Where Sentence Is Served: Entrepreneurship and Socioeconomic Mobility Among Ex-Offenders

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.19965

References

  • Aebi MF, Caneppele S, Harrendorf S, Hashimoto YZ, Jehle J-M, Khan TS, Kühn O, et al. (2021) European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics–2021 (Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agan A, Starr S (2018) Ban the box, criminal records, and racial discrimination: A field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):191–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Ganco M, Raffiee J (2022) Immigrant entrepreneurship: The effect of early career immigration constraints on new venture formation. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1372–1395.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmed AM, Lång E (2017) The employability of ex-offenders: A field experiment in the Swedish labor market. IZA J. Labor Policy 6(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amin J, van Burg E, Stam W (2025) In search of a soft landing: How premigration work attainments influence identity transformation processes of refugee entrepreneurs. Organ. Sci. 36(3):1177–1201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amis JM, Mair J, Munir KA (2020) The organizational reproduction of inequality. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):195–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amis JM, Munir KA, Lawrence TB, Hirsch P, McGahan A (2018) Inequality, institutions and organizations. Organ. Stud. 39(9):1131–1152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersen LH, Andersen SH (2012) Losing the stigma of incarceration: Does serving a sentence with electronic monitoring causally improve post-release labor market outcomes? Research Report No. 40, Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  • Andersen MM, Dilling-Hansen R, Vorre Hansen A (2022) Expanding the concept of social impact bonds. J. Soc. Entrepreneurship 13(3):390–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aranda AM, Helms WS, Patterson KDW, Roulet TJ, Hudson BA (2023) Standing on the shoulders of Goffman: Advancing a relational research agenda on stigma. Bus. Soc. 62(7):1339–1377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Jones BF, Kim JD, Miranda J (2022) Immigration and entrepreneurship in the United States. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 4(1):71–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bäckman O, Estrada F, Nilsson A (2018) Locked up and locked out? The impact of imprisonment on labour market attachment. Brit. J. Criminol. 58(5):1044–1065.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bacq S, Toubiana M, Ruebottom T, Ormiston J, Ajunwa I (2023) Entrepreneurship out of shame: Entrepreneurial pathways at the intersection of necessity, emancipation, and social change. Organ. Theory 4(1):26317877231153185.Google Scholar
  • Bapuji H, Ertug G, Shaw JD (2020) Organizations and societal economic inequality: A review and way forward. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):60–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay L, Symons T (2013) A Technical Guide to Developing Social Impact Bonds (Social Finance, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
  • Baskaran P (2019) Respect the hustle: Necessity entrepreneurship, returning citizens, and social enterprise strategies. Maryland Law Rev. 78(2):323–381.Google Scholar
  • Becker GS (2010) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Bennett P, Ouazad A (2020) Job displacement, unemployment, and crime: Evidence from Danish microdata and reforms. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 18(5):2182–2220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhuller M, Dahl GB, Løken KV, Mogstad M (2020) Incarceration, recidivism, and employment. J. Polit. Econom. 128(4):1269–1324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bianchi M (2012) Financial development, entrepreneurship, and job satisfaction. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(1):273–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borusyak K, Hull P, Jaravel X (2025) A practical guide to shift-share instruments. J. Econom. Perspect. 39(1):181–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Botelho TL, Gulati R, Sorenson O (2024) The sociology of entrepreneurship revisited. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 50(1):341–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brändle L, Rönnert A-L, Moergen KJN, Yanfei Zhao E (2025) Social class origin and entrepreneurship: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Bus. Venturing 40(4):106503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brattström A, Wennberg K (2022) The entrepreneurial story and its implications for research. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 46(6):1443–1468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clough DR, Pan Fang T, Vissa B, Wu A (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):240–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conti R, Kacperczyk O, Valentini G (2022) Institutional protection of minority employees and entrepreneurship: Evidence from the LGBT Employment Non-Discrimination Acts. Strategic Management J. 43(4):758–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cowden BJ, Bendickson JS, Mathias BD, Solomon SJ (2022) Straight OUTTA Detroit: Embracing stigma as part of the entrepreneurial narrative. J. Management Stud. 59(8):1915–1949.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cullen Z, Dobbie W, Hoffman M (2023) Increasing the demand for workers with a criminal record. Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):103–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2009) The embedded entrepreneur. Eur. Management Rev. 6(3):172–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2012) Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Sci. 58(6):1059–1071.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Damm AP, Gorinas C (2020) Prison as a criminal school: Peer effects and criminal learning behind bars. J. Law Econom. 63(1):149–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Decker R, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2014) The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):3–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doleac JL (2023) Encouraging desistance from crime. J. Econom. Lit. 61(2):383–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fabri M, Langbroek PM (2007) Is there a right judge for each case—A comparative study of case assignment in six European countries. Eur. J. Legal Stud. 1(2):292.Google Scholar
  • Fairlie RW (2002) Drug dealing and legitimate self-employment. J. Labor Econom. 20(3):538–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forsvarsministeriets (2020) The Danish military justice system. Technical report, Forsvarsministeriets, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  • Gagliardi L, Sorenson O (2026) Entrepreneurship and gentrification. Organ. Sci. 37(1):1–16.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garin A, Koustas D, McPherson C, Norris S, Pecenco M, Rose EK, Shem-Tov Y, Weavere J (2025) The impact of incarceration on employment, earnings, and tax filing. Econometrica 93(2):503–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1963) Embarrassment and social organization. Smelser NJ, Smelser WT, eds. Personality and Social Systems (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 541–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gottschalk P (2010) Criminal entrepreneurial behavior. J. Internat. Bus. Entrepreneurship Development 5(1):63–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graebner ME, Knott AM, Lieberman MB, Mitchell W (2023) Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question-driven, phenomenon-based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 44(1):3–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grenet J, Grönqvist H, Niknami S (2024) The effects of electronic monitoring on offenders and their families. J. Public Econom. 230(1):105051.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grogger J (1995) The effect of arrests on the employment and earnings of young men. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):51–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grosholz JM, Kabongo JD, Morris MH, Wichern A (2020) Entrepreneurship education in the transformation of incarcerated individuals: A review of the literature and future research directions. Internat. J. Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology 64(15):1551–1570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hajro A, Žilinskaitė M, Gibson CB (2025) The refugee journey: An exploration of the role of organizations and psychological processes. Organ. Sci. 37(2):424–443.Google Scholar
  • Haltiwanger J, Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2013) Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(2):347–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halvarsson D, Korpi M, Wennberg K (2018) Entrepreneurship and income inequality. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 145(1):275–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harju J, Juuti T, Matikka T (2025) Selection into entrepreneurship, income mobility and firm performance. J. Labor Econom., ePub ahead of print October 10, https://doi.org/10.1086/740193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hegde D, Tumlinson J (2021) Information frictions and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 42(3):491–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill R (2022) Hidden potential: Three essays on entrepreneurial prison training. PhD dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  • Hjalmarsson R, Lindquist MJ, Lepage L-P, Miller C (2025) Job sorting and the labor market effects of a criminal record. NBER Working Paper No. 33865, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Hudson BA, Patterson KDW, Roulet TJ, Helms WS, Elsbach K (2022) Organizational stigma: Taking stock and opening new areas for research. J. Management Stud. 59(8):1899–1914.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang KJ (2022) From prison to entrepreneurship: Can entrepreneurship be a reentry strategy for justice-impacted individuals? Ann. Amer. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 701(1):114–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang KJ, Phillips DJ (2024a) Entrepreneurship as a response to labor market discrimination for formerly incarcerated people. Amer. J. Sociol. 130(1):88–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang KJ, Phillips DJ (2024b) “We are experts on elite entrepreneurs”: A call to integrate marginalized populations into entrepreneurship research. Res. Organ. Behav. 44(1):100206.Google Scholar
  • Hwang KJ, Wallskog M (2025) Why do young firms hire individuals with criminal records? Preprint, submitted September 30, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5463334.Google Scholar
  • Irankunda A, et al. (2020) Ex-incarceree/convict status: Beneficial for self-employment and entrepreneurship? Amer. Econom. 65(1):144–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Young NC, Powell GN (2015) Hiring ex-offenders: A theoretical model. Human Resource Management Rev. 25(3):298–312.Google Scholar
  • Jordan A, Karger E, Neal D (2025) Heterogeneous impacts of sentencing decisions. J. Labor Econom. 43(4):1005–1034.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk O, Younkin P (2022) A founding penalty: Evidence from an audit study on gender, entrepreneurship, and future employment. Organ. Sci. 33(2):716–745.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Killias M, Gilliéron G, Kissling I, Villettaz P (2010) Community service versus electronic monitoring—What works better? Results of a randomized trial. Brit. J. Criminol. 50(6):1155–1170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim PH, Longest KC, Aldrich HE (2013) Can you lend me a hand? Task-role alignment of social support for aspiring business owners. Work Occupations 40(3):213–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klement C (2015) Comparing the effects of community service and imprisonment on reconviction: Results from a quasi-experimental Danish study. J. Experiment. Criminol. 11(2):237–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kline P, Rose EK, Walters CR (2022) Systemic discrimination among large U.S. employers. Quart. J. Econom. 137(4):1963–2036.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Köllő J, Boza I, Ilyés V, Köműves Z, Márk L (2023) How do firms deal with the risks of employing ex-prisoners? Technical report, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Lagoni TM, Kyvsgaard B (2008) Forløbsundersøgelse af samfundstjeneste. Justitsministeriets Forskningsenhed. Accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.justitsministeriet.dk/sites/default/files/media/Arbejdsomraader/Forskning/Forskningsrapporter/2009/forloeb_af_samfundstjeneste.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Lappi-Seppala T (2019) Community sanctions as substitutes to imprisonment in the Nordic countries. Law Contemp. Problems 82(1):17.Google Scholar
  • Levine R, Rubinstein Y (2017) Smart and illicit: Who becomes an entrepreneur and do they earn more? Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):963–1018.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis AC, Bruton GD, Shepherd DA (2026) A promise not (yet) fulfilled: Entrepreneurship, opportunity underexploitation, and the reproduction of inequality via consumer markets. Acad. Management Rev. 51(1):86–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindquist MJ, Vladasel T (2025) Are entrepreneurs more upwardly mobile? J. Bus. Venturing 40(4):106498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahieu J, Melillo F, Thompson P (2022) The long-term consequences of entrepreneurship: Earnings trajectories of former entrepreneurs. Strategic Management J. 43(2):213–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahieu J, Melillo F, Reichstein T, Thompson P (2021) Shooting stars? Uncertainty in hiring entrepreneurs. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 15(4):526–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manso G (2016) Experimentation and the returns to entrepreneurship. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(9):2319–2340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merida AL, Rocha V (2021) It’s about time: The timing of entrepreneurial experience and the career dynamics of university graduates. Res. Policy 50(1):104135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mongelli L, Versari P, Rullani F, Vaccaro A (2018) Made in Carcere: Integral human development in extreme conditions. J. Bus. Ethics 152(4):977–995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pager D (2003) The mark of a criminal record. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):937–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patzelt H, Williams TA, Shepherd DA (2014) Overcoming the walls that constrain us: The role of entrepreneurship education programs in prison. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 13(4):587–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Ranganathan A (2025) Addressing marginalized populations in management research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 70(3):587–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pongeluppe LS (2024) The allegory of the favela: The multifaceted effects of socioeconomic mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(3):619–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt J (2008a) Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. Brit. J. Criminol. 48(2):119–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt J (2008b) Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part II: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future? Brit. J. Criminol. 48(3):275–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2005) Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime Justice 32(1):373–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raines GW, Polhill P, Sine W (2024) Neighborhood stigma and Romani entrepreneurship: Evidence from an audit study in the Czech Republic. Acad. Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Valhalla, NY), 17533.Google Scholar
  • Rider CI, Choe S, Jaewon Myung B, McCullers K (2023) Entrepreneurship and social mobility: Three status metaphors for future research. Res. Organ. Behav. 43(1):100192.Google Scholar
  • Rindova V, Barry D, Ketchen DJ Jr (2009) Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):477–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson F, Fernhaber SA (2024) Entrepreneurship after prison: It’s complicated. J. Bus. Venturing Insights 21(1):e00465.Google Scholar
  • Rogers KM, Corley KG, Ashforth BE (2017) Seeing more than orange: Organizational respect and positive identity transformation in a prison context. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):219–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose EK (2018) The effects of job loss on crime: Evidence from administrative data. Preprint, submitted July 28, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2991317.Google Scholar
  • Rose EK (2021a) Does banning the box help ex-offenders get jobs? Evaluating the effects of a prominent example. J. Labor Econom. 39(1):79–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose EK (2021b) Who gets a second chance? Effectiveness and equity in supervision of criminal offenders. Quart. J. Econom. 136(2):1199–1253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose EK, Shem-Tov Y (2021) How does incarceration affect reoffending? Estimating the dose-response function. J. Political Econom. 129(12):3302–3356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sampson RJ, Laub JH (1990) Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 55(5):609–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santangelo GD, Rocha V, Sofka W (2025) Refugee hiring and organizational performance. Organ. Sci. 36(3):1131–1153.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Scheidgen K, Brattström A (2023) Berlin is hotter than Silicon Valley! How networking temperature shapes entrepreneurs’ networking across social contexts. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 47(6):2233–2262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen JB, Sharkey AJ (2014) Entrepreneurship as a mobility process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):328–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Dahl MS, Canales R, Burton MD (2021) Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organ. Sci. 32(3):587–604.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2007) Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(3–4):211–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thébaud S (2015) Business as plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uggen C (1999) Ex-offenders and the conformist alternative: A job quality model of work and crime. Soc. Problems 46(1):127–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uggen C (2000) Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(4):529–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • UNODC (2018) Addressing the global prison crisis. Technical report, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Vienna.Google Scholar
  • Wainwright L, Muñoz P (2025) Enabling agency in constrained contexts: How restorative entrepreneuring supports reintegration post-incarceration. Internat. Small Bus. J. 43(5):474–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walmsley R (2016) World prison population list. Report, International Centre for Prison Studies, King’s College London, School of Law, London.Google Scholar
  • Yang T, Kacperczyk O (2024) The racial gap in entrepreneurship and opportunities inside established firms. Strategic Management J. 45(4):745–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang T, Kacperczyk A, Naldi L (2024) The motherhood wage penalty and female entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 35(1):27–51.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang T, Kacperczyk A, Naldi L (2026) Does entrepreneurship narrow the gender earnings gap? Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print January 20, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70065.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.