Steady as She Goes: Remote Work Benefits Daily Goal Progress Through Reduced Energy Variability

References

• Abrahams L, Hofmans J, De Fruyt F (2025) Fresh as a daisy: Within‐person associations between sleep, vitality, and self‐and other‐rated job performance. J. Organ. Behav. 46(3):448–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahams L, Vergauwe J, De Fruyt F (2023) Within-person personality variability in the work context: A blessing or a curse for job performance? J. Appl. Psychol. 108(11):1834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Culpepper SA (2013) Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. J. Management 39(6):1490–1528. Google Scholar
• Baker WE (2019) Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: Toward a multilevel model. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 6(1):373–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnes CM, Morgeson FP (2007) Typical performance, maximal performance, and performance variability: Expanding our understanding of how organizations value performance. Human Performance 20(3):259–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnes CM, Wagner DT, Schabram K, Boncoeur D (2023) Human sustainability and work: A meta-synthesis and new theoretical framework. J. Management 49(6):1965–1996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Trougakos JP, Weiss HM, Dalal RS (2013) Affect spin and the emotion regulation process at work. J. Appl. Psych. 98(4):593–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Weiss HM, Barros E, MacDermid SM (2005) An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1054–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett AA, Gabriel AS, Calderwood C (2020) Examining the interplay of micro-break durations and activities for employee recovery: A mixed-methods investigation. J. Occupational Health Psych. 25(2):126–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett AA, Campion ED, Keeler KR, Keener SK (2021) Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. J. Appl. Psych. 106(3):330–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhave DP, Lefter AM (2018) The other side: Occupational interactional requirements and work–home enrichment. Acad. Management J. 61(1):139–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ (2015) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):165–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bredehorst J, Krautter K, Meuris J, Jachimowicz JM (2024) The challenge of maintaining passion for work over time: A daily perspective on passion and emotional exhaustion. Organ. Sci. 35(1):364–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Chiles B (2022) Mitigating gig and remote worker misconduct: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1273–1299.Link, Google Scholar
• Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psych. Res. 28(2):193–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson KD, Wu J (2012) The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organ. Res. Methods 15(3):413–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavalcante DC, Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS, Martins R, Cameira M, Queirós C (2025) The relation of telework, hybrid work, and in-person work to mental health: A study of Brazilian civil servants. J. Workplace Behav. Health 40(4):587–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chae H, Choi JN (2019) Routinization, free cognitive resources and creativity: The role of individual and contextual contingencies. Human Relations 72(2):420–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chauvin J, Choudhury P, Fang TP (2024) Working around the clock: Temporal distance, intrafirm communication, and time shifting of the employee workday. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1660–1681.Link, Google Scholar
• Clinton ME, Conway N, Sturges J (2017) “It’s tough hanging-up a call”: The relationships between calling and work hours, psychological detachment, sleep quality, and morning vigor. J. Occupational Health Psych. 22(1):28–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole MS, Bruch H, Vogel B (2012) Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness. J. Organ. Behav. 33(4):445–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortés-Denia D, Isoard-Gautheur S, Lopez-Zafra E, Pulido-Martos M (2022) Effects of vigor at work and weekly physical activity on job stress and mental health. Sci. Rep. 12(1):16025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalal RS, Alaybek B, Lievens F (2020) Within-person job performance variability over short timeframes: Theory, empirical research, and practice. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 7(1):421–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M (2020) Between-person and within-person effects of telework: A quasi-field experiment. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 29(6):795–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M (2024) Biophilia in the home–workplace: Integrating dog caregiving and outdoor access to explain teleworkers’ daily physical activity, loneliness, and job performance. J. Occupational Health Psych. 29(3):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M, Germeys L (2019) Boundary role transitions: A day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Human Relations 72(12):1843–1868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demerouti E (2023) Effective employee strategies for remote working: An online self-training intervention. J. Vocational Behav. 142:103857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doden W, Bindl U, Unger D (2024) Does it take two to tango? Combined effects of relational job crafting and job design on energy and performance. J. Organ. Behav. 45(8):1189–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doering L, Tilcsik A (2025) Location matters: Everyday gender discrimination in remote and on-site work. Organ. Sci. 36(2):547–571. Link, Google Scholar
• Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psych. Methods 12(2):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL (2000) Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition Emotion 14(4):577–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fritz C, Lam CF, Spreitzer GM (2011) It’s the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers’ energy management. Acad. Management Perspective 25(3):28–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Harrison DA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1524–1541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Ponnapalli AR, Wang C, Javalagi AA (2024) A dual pathway model of remote work intensity: A meta‐analysis of its simultaneous positive and negative effects. Personnel Psych. 77(4):1351–1386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerpott FH, Rivkin W, Unger D (2022) Stop and go, where is my flow? How and when daily aversive morning commutes are negatively related to employees’ motivational states and behavior at work. J. Appl. Psych. 107(2):169–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonsalves L (2023) Work (un) interrupted: How non-territorial space shapes worker control over social interaction. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1651–1671.Link, Google Scholar
• Grandey AA, Gabriel AS (2015) Emotional labor at a crossroads: Where do we go from here? Ann. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2(1):323–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruber J, Kogan A, Quoidbach J, Mauss IB (2013) Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health. Emotions 13(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haapakangas A, Hirvonen S, Selander K (2025) A mixed-methods study of work location choices in hybrid work. Facilities 43(15–16):46–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn VC, Binnewies C, Sonnentag S, Mojza EJ (2011) Learning how to recover from job stress: Effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. J. Occupational Health Psych. 16(2):202–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handke L, O’Neill TA, McLarnon MJ, Kauffeld S (2025) What goes around comes around-work characteristics as both antecedents and outcomes of hybrid work adoption. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 34(1):12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harkin B, Webb TL, Chang BP, Prestwich A, Conner M, Kellar I, Benn Y, Sheeran P (2016) Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psych. Bull. 142(2):198–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauff S, Alewell D, Hansen NK (2014) HRM systems between control and commitment: Occurrence, characteristics and effects on HRM outcomes and firm performance. Human Res. Management J. 24(4):424–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, van Gils S, Walkowiak A (2021) The regulating role of mindfulness in enacted workplace incivility: An experience sampling study. J. Appl. Psych. 106(8):1250–1265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J. Occupational Health Psych. 3(4):322–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaur E, Barnes CM, Butts MM, Gabriel AS (2025) Domain switch theory: A deeper understanding of transitions between work and nonwork domains in modern work life. Acad. Management Rev. 50(4):838–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim HLR, Foulk TA, Schaerer M, Gale J, Anicich EM (2025) Riding the waves of power: Power fluctuation, cognitive energy, and goal pursuit. Personnel Psych. 78(4):520–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuppens P, Verduyn P (2017) Emotion dynamics. Current Opinion Psych. 17:22–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuppens P, Oravecz Z, Tuerlinckx F (2010) Feelings change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(6):1042–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee FC, Diefendorff JM, Nolan MT, Trougakos JP (2023) Emotional exhaustion across the workday: Person-level and day-level predictors of workday emotional exhaustion growth curves. J. Appl. Psych. 108(10):1662–1679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makadok R, Burton R, Barney J (2018) A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1530–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maynard MT, Gilson LL, Mathieu JE (2012) Empowerment—Fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. J. Management 38(4):1231–1281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClean ST, Koopman J, Yim J, Klotz AC (2021) Stumbling out of the gate: The energy‐based implications of morning routine disruption. Personnel Psych. 74(3):411–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF (1971) Manual for the Profile of Mood States (POMS) (Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego).Google Scholar
• Merlo KL, Shaughnessy S, Weiss HM (2018) Affective influences on within-person changes in work performance as mediated by attentional focus. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 27(1):126–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthen LK, Muthen B (2017) Mplus Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables User’s Guide (Muthen and Muthen, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Ohly S, Göritz AS, Schmitt A (2017) The power of routinized task behavior for energy at work. J. Vocational Behav. 103:132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owens BP, Baker WE, Sumpter DM, Cameron KS (2016) Relational energy at work: Implications for job engagement and job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 101(1):35–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SL, Dawson N, Keenan C, Sonnentag S, Neal A, Jimmieson NL (2026) Hybrid work and daily energy dynamics: Breaks, inclusion, and evening recovery. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych., ePub ahead of print January 31, https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2026.2622933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peeters MC, Montgomery AJ, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB (2005) Balancing work and home: How job and home demands are related to burnout. Internat. J. Stress Management 12(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phan V, Nishioka M, Beck JW, Scholer AA (2023) Goal progress velocity as a determinant of shortcut behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 108(4):553–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Selig JP (2010) Monte Carlo method for assessing multilevel mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervalsfor indirect effects in 1-1-1 multilevel models. https://www.quantpsy.org/medmc/medmc111.htm.Google Scholar
• Pulido-Martos M, Cortés-Denia D, Lopez-Zafra E (2021) Teleworking in times of COVID-19: Effects on the acquisition of personal resources. Frontiers Psych. 12:685275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranik H, Koopman J, Vough HC (2021) Excuse me, do you have a minute? An exploration of the dark-and bright-side effects of daily work interruptions for employee well-being. J. Appl. Psych. 106(12):1867–1884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn RW, Spreitzer GM, Lam CF (2012) Building a sustainable model of human energy in organizations: Exploring the critical role of resources. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):337–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan O, Dablander F, Haslbeck J (2025) Toward a generative model for emotion dynamics. Psych. Rev. 132(2):416–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sayre GM, Chi NW, Grandey AA (2025) Surface acting loss spirals: Getting unstuck with recovery activities. J. Organ. Behav. 46(5):685–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt AM, DeShon RP (2009) Prior performance and goal progress as moderators of the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. Human Performance 22(3):191–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt AM, Dolis CM (2009) Something’s got to give: The effects of dual-goal difficulty, goal progress, and expectancies on resource allocation. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):678–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt A, Belschak FD, Den Hartog DN (2017) Feeling vital after a good night’s sleep: The interplay of energetic resources and self-efficacy for daily proactivity. J. Occupational Health Psych. 22(4):443–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt A, Ohly S, Kleine A-K, Schnafel A-K (2026) Relationships between human energy and work-related constructs: A meta-analysis. App. Psych. 75(1):e70073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selig JP, Preacher KJ (2008) Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects. http://quantpsy.org/.Google Scholar
• Shirom A (2003) Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. Perrewe PL, Ganster DC, eds. Emotional and Physiological Processes and Positive Intervention Strategies (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 135–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shockley KM, Ispas D, Rossi ME, Levine EL (2012) A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between state affect, discrete emotions, and job performance. Human Performance 25(5):377–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spector PE, Jex SM (1998) Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. J. Occupational Health Psych. 3(4):356–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szumowska E, Jasko K, Dukała K, Górska P (2025) Goal cycle: Motivational and emotional antecedents and consequences of goal progress. Motivation Emotion 49(4):384–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vahle-Hinz T, De Bloom J, Syrek C, Kühnel J (2021) Putting the episodic process model to the test: Explaining intraindividual fluctuations in job performance across the working day. J. Bus. Psychol. 36(1):71–84. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wanberg CR, Zhu J, Van Hooft EA (2010) The job search grind: Perceived progress, self-reactions, and self-regulation of search effort. Acad. Management J. 53(4):788–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang M, Liao H, Zhan Y, Shi J (2011) Daily customer mistreatment and employee sabotage against customers: Examining emotion and resource perspectives. Acad. Management J. 54(2):312–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Tellegen A (1985) Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psych. Bull. 98(2):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Cropanzano R (1996) Affective events theory. Res. Organ. Behav. 18(1):1–74.Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Merlo KL (2020) Affect, attention, and episodic performance. Current Directive Psych. Sci. 29(5):453–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CE, Thomas JS, Bennett AA, Banks GC, Toth A, Dunn AM, McBride A, et al. (2024) The role of discrete emotions in job satisfaction: A meta‐analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 45(1):97–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windeler JB, Chudoba KM, Sundrup RZ (2017) Getting away from them all: Managing exhaustion from social interaction with telework. J. Organ. Behav. 38(7):977–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wirth M, Voss A, Wirth S, Rothermund K (2022) Affect dynamics and well-being: Explanatory power of the model of intraindividual variability in affect (MIVA). Cognition Emotion 36(2):188–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa H (2021) Free-energy model of emotion potential: Modeling arousal potential as information content induced by complexity and novelty. Frontiers Comput. Neurosci. 15:698252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yik M, Russell JA, Steige JH (2011) A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotions 11(4):705–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zacher H, Brailsford HA, Parker SL (2014) Micro-breaks matter: A diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. J. Vocational Behav. 85(3):287–297.Crossref, Google Scholar