Can Task Motivation Backfire? The Roles of Perceived Task Interdependence and Interaction Avoidance

References

• Ali H, Davies DR (2003) The effects of age, sex and tenure on the job performance of rubber tappers. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 76(3):381–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachrach DG, Powell BC, Bendoly E, Richey RG (2006) Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. J. Appl. Psych. 91(1):193–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baethge A, Vahle-Hinz T, Rigotti T (2020) Coworker support and its relationship to allostasis during a workday: A diary study on trajectories of heart rate variability during work. J. Appl. Psych. 105(5):506–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Xanthopoulou D (2009) The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor-partner interdependence model. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1562–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bareket-Bojmel L, Hochman G, Ariely D (2017) It’s (not) all about the Jacksons: Testing different types of short-term bonuses in the field. J. Management 43(2):534–554.Google Scholar
• Barnett K, McCormick J (2016) Perceptions of task interdependence and functional leadership in schools. Small Group Res. 47(3):279–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartoo H, Sias PM (2004) When enough is too much: Communication apprehension and employee information experiences. Comm. Quart. 52(1):15–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bashir M, Wright BE, Hassan S (2023) The interactive influence of public service motivation, perceived reward equity, and prosocial impact on employee engagement: A panel study in Pakistan. Public Management Rev. 25(7):1213–1237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 11(2):142–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF (1984) Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 46(3):610–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Showers CJ (1986) A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 16(4):361–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bavik YL, Shaw JD, Wang XH (2020) Social support: Multidisciplinary review, synthesis, and future agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):726–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer JM, Chattopadhyay P, George E, Glick WH, Ogilvie DT, Pugliese D (1997) The selective perception of managers revisited. Acad. Management J. 40(3):716–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumberg M, Pringle CD (1982) The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Acad. Management Rev. 7(4):560–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Grant AM (2016) The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):599–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brehm JW, Self EA (1989) The intensity of motivation. Annual Rev. Psych. 40:109–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buller PF, Bell CHJ (1986) Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Acad. Management J. 29(2):305–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burnkrant RE (1976) A motivational model of information processing intensity. J. Consumer Res. 3(1):21–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlin KG, Plant EA (2023) Systemic sexism recognition and antisexism encourage gender equality activism: An adaptation of bystander intervention theory. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 53(10):911–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Harrison DA (2008) Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 93(5):1082–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Alper CM, Doyle WJ, Adler N, Treanor JJ, Turner RB (2008) Objective and subjective socioeconomic status and susceptibility to the common cold. Health Psych. 27(2):268–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1980) The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 39–80.Google Scholar
• Delaney ML, Royal MA (2017) Breaking engagement apart: The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in engagement strategies. Indust. Organ. Psych. 10(1):127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE (2006) The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psych. Assessment 18(2):192–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earle F, Hockey B, Earle K, Clough P (2015) Separating the effects of task load and task motivation on the effort-fatigue relationship. Motivation Emotion 39(4):467–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles JS, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Rev. Psych. 53:109–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Van Dyne L, Kamdar D (2015) The contextualized self: How team-member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):583–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fragale AR (2006) The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham S, Golan S (1991) Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. J. Ed. Psych. 83(2):187–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 54(1):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer T, Sagioglou C (2016) Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: A test of the theory of social deprivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 111(2):178–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK (2007) A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad. Management J. 50(2):327–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin DJ, Somaraju AV, Dishop C, DeShon RP (2023) Evaluating interdependence in workgroups: A network-based method. Organ. Res. Methods 26(3):459–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guerin B (1986) Mere presence effects in humans: A review. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 22(1):38–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzzo RA, Dickson MW (1996) Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Rev. Psych. 47(1):307–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hafenbrack AC, Vohs KD (2018) Mindfulness meditation impairs task motivation but not performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 147:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JRB, Wheeler AR (2015) To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior. J. Management 41(6):1628–1650.Google Scholar
• Hanser LM, Muchinsky PM (1978) Work as an information environment. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 21(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holste JS, Fields D (2010) Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. J. Knowledge Management 14(1):128–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu X, Shi J (2015) Employees’ surface acting in interactions with leaders and peers. J. Organ. Behav. 36(8):1132–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang X, Hsieh JPA, He W (2014) Expertise dissimilarity and creativity: The contingent roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. J. Appl. Psych. 99(5):816–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hur JD, Lee-Yoon A, Whillans AV (2021) Are they useful? The effects of performance incentives on the prioritization of work versus personal ties. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 165:103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson CL, Colquitt JA, Wesson MJ, Zapata-Phelan CP (2006) Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):884–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Jones AP (1980) Perceived job characteristics and job satisfaction: An examination of reciprocal causation. Personnel Psych. 33(1):97–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1973) Attention and Effort (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kamdar D, Van Dyne L (2007) The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1286–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanfer R (1990) Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. Dunnette MD, Hough L, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), 75–170.Google Scholar
• Kanfer R, Frese M, Johnson RE (2017) Motivation related to work: A century of progress. J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):338–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Vandenberghe C (2018) The moderating roles of perceived task interdependence and team size in transformational leadership’s relation to team identification: A dimensional analysis. J. Bus. Psych. 33(4):509–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SL, Yun S (2015) The effect of coworker knowledge sharing on performance and its boundary conditions: An interactional perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):575–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, Schaufeli WB, de Vet HCW, van der Beek AJ (2011) Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. J. Occupational Environ. Medicine 53(8):856–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ (2015) Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organ. Psych. Rev. 5(4):270–299.Google Scholar
• Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuvaas B, Buch R, Weibel A, Dysvik A, Nerstad CGL (2017) Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? J. Econom. Psych. 61:244–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lebel RD, Patil SV (2018) Proactivity despite discouraging supervisors: The powerful role of prosocial motivation. J. Appl. Psych. 103(7):724–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepper MR, Greene D (1978) Overjustification research and beyond: Toward a means-ends analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Lepper MR, Greene D, eds. The Hidden Costs of Reward (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 109–148.Google Scholar
• Li F, Chen T, Bai Y, Liden RC, Wong M-N, Qiao Y (2023) Serving while being energized (strained)? A dual-path model linking servant leadership to leader psychological strain and job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 108(4):660–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao H, Su R, Ptashnik T, Nielsen J (2022) Feeling good, doing good, and getting ahead: A meta-analytic investigation of the outcomes of prosocial motivation at work. Psych. Bull. 148(3–4):158–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Jaworski RA, Bennett N (2004) Social loafing: A field investigation. J. Management 30(2):285–304.Google Scholar
• Liu K (2025) Understanding the post-covid Chinese economy. Internat. Rev. Appl. Econom. 39(1):126–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCloy RA, Campbell JP, Cudeck R (1994) A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. J. Appl. Psych. 79(4):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mell JN, DeChurch LA, Leenders RTAJ, Contractor N (2020) Identity asymmetries: An experimental investigation of social identity and information exchange in multiteam systems. Acad. Management J. 63(5):1561–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menges JI, Tussing DV, Wihler A, Grant AM (2017) When job performance is all relative: How family motivation energizes effort and compensates for intrinsic motivation. Acad. Management J. 60(2):695–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA (2009) Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):535–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Hermida R (2010) A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J. Management 36(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR (1997) Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. Res. Organ. Behav. 19:57–149.Google Scholar
• Morrow PC, Crum MR (1998) The effects of perceived and objective safety risk on employee outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 53(2):300–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén B (2019) Mplus 8.4 (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Ng TWH, Feldman DC (2008) The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 93(2):392–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng TWH, Feldman DC (2009) How broadly does education contribute to job performance? Personnel Psych. 62(1):89–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nifadkar S, Tsui AS, Ashforth BE (2012) The way you make me feel and behave: Supervisor-triggered newcomer affect and approach-avoidance behavior. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1146–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcelik H, Barsade SG (2018) No employee an island: Workplace loneliness and job performance. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2343–2366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK (2014) Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Rev. Psych. 65:661–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patall EA, Sylvester BJ, Han CW (2014) The role of competence in the effects of choice on motivation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 50:27–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pate LE, Merker GE (1978) Communication apprehension: Implications for management and organizational behavior. J. Management 4(2):107–119.Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi V (2017) The moderating effect of interaction avoidance between abusive supervision and subordinates’ job promotions. J. Psych. 151(7):669–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peyrols Wu C, Ng KY (2021) Cultural intelligence and language competence: Synergistic effects on avoidance, task performance, and voice behaviors in multicultural teams. Appl. Psych. 70(4):1512–1542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R, Warlop L (1999) Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 16(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psych. Methods 15(3):209–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy N, Flood PC (2004) Individualism/collectivism, perceived task interdependence and teamwork attitudes among Irish blue-collar employees: A test of the main and moderating effects. Human Relations 57(3):347–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R (2020) The role of interdependence in the micro-foundations of organization design: Task, goal, and knowledge interdependence. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):828–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reizer A, Brender-Ilan Y, Sheaffer Z (2019) Employee motivation, emotions, and performance: A longitudinal diary study. J. Managerial Psych. 34(6):415–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rico R, Cohen SG (2005) Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams. J. Managerial Psych. 20(3/4):261–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth PL, Purvis KL, Bobko P (2012) A meta-analysis of gender group differences for measures of job performance in field studies. J. Management 38(2):719–739.Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Ed. Psych. Measurement 66(4):701–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz G, Eva N, Newman A (2020) Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance? Public Admin. Rev. 80(4):543–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah JY, Friedman R, Kruglanski AW (2002) Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(6):1261–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin J, Grant AM (2019) Bored by interest: How intrinsic motivation in one task can reduce performance on other tasks. Acad. Management J. 62(2):415–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin Y, Hur WM (2021) When do job-insecure employees keep performing well? The buffering roles of help and prosocial motivation in the relationship between job insecurity, work engagement, and job performance. J. Bus. Psych. 36(4):659–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shkoler O, Kimura T (2020) How does work motivation impact employees’ investment at work and their job engagement? A moderated-moderation perspective through an international lens. Fronters Psych. 11:38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sias PM (2005) Workplace relationship quality and employee information experiences. Comm. Stud. 56(4):375–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taggar S, Haines VY (2006) I need you, you need me: A model of initiated task interdependence. J. Managerial Psych. 21(3):211–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson ER (2007) Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 38(2):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui AS, Ashford SJ, St. Clair L, Xin KR (1995) Dealing with discrepant expectations: Response strategies and managerial effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 38(6):1515–1543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, Janssen O (2003) Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. J. Management 29(5):729–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, Van de Vliert E (2005) Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. J. Management 31(1):73–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, Emans B, Van de Vliert E (2000) Team members’ affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. J. Management 26(4):633–655.Google Scholar
• Van Iddekinge CH, Aguinis H, Mackey JD, DeOrtentiis PS (2018) A meta-analysis of the interactive, additive, and relative effects of cognitive ability and motivation on performance. J. Management 44(1):249–279.Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1988) Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers’ belief structures and information processing. Acad. Management J. 31(4):873–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welsh DT, Outlaw R, Newton DW, Baer MD (2022) The social aftershocks of voice: An investigation of employees’ affective and interpersonal reactions after speaking up. Acad. Management J. 65(6):2034–2057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wigfield A, Eccles JS (2000) Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Ed. Psych. 25(1):68–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson KS, Sin HP, Conlon DE (2010) What about the leader in leader-member exchange? The impact of resource exchanges and substitutability on the leader. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):358–372.Google Scholar
• Woolum A, Foulk T, Lanaj K, Erez A (2017) Rude color glasses: The contaminating effects of witnessed morning rudeness on perceptions and behaviors throughout the workday. J. Appl. Psych. 102(12):1658–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu L, Duffy MK (2021) The whiplash effect: The (moderating) role of attributed motives in emotional and behavioral reactions to abusive supervision. J. Appl. Psych. 106(5):754–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Liu P, Liu B, Cui Z (2024) Small talk and knowledge sharing: A moderated dual-facilitating pathway model based on interpersonal trust and perceived similarity. J. Knowledge Management 28(6):1538–1565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Liao H, Li N, Colbert AE (2020) Playing it safe for my family: Exploring the dual effects of family motivation on employee productivity and creativity. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1923–1950.Crossref, Google Scholar