Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43

References

  • Abernathy W. J.The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry (1978) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Abernathy W. J., Clark K. B., Kantrow A. M.Industrial Renaissance (1983) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Adler P. S. Managing flexible automation. California Management Rev. (1988) Spring):34–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P. S.Technology and the Future of Work (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Staw Barry M., Cummings Larry L. The learning bureaucracy: New United Motors Manufacturing Inc.. Research in Organizational behavior (1993) 15(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 111–194Google Scholar
  • Adler P. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:147–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Borys B. Bureaucracy: Coercive versus enabling. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):61–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Cole R. Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan Management Rev. (1993) 34(3):85–94Google Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota production system: A case study of NUMMI's 1993 model introduction. Indust. and Labor Relations Rev. (1997) 50(3):416–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris Chris, Schon Donald. Organizational Learning (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bowen David E., Lawler Edward E. The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how and when. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 33(3):31–40Google Scholar
  • Bowen David E., Lawler Edward E. Empowering service employees. Sloan Management Rev. (1995) Summer):73–84Google Scholar
  • Bowen H. Kent, Ryckebusch Sylvie. Injex Industries (1996) (Harvard Business School Case 9-696-090, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brush Thomas, Karnani Aneel. Impact of plant size and focus on productivity: An empirical study. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):1065–1081LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burns Tom, Stalker George M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, England) Google Scholar
  • Bushe Gervase R., Shani A. B.Parallel Learning Structures: Increasing Innovation in Bureaucracies (1991) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Business Week Motown's struggle to shift on the fly. (1994) July 11):111–112Google Scholar
  • Clark Kim B. Competing through manufacturing and the new manufacturing paradigm: Is manufacturing strategy passé? Production and Oper. Management (1996) 5:42–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark Kim B., Chew Bruce, Fujimoto Takahiro, Susman Gerald I. Manufacturing for design: Beyond the production/R&D dichotomy. Integrating Design and Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) 178–206Google Scholar
  • Clark Kim B., Fujimoto Takahiro. Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Corrêa Henrique Luiz. Linking Flexibility, Uncertainty and Variability in Manufacturing Systems (1994) (Averbury, Aldershot, England) Google Scholar
  • Daft Richard. Essentials of Organization Theory and Design (1998) (South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, Ohio) Google Scholar
  • de Meyer Arnould, Nakane Jinichiro, Miller Jeffrey G., Ferdows Kasra. Flexibility: The next competitive battle. The manufacturing futures survey. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:135–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty Deborah. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan Robert B., Kilman Ralph H., Pondy Louis R., Slevin Dennis P. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization Design (1976) 1(North-Holland, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:57–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferdows Kasra, de Meyer Arnoud. Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance. J. Oper. Management (1990) 9:168–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischman Charles A. The endogeneity of employment adjustment costs: The tradeoff between efficiency and flexibility. (1996) . Finance and Economics Discussion Series, no. 1996–48, Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  • Garud Raghu, Kumaraswamy Arun. Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:93–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerwin Donald. Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Sci. (1993) 39:395–408LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat Pankaj, Ricart I Costa Joan E. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:59–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Consequences of Modernity (1990) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Goldhar Joel D., Jelinek Mariann. Plan for economies of scope. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1983) 61(6):141–148Google Scholar
  • Goldstein S. G. Organizational dualism and quality circles. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:504–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant Robert M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. Richard, Oldham Greg R.Work Redesign (1980) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hannan Michael T., Freeman John. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociology (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan Michael T., Freeman John. Organizational Ecology (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart A. G., Schultz H., Lange O., McIntyre F. Risk, uncertainty, and the unprofitability of compounding probabilities. Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics (1942) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 110–118Google Scholar
  • Hayes Robert H., Pisano Gary P. Manufacturing strategy: At the intersection of two paradigm shifts. Production and Operations Management (1996) 5:25–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes Robert H., Wheelwright S. C.Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing (1984) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Helper Susan. Comparative supplier relations in the US and Japanese auto industries. Business and Economic History (1990) 19(Second Series):153–162Google Scholar
  • Helper Sussan, Levine David I. Long-term supplier relations and product market structure. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1992) 8:561–581Google Scholar
  • Hill Stephen, Wilkinson Adrian, Willmott Hugh. From quality circles to total quality management. Making Quality Critical: New Perspectives on Organizational Change (1995) (Routledge, New York and London, England) 33–53Google Scholar
  • Hounshell David A.From the American System to Mass Production 1800–1932 (1984) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Jelinek Mariann, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. The Innovation Marathon (1993) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kekre S., Srinivasan Kannan. Broader product line: A necessity to achieve success? Management Sci. (1990) 36:1216–1231LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klein Burton H.Prices Wages and Business Cycles: A Dynamic Theory (1984) (Pergamon, New York) Google Scholar
  • Knott Anne Marie. Do Managers Matter? (1996) . Unpublished dissertation, UCLAGoogle Scholar
  • Krafcik John. A new diet for US manufacturing: The auto industry enters the 1990s. Tech. Rev. (1989) January):28–39Google Scholar
  • Kurke Lance B., Zucker L. G. Does adaptation preclude adaptability? Strategy and performance. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 199–222Google Scholar
  • Langer E. J. Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness/mindfulness. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1989) 22:137–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler Edward E., Mohrman Susan A. Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) 85(1):64–71Google Scholar
  • Lawrence Paul R., Lorsch Jay W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ledford Gerald E., Lawler III Edward E., Mohrman Susan A., Campbell J. P., Campbell R. J. The quality circle and its variations. Productivity in Organizations: New Perspectives from Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1988) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 255–294Google Scholar
  • Levine David I.Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employees Can Both Win (1995) (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Levinthal Daniel, March James. Myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(S2):95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln James R., Kalleberg Arne L.Culture, Control and Commitment (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Louis Meryl Reis, Sutton Robert I. Switching cognitive gears. Human Relations (1991) 44(1):55–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luhmann N.Trust and Power (1979) (Wiley, Chichester, New York) Google Scholar
  • MacDuffie John Paul, Sethuraman Kannan, Fisher Marshall L. Product variety and manufacturing performance: Evidence from the International Automotive Assembly Plant study. Management Sci. (1996) 42(3):350–369LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacDuffie John Paul, Kochan Thomas A. Do US firms invest less in human resources? Training in the world auto industry. Indust. Relations (1995) 34(2):147–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March James. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maybury-Lewis David, Almagor Uri. The quest for harmony. David Maybury-Lewis. The Attraction of Opposites: Thought and Society in the Dualistic Mode (1989) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) 1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer Robert C., Davis James H., David Schoorman F. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonough Edward F., Leifer Richard. Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:727–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGill Michael E., Slocum John W., Lei David. Management practices in learning organizations. Organ. Dynam. (1992) Summer):5–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGregor Douglas. The Human Side of Enterprise (1960) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Merton Robert K. Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Theory and Social Structure (1958) 3rd ed.(Free Press, New York) 249–260Google Scholar
  • Miles Raymond E., Snow Charles C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miller E. C. The parallel organization structure at General Motors: An interview with Howard C. Carlson. Personnel (1978) 55(4):64–69Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg Henry. The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mishra Aneil K., Kramer Roderick M., Tyler Tom R. Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. Trust in Organizations (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 261–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monden Y.Toyota Production System (1983) (Institute of Industrial Engineers, Atlanta, GA) Google Scholar
  • Nelson Richard R., Winter Sidney G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohno Taichi. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production (1988) (Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Organization Science Special Issue on Hypercompetition. 7(3 and 4Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer Jeffrey. Organization Design (1978) (AHM, Arlington Heights, IL) Google Scholar
  • Pil Frits K., MacDuffie John Paul, Voos Paula. Japanese and local influences on the transfer of work practices at Japanese transplants. (1996) Proc. Forty-eighth Annual MeetingMadison, WI(Industrial Relations Research Association)278–297Google Scholar
  • Pine B. Joseph. Mass Customization (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Poole Marshall Scott, Van de Ven Andrew H. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):562–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter Michael E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Power J. D. Japanese and domestic launches. (1995) . Archival data and AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  • Safizadeh M. Hossein, Ritzman Larry P., Sharma Deven, Wood Craig. An empirical analysis of the product-process matrix. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1576–1591LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sako Mari. Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schon Donald A.The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1983) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter Joseph. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1976) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. Richard. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (1992) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sethi Andrea K., Sethi Suresh P. Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1990) 2(4):289–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro Susan P. The social control of impersonal trust. Amer. J. Sociology (1987) 93(3):623–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin Sim B. On the positive effect of legalization of trust. Res. Negotiations Organ. (1995) 5:185–217Google Scholar
  • Skinner Wickham. Manufacturing: The Formidable Competitive Weapon (1985) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Skinner Wickham. Manufacturing strategy on the “s” curve. Production and Oper. Management (1996) 5(1):3–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein Barry A., Moss Kanter R. Building the parallel organization: Creating mechanisms for permanent quality of work life. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1980) 16(3):371–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler George. Production and distribution in the short run. J. Political Econom. (1939) 47:305–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suárez Fernando F., Cusumano Michael, Fine Charles. An empirical study of manufacturing flexibility in printed circuit board assembly. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):223–240LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman Michael L., O'Reilly Charles A.Winning Through Innovation (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Upton David M. The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Rev. (1994) 36(2):72–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Victor Bart, Boynton Andrew, Jahng Theresa S. The effective organization of work under Total Quality Management. Organ. Sci. (1998) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda Henk W. Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):359–374LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walton Richard E., Walton Richard E., Lawrence Paul R. Toward a strategy of eliciting employee commitment based on policies of mutuality. HRM Trends and Challenges (1985) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 119–218Google Scholar
  • Weick Karl. The Social Psychology of Organizing (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Williamson Oliver E. Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. J. Law and Econom. (1993) April):453–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Womack James, Jones Daniel, Roos Daniel. The Machine that Changed the World (1990) (Rawson Associates, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zammuto Raymond F., O'Connor Edward J. Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies' benefits: The roles of organization design and culture. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(4):701–728CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zand D. Collateral organization: A new change strategy. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1974) 10:63–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker Lynne G. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Res. Organ. Behavior (1986) 8:53–111Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.