Machine Learning Instrument Variables for Causal Inference

References

• Ackerberg D, Caves K, Frazer G (2006) Structural identification of production functions. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Amemiya T (1966) On the use of principal components of independent variables in two-stage least-squares estimation. Internat. Econom. Rev. 7(3):283–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amemiya T (1974) The nonlinear two-stage least-squares estimator. J. Econometrics 2(2):105–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Krueger AB (1999) Jackknife instrumental variables estimation. J. Appl. Econometrics 14(1):57–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Krueger AB (1993) Split sample instrumental variables, Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong TB (2016) Large market asymptotics for differentiated product demand estimators with economic models of supply. Econometrica 84(5):1961–1980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayyagari R (2010) Applications of influence functions to semiparametric regression models. Unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bai J, Ng S (2009) Boosting diffusion indices. J. Appl. Econometrics 24(4):607–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2014) Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):608–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chen D, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2012) Sparse models and methods for optimal instruments with an application to eminent domain. Econometrica 80(6):2369–2429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett A, Kallus N, Schnabel T (2019) Deep generalized method of moments for instrumental variable analysis. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 3559–3569.Google Scholar
• Berry S, Haile PA (2014) Identification in differentiated products markets using market level data. Econometrica 82(5):1749–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):443–450.Google Scholar
• Breiman L (1996) Stacked regressions. Machine Learn. 24(1):49–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G (1987) Asymptotic efficiency in estimation with conditional moment restrictions. J. Econometrics 34(3):305–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2013) Econometrics of high-dimensional sparse models. Lecture, NBER, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Escanciano JC, Ichimura H, Newey WK, Robins JM (2022) Locally robust semiparametric estimation. Econometrica 90(4):1501–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, Duflo E, Hansen C, Newey W, Robins J (2018) Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal 21(1):C1–C68.Google Scholar
• Deaner B (2019) On the sensitivity of nonparametric instrumental variables estimators to misspecification. Preprint, submitted January 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.01241.Google Scholar
• Dinner IM, Van Heerde HJ, Neslin SA (2013) Driving online and offline sales: The cross-channel effects of traditional, online display, and paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 50(5):527–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donald SG, Imbens GW, Newey WK (2009) Choosing instrumental variables in conditional moment restriction models. J. Econometrics 152(1):28–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan J, Liao Y (2014) Endogeneity in high dimensions. Ann. Statist. 42(3):872–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell M, Liang T, Misra S (2021) Deep neural networks for estimation and inference. Econometrica 89(1):181–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedberg R, Tibshirani J, Athey S, Wager S (2021) Local linear forests. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 30(2):503–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandhi A, Houde J-F (2019) Measuring substitution patterns in differentiated products industries. NBER Working Paper No. 26375, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gautier E, Rose C (2011) High-dimensional instrumental variables regression and confidence sets. Preprint, submitted May 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2454.Google Scholar
• Ghadimi S, Wang M (2018) Approximation methods for bilevel programming. Preprint, submitted February 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02246.Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, Lawrence ND, Weinberger KQ, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 27 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 2672–2680.Google Scholar
• Gould S, Fernando B, Cherian A, Anderson P, Cruz RS, Guo E (2016) On differentiating parameterized argmin and argmax problems with application to bi-level optimization. Preprint, submitted July 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.05447.Google Scholar
• Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4):1029–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen LP (1985) A method for calculating bounds on the asymptotic covariance matrices of generalized method of moments estimators. J. Econometrics 30(1–2):203–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartford J, Lewis G, Leyton-Brown K, Taddy M (2017) Deep IV: A flexible approach for counterfactual prediction. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 70 (JMLR.org), 1414–1423.Google Scholar
• Hausman J (1996) Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. Bresnahan TF, Gordon RJ, eds. The Economics of New Goods (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 207–248.Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Leonard G, Zona JD (1994) Competitive analysis with differentiated products. Ann. Econom. Statist. 34:159–180.Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Asymptotic properties of the Hahn–Hausman test for weak-instruments. Econom. Lett. 89(3):333–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ji K, Yang J, Liang Y (2021) Bilevel optimization: Convergence analysis and enhanced design. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 4882–4892.Google Scholar
• Kapetanios G, Marcellino M (2010) Factor-GMM estimation with large sets of possibly weak instruments. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 54(11):2655–2675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kloek T, Mennes L (1960) Simultaneous equations estimation based on principal components of predetermined variables. Econometrica 28(1):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knittel CR, Metaxoglou K (2014) Estimation of random-coefficient demand models: Two empiricists’ perspective. Rev. Econom. Stat. 96(1):34–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee N, Bollinger B, Staelin R (2023) Vertical versus horizontal variance in online reviews and their impact on demand. J. Marketing Res. 60(1):130–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Syrgkanis V (2018) Adversarial generalized method of moments. Preprint, submitted March 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07164.Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xie Y (2020) Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. J. Marketing Res. 57(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Song L, Wu X, He R, Tan T (2018) Anti-makeup: Learning a bi-level adversarial network for makeup-invariant face verification. McIlraith SA, Weinberger KQ, eds. Proc. 32nd AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18) (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 7057–7064.Google Scholar
• Luo D, Bayati M, Plambeck EL, Aratow M (2018) Low-acuity patients delay high-acuity patients in the emergency department. Preprint, submitted January 5, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3095039.Google Scholar
• Melitz MJ, Polanec S (2015) Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit. RAND J. Econom. 46(2):362–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moshary S, Shapiro BT, Song J (2021) How and when to use the political cycle to identify advertising effects. Marketing Sci. 40(2):283–304.Link, Google Scholar
• Muandet K, Mehrjou A, Lee SK, Raj A (2019) Dual IV: A single stage instrumental variable regression. Preprint, submitted October 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.12358.Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2000) A practitioner’s guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):513–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2001) Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica 69(2):307–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newey WK (1990) Semiparametric efficiency bounds. J. Appl. Econometrics 5(2):99–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newey WK (1993) Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions. Maddala GS, Rao CR, Vinod HD, eds. Handbook of Statistics, Econometrics, vol. 11 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 419–454.Google Scholar
• Newey WK, McFadden D (1994) Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2111–2245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newey WK, Powell JL (2003) Instrumental variable estimation of nonparametric models. Econometrica 71(5):1565–1578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newey WK, Robins JR (2018) Cross-fitting and fast remainder rates for semiparametric estimation. Preprint, submitted January 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09138.Google Scholar
• Olea JLM, Pflueger C (2013) A robust test for weak instruments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 31(3):358–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, Dorogush AV, Gulin A (2018) Catboost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 31 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
• Reynaert M, Verboven F (2014) Improving the performance of random coefficients demand models: The role of optimal instruments. J. Econometrics 179(1):83–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2014) Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of IV methods in marketing applications. Marketing Sci. 33(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Samuel KGG, Tappen MF (2009) Learning optimized MAP estimates in continuously-valued MRF models. 2009 IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2009) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 477–484.Google Scholar
• Scornet E, Biau G, Vert J-P, et al. (2015) Consistency of random forests. Ann. Statist. 43(4):1716–1741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro B, Hitsch GJ, Tuchman A (2021) Research note: Procedure for building Nielsen ad intel data and merging with Nielsen RMS scanner data. Preprint, submitted February 18, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3761483.Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT, Hitsch GJ, Tuchman AE (2021) TV advertising effectiveness and profitability: Generalizable results from 288 brands. Econometrica 89(4):1855–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh A, Hosanagar K, Nevo A (2021a) Network externalities and app store fees in mobile platforms. Preprint, submitted August 28, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911638.Google Scholar
• Singh R, Sahani M, Gretton A (2019) Kernel instrumental variable regression. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 4595–4607.Google Scholar
• Singh A, Zhang J, Veeraraghavan SK (2021b) Fulfillment by platform: Competition and upstream market power. Proc. 22nd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Sinkinson M, Starc A (2019) Ask your doctor? Direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(2):836–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinwart I (2005) Consistency of support vector machines and other regularized kernel classifiers. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 51(1):128–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH (2000) GMM with weak identification. Econometrica 68(5):1055–1096.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS (1999) Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. 45(10):1324–1338.Link, Google Scholar
• Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Yu Z (2012) Trading partners, traded products and firm performances of China’s exporter-importers: Does processing trade make a difference? World Econom. 35(12):1795–1824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolpert DH (1992) Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5(2):241–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yang J, Lee JY, Chintagunta PK (2021) Commercial success through commercials? Advertising and pay-tv operators. J. Marketing Res. 58(5):925–947.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yogo M (2004) Estimating the elasticity of intertemporal substitution when instruments are weak. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(3):797–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young A (2022) Consistency without inference: Instrumental variables in practical application. Eur. Econom. Rev. 147:104112.Google Scholar
• Zoph B, Le QV (2016) Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. Preprint, submitted November 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01578.Google Scholar