Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0080

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Albrecht T. L., Hall B. J. Facilitating talk about new ideas: The role of personal relationships in organizational innovation. Comm. Monographs (1991) 58:273–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J. Communication networks in R&D labs. R&D Management (1970) 1:14–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992a) 37:634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992b) 3:321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Gruenfeld D., Naquin C., Turner M. E. Group learning in organizations. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 369–409Google Scholar
  • Arrow H., McGrath J. E., Berdahl J. L.Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation (2000) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Arvey R. D., Murphy K. R. Performance evaluation in work settings. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1998) 49:141–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51:1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Inequality and Heterogeneity (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bliese P. D., Halverson R. R. Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. J. Management (1998) 24:157–172Google Scholar
  • Brewer M. B., Kramer R. M. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 50:543–549CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:552–560CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. Environmental scanning: The effects of task complexity and source accessibility on information gathering behavior. Decision Sci. (1983) 14:194–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:128–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M. Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:403–420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G., Hackman J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1990) 47:65–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory (1983) 1:201–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Lorsch J. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–342Google Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B., Neale M. A., Mannix E. A., Wageman R. Group cognition and creativity in organizations. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (1999) Vol. 2(JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT) 137–155Google Scholar
  • Harkins S. G., Szymanski K. Social loafing and group evaluation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 56:934–941CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson J. W., Smith E. R. Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1999) 25:120–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. J., Wolf G. Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janis I. L.Victims of Groupthink (1972) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:256–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:81–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Tushman M. L. Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1979) 23:139–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny D. A., LaVoie L. Separating individual and group effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48:339–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leifer R., Delbecq A. Organizational/environmental interchange: A model of boundary spanning activity. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3:40–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy (1988) 17:251–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D. W., Moreland R. L., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieu J. E., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:273–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth C. J., Kwan J. L. Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1985) 48:277–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth C. J., Kwan J. L. Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1987) 17:788–799CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth C. J., Wachtler J. Creative problem solving as a result of majority and minority influence. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1983) 13:45–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Reilly III C. A., Caldwell D. F., Barnett W. P. Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:21–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J. E., Middleton D., Edwards D. Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. Collective Remembering (1990) (Sage Publications, London, U.K) 169–189Google Scholar
  • Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. A framework for comparative organizational analysis. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1967) 16:444–459Google Scholar
  • Perrow C.Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View (1970) (Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12:531–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Rogers E. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge (1980) 1:499–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Vidal P., Ployhart R. E., Marangoni A. Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. (2003) 49:39–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Senge P. M.The Fifth Discipline (1990) (Currency Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Sutcliffe K. S., Schroeder R. Control versus learning in total quality management. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 19:537–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutcliffe K. M. What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1360–1378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:685–718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J. C., Austin W., Worchel S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1979) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) 33–47Google Scholar
  • Turner J. C., Hogg M. A., Oakes P. J., Reicher S. D., Wetherell M. S.Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (1987) (Blackwell, Oxford, England) Google Scholar
  • Watson W., Sharp W., Michaelsen L. K. Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76:803–809CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.