Experimental Evidence on Structural State Dependence in Demand

References

• Abadie A (2002) Bootstrap tests for distributional treatment effects in instrumental variable models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97(457):284–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews I, Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2017) Measuring the sensitivity of parameter estimates to estimation moments. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):1553–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews I, Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2020a) On the informativeness of descriptive statistics for structural estimates. Econometrica 88(6):2231–2258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews I, Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2020b) Transparency in structural research. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 38(4):711–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2010) The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijmolt TH, Van Heerde HJ, Pieters RG (2005) New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E (1998) Encouragement designs: An approach to self-selected samples in an experimental design. Marketing Lett. 9:383–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P, Dubé JP, Goh KY (2005) Beyond the endogeneity bias: The effect of unmeasured brand characteristics on household-level brand choice models. Management Sci. 51(5):832–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2009) Do switching costs make markets less competitive? J. Marketing Res. 46(4):435–445. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE, Vitorino MA (2008) Category pricing with state-dependent utility. Marketing Sci. 27(3):417–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Klopack B, Mahoney N (2025) Selling subscriptions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 115(5):1650–1671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Armstrong M, Porter RH, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1967–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Figueroa C, Musalem A, Noton C (2019) Earthquakes and brand loyalty: Beyond the short-term effects of product unavailability. Preprint, submitted February 11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3325923.Google Scholar
• Fradkin A, Holtz D (2023) Do incentives to review help the market? Evidence from a field experiment on Airbnb. Marketing Sci. 42(5):853–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Frank RE (1962) Brand choice as a probability process. J. Bus. 35(1):43–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabel S, Simester D, Timoshenko A (2024) How retailers became ad platforms. Accessed October 7, 2026, https://hbr.org/2024/06/how-retailers-became-ad-platforms.Google Scholar
• Gabel S, Simester D, Timoshenko A (2025) Store-Entry Coupons: A large-scale field experiment. Preprint, submitted January 26, 2023, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4335525.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A (2006) State dependence at internet portals. J. Econom. Management Strategy 15(2):317–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green EJ, Strawderman WE (1991) A James-Stein type estimator for combining unbiased and possibly biased estimators. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86(416):1001–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JD (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR (2006) Intertemporal effects of consumption and their implications for demand elasticity estimates. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4:325–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. Studies in Labor Markets (University of Chicago Press), 91–140.Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (2010) Building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):356–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T (2010) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25(1):51–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Angrist JD (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62(2):467–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James W, Stein C (1961) Estimation with quadratic loss. Neyman J, ed. Proc. 4th Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. and Probability, vol. 1 (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA), 361–379.Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Lewis RA, Nubbemeyer E (2017a) The online display ad effectiveness funnel & carryover: Lessons from 432 field experiments. Preprint, submitted December 11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2701578.Google Scholar
• Johnson GA, Lewis RA, Nubbemeyer EI (2017b) Ghost ads: Improving the economics of measuring online ad effectiveness. J. Marketing Res. 54(6):867–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge GG, Mittelhammer RC (2004) A semiparametric basis for combining estimation problems under quadratic loss. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99(466):479–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane MP (1997) Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 15(3):310–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong X, Dubé JP, Daljord Ø (2025) Nonparametric estimation of demand with switching costs: The case of habitual brand loyalty. Preprint, submitted April 8, 2022, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4070747.Google Scholar
• Levine J, Seiler S (2023) Identifying state dependence in brand choice: Evidence from hurricanes. Marketing Sci. 42(5):934–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massy WF (1966) Order and homogeneity of family specific brand-switching processes. J. Marketing Res. 3(1):48–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matzke D, Ly A, Selker R, Weeda W, Scheibehenne B, Lee M, Wagenmakers EJ (2017) Bayesian inference for correlations in the presence of measurement error and estimation uncertainty. Collabra: Psych. 3(1):25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElreath R (2020) Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan, 2nd ed. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL)).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meager R (2019) Understanding the average impact of microcredit expansions: A Bayesian hierarchical analysis of seven randomized experiments. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 11(1):57–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KM, Sahni NS, Strulov-Shlain A (2025) Sophisticated consumers with inertia: Long-term implications from a large-scale field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Mogstad M, Torgovitsky A (2018) Identification and extrapolation of causal effects with instrumental variables. Annu. Rev. Econom. 10:577–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A, Whinston MD (2010) Taking the dogma out of econometrics: Structural modeling and credible inference. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):69–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P (2023) bayesm: Bayesian inference for marketing/micro-econometrics. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bayesm.Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. 15(4):321–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1981) Estimation in parallel randomized experiments. J. Ed. Statist. 6(4):377–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS, Zou D, Chintagunta PK (2017) Do targeted discount offers serve as advertising? Evidence from 70 field experiments. Management Sci. 63(8):2688–2705.Link, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman P (2004) Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Sci. 23(2):263–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT, Hitsch GJ, Tuchman AE (2021) TV advertising effectiveness and profitability: Generalizable results from 288 brands. Econometrica 89(4):1855–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonov A, Nosko C, Rao JM (2018) Competition and crowd-out for brand keywords in sponsored search. Marketing Sci. 37(2):200–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonov A, Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Rossi P (2020) State-dependent demand estimation with initial conditions correction. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):789–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todd PE, Wolpin KI (2023) The best of both worlds: Combining randomized controlled trials with structural modeling. J. Econom. Literature 61(1):41–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torgovitsky A (2019) Nonparametric inference on state dependence in unemployment. Econometrica 87(5):1475–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb R, Fong J, Landry P, Levine J, Wellsjo AS, Natan O, Mazar A, et al. (2025) Integrating neuro-psychological habit research into consumer choice models. Internat. J. Res. Marketing.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt N, Tuchman A, Shapiro B, Moakler R (2025) Estimating the value of offsite tracking data to advertisers: Evidence from Meta. Marketing Sci. 44(2):268–286.Link, Google Scholar