Published Online:13 Jun 2025https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.19018
- Cited by
- A framework of frameworks: theoretical, conceptual, contextual, methodological and impact frameworks21 April 2026 | Journal of Trade Science, Vol. 14, No. 2
- 9 February 2026 | Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 35, No. 2
- 1 June 2026 | British Journal of Management, Vol. 37
- International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 649
- 19 March 2026 | Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 60
- 26 November 2025 | Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 30, No. 2
- Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13, No. 1
- 13 January 2026 | Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 1
- Journal of Business Research, Vol. 202
- 29 December 2025 | Production and Operations Management, Vol. 47
- 29 December 2025 | Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 14
- 3 October 2025 | Information, Vol. 16, No. 10
- Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 24, No. 3
- International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 43, No. 6
- 1 January 2024 | SSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 33

Volume 36, Issue 4
July-August 2025
Pages 1221-1642, iii-iv
Article Information
Metrics
Information
- Received:May 16, 2024
- Accepted:April 26, 2025
- Published Online:June 13, 2025
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s)
Cite as
Andrew M. Carton (2025) The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory. Organization Science 36(4):1242-1270.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.19018
Keywords
The author is grateful for the clear and constructive guidance from Lamar Pierce and three reviewers who helped to sharpen the focus of the paper while ensuring its relevance to a wide range of scholars. Additionally, the author is indebted to Otilia Obodaru and McKenzie Preston for multiple rounds of thorough feedback. For insightful comments on earlier drafts, the author thanks Adam Cobb, Constantinos Coutifaris, Laura Giurge, Steph Saryev, and Marissa Shandell. The author is also grateful for conversations with Manav Raj and Matteo Tranchero. Finally, the author thanks the Mack Institute and participants in Yale University’s seminar series.
