Shareholder Activism and Corporate Political Activity: A Governance Systems Perspective

References

• Abdurakhmonov M, Malhotra S, Mbaraonye I (2025) Risk sharing in government contracting: Strategic alliances as safeguards in government supplier relationships. J. Management, ePub ahead of print December 25, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251392213.Google Scholar
• Abdurakhmonov M, Ridge JW, Hill AD (2021) Unpacking firm external dependence: How government contract dependence affects firm investments and market performance. Acad. Management J. 64(1):327–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdurakhmonov M, Ridge JW, Hill AD, Loncarich H (2022) Strategic risk and lobbying: Investigating lobbying breadth as risk management. J. Management 48(5):1103–1130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, de Figueiredo JM, Snyder JM Jr (2003) Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appel IR, Gormley TA, Keim DB (2019) Standing on the shoulders of giants: The effect of passive investors on activism. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(7):2720–2774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Brav A, Jiang W (2015) The long-term effects of hedge fund activism. Columbia Law Rev. 115(5):1085–1155.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2014) Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3885–3920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Withers MC, Graffin SD, Corley KG (2021) Corporate directors’ implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1662–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2012) Competition and political organization: Together or alone in lobbying for trade policy? J. Internat. Econom. 87(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2020) Empirical models of lobbying. Ann. Rev. Econom. 12(1):391–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyson NM, Gantchev N, Shivdasani A (2017) Activism mergers. J. Financial Econom. 126(1):54–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brauer M, Wiersema M, Binder P (2023) “Dear CEO and board”: How activist investors’ confidence in tone influences campaign success. Organ. Sci. 34(4):1487–1508.Link, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Kim H (2010) Hedge fund activism: A review. Foundations Trends Finance 4(3):185–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, Tian X (2018) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? J. Financial Econom. 130(2):237–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Partnoy F, Thomas R (2008) Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. J. Finance 63(4):1729–1775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Rev. 73(3):305–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byun H, Frake J, Agarwal R (2018) Leveraging who you know by what you know: Specialization and returns to relational capital. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1803–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Feldman ER (2018) Activist‐impelled divestitures and shareholder value. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2726–2744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Shohfi TD (2022) Do sell-side analysts play a role in hedge fund activism? Evidence from textual analysis. Contemporary Accounting Res. 39(3):1583–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng CSA, Huang HH, Li Y, Stanfield J (2012) The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Rev. 87(5):1493–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chuah K, DesJardine MR, Goranova M, Henisz WJ (2024) Shareholder activism research: A system-level view. Acad. Management Ann. 18(1):82–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coates JC IV (2012) Corporate politics, governance, and value before and after Citizens United. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 9(4):657–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Hoskisson RE, Tihanyi L, Certo ST (2010) Ownership as a form of corporate governance. J. Management Stud. 47(8):1561–1589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahan NM, Hadani M, Schuler DA (2013) The governance challenges of corporate political activity. Bus. Soc. 52(3):365–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai X, Gao F, Lisic LL, Zhang IX (2023) Corporate social performance and the managerial labor market. Rev. Accounting Stud. 28(1):307–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo JM, Richter BK (2014) Advancing the empirical research on lobbying. Ann. Rev. Political Sci. 17(1):163–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeHaan E, Larcker D, McClure C (2019) Long-term economic consequences of hedge fund activist interventions. Rev. Accounting Stud. 24(2):536–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denes MR, Karpoff JM, McWilliams VB (2017) Thirty years of shareholder activism: A survey of empirical research. J. Corporate Finance 44(3):405–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Durand R (2020) Disentangling the effects of hedge fund activism on firm financial and social performance. Strategic Management J. 41(6):1054–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Shi W (2023) The downside of displaying agentic values: Evidence from shareholder activism. Organ. Sci. 34(4):1577–1601.Link, Google Scholar
• DesJardine M, Marti E, Durand R (2021) Why activist hedge funds target socially responsible firms: The reaction costs of signaling corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management J. 64(3):851–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Shi W, Cheng X (2023) The new invisible hand: How common owners use the media as a strategic tool. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(4):956–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Shi W, Sun Z (2022) Different horizons: The effects of hedge fund activism versus corporate shareholder activism on strategic actions. J. Management 48(7):1858–1887.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Shi W, Werner T (2025) Shareholder activism and the deterrence effect of Democratic politician shareholders. Organ. Sci. 36(2):993–1019.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Lins KV, Roth L, Wagner HF (2019) Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financial Econom. 131(3):693–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fackler D, Hölscher L, Schnabel C, Weyh A (2022) Does working at a start-up pay off? Small Bus. Econom. 58(4):2211–2233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faleye O (2026) Does familiarity breed activism? Geography and hedge fund activism. J. Financial Markets 77:101005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER, Amit R, Chen S (2024) Hedge fund activism in family firms. Strategic Management J. 45(7):1273–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris SP, Jagannathan M, Pritchard AC (2003) Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. J. Finance 58(3):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Field L, Lowry M, Mkrtchyan A (2013) Are busy boards detrimental? J. Financial Econom. 109(1):63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fouirnaies A, Hall AB (2018) How do interest groups seek access to committees? Amer. J. Political Sci. 62(1):132–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gantchev N (2013) The costs of shareholder activism: Evidence from a sequential decision model. J. Financial Econom. 107(3):610–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaspar J-M, Massa M, Matos P (2005) Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. J. Financial Econom. 76(1):135–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godwin K, Ainsworth SH, Godwin E (2012) Lobbying and Policymaking: The Public Pursuit of Private Interests (CQ Press, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Goldman E, Rocholl J, So J (2009) Do politically connected boards affect firm value? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(6):2331–2360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• González TA, Schmid M, Yermack D (2019) Does price fixing benefit corporate managers? Management Sci. 65(10):4813–4840.Link, Google Scholar
• Goranova M, Ryan LV (2014) Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. J. Management 40(5):1230–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gounopoulos D, Loukopoulos G, Loukopoulos P, Wood G (2024) Corporate political activities and the SEC’s oversight role in the IPO process. J. Management Stud. 61(2):375–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo F, Lin C, Masli A, Wilkins MS (2021) Auditor responses to shareholder activism. Contemporary Accounting Res. 38(1):63–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M (2012) Institutional ownership monitoring and corporate political activity: Governance implications. J. Bus. Res. 65(7):944–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hainmueller J (2012) Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Anal. 20(1):25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):334–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Misangyi VF, Park CA (2015) The quad model for identifying a corporate director’s potential for effective monitoring: Toward a new theory of board sufficiency. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):323–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill MD, Kelly GW, Lockhart GB, Van Ness RA (2013) Determinants and effects of corporate lobbying. Financial Management 42(4):931–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ (2005) Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? J. Management 31(3):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Cannella AA, Paetzold RL (2000) The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. J. Management Stud. 37(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik JD, Stein JC (2005) Thy neighbor’s portfolio: Word‐of‐mouth effects in the holdings and trades of money managers. J. Finance 60(6):2801–2824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram AE, Ridge JW, Abdurakhmonov M (2025) Transparent politics: Political ideology, lobbying and firm performance. Strategic Organ., ePub ahead of print January 27, https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270251314674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiao A, Lu J (2024) Buffing firm innovation by lobbying. J. Corporate Finance 85:102557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katic IV, Hillman A (2023) Corporate political activity, reimagined: Revisiting the political marketplace. J. Management 49(6):1911–1938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang K (2016) Policy influence and private returns from lobbying in the energy sector. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):269–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang J-K, Zhang L (2018) Do outside directors with government experience create value? Financial Management 47(2):209–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim IS (2018) LobbyView: Firm-level lobbying & congressional bills database. Working paper, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
• Koo H, Wiersema M, Park KF (2026) Dare to fight? How activist hedge funds’ hostile tactics influence target firm resistance. J. Management 52(2):767–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langan R, Krause R, Menz M (2023) Executive board chairs: Examining the performance consequences of a corporate governance hybrid. J. Management 49(7):2218–2253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Schoar A, Wang J (2008) Secrets of the academy: The drivers of university endowment success. J. Econom. Perspect. 22(3):207–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester RH, Hillman A, Zardkoohi A, Cannella AA Jr (2008) Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Acad. Management J. 51(5):999–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lock I, Seele P (2016) Deliberative lobbying? Toward a noncontradiction of corporate political activities and corporate social responsibility? J. Management Inquiry 25(4):415–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lux S, Crook TR, Woehr DJ (2011) Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. J. Management 37(1):223–247.Google Scholar
• Ma M, Pan J, Rouen E, Wellman L (2025) Legislators’ demand for firms’ financial statements: Evidence from US congressional redistricting events. Rev. Accounting Stud. 30(4):3815–3856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCahery JA, Sautner Z, Starks LT (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71(6):2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Min G, You HY (2019) Active firms and active shareholders: Corporate political activity and shareholder proposals. J. Legal Stud. 48(1):81–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puck JF, Rogers H, Mohr AT (2013) Flying under the radar: Foreign firm visibility and the efficacy of political strategies in emerging economies. Internat. Bus. Rev. 22(6):1021–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richter BK, Samphantharak K, Timmons JF (2009) Lobbying and taxes. Amer. J. Political Sci. 53(4):893–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridge JW, Hill AD, Ingram A (2018) The signaling role of politician stock ownership: Effects on lobbying intensity. J. Management 44(5):2116–2141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridge JW, Ingram A, Hill AD (2017) Beyond lobbying expenditures: How lobbying breadth and political connectedness affect firm outcomes. Acad. Management J. 60(3):1138–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samila S, Sorenson O (2011) Venture capital, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):338–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuler DA, Shi W, Hoskisson RE, Chen T (2017) Windfalls of emperors’ sojourns: Stock market reactions to Chinese firms hosting high‐ranking government officials. Strategic Management J. 38(8):1668–1687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang L, Lin J-C, Saffar W (2021) Does economic policy uncertainty drive the initiation of corporate lobbying? J. Corporate Finance 70:102053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanor A, McDonnell M-H, Werner T (2021) Corporate political power: The politics of reputation and traceability. Emory Law J. 71(2):153–216.Google Scholar
• Shi W, Gao C, Aguilera RV (2021) The liabilities of foreign institutional ownership: Managing political dependence through corporate political spending. Strategic Management J. 42(1):84–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Xia C, Meyer-Doyle P (2022) Institutional investor activism and employee safety: The role of activist and board political ideology. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2404–2420.Link, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Connelly BL, Hoskisson RE, Ketchen DJ Jr (2020) Portfolio spillover of institutional investor activism: An awareness–motivation–capability perspective. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1865–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su W, Tsang EWK (2015) Product diversification and financial performance: The moderating role of secondary stakeholders. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1128–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler BB, Caner T (2016) New product introductions below aspirations, slack and R&D alliances: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management J. 37(5):896–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang M (2014) Which types of institutional investors constrain abnormal accruals? Corporate Governance 22(1):43–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Werner T (2017) Investor reaction to covert corporate political activity. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2424–2443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema M, Ahn A, Zhang Y (2020) Activist hedge fund success: The role of reputation. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2493–2517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Withers MC, Hillman AJ, Cannella AA Jr (2012) A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. J. Management 38(1):243–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Percival D (2017) Entropy balancing is doubly robust. J. Causal Inference 5(1):20160010.Crossref, Google Scholar