Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0069

References

  • Anand V., Manz C. C., Glick W. H. An organizational memory approach to information management. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):796–809CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baguley T., Payne S. J. Long-term memory for spatial and temporal mental models includes construction processes and model structure. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. (2000) 53A(2):479–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banks A. P., Millward L. J. Running shared mental models as a distributed cognitive process. British J. Psych. (2000) 91:513–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger C. R., Kellerman K., Daly J. A., Wiemann J. M. Acquiring social information. Strategic Interpersonal Communication. LEA's Communication Series (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Berman S. L., Down J., Hill C. W. L. Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):13–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blickensderfer E., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E., Beyerlein M. M., Johnson D. A., Beyerlein S. T. Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Implementation Issues (1997) Vol. 4(JAI Press, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Blickensderfer E., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E., Baker D. P., Schraagen J. M., Chipman S. F., Shalin V. L. Analyzing knowledge requirements in team tasks. Cognitive Task Analysis (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Brown T. M., Miller C. E. Communication networks in task-performing groups: Effects of task complexity, time pressure, and interpersonal dominance. Small Group Res. (2000) 31(2):131–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. J. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(1):40–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derry S. J., DuRussel L. A., O'Donnell A. M. Individual and distributed cognitions in interdisciplinary teamwork: A developing case study and emerging theory. Educational Psych. Rev. (1998) 10(1):25–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devine D. J., Clayton L. D., Philips J. L., Dunford B. B., Melner S. B. Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Res. (1999) 30(6):678–711CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doise W., Mugny G., Perez J. A., Duveen G., Flick U. The social construction of knowledge: Social marking and socio-cognitive conflict. The Psychology of the Social (1998) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Doyle J. K., Ford D. N. Mental models concepts for system dynamics research. System Dynam. Rev. (1997) 14(1):3–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fraidin S. N., Hollingshead A. B., Neale M. A., Mannix E. A., Thomas-Hunt M. In press. “I know what I'm doing:” The impact of gender stereotypes about expertise in work groups. Research on Managing Groups and TeamsVol. 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Henry R. A., Strickland O. J., Yorges S. L., Ladd D. Helping groups determine their most accurate member: The role of outcome feedback. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1996) 26(13):1153–1170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinsz V. B. Mental models of groups as social systems. Small Group Res. (1995) 26(2):200–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., Vollrath D. A. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121:43–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1998a) 34:423–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., Gruenfeld D. H. Distributed expertise and communication processes in groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (1998b) Vol. 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Group and individual training: The impact of practice on performance. Small Group Res. (1998c) 29:254–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998d) 74:659–671CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Perceptions of expertise in and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Processes Intergroup Relations (2000) 3:257–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81:1080–1089CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B., Brandon D. P. Communication and transactive memory systems. Human Comm. Res. (2003) 29:607–615CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B., Fraidin S. N. Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2003) 39:355–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B., Fulk J., Monge P., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Fostering intranet knowledge-sharing: An integration of transactive memory and public goods approaches. Distributed Work: New Research on Working Across Distance Using Technology (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kameda T., Ohtsubo Y., Takezawa M. Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1997) 734(2):296–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley H. H., Thibaut J. W.Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence (1978) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Klimoski R., Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? J. Management (1994) 20(2):403–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koriat A., Goldsmith M., Pansky A., Fiske S. T., Schaater P. L., Zahn-Waxler C. Z. Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology (2000) Vol. 51(Annual Reviews, Stanford, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine J. M., Moreland R. L., Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messnick D. M. Knowledge transmission in work groups: Helping newcomers to succeed. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum, London, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and individual performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littlepage G. E., Robison W., Reddington K. Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1997) 69:133–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieu J. E., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(2):273–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J. E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP). A theory of groups. Small Group Res. (1991) 22(2):147–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michaels J. W., McCulloch D. H. Rationale and design for reducing sex differences in occupational and educational attainment by strengthening across-sex peer influences. Center for Social Organization of Schools Report (1975) Vol. 17(Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) 196Google Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Thompson L., Messick D., J. Levine. Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Sharing Knowledge in Organizations (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Lawler E., Markovsky B., Ridgeway C., Walker H. The composition of small groups. Advances in Group Processes (1992) Vol. 9(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 237–280Google Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behavior Group Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):117–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What's Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage, London, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Tindale R. S., Edwards J., Posavac E. J., Bryant F. B., Suarez-Balcazar Y., Henderson-King E., Myers J. Training people to work in groups. Theory and Research on Small Groups (1998) (Plenum Press, New York) 37–60Google Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Wingert M. L., Witte E. H., Davis J. H. Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. Understanding Group Behavior: Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations (1996) Vol. 2(Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 11–35Google Scholar
  • Nickerson R. S. How we know and sometimes misjudge what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge on others. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125:737–759CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orasanu J., Connolly T., Klein G. A., Orasanu J., Calderwood R., Zsambok C. E. The reinvention of decision making. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods (1993) (Ablex Publishing, ) Google Scholar
  • Peterson E., Mitchell T. R., Thompson L., Burr R. Collective efficacy and aspects of shared mental models as predictors of performance over time in work groups. Group Process Intergroup Relations (2000) 3(3):296–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poole M. S., Streed R., Capella J.Sequence and Pattern in Communicative Behavior (1985) (Edward Arnold, ) Google Scholar
  • Poole M. S., Doelger J. A., Hirokawa R. Y., Poole M. S. Developmental processes in group decision-making. Communication and Group Decision Making (1986) (Sage, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Rasker P. C., Post W. M., Schraagen J. M. C. Effects of two types of intra-team feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams. Ergonomics (2000) 43(8):1167–1189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rulke D. L., Galaskiewicz J. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Sci. (2000) 46:612–625LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rulke D. L., Rau D. Investigating the encoding process and transactive memory development in group training. Group Organ. Management (2000) 25(4):373–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sprigg C. A., Jackson P. R., Parker S. K. Production teamworking: The importance of interdependence and autonomy for employee strain and satisfaction. Human Relations (2000) 53:1519–1543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staggers N., Norcio F. Mental models: Concepts for human-computer interaction research. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1993) 38:587–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Stewart D. D., Wittenbaum G. M. Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1995) 31:244–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner I. D.Group Process and Productivity (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stout R. J., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E., Milanovich D. M. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors (1999) 41(1):61–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson L., Fine G. A. Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (1999) 3(4):278–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R.Theories of Group Behavior (1987) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wegner D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cognition (1995) 13:319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 61(6):923–929CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Giuliano T., Hertel P., Ickes W. J. Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Hubbell A. P., Zuckerman C. Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 77(5):967–978CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Stasser G., Merry C. J. Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1996) 32:129–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Vaughan S. I., Stasser G., Tindale R. S., Heath L., Edwards J., Posavac E. J., Bryant F. B., Suarez-Balcazar Y., Henderson-King E., Myers J. Coordination in task performing groups. Theory and Research on Small Groups: Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues (1998) Vol. 4(Plenum Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Yan A., Louis M. R. The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations (1999) 52(1):25–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zigurs I., Buckland B. K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3):313–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.