(1):285–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis JMV, Greenberg K, Jones D (2023) An experimental evaluation of deferred acceptance: Evidence from over 100 Army officer labor markets. NBER Working Paper No. 31612, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• De Corte W, Sackett PR, Lievens F (2024) Designing pareto-optimal selection systems for multiple minority subgroups and multiple criteria. J. Appl. Psych. 109(4):513–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeStefano T, Kellogg KC, Menietti M, Vendraminelli L (2022) Why providing humans with interpretable algorithms may, counterintuitively, lead to lower decision-making performance. Preprint, submitted October 12, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4246077.Google Scholar
• Ding T, Schotter A (2019) Learning and mechanism design: An experimental test of school matching mechanisms with intergenerational advice. Econom. J. 129(623):2779–2804.Google Scholar
• Dubins LE, Freedman DA (1981) Machiavelli and the Gale–Shapley algorithm. Amer. Math. Monthly 88(7):485–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.Link, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (2013) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Psychology Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Steffen VJ (1984) Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 46(4):735–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W (1999) The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. Amer. Psychologist 54(6):408–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W, Diekman AB (2000) Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. Eckes T, Trautner HM, eds. The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 123–174.Google Scholar
• Fabel O, Hopp C, Speil A (2020) Advice-seeking and advice-utilization for hiring decisions: An investigation of a partially outsourced recruitment process for rank-and-file managers. Managerial Decision Econom. 41(5):784–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fack G, Grenet J, He Y (2019) Beyond truth-telling: Preference estimation with centralized school choice and college admissions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(4):1486–1529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang RT, Saks AM (2021) Class advantage in the white-collar labor market: An investigation of social class background, job search strategies, and job search success. J. Appl. Psych. 106(11):1695–1713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Zhang Z, Shaw JD (2021) Gender and social network brokerage: A meta-analysis and field investigation. J. Appl. Psych. 106(11):1630–1654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Kaplan S (2018) Gender and organization science: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1229–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Fetherston M (2017) Information seeking and organizational socialization: A review and opportunities for anticipatory socialization research. Ann. Internat. Comm. Assoc. 41(3–4):258–277.Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Aguinis H (2017) Using theory elaboration to make theoretical advancements. Organ. Res. Methods 20(3):438–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerster A, Wirth R, Berghoefer FL, Kunde W, Pfister R (2019) Capacity limitations of dishonesty. J. Experiment. Psych. General 148(6):943–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford JK, Baldwin TT, Prasad J (2018) Transfer of training: The known and the unknown. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5:201–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel AS, Butts MM, Yuan Z, Rosen RL, Sliter MT (2018) Further understanding incivility in the workplace: The effects of gender, agency, and communion. J. Appl. Psych. 103(4):362–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel AS, Ladge JJ, Little LM, MacGowan RL, Stillwell EE (2023) Sensemaking through the storm: How postpartum depression shapes personal work–family narratives. J. Appl. Psych. 108(12):1903–1923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glikson E, Woolley AW (2020) Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):627–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Imas A (2017) Chapter 10—Lab in the field: Measuring preferences in the wild. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 439–464.Google Scholar
• Green DP, Ha SE, Bullock JG (2010) Enough already about “black box” experiments: Studying mediation is more difficult than most scholars suppose. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 628(1):200–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes M, von Krogh G, Feuerriegel S, Rink F, Gruber M (2023) From scarcity to abundance: Scholars and scholarship in an age of generative artificial intelligence. Acad. Management J. 66(6):1617–1624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen P, Hakimov R (2018) The effectiveness of top-down advice in strategy-proof mechanisms: A field experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 101:505–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen P, Hing A (2014) Lying through their teeth: Third party advice and truth telling in a strategy proof mechanism. Eur. Econom. Rev. 70:178–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen P, Kesten O, Kiefer A, Melatos M (2022) A field evaluation of a matching mechanism: University applicant behavior in Australia. PNAS Nexus 1(1):pgac010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hakimov R, Kübler D (2021) Experiments on centralized school choice and college admissions: A survey. Experiment. Econom. 24(2):434–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassidim A, Romm A, Shorrer RI (2021) The limits of incentives in economic matching procedures. Management Sci. 67(2):951–963.Link, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2022) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• He JC, Kang SK (2023) Moving from i-frame to s-frame focus in equity, diversity, and inclusion research, practice, and policy. Behav. Brain Sci. 46:e159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Caleo S, Manzi F (2024) Women at work: Pathways from gender stereotypes to gender bias and discrimination. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 11:165–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hideg I, Krstic A, Trau RNC, Zarina T (2018) The unintended consequences of maternity leaves: How agency interventions mitigate the negative effects of longer legislated maternity leaves. J. Appl. Psych. 103(10):1155–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Patterson M, Pfeffer J (2001) Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1232–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Res. 15(9):1277–1288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humlum A, Vestergaard E (2024) The adoption of ChatGPT. Working Paper No. 2024-50, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson TD, Joshi A (2016) Dark clouds or silver linings? A stigma threat perspective on the implications of an autism diagnosis for workplace well-being. J. Appl. Psych. 101(3):430–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson I, Lemmerich F, Sáez-Trumper D, West R, Strohmaier M, Zia L (2021) Global gender differences in Wikipedia readership. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 15:254–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph MM, Ahasic AM, Clark J, Templeton K (2021) State of women in medicine: History, challenges, and the benefits of a diverse workforce. Pediatrics 148(Suppl 2):e2021051440C.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katuščák P, Kittsteiner T (2025) Strategy-proofness made simpler. Management Sci. 71(9):7560–7578.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeves GD, Westphal JD (2021) From help to harm: Increases in status, perceived under-reciprocation, and the consequences for access to strategic help and social undermining among female, racial minority, and white male top managers. Organ. Sci. 32(4):1120–1148.Link, Google Scholar
• Keller J (2018) Posting and slotting: How hiring processes shape the quality of hire and compensation in internal labor markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):848–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2011) Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 22(2):482–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim KS, Sin SCJ, Tsai TI (2014) Individual differences in social media use for information seeking. J. Acad. Librarianship 40(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King DD, Fattoracci ESM, Hollingsworth DW, Stahr E, Nelson M (2023) When thriving requires effortful surviving: Delineating manifestations and resource expenditure outcomes of microaggressions for Black employees. J. Appl. Psych. 108(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenig AM, Eagly AH (2014) Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(3):371–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komissarouk S, Nadler A (2014) “I” seek autonomy, “we” rely on each other: Self-construal and regulatory focus as determinants of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help-seeking behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 40(6):726–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kormylo C, Adjerid I, Ball S, Dogan C (2026) Till tech do us part: Betrayal aversion and its role in algorithm use. Management Sci. 72(1):343–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraiger K, Ford JK (2021) The science of workplace instruction: Learning and development applied to work. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 8:45–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kugler KG, Reif JAM, Kaschner T, Brodbeck FC (2018) Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 144(2):198–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulkarni M, Mantere S, Vaara E, van den Broek E, Pachidi S, Glaser VL, Gehman J, et al. (2024) The future of research in an artificial intelligence-driven world. J. Management Inquiry 33(3):207–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuwabara K, Cao J, Cho S, Ingram P (2023) Lay theories of instrumental relations: Explaining individual differences in dispositional similarity-attraction. Acad. Management J. 66(2):667–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane JN, Lakhani KR, Fernandez RM (2024) Setting gendered expectations? Recruiter outreach bias in online tech training programs. Organ. Sci. 35(3):911–927.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration? Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do women avoid salary negotiations? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Sci. 61(9):2016–2024.Link, Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Koppman S (2018) Taking a pass: How proportional prejudice and decisions not to hire reproduce gender segregation. Amer. J. Sociol. 124(3):762–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levi M, Li K, Zhang F (2015) Are women more likely to seek advice than men? Evidence from the boardroom. J. Risk Financial Management 8(1):127–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine KJ, Aley M (2022) Introducing the sixth source of vocational anticipatory socialization: Using the internet to search for career information. J. Career Development 49(2):443–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim JH, Tai K, Bamberger PA, Morrison EW (2020) Soliciting resources from others: An integrative review. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):122–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chen FX, Chiang JTJ, Wang Z, Liu H (2022) Asking how to fish vs. asking for fish: Antecedents and outcomes of different types of help-seeking at work. Personnel Psych. 75(3):557–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma S, Kor YY, Seidl D (2020) CEO advice seeking: An integrative framework and future research agenda. J. Management 46(6):771–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma A, Rosette AS, Koval CZ (2022) Reconciling female agentic advantage and disadvantage with the CADDIS measure of agency. J. Appl. Psych. 107(12):2115–2148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madera JM, Hebl MR, Martin RC (2009) Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1591–1599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maloney MM, Shah PP, Zellmer-Bruhn M, Jones SL (2019) The lasting benefits of teams: Tie vitality after teams disband. Organ. Sci. 30(2):260–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin AE, Slepian ML (2018) Dehumanizing gender: The debiasing effects of gendering human-abstracted entities. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 44(12):1681–1696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AE, Slepian ML (2021) The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 16(6):1143–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy B (2023) Creating a match rank-order list? Avoid these 4 common missteps. Accessed December 19, 2023, https://www.ama-assn.org/medical-students/preparing-residency/creating-match-rank-order-list-avoid-these-4-common-missteps.Google Scholar
• Nadler A (2018) The human essence in helping relations: Belongingness, independence, and status. van Zomeren M, Dovidio JF, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Human Essence (Oxford University Library of Psychology, Oxford, UK), 123–134.Google Scholar
• Nadler A, Ellis S, Bar I (2003) To seek or not to seek: The relationship between help seeking and job performance evaluations as moderated by task-relevant expertise. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3:601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakarinen P, Huising R (2025) Relational expertise: What machines can’t know. J. Management Stud. 62(5):2053–2082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pathak PA, Sönmez T (2008) Leveling the playing field: Sincere and sophisticated players in the Boston mechanism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1636–1652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polin B, Doyle SP, Kim S, Lewicki RJ, Chawla N (2024) Sorry to ask but … how is apology effectiveness dependent on apology content and gender? J. Appl. Psych. 109(3):339–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad. Management J. 49(2):235–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Carranza E (2002) What women should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psych. Women Quart. 26(4):269–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raghavan M, Barocas S, Kleinberg J, Levy K (2020) Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. Proc. 2020 Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency FAT* ‘20 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 469–481.Google Scholar
• Rahman HA, Karunakaran A, Cameron LD (2024) Taming platform power: Taking accountability into account in the management of platforms. Acad. Management Ann. 18(1):251–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rees-Jones A (2018) Suboptimal behavior in strategy-proof mechanisms: Evidence from the residency match. Games Econom. Behav. 108:317–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rees-Jones A, Shorrer R (2023) Behavioral economics in education market design: A forward-looking review. J. Political Econom. Microeconomics 1(3):557–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rees-Jones A, Skowronek S (2018) An experimental investigation of preference misrepresentation in the residency match. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(45):11471–11476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhymer J (2023) Location-independent organizations: Designing collaboration across space and time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):1–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2020) Employer decision making. Annual Rev. Sociol. 46:215–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA, Tilcsik A (2016) Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1097–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Koval CZ, Ma A, Livingston R (2016) Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. Leadership Quart. 27(3):429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(4):748–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottman C, Gardner C, Liff J, Mondragon N, Zuloaga L (2023) New strategies for addressing the diversity–validity dilemma with big data. J. Appl. Psych. 108(9):1425–1444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Røvik KA (2016) Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory. Internat. J. Management Rev. 18(3):290–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Phelan JE (2008) Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:61–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Moss-Racusin CA, Phelan JE, Nauts S (2012) Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(1):165–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaumberg RL, Flynn FJ (2017) Self-reliance: A gender perspective on its relationship to communality and leadership evaluations. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1859–1881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sergeeva A, Andreeva T (2016) Knowledge sharing research: Bringing context back in. J. Management Inquiry 25(3):240–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sergeeva AV, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1248–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A (2018) Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media Soc. 20(8):2954–2971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sitzmann T, Brown KG, Casper WJ, Ely K, Zimmerman RD (2008) A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions. J. Appl. Psych. 93(2):280–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siy JO, Germano AL, Vianna L, Azpeitia J, Yan S, Montoya AK, Cheryan S (2023) Does the follow-your-passions ideology cause greater academic and occupational gender disparities than other cultural ideologies? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 125(3):548–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith T (2024) Match ranking advice: Trust your gut. Accessed March 16, 2024, https://www.ama-assn.org/medical-students/preparing-residency/match-ranking-advice-trust-your-gut.Google Scholar
• Smith S, Blank A (2023) Healthcare occupations: Characteristics of the employed. Accessed May 31, 2024, https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2023/healthcare-occupations-in-2022/home.htm.Google Scholar
• Steinberg L, Silverberg SB (1986) The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development 57(4):841–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tamres LK, Janicki D, Helgeson VS (2002) Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 6(1):2–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thakur A (2021) Matching in the civil service: A market design approach to public administration and development. ECONTribute Discussion Paper No. 087, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Trzebiatowski T, McCluney C, Hernandez M (2023) Managing the double bind: Women directors’ participation tactics in the gendered boardroom. Organ. Sci. 34(2):801–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Edmondson AC (2015) Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Vlasceanu M, Amodio DM (2022) Propagation of societal gender inequality by internet search algorithms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(29):e2204529119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waardenburg L, Huysman M, Sergeeva AV (2022) In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king: Knowledge brokerage in the age of learning algorithms. Organ. Sci. 33(1):59–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh MM, Krusmark MA, Jastrembski T, Hansen DA, Honn KA, Gunzelmann G (2023) Enhancing learning and retention through the distribution of practice repetitions across multiple sessions. Memory Cognition 51(2):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weller I, Hymer CB, Nyberg AJ, Ebert J (2019) How matching creates value: Cogs and wheels for human capital resources research. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):188–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White MS (1979) Measuring androgyny in adulthood. Psych. Women Quart. 3(3):293–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woehler ML, Cullen-Lester KL, Porter CM, Frear KA (2021) Whether, how, and why networks influence men’s and women’s career success: Review and research agenda. J. Management 47(1):207–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wojciszke B, Abele AE (2008) The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(7):1139–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood W, Eagly AH (2012) Chapter two—Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Olson JM, Zanna MP, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 46 (Academic Press, San Diego), 55–123.Google Scholar
• Yi-Feng Chen N, Crant JM, Wang N, Kou Y, Qin Y, Yu J, Sun R (2021) When there is a will there is a way: The role of proactive personality in combating COVID-19. J. Appl. Psych. 106(2):199–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu S, Shea C (2024) The company she seeks: How the prismatic effects of ties to high-status network contacts can reduce status for women in groups. Organ. Sci. 35(3):853–887.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Harrington KB, Sherf EN (2022) The errors of experts: When expertise hinders effective provision and seeking of advice and feedback. Current Opinion Psych. 43:91–95.Crossref, Google Scholar