Behind Closed Doors: The Uncommunal Feminine Stereotype

References

• Abrams D, Viki GT, Masser B, Bohner G (2003) Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjei Boateng F, Heilman ME (2024) Think manager-think male re-examined: Race as a moderator. Sex Roles 90(12):1717–1734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afifi WA, Metts S (1998) Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 15(3):365–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allport GW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Amanatullah E, Morris M (2010) Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(2):256–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson RH, Smith DG (2019) What men can do to be better mentors and sponsors to women. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 7), https://hbr.org/2019/08/what-men-can-do-to-be-better-mentors-and-sponsors-to-women.Google Scholar
• Arvate PR, Galilea GW, Todescat I (2018) The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. Leadership Quart. 29(5):533–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashmore RD, Solomon MR, Longo LC (1996) Thinking about fashion models’ looks: A multidimensional approach to the structure of perceived physical attractiveness. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(11):1083–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Tringale AM, Sturm RE, Taylor SN, Braddy PW (2019) Looking ahead: How what we know about sexual harassment now informs us of the future. Organ. Dynam. 48(4):100677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Peyser B, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2022) The No Club: Putting a Stop to Women’s Dead-End Work (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Bailey AH, Williams A, Cimpian A (2022) Based on billions of words on the internet, people = men. Sci. Adv. 8(13):eabm2463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bareket O, Fiske ST (2023) A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men’s power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psych. Bull. 149(11–12):637–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer JS, Brandler S (2021) Why don’t we know more about the minds of authentic people? Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 15(10):e12637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensinger K (2024) Trump elevates false, fringe attacks on Harris to center of his campaign. New York Times (August 1), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/01/us/politics/trump-harris-race.html.Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH, Stegner SE (1979) Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge’s point of view. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(1):48–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower T (2017) The #MeToo backlash. Harvard Bus. Rev. (September), https://hbr.org/2019/09/the-metoo-backlash.Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Flynn FJ (2010) Gender and persistence in negotiation: A dyadic perspective. Acad. Management J. 53(4):769–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Gelfand M (2010) Status and the evaluation of workplace deviance. Psych. Sci. 21(1):49–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Mazei J, Liu HH (2025) “When” versus “whether” gender/sex differences: Insights from psychological research on negotiation, risk-taking, and leadership. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 20(5):855–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brescoll VL (2012) Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(4):622–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brescoll VL, Glass J, Sedlovskaya A (2013) Ask and ye shall receive? The dynamics of employer‐provided flexible work options and the need for public policy. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):367–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer G, Archer J (2007) What do people infer from facial attractiveness? J. Evolutionary Psych. 5(1):39–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Gaertner SL (2003) Toward reduction of prejudice: Intergroup contact and social categorization. Brown R, Gaertner SL, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA), 451–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunyan R (2021) Snappy Kamala’s ‘toxic work culture’: More former staffers come forward to describe ‘unpredictable and demeaning’ VP who would ‘leave interns in tears and staff paranoid that she would snap at them.’ Daily Mail (July 15), https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9791007/More-ex-staffers-Kamala-Harriss-unpredictable-demeaning-behavior-offices.html.Google Scholar
• Burke RJ, McKeen CA (1990) Mentoring in organizations: Implications for women. J. Bus. Ethics 9:317–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt MR (1980) Cultural myths and supports for rape. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(2):217–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caliskan A, Ajay PP, Charlesworth T, Wolfe R, Banaji MR (2022) Gender bias in word embeddings: A comprehensive analysis of frequency, syntax, and semantics. Proc. 2022 AAAI/ACM Conf. AI Ethics. Soc. (ACM, New York), 156–170.Google Scholar
• Capezza NM, Arriaga XB (2008) Why do people blame victims of abuse? The role of stereotypes of women on perceptions of blame. Sex Roles 59(11–12):839–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlisle M (2019) History tells me that white people cannot be trusted, especially white women. Medium (March 30), https://medium.com/@mauriceawakecarlisle/history-tells-me-that-white-people-cannot-be-trusted-especially-white-women-e449cd475b76.Google Scholar
• Carter ER, Onyeador IN, Lewis NA Jr (2020) Developing & delivering effective anti-bias training: Challenges & recommendations. Behav. Sci. Policy 6(1):57–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2020) Quick take: Women in management. Accessed April 22, 2022, https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-management/.Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Milkman KL, Gromet DM, Rebele RW, Massey C, Duckworth AL, Grant AM (2019) The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(16):7778–7783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cillizza C (2016) How the heck can voters think Donald Trump is more honest than Hillary Clinton? Washington Post (November 2), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/02/donald-trump-hasnt-told-the-truth-repeatedly-in-this-campaign-voters-still-think-he-is-more-honest-than-hillary-clinton/.Google Scholar
• Cortina LM, Berdahl JL (2008) Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. Cooper C, Barling J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Micro Perspectives (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 469–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cota AA, Reid A, Dion KL (1991) Construct validity of a diagnostic ratio measure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles 25:225–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coyne SM, Archer J (2005) The relationship between indirect and physical aggression on television and in real life. Soc. Development 14(2):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coyne SM, Whitehead E (2008) Indirect aggression in animated Disney films. J. Comm. 58(2):382–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJ, Wolf EB, Glick P, Crotty S, Chong J, Norton MI (2015) Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 109(4):622–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daubman KA, Heatherington L, Ahn A (1992) Gender and the self-presentation of academic achievement. Sex Roles 27:187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delacollette N, Dumont M, Sarlet M, Dardenne B (2013) Benevolent sexism, men’s advantages and the prescription of warmth to women. Sex Roles 68(5–6):296–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derks B, Van Laar C, Ellemers N (2016) The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. Leadership Quart. 27(3):456–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derks B, Ellemers N, Van Laar C, De Groot K (2011) Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British J. Soc. Psych. 50(3):519–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devine PG, Forscher PS, Austin AJ, Cox WTL (2012) Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(6):1267–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson M (2016) Is Donald Trump more honest than Hillary Clinton? Christian Sci. Monitor (June 6), https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2016/0606/Is-Donald-Trump-more-honest-than-Hillary-Clinton.Google Scholar
• Diekman AB, Eagly AH (2000) Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(10):1171–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinos S, Burrowes N, Hammond K, Cunliffe C (2015) A systematic review of juries’ assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making? Internat. J. Law. Crime Justice 43(1):36–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly A, Mladinic A, Otto S (1994) Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 30(2):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Nater C, Miller DI, Kaufmann M, Sczesny S (2020) Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Amer. Psychologist 75(3):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eareckson HB, Heilman ME (2024) Explaining penalties and rewards for gender norm violations: A unified theory. Sex Roles 90(12):1701–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2004) Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. Edmondson A, Kramer R, Cook K, eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 239–272.Google Scholar
• Egan M, Matvos G, Seru A (2022) When Harry fired Sally: The double standard in punishing misconduct. J. Political Econom. 130(5):1184–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellemers N (2018) Gender stereotypes. Annual Rev. Psych. 69:275–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellemers N, van den Heuvel H, de Gilder D, Maass A, Bonvini A (2004) The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British J. Soc. Psych. 43(3):315–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esterline KM, Muehlenhard CL (2017) Wanting to be seen: Young people’s experiences of performative making out. J. Sex Res. 54(8):1051–1063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ezzedeen SR (2013) The portrayal of professional and managerial women in North American films: Good news or bad news for your executive pipeline? Organ. Dynam. 42(4):248–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fakunmoju SB (2022) “She lied”: Relationship between gender stereotypes and beliefs and perception of rape across four countries. Arch. Sex. Behav. 51(2):833–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Bersoff DN, Borgida E, Deaux K, Heilman ME (1991) Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. Amer. Psychologist 46(10):1049–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forscher PS, Lai CK, Axt JR, Ebersole CR, Herman M, Devine PG, Nosek BA (2019) A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 117(3):522–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky A, Hall E, Cuddy A (2013) Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psych. Sci. 24(4):498–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangestad SW, Snyder M (2000) Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psych. Bull. 126(4):530–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ (2018) Rule Makers, Rule Breakers: How Tight and Loose Cultures Wire Our World (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
• Gershtenson J, Plane DL (2024) Citizen incivility toward U.S. presidential candidates in the 2016 election: She’s a devious, self-indulgent, manipulative liar and he’s a racist, dishonest, dangerous deplorable. Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública 13(25):9–48.Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Malone PS (1995) The correspondence bias. Psych. Bull. 117(1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giles JW, Heyman GD (2005) Young children’s beliefs about the relationship between gender and aggressive behavior. Child Dev. 76(1):107–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill MJ (2004) When information does not deter stereotyping: Prescriptive stereotyping can foster bias under conditions that deter descriptive stereotyping. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(5):619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (2001) An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Amer. Psychologist 56(2):109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST, Mladinic A, Saiz JL, Abrams D, Masser B, Adetoun B, et al. (2000) Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(5):763–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Goldberg RM, Smith-Adcock S, Dixon AL (2011) The influence of the mass media on relational aggression among females: A feminist counseling perspective. J. Aggression Maltreatment Trauma 20(4):376–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RJ, Slone CG (1982) The “feminine modesty” effect: A self-presentational interpretation of sex differences in causal attribution. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 8(3):477–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grégoire Y, Fisher RJ (2008) Customer betrayal and retaliation: When your best customers become your worst enemies. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36:247–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall EV, Phillips KW, Glick P, Livingston RW, Rudman L, Washington E (2014) Laying the groundwork for future research in intersectionality: Descriptive and prescriptive stereotypes for Black and White women and men. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Hamilton DL, Sherman SJ, Ruvolo CM (1990) Stereotype‐based expectancies: Effects on information processing and social behavior. J. Soc. Issues 46(2):35–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond MD, Milojev P, Huang Y, Sibley CG (2018) Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 9(7):863–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2012) Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Caleo S (2018) Combatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 21(5):725–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Eagly AH (2008) Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Indust. Organ. Psych. 1(4):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Okimoto TG (2007) Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Okimoto TG (2008) Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):189–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Saruwatari LR (1979) When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 23(3):360–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Stopeck MH (1985) Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. J. Appl. Psych. 70(2):379–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Block CJ, Martell RF (1995) Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? J. Soc. Behav. Personality 10(4):237–252.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Caleo S, Manzi F (2024) Women at work: Pathways from gender stereotypes to gender bias and discrimination. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 11(1):165–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Wallen AS, Fuchs D, Tamkins MM (2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. J. Appl. Psych. 89(3):416–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennekam S, Ladge JJ (2023) Free to be me? Evolving gender expression and the dynamic interplay between authenticity and the desire to be accepted at work. Acad. Management J. 66(5):1529–1553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlin PF (2003) And the award for best actor goes to …: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 28(4):633–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho C, Jackson JW (2001) Attitude toward Asian Americans: Theory and measurement. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 31(8):1553–1581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochschild AR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Hoffman C, Hurst N (1990) Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(2):197–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):56–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Carter N, Silva C (2010) Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(9):80–85.Google Scholar
• Jackson CM (2017) White Spaces Missing Faces: Why Women of Color Don’t Trust White Women (Catriceology Enterprises, Omaha, NE).Google Scholar
• Jodlbauer B, Jonas E (2011) Forecasting clients’ reactions: How does the perception of strategic behavior influence the acceptance of advice? Internat. J. Forecasting 27(1):121–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John LK, Barasz K, Norton MI (2016) Hiding personal information reveals the worst. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(4):954–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson SK, Podratz KE, Dipboye RL, Gibbons E (2010) Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the “beauty is beastly” effect. J. Soc. Psych. 150(3):301–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Oh S, DesJardine M (2024) A new perspective on gender bias in the upper echelons: Why stakeholder variability matters. Acad. Management Rev. 49(2):322–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Neely B, Emrich C, Griffiths D, George G (2015) Gender research in AMJ: An overview of five decades of empirical research and calls to action: Thematic issue on gender in management research. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1459–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Kay AC (2005) Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(3):498–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk O, Younkin P, Rocha V (2023) Do employees work less for female leaders? A multi-method study of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1111–1133.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, McDonnell MH, Stephens NM (2022) Do women face a higher ethical bar? Exploring gender discrimination in the punishment of ethical violations at work. Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
• Kennedy JA, Kray LJ (2015) A pawn in someone else’s game?: The cognitive, motivational, and paradigmatic barriers to women’s excelling in negotiation. Res. Organ. Behav. 35:3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kernis MH, Goldman BM (2006) A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38:283–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenig AM (2018) Comparing prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes about children, adults, and the elderly. Frontiers Psych. 9:1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Locke CC (2008) To flirt or not to flirt? Sexual power at the bargaining table. Negotiation J. 24(4):483–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaFrance M, Hecht MA, Paluck EL (2003) The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psych. Bull. 129(2):305–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaPierre RT (1934) Attitudes vs. actions. Soc. Forces 13(2):230–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawson A, Matz S, Gotz F, Martin AE (2026) Female leaders are more trusted but less effective when they use gender-stereotypical language. J. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Lawson MA, Martin AE, Huda I, Matz SC (2022) Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(9):e2026443119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeanIn.com (2022) Now more than ever, men need to do more to support women. Accessed June 17, 2023, https://leanin.org/mentor-her#!.Google Scholar
• Lee H (2017) One-fifth of American adults have experienced sexual harassment at work, CNBC survey says. CNBC (December 19), www.cnbc.com/2017/12/19/one-fifth-of-american-adults-have-been-sexually-harassed-at-work.html.Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Hanson MD, Cheung HK (2019) Incorporating bystander intervention into sexual harassment training. Indust. Organ. Psych. 12(1):52–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin MH, Kwan VS, Cheung A, Fiske ST (2005) Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 31(1):34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livingston RW, Rosette AS, Washington EF (2012) Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psych. Sci. 23(4):354–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke V, MacLeod C, Walker I (1994) Automatic and controlled activation of stereotypes: Individual differences associated with prejudice. British J. Soc. Psych. 33(1):29–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF (1994) Rape myths: In review. Psych. Women Quart. 18(2):133–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF (1995) Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(4):704–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• López-Sáez M, Lisbona A (2009) Descriptive and prescriptive features of gender stereotyping. Relationships among its components. Internat. J. Soc. Psych. 24(3):363–379.Google Scholar
• Ma A, Rosette AS, Koval CZ (2022) Reconciling female agentic advantage and disadvantage with the CADDIS measure of agency. J. Appl. Psych. 107(12):2115–2148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzi F, Caleo S, Heilman ME (2024) Unfit or disliked: How descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotypes lead to discrimination against women. Current Opinion Psych. 60:101928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marin AJ, Guadagno RE (1999) Perceptions of sexual harassment victims as a function of labeling and reporting. Sex Roles 41(11–12):921–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AE (2023) The divergent effects of diversity ideologies for race and gender relations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 175:104226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AE, Slepian ML (2021) The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspectives Psych. Sci. 16(6):1143–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AE, Slepian ML (2025) The process of gendering: Gender as a verb. Trends Cognitive Sci. 29(1):73–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AE, North MS, Phillips KW (2019) Intersectional escape: Older women elude agentic prescriptions more than older men. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 45(3):342–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mavin S (2008) Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: No more ‘best enemies’ for women in management? British J. Management 19(s1):S75–S84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mavin S, Grandy G, Williams J (2014) Experiences of women elite leaders doing gender: Intra‐gender micro‐violence between women. British J. Management 25(3):439–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mize TD (2019) Doing gender by criticizing leaders: Public and private displays of status. Soc. Problems 66(1):86–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery N, Cowen A (2020) How leader gender influences external audience response to organizational failures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 118(4):639–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moscatelli S, Menegatti M, Ellemers N, Mariani MG, Rubini M (2020) Men should be competent, women should have it all: Multiple criteria in the evaluation of female job candidates. Sex Roles 83(5):269–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin CA, Sanzari C, Caluori N, Rabasco H (2018) Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement. Sex Roles 79(11):651–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noe RA (1988) An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psych. 41(3):457–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North MS, Fiske ST (2013) A prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale: Succession, identity, and consumption (SIC). Psych. Assessment 25(3):706–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onyeador IN, Mobasseri S, McKinney HL, Martin AE (2024) A future for organizational diversity training: Mobilizing diversity science to improve effectiveness. Acad. Management Perspect. 38(3):392–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otway T (1888) Thomas Otway: With an Introduction and Notes, Noel R, ed. (Vizetelly, London), 118.Google Scholar
• Paluck EL, Green DP (2009) Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Rev. Psych. 60:339–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paluck EL, Porat R, Clark CS, Green DP (2021) Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Rev. Psych. 72:533–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plant EA, Devine PG, Cox WTL, Columb C, Miller SL, Goplen J, Peruche BM (2009) The Obama effect: Decreasing implicit prejudice and stereotyping. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):961–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posten AC, Mussweiler T (2013) When distrust frees your mind: The stereotype-reducing effects of distrust. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 105(4):567–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Carranza E (2002) What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psych. Women Quart. 26(4):269–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR (1989) Barriers to mentoring: The female manager’s dilemma. Human Relations 42(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Cotton JL (1991) Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Acad. Management J. 34(4):939–951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuters (2020) Fact check: Kamala Harris and Willie Brown had a relationship over a decade after he separated from wife. Reuters (October 13), https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-kamala-harrisandwillie-brownhad-a-relationshipover-adecadeafte-idUSKBN26Y2RJ/.Google Scholar
• Roberts SO (2022) Descriptive-to-prescriptive (D2P) reasoning: An early emerging bias to maintain the status quo. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 33(2):289–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roehling M, Huang J (2018) Sexual harassment training effectiveness: An interdisciplinary review and call for research. J. Organ. Behav. 39(2):134–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblum M, Schroeder J, Gino F (2020) Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 119(1):75–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotenberg KJ, MacDonald‐Taylor B, Holland R (2024) Trusting others who vary in consistency between their personal standards and behavior: Differences by age, gender, and honesty trust beliefs. Soc. Development 33(2):e12717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Galinsky AD, Magee JC (2018) The agentic–communal model of advantage and disadvantage: How inequality produces similarities in the psychology of power, social class, gender, and race. Olson JM, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 58 (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 71–125.Google Scholar
• Rudman LA (1998) Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3):629–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Fairchild K (2004) Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(2):157–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Phelan JE (2008) Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:61–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Ashmore RD, Gary ML (2001) “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(5):856–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Greenwald AG, McGhee DE (2001) Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(9):1164–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Moss-Racusin CA, Phelan JE, Nauts S (2012) Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(1):165–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaumberg RL, Flynn F (2017) Self-reliance: A gender perspective on its relationship to communality and leadership evaluations. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1859–1881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein VE, Mueller R, Lituchy T, Liu J (1996) Think manager—Think male: A global phenomenon? J. Organ. Behav. 17(1):33–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz MD (2010) Police investigation of rape-roadblocks and solutions. National Institute of Justice Report No. 232667, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Sczesny S, Nater C, Rudman L, Lohmore A, Malayeri S, Sakallı N, Saxler FM, Gustafsson Sendén M (2025) How women and men should (not) be: Gender rules and their alignment with status beliefs across nations. Psych. Women Quart. 49(2):243–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Schlegel RJ (2024) Distilling the concept of authenticity. Nature Rev. Psych. 3(8):509–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan W, Keller J, Joseph D (2019) Are men better negotiators everywhere? A meta‐analysis of how gender differences in negotiation performance vary across cultures. J. Organ. Behav. 40(6):651–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheppard LD, Aquino K (2013) Much ado about nothing? Observers’ problematization of women’s same-sex conflict at work. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(1):52–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheppard LD, Johnson SK (2019) The femme fatale effect: Attractiveness is a liability for businesswomen’s perceived truthfulness, trust, and deservingness of termination. Sex Roles 81(11):779–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sibley CG, Perry R (2010) An opposing process model of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles 62:438–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sibley CG, Overall N, Duckitt J (2007) When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles 57:743–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh D (2004) Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness. J. Sex Res. 41(1):43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirdeshmukh D, Singh J, Sabol B (2002) Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Marketing 66(1):15–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1979) Self-monitoring processes. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 12:85–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swim JK, Hyers LL (1999) Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(1):68–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobin RM, Graziano WG (2011) The disappointing gift: Dispositional and situational moderators of emotional expressions. J. Experiment. Child Psych. 110(2):227–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toneva Y, Heilman ME, Pierre G (2020) Choice or circumstance: When are women penalized for their success? J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 50(11):651–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tudor TR, Gapud SD, Bajwa N (2024) Fear of sexual harassment accusations: A hidden barrier to opposite-gender mentoring in Taiwan? Behavioral Sci. 14(2):137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turban DB, Dougherty TW (1994) Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Acad. Management J. 37(3):688–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Nations (2020) Visualizing the data: Women’s representation in society. Accessed June 17, 2023, https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/multimedia/2020/2/infographic-visualizing-the-data-womens-representation.Google Scholar
• U.S. Equal Employment Commission (2016) Report of the co-chairs of the EEOC select task force on the study of harassment in the workplace. Accessed March 18, 2022, https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/upload/report.pdf.Google Scholar
• van Dijk H, Meyer B, Van Engen M, Loyd DL (2017) Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):517–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandello JA, Bosson JK (2013) Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psych. Men Masculinity 14(2):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandello JA, Bosson JK, Cohen D, Burnaford RM, Weaver JR (2008) Precarious manhood. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(6):1325–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallen AS, Morris MW, Devine BA, Lu JG (2017) Understanding the MBA gender gap: Women respond to gender norms by reducing public assertiveness but not private effort. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 43(8):1150–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams MJ, Tiedens LZ (2016) The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women’s implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psych. Bull. 142(2):165–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood W, Eagly AH (2012) Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46:55–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zlatev JJ (2019) I may not agree with you, but I trust you: Caring about social issues signals integrity. Psych. Sci. 30(6):880–892.Crossref, Google Scholar