Impact of CEO Succession in Japanese Companies: A Coevolutionary Perspective

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.654

References

  • Aoki Masahiko. Towards an economic model of the Japanese firm. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28:1–27Google Scholar
  • Aoki Masahiko, Aoki M., Patrick H. Monitoring characteristic of the main bank system: An analytical and developmental view. The Japanese Main Bank Systems: Its Relevancy for Developing and Transforming Economies (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Armour H., Teece D. Organizational structure and economic performance. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9:106–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baden-Fuller Charles, Stopford John M.Rejuvenating the Mature Business (1992) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
  • Baron David P.Business and Environment (1996) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Beatty Randolph P., Zajac Edward J. CEO changes and firm performance in large corporations: Succession effects and manager shifts. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:305–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bendix R.Work and Authority in Industry (1956) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Benston George. The self-serving management hypothesis: Some evidence. J. Accounting Econom. (1985) 7:67–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bethel Jennifer, Liebeskind Julia. The effects of ownership structure on corporate restructuring. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:15–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bibeault Donald B.Corporate Turnaround: How Managers Turn Losers into Winners (1982) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boker Warren. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):152–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman Edward, Singh Harbir. Corporate restructuring: Re-Configuring the firm. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(Summer):5–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brady Gene, Helmich Donald L.Executive Succession: Toward Excellence in Corporate Leadership (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
  • Calori R., Lubatkin M., Very P., Veiga J. F. Modelling the origins of nationally-bound administrative heritages: A historical institutional analysis of French and British firms. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(6):681–696LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaganti Rajeswararas, Sambharya Rakesh. Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:393–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakravarthy Balaji S. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:437–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler A. D.Scale and Scope, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (1990) (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Chung Kae H., Lubatkin Michael, Rogers Ronald C., Owens James E. Do insiders make better CEOs than outsiders? Acad. Management Executive (1987) 1:323–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark Rodney. The Japanese Company (1979) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Cook Thomas D., Campbell Donald T.Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Coughlan Anne, Schmidt Ronald M. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. J. Accounting and Econom. (1985) 7:43–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crain W. M., Deaton T., Tollison R. On the survival of corporate executives. Southern Econom. J. (1977) 43:1372–1376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crystal G. S. The wacky, wacky world of CEO pay. Fortune (1988) 6:68–78Google Scholar
  • Crystal G. S.The Search of Excess: The Overcompensation of American Executives (1991) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L.Organization Theory and Design (1998) 6th ed.(South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lewin Arie Y. Where are the theories for the “new” organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(4):i–viGoogle Scholar
  • Dalton Dan R., Kesner Idalene F. Inside/outside succession and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive succession. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:736–742CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dalton Dan R., Kesner Idalene F. Organizational performance as antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28:749–762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson Wallace N. III., Worrell Dan L., Cheng Louis. Key executive succession and stockholder wealth: The influence of successor's origin, position and age. J. Management (1990) 16:647–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeAngelo H., DeAngelo I. Proxy contests and the governance of publicly held corporations. J. Financial Accounting (1989) 12:29–59Google Scholar
  • Dijksterhuis Marjolijin, Van den Bosch Frans, Volberda Henk. Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson L., Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Nord W. R. The normal science of structural contingency theory. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage, London) 57–76Google Scholar
  • Finkelstein Sydney, Hambrick Donald. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (1996) (West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN) Google Scholar
  • Fligstein N. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1985) 50:377–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman Steward D., Saul Kathleen. A leader's wake: Organization member reactions to CEO succession. J. Management (1991) 17:619–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman Steward D., Singh Harbir. CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:718–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furtado Eugene P. H., Rozeff Michael. The wealth effects of company initiated management changes. J. Financial Econom. (1987) 18:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ginsberg Ari. Measuring and modeling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:559–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodstein Jerry, Boeker Warren. Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:306–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greiner Larry E., Bhambri Arvind. New CEO intervention and dynamics of deliberate change. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10(Summer):67–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guillen M.Models of Management Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective (1994) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick Donald C. Environment, strategy and power within top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:253–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton G. G., Biggart N. W. Market, culture and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. Amer. J. Soc. (1988) 94:S95–S120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helmich Donald L. Organizational growth succession patterns. Acad. Management J. (1974) 17:771–775CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helmich Donald L. Corporate succession: An examination. Acad. Management J. (1975) 18:429–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helmich Donald L. Matching board size and executive span. J. Bus. Res. (1976) 4:255–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helmich Donald L., Brown Warren D. Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:371–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill Charles, Snell Scott A. External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:577–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofer Charles W. Turnaround strategy. J. Bus. Strategy (1980) 1:19–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede Geert. Culture's Consequences (1980) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hofstede Geert. Cultural constraints in managerial theories. Acad. Management Executive (1993) 7(1):81–95Google Scholar
  • Hoskisson Robert E., Johnson Richard A., Moesel Douglas D. Corporate divesture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1207–1251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Itami Hiroyuki, Hidemasa Morikawa, Yonekura Seiichiro. Sengo Nihon no Toppu Manejimento [Japanese top management after World War II]. Nihon Keieishi 5: Kohdo Seicho o Koete [Post Era of High Economic Growth] (1995) (Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo) Google Scholar
  • Jauch I., Martin T., Osborn R. Top management under fire. J. Bus. Strategy (1980) 1:33–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jepperson R., Powell W., DiMaggio P. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Kang Jun-Koo, Shivdasani Anil. Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan. J. Financial Econom. (1995) 38:29–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan Steven N. Top executive rewards and firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the United States. J. Political Economy (1994) 102:510–546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan Steven N., Minton B. A. Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards: Determinants and implications for managers. J. Financial Econom. (1994) 36:225–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kesner Idalene F., Sebora Terrence C. Executive succession: Past, present and future. J. Management (1994) 20:327–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kieser A. Why organization theory needs historical analysis and how this should be performed. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):608–620LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kigyo Keiretsu Soran [Corporate Grouping in Japan]Toyo Keizai Shimposha (1990 and 1991) . (in Japanese). TokyoGoogle Scholar
  • Klein April, Rosenfeld James. Targeted share repurchases and top management changes. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 19:493–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard School of Business Administration Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(Winter):95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin Arie Y., Long Chris P., Carroll Timothy N. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin Arie Y., Stephens Carroll U. CEO attitudes as determinants of organization design: An integrated model. Organ. Stud. (1994) 15(2):183–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin Arie Y., Wolf Carl. When the CEO must go. Advanced Management J. (1974) 39:59–62Google Scholar
  • Liebeskind Julia, Wiersema Margarethe, Hansen Gary. LBOs, corporate restructuring, and the incentive-intensity hypothesis. Financial Management (1992) 21(1):73–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lubatkin Michael H., Chung Kae H., Rogers Ronald C., Owers James E. Stockholder reactions to CEO changes in large organizations. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:47–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan Arvind, Lummer Scott. Shareholder wealth effects of management changes. J. Bus. Finance and Accounting (1993) 20:393–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March James G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March James G. The future, disposable organizations, and the rigidities of imagination. Organization (1995) 2(3/4):427–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J., Boli J., Thomas G. M., Ramirez F. O. World society and the nation-state. Amer. J. Soc. (1997) 103:144–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller Danny. Some organizational consequences of CEO succession. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:644–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miyajima Hideaki. The evolution and change of contingent governance structure in the J-firm system: An approach to presidential turnover and firm performance. (1996) . Working paper no. 9606, Institute for Research in Contemporary Political and Economic Affairs, Waseda University, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  • Morck Randall, Nakamura Masao. Banks and corporate control in Japan. (1994) . Working paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Morck Randall, Schleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert W. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 18:293–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morishima Motohito, Cooper C. L., Rousseay D. M. Renegotiating psychological controls, Japanese style. Trends in Organizational Behavior (1996) 3(John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York) 139–158Google Scholar
  • Noburn David. GOGOs, YOYOs, and DODOs: Company directors and industry performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:101–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noburn David, Birley Sue. The top management team and corporate performance. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:225–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka Ikujiro, Takeuchi Hirotaka. The Knowledge Creating Companies: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Main B. G., Crystal G. S. CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33:257–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puffer Sheilla M., Weintrop Joseph. Corporate performance and CEO turnover: The role of performance expectations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajagopalan N., Spreitzer G. Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(1):48–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinganum Marc R. The effects of executive succession on stockholder wealth. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:46–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik Gerald R., Pfeffer Jeffrey. Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in United States corporations. Acad. Management J. (1980) 23:653–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R., Meyer J. W., Meyer J. W., Scott W. R. The organization of societal sectors. Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality (1983) (Falmer Press, New York) 129–160Google Scholar
  • Sheard Paul. The main bank system and corporate monitoring and control in Japan. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1989) 11:399–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheard Paul, Aoki M., Dore R. Interlocking shareholdings and corporate governance. The Japanese Firms: Sources of Competitive Strength (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheard Paul. Bank executives on Japanese corporate boards. Bank of Japan Monetary and Econom. Stud. (1994) Google Scholar
  • Starbuck William H., Hedberg B. L., Thorelli Hans B. Saving an organization from a stagnating environment. Strategy + Structure = Performance: The Strategic Imperative (1977) (Indiana University Press, Bloomington) 249–258Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organization in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tichy N., Sherman S.Control Your Destiny or Someone Else Will (1993) (Currency Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Triandis H., Bagley C., Vernma G. Collectivism vs. individualism. A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology. Personality, Cognition, and Values (1986) (Macmillan, London) 60–95Google Scholar
  • Vancil Richard F.Passing the Baton: Managing the Process of CEO Succession (1987) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Venkatraman N., Ramanujam Vasudevan. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11:801–814CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Virany Beverly, Tushman Michael L., Romanelli Elaine. Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:72–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda Henk. Building the Flexible Firm (1998) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) Google Scholar
  • Wagner W. Gary, Pfeffer Jeffrey, O Reilly Charles A. Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:74–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh James P. Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:173–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warner Jerald B., Watts Ross L., Wruck Karen H. Stock prices and top management changes. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20:461–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb David, Pettigrew Andrew. The temporal development of strategy: Patterns in the United Kingdom insurance industry. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5). This issueLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitley R.Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies (1992) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
  • Whitley R.Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies (1993) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Wiersema Margarethe F. Strategic consequences of executive succession within diversified firms. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:73–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersema Margarethe F., Bird Allen. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:996–1025CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisbach Michael S. Outside directors and CEO turnover. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20:431–460CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wruck Karen H. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. J. Financial Econom. (1989) 23:3–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yakuin Shikiho. . (in Japanese) [Who's Who of Corporate Executives]. 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, Toyo Keizai Shimposha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.