Behavioral Intervention Construal: A Framework for Understanding Inferences from Behavioral Interventions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.21412

References

  • Allcott H (2015) Site selection bias in program evaluation. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1117–1165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alderfer CP (1969) An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 4(2):142–175.Google Scholar
  • Amazon (2021) Amazon helps vaccinate thousands in its hometown. Amazon Company News. Accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/amazon-to-help-vaccinate-thousands-in-its-hometown.Google Scholar
  • Amengual M, Apfelbaum EP (2021) True motives: Prosocial and instrumental justifications for behavioral change in organizations. Management Sci. 67(8):5032–5051.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews FM, Withey SB (1976) Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality (Plenum Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnaud A, Schminke M (2012) The ethical climate and context of organizations: A comprehensive model. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1767–1780.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bachas P, Gertler P, Higgins S, Seira E (2018) Digital financial services go a long way: Transaction costs and financial inclusion. AEA Papers Proc. 108:444–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baer MD, Colquitt JA (2018) Why do people trust? Moving toward a more comprehensive consideration of the antecedents of trust. Searle RH, Nienaber A-MI, Sitkin SB, eds. The Routledge Companion to Trust (Routledge, London), 163–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. 84(2):191–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 52:1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barasch A, Berman JZ, Small DA (2016) When payment undermines the pitch. Psych Sci. 27(10):1388–1397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(3):497–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Behavioural Insights Team (2014) EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. Report, Behavioural Insights Team, London.Google Scholar
  • Belk RW (1988) Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Res. 15(2):139–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S (2001) Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock. J. Finance 56(5):1747–1764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S, Thaler RH (2013) Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science 339(6124):1152–1153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertini M, Aydinli A (2020) Consumer reactance to promotional favors. J. Retailing 96(4):578–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettinger EP, Long BT, Oreopoulos P, Sanbonmatsu L (2012) The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1205–1242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. 25(3):187–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blader S, Gartenberg C, Prat A (2020) The contingent effect of management practices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(2):721–749.Google Scholar
  • Bogard JE, Goldstein NJ (2022) The choice architect doth protest too much: Ironic effects of nudging on perceptions of descriptive social norms. Preprint, submitted May 1, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4892836.Google Scholar
  • Bogard JE, Reiff JS, Caruso EM, Hershfield HE (2024) Social inferences from choice context: Dominated options can engender distrust. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 183:104337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowles S (2008) Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320(5883):1605–1609.Google Scholar
  • Brambilla M, Sacchi S, Rusconi P, Cherubini P, Yzerbyt VY (2012) You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British J. Soc. Psych. 51(1):149–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brehm JW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Brody I, Dai H, Saccardo S, Milkman K, Duckworth AL, Patel M, Gromet D (2026) Targeting behavioral interventions based on past behavior: Evidence from vaccine uptake. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 192:104465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown CL, Krishna A (2004) The skeptical shopper: A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. J Consumer Res. 31(3):529–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SP, Jones E, Leigh TW (2005) The attenuating effect of role overload on relationships linking self-efficacy and goal level to work performance. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):972–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butera L, Metcalfe R, Morrison W, Taubinsky D (2022) Measuring the welfare effects of shame and pride. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(1):122–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cadario R, Zimmermann J, Van Den Bergh B (2026) Beyond opt-out: How presumed-consent language shapes persuasion. J. Marketing 90(1):72–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell MC (1999) Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing Res. 36(2):187–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell MC, Kirmani A (2000) Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. J Consumer Res. 27(1):69–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL (1976) The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cardinaels E, Yin H (2015) Think twice before going for incentives: Social norms and the principal’s decision on compensation contracts. J Accounting Res. 53(5):985–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassar L, Meier S (2021) Intentions for doing good matter for doing well: The negative effects of prosocial incentives. Econom. J. 131(637):1988–2017.Google Scholar
  • Chater N, Loewenstein G (2016) The under-appreciated drive for sense-making. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 126:137–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cryder CE, London AJ, Volpp KG, Loewenstein G (2010) Informative inducement: Study payment as a signal of risk. Soc. Sci. Medicine 70(3):455–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Ridder D, Kroese F, Van Gestel L (2022) Nudgeability: Mapping conditions of susceptibility to nudge influence. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 17(2):346–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Linos E (2022) RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90(1):81–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deserranno E (2019) Financial incentives as signals: Experimental evidence from the recruitment of village promoters in Uganda. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 11(1):277–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillard JP, Shen L (2005) On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Comm. Monographs 72(2):144–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dinner I, Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG, Liu K (2011) Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 17(4):332–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drake C, Anderson D, Cai ST, Sacks DW (2023) Financial transaction costs reduce benefit take-up evidence from zero-premium health insurance plans in Colorado. J. Health Econom. 89:102752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Kosse F, Menrath I, Verde PE, Siegrist J (2018) Unfair pay and health. Management Sci. 64(4):1477–1488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Falk A (2002) Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(4):687–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2004) Fairness and incentives in a multi-task principal-agent model. Scand. J. Econom. 106(3):453–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske AP (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psych. Rev. 99(4):689–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Columbus, OH).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Spencer S, Fein S, Zanna M, Olson J (2003) Five core social motives, plus or minus five. Spencer SJ, Fein S, Zanna MP, Olson JM, eds. Motivated Social Perception: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 9 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 243–246.Google Scholar
  • Fitzsimons GJ, Lehmann DR (2004) Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Sci. 23(1):82–94.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fodor J (1983) The Modularity of Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F (1997) The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(4):746–755.Google Scholar
  • Friestad M, Wright P (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallegos S, Roseth B, Cuesta A, Sánchez M (2023) Increasing the take-up of public health services: An at-scale experiment on digital government. J. Public Econom. 227:104975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallus J, Reiff JS, Kamenica E, Fiske AP (2022) Relational incentives theory. Psych. Rev. 129(3):586–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. Shaw R, Bransford J, eds. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 67–82.Google Scholar
  • Goodwin GP (2015) Moral character in person perception. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 24(1):38–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodwin GP, Piazza J, Rozin P (2014) Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 106(1):148–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goswami I, Urminsky O (2022) Why many behavioral interventions have unpredictable effects in the wild: The conflicting consequences problem. Mažar N, Soman D, eds. Behavioral Science in the Wild (University of Toronto Press, Toronto), 65–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray K, Young L, Waytz A (2012) Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psych. Inquiry 23(2):101–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J (1990) Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psych. 75(5):561–568.Google Scholar
  • Griffin DW, Ross L (1991) Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 24 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 319–359.Google Scholar
  • Griffin DW, Dunning D, Ross L (1990) The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(6):1128–1139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gross J (2021) Yes, your employer can require you to be vaccinated. New York Times (June 9), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/09/business/covid-vaccine-employer-rules.html.Google Scholar
  • Gupta PS, Mohareb AM, Valdes C, Price C, Jollife M, Regis C, Munshi N, et al. (2022) Expanding COVID-19 vaccine access to underserved populations through implementation of mobile vaccination units. Preventive Medicine 163:107226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haggag K, Paci G (2014) Default tips. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 6(3):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halbesleben JRB, Buckley MR (2004) Burnout in organizational life. J. Management 30(6):859–879.Google Scholar
  • Hall CC, Zhao J, Shafir E (2014) Self-affirmation among the poor: Cognitive and behavioral implications. Psych. Sci. 25(2):619–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallsworth M (2023) A manifesto for applying behavioural science. Nature Human Behav. 7(3):310–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallsworth M, Kirkman E (2020) Behavioral Insights (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Markus HR, Kitayama S (1999) Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psych. Rev. 106(4):766–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henrich J, Henrich N (2006) Culture, evolution and the puzzle of human cooperation. Cognitive Systems Res. 7(2):220–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henrich J, Ensminger J, McElreath R, Barr A, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JC, et al. (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327(5972):1480–1484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huffman D, Raymond C, Shvets J (2022) Persistent overconfidence and biased memory: Evidence from managers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(10):3141–3175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1332–1356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irmak C, Murdock MR, Kanuri VK (2020) When consumption regulations backfire: The role of political ideology. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):966–984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer R, Koleva S, Graham J, Ditto P, Haidt J (2012) Understanding Libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified Libertarians. PLoS One 7(8):e42366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jachimowicz JM, Duncan S, Weber EU, Johnson EJ (2019) When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behav. Public Policy 3(2):159–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone AA (2006) Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science 312(5782):1908–1910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kassirer S, Kouchaki M (2023) Aid utility theory: A new way of thinking about and tackling aid utilization neglect. Res. Organ. Behav. 43:100196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirmani A, Rao AR (2000) No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing 64(2):66–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krijnen JM, Tannenbaum D, Fox CR (2017) Choice architecture 2.0: Behavioral policy as an implicit social interaction. Behav. Sci. Policy 3(2):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(6):1121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruglanski AW, Chernikova M, Rosenzweig E, Kopetz C (2014) On motivational readiness. Psych. Rev. 121(3):367–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.Google Scholar
  • Kulle A-C, Schumacher S, von Bieberstein F (2024) Mobile vaccination units substantially increase COVID-19 vaccinations: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. J. Public Health 46(1):151–157.Google Scholar
  • Kuvaas B, Ding H (2025) Pay for performance and employee outcomes: The mediating roles of controlling and informational perceptions of pay. J. Occupational Organ. Psychol. 98(3):e70055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasky-Fink J, Linos E (2024) Improving delivery of the social safety net: The role of stigma. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 34(2):270–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leach CW, Ellemers N, Barreto M (2007) Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(2):234–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary MR, Baumeister RF (2000) The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 32 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1–62.Google Scholar
  • Lee RT, Ashforth BE (1996) A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. J. Appl. Psych. 81(2):123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leotti LA, Iyengar SS, Ochsner KN (2010) Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends Cognitive Sci. 14(10):457–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. Gergen KJ, Greenberg MS, Wills RH, eds. Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (Springer, Boston), 27–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman A, Duke KE, Amir O (2019) How incentive framing can harness the power of social norms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:118–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lind EA, Tyler TR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linos E, Lasky-Fink J, Larkin C, Moore L, Kirkman E (2024) The formality effect. Nature Human Behav. 8(2):300–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA (2022) The Voltage Effect: How to Make Good Ideas Great and Great Ideas Scale (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2006) New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 15(5):265–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacDonald G, Leary MR (2005) Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psych. Bull. 131(2):202–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madrian BC, Shea DF (2001) The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1149–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manthei K, Sliwka D, Vogelsang T (2023) Information, incentives, and attention: A field experiment on the interaction of management controls. Accounting Rev. 98(5):455–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP (2001) Job burnout. Annual Rev. Psychol. 52:397–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psych. Rev. 50(4):370–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maslow AH (1954) The instinctoid nature of basic needs. J. Personality 22(3):326–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland DC (1965) Toward a theory of motive acquisition. Amer. Psych. 20(5):321–333.Google Scholar
  • McGraw PA, Schwartz JA, Tetlock PE (2012) From the commercial to the communal: Reframing taboo trade-offs in religious and pharmaceutical marketing. J. Consumer Res. 39(1):157–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKenzie CRM, Liersch MJ, Finkelstein SR (2006) Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psych. Sci. 17(5):414–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milkman KL, Ellis SF, Gromet DM, Jung Y, Luscher AS, Mobarak RS, Paxson MK, et al. (2024) Megastudy shows that reminders boost vaccination but adding free rides does not. Nature 631(8019):179–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman GE, Cain DM (2014) Tainted altruism: When doing some good is evaluated as worse than doing no good at all. Psych. Sci. 25(3):648–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman GE, Gorlin M, Dhar R (2014) When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. J. Consumer Res. 41(3):823–839.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norman DA (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Oorschot WV (2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy Politics 28(1):33–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paluck EL, Shafir E (2017) The psychology of construal in the design of field experiments. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 245–268.Google Scholar
  • Parker SK, Morgeson FP, Johns G (2017) One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):403–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peyton K, Sierra-Arévalo M, Rand DG (2019) A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(40):19894–19898.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L, Rees-Jones A, Blank C (2025) The negative consequences of loss-framed performance incentives. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 17(1):506–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prentice DA, Miller DT (1993) Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(2):243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prentice DA, Paluck EL (2020) Engineering social change using social norms: Lessons from the study of collective action. Curr. Opinion Psych. 35:138–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preston SD, De Waal FBM (2002) Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiff JS, Dai H, Beshears J, Milkman KL, Benartzi S (2023) Save more today or tomorrow: The role of urgency in precommitment design. J. Marketing Res. 60(6):1095–1113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiff JS, Zhang JC, Gallus J, Dai H, Pedley NM, Vangala S, Leuchter RK, et al. (2022) When peer comparison information harms physician well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(29):e2121730119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers-Dillon R (1995) The dynamics of welfare stigma. Qualitative Sociol. 18(4):439–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross L, Nisbett RE (1991) The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, Columbus, OH).Google Scholar
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psych. 55(1):68–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2008) Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA, eds. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3rd ed. (Guilford Press, New York), 654–678.Google Scholar
  • Salerno JM, Peter-Hagene LC (2013) The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psych. Sci. 24(10):2069–2078.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seijts GH, Latham GP (2001) The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. J. Organ. Behav. 22(3):291–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherman DK, Cohen GL (2006) The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38:183–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirgy MJ (2018) The psychology of material well-being. Appl. Res. Quality Life 13(2):273–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sliwka D (2007) Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):999–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slovic P (1995) The construction of preference. Amer. Psych. 50(5):364–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele CM (1988) The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 21 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 261–302.Google Scholar
  • Swider BW, Zimmerman RD (2010) Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 76(3):487–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szaszi B, Higney A, Charlton A, Gelman A, Ziano I, Aczel B, Goldstein DG, Yeager DS, Tipton E (2022) No reason to expect large and consistent effects of nudge interventions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(31):e2200732119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tankard ME, Paluck EL (2017) The effect of a Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psych. Sci. 28(9):1334–1344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tannenbaum D, Fox CR, Goldstein NJ (2017) Partitioning menu items to nudge single-item choice. Accessed July 31, 2025, https://davetannenbaum.github.io/documents/TannenbaumFoxGoldstein2025.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Taylor SE (1983) Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. Amer. Psych. 38(11):1161–1173.Google Scholar
  • Tannenbaum D, Valasek CJ, Knowles ED, Ditto PH (2013) Incentivizing wellness in the workplace: Sticks (not carrots) send stigmatizing signals. Psych. Sci. 24(8):1512–1522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save More TomorrowTM: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econom. 112(S1):S164–S187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thibaut J, Walker L, LaTour S, Houlden P (1974) Procedural justice as fairness. Stanford Law Rev. 26(6):1271–1290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas CC, Otis NG, Abraham JR, Markus HR, Walton GM (2020) Toward a science of delivering aid with dignity: Experimental evidence and local forecasts from Kenya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(27):15546–15553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson SC (1981) Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psych. Bull. 90(1):89–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treviño LK, Butterfield KD, McCabe DL (1998) The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Bus. Ethics Quart. 8(3):447–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol. 46(1):35–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler TR (1994) Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(5):850–863.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler TR, Blader SL (2005) Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1143–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valenzuela A, Raghubir P (2009) Position‐based beliefs: The center‐stage effect. J Consumer Psych. 19(2):185–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Roekel H, Giurge LM, Schott C, Tummers L (2026) Nudges can be both autonomy-preserving and effective: Evidence from a survey and quasi-field experiment. Behav. Public Policy 10(1):127–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Wesep ED (2010) Pay (be)for(e) performance: The signing bonus as an incentive device. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3812–3848.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vonasch AJ, Mofradidoost R, Gray K (2025) People reject free money and cheap deals because they infer phantom costs. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 51(10):2050–2067.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walters DJ, Fernbach PM (2021) Investor memory of past performance is positively biased and predicts overconfidence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(36):e2026680118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton GM, Wilson TD (2018) Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psych. Rev. 125(5):617–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Krishna A, McFerran B (2017) Turning off the lights: Consumers’ environmental efforts depend on visible efforts of firms. J. Marketing Res. 54(3):478–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wendel S (2020) Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
  • Wilson TD (2022) What is social psychology? The construal principle. Psych. Rev. 129(4):873–889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Tulloch JSP, Knott S, Allison R, Parvulescu P, Buchan IE, Garcia-Finana M, et al. (2023) Evaluating the impact of using mobile vaccination units to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Cheshire and Merseyside, UK: A synthetic control analysis. BMJ Open 13(10):e071852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu M, Bagchi R, Hock SJ (2019) The mere deadline effect: Why more time might sabotage goal pursuit. J. Consumer Res. 45(5):1068–1084.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.