Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities

References

• Allaire Y., Firsirotu M. E. Theories of organizational culture. Organ. Stud. (1984) 5:193–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. I., Brandenburg R. G. A language for organizational design: Parts I and II. Management Sci. (1971) 17(12):B705–731Link, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V.Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S.Managing Across Borders, The Transnational Solution (1989) (Hutckinson Business Books, London) Google Scholar
• Bettis R. A., Hitt M. A. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:7–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boer M. de, Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. J. Management Stud. (1999) 36(3):379–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boisot M.Knowledge Assets (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design (1995) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Vepsalainen A. The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:115–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J.Organization, a Guide to Problems and Practice (1984) (Chapman Publishing Ltd, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma, When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Econom. J. (1989) 99:569–596Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Sci. (1994) 40:227–251Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Reply to comments on fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1463–1468Link, Google Scholar
• Collis D. J., Bane P. W., Bradley S. P., Yoffie D. B. Winners and losers: Industry structure in the converging world of telecommunications, computing and entertainment. Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 159–200Google Scholar
• De Leeuw A. J. C., Volberda H. W. On the concept of flexibility: A dual control perspective. Omega (1996) 2:121–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Where are the theories for the “new” organization forms? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:i–viGoogle Scholar
• Dijksterhuis M., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueLink, Google Scholar
• Ferlie E., Pettigrew A. M. Managing through internal networks: Some issues and implications for the NHS. British J. Management (1996) 7(Special Issue):81–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organization capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996a) 7:375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996b) 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:293–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagel J., Eisenmann T. R. Navigating the multimedia landscape. The McKinsey Quart. (1994) 3:39–55Google Scholar
• Hamel G., Prahalad C. K.Competing for the Future (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Hedlund G. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Summer Special Issue):73–90Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilinitch A. Y., D'Aveni R. A., Lewin A. Y. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):211–220Link, Google Scholar
• Inkpen A. C., Dinur A. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:454–468Link, Google Scholar
• Keesing R. Theories of culture. Ann. Rev. Anthropology (1974) 3:73–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khandwalla P. N.The Design of Organizations (1977) (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York) Google Scholar
• Kist J.Electronic Publishing: Looking for a Blueprint (1987) (Croom Helm, New York) Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, integration capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Koza M. P., Lewin A. Y. The coevolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):255–264Link, Google Scholar
• Krijnen H. G. The flexible firm. Long Range Planning (1979) 12:63–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar R., Nti K. Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:356–367Link, Google Scholar
• Lane P. J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:461–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Surviving Schumpeterian environments: An evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organization (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 167–178Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of Learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Long C. P., Caroll T. N. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueGoogle Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Volberda H. W. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework of research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueGoogle Scholar
• Lorenzoni G., Lipparini A. The leveraging of intrafirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:317–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. Quasi-natural organization science. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:352–380Link, Google Scholar
• McLaughlin J. F., Biriny A. E., Compaine B. M. Mapping the information business. Understanding New Media (1984) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame (1984) (The Free Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C. Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Rev. (1986) 27:62–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organization knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:14–37Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G.Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge (1981) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Pennings J. M., Harianto F. Technological networking and innovation implementation. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:356–382Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch F. A. J., de Man A. P.Perspectives on Strategy (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda H. W.Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) Google Scholar
• Whittington R., Pettigrew A., Peck S., Fenton E., Conyon M. Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueLink, Google Scholar
• Winch G., Schneider E. Managing the knowledge-based organization: The case of architectural practice. J. Management Stud. (1993) 6:923–937Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Teece D. J. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wijk R. A. van, Van den Bosch F. A. J., Havlovic S. Knowledge characteristics of internal network-based forms of organizinged. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (1998) August 9–12San Diego, CA:B1–B7Google Scholar
• Yoffie D. B.Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar