Dynamic Models Incorporating Individual Heterogeneity: Utility Evolution in Conjoint Analysis

References

• Allenby G., Lenk P. Modeling household purchase behavior with logistic normal regression. J. Amer. Statist. Association (1994) 89:1218–1231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijmolt T., Wedel M. The effects of alternative methods of collecting similarity data for multidimensional scaling. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12:363–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B., Mahajan V., Vanhonacker W. The emergence of new repeat-purchase categories: The interplay of market share and retailer distribution. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37:16–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekimpe M., Hanssens D. The persistence of marketing effects on sales. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14:1–21Link, Google Scholar
• DeSarbo W., Lehmann D., Hollman F. Modeling dynamic effects in repeated measures experiments involving preference/choice: An illustration involving stated preference analysis. Appl. Psych. Measurement (2004) 28:186–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSarbo W., Fong D. K. H., Liechty J., Copland J. C. Evolutionary preference/utility functions: A dynamic perspective. Psychometrika (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Erdem T. A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Sci. (1996) 14:359–378Link, Google Scholar
• Gilks W., Richardson S., Spiegelhalter D.Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (1996) (Chapman & Hall, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P., Little J. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2:203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Hsee C., Loewenstein G., Blount S., Bazerman M. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(5):576–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Wittink D., Johnson R., Miller R. Learning effects in preference tasks: Choice-based versus standard conjoint. Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (1992) (Sawtooth Software, Inc., Sequim, WA) Google Scholar
• Johnson R., Orme B. How many questions should you ask in choice-based conjoint studies. (1996) . Technical report, Sawtooth Software, Inc., Sequim, WAGoogle Scholar
• Kardes F., Kalyanaram G. Order-of-entry effects on consumer memory of judgment: An information integration perspective. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29:343–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keppel G.Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook (1991) ed. 3(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lenk P., DeSarbo W., Green P., Young M. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of part-worth heterogeneity from incomplete designs in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15:173–191Link, Google Scholar
• Luce D., Tukey J. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. J. Math. Psych. (1964) 1:1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer R., Sathi A. A multiattribute model of consumer choice during product learning. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:41–61Link, Google Scholar
• Muthukrishnan A. V., Kardes F. Persistent preferences for product attributes: The effects of the initial choice context and uninformative experience. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28:89–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton M., Raftery A. Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1994) 56:3–48Google Scholar
• Paap R., Franses P. A dynamic multinomial probit model for brand choice with different long-run and short-run effects of marketing-mix variables. J. Appl. Econometrics (2000) 15:717–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J., Bettman J., Johnson E. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1992) 43:87–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P. The construction of preference. Amer. Psych. (1995) 50:364–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Simester D. I., Hauser J. R., Dahan E. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):273–303Link, Google Scholar
• Vakratsas D., Feinberg F. M., Bass F. M., Kalyanaram G. The shape of advertising response functions revisited: A model of dynamic probabilistic thresholds. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):109–119Link, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• West M., Harrison J.Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (1997) ed. 2(Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
• Wildt A., Winer R. Modeling and estimation in changing market environments. J. Bus. (1983) 56:365–388Crossref, Google Scholar