The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms in the Fashion Industry: A Historical and Comparative Study of France, Italy, and the United States

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.622

References

  • Ainamo A. Industrial design and business performance: A case study of a Finnish fashion firm. (1996) . Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  • Bartlett C., Ghoshal S.Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (1989) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.La Distinction (1979) (Editions de Minuit, Paris, France) Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P. The field of cultural production or the economic world reversed. Poetics: J. Empirical Res. Literature, the Media and the Arts (1983) 12:311–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S., Eisenhardt K.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brusco S. The Emilian model: Productive decentralization and social integration. Cambridge J. Econom. (1982) 6Google Scholar
  • Burns T., Stalker G.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
  • CERNAL'industrie du luxe dans l'économie française (1995) (Ministère de L'Industrie, Paris) Google Scholar
  • Chandler A.Scale and Scope (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Social (1972) 6:1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choez. (1998) . Interview with M. Choez general manager of the perfumes division, LVMHGoogle Scholar
  • Clegg S.Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World (1990) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
  • Crane D. Globalization, organizational size, and innovation in the French luxury fashion industry: Production of culture theory revisited. Poetics: J. Empirical Res. Literature, the Media and the Arts (1997) 24:393–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dijksterhuis M., Van den Bosch F., Volverda H. Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Djelic M. L.Exporting the American Model (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Djelic M. L., Gutsatz M. Organizational and managerial competences in the luxury goods industry—Between tradition and postmodernism. (1998) Oslo, NorwayPaper presented at the IVth International Conference on Competence-Based Management(available on request)Google Scholar
  • Dumas. (1998) . Interview with M. Dumas Chairman, HermèsGoogle Scholar
  • Les Echos Donna Karan International flouge lourdement dans le rouge. (1998) 24 MarchGoogle Scholar
  • Les Echos Jean-Louis Dumas souhaite ajouter de nouvelles brancher à Herniès. (1998) 26 MarchGoogle Scholar
  • Les Echos Luxe: 'elargir l'offre sans banaliser les marques. (1998) 30 AprilGoogle Scholar
  • Les Echos Pierre Cardin n'exclut pas de s'introduire en bourse. (1998) 11 JulyGoogle Scholar
  • Ecole de ParisDébat: Le luxe, domaine des rêves (1998) March 23Google Scholar
  • The Economist The Changing Fabric of Fashion. (1998) 11 AprilGoogle Scholar
  • Le Figaro LVMH: Courment reboudir. (1998) 16 MarchGoogle Scholar
  • Financial Times (1998) 27 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman E., Bamford J.Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy (1989) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Soc. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grumbach D.Histoires de la Mode (1993) (Seuil, Paris) Google Scholar
  • Guillèn M. Scientific management's lost aesthetic: Architecture, organization, and the taylorized beauty of the mechanical. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:682–715CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutsatz M. Le luxe: Représentations et compétences. Decisions Marketing (1996) 9Google Scholar
  • Hannan M., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jellinek S. Le sage et la cynique: Débat virtuel sur des questions fondamentales de parfumerie. Dragoco Report (1997) 4:19–148Google Scholar
  • Koza M., Lewin A. The coevolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):255–265LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koza M., Lewin A. The coevolution of network alliances: A longitudinal analysis of an international professional service network. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lazerson M. A new phoenix?: Modern putting-out in the Modena knitwear industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) March):34–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., March J. The myopia of strategic learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin A., Stephens C., Huber G., Glick W. Designing postindustrial organizations: Combining theory and practice. Organizational Change and Redesign (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lewin A., Long C., Carroll T. Coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin K.Field Theory in Social Science (1951) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 26:563–577Google Scholar
  • March J. The future disposable organizations and the rigidities of imagination. Organization (1995) 2:71–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin. (1998) . Interview with M. Martin, chairman, Kenzo, LVMHGoogle Scholar
  • Miles R., Snow C. Organizations: New concepts for the new forms. California Management Rev. (1986) 28:62–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Le Monde Du gris, du chic, du confort. (1998) 18 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N., Eccles R.Networks and Organizations (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nueno J., Quelch J. The mass marketing of luxury. Bus. Horizons (1998) November–December):61–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behavior (1990) 12:295–336Google Scholar
  • Powell W., DiMaggio P.The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott R.Institutional Environments and Organizations (1994) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Simon H.Sciences of the Artificial (1996) 3rd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Taylor F. W.The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
  • Taylor W. The logic of global business: An interview with ABB's Percy Barnevik. Harvard Bus. Rev (1991) March–AprilGoogle Scholar
  • La Tribune Etro réussit sa mutation vers le frét-à-porter. (1998) 7 AprilGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart (1997) 42:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda H. Towards the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):359–374LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda H.Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive (1998) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Laura Asley finds a Malaysian supporterWall Street Journal (1998) 20 AprilGoogle Scholar
  • Webb D., Pettigrew A. The temporal development of strategy: Patterns in the UK insurance industry. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1969) (Addison Wesley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weiss L.Creating Capitalism: The State and Small Business Since 1945 (1988) (Basil Blackwell, New York) Google Scholar
  • Women's Wear Daily Fashion Waves. (1997) 7 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  • Women's Wear Daily Powering Prada. (1997) 10 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  • Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, London) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.