A Test of the Individual Action Model for Organizational Information Commons

References

• Allen B. Information as an economic commodity. New Developments Econom. Theory (1990) 80(2):268–273Google Scholar
• Arrow K. J., McGuire C. B., Radner R. The value of and demand for information. Decision and Organization (1971) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 131–139Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A.Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (Wiley-Interscience, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler B. S. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–362Link, Google Scholar
• Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society (1996) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Cheverie J. F. The changing economics of information, technological development, and copyright protection: What are the consequences of the public domain? The J. Academic Librarianship (2002) 28(5):325–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly T., Thorn B. K., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Discretionary databases: Theory, data, and implications. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 219–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Due R. T. The knowledge economy. Inform. Systems Management (1995) 12:76–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):535–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekeh P. P.Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Fink E. L., Monge P. R., Dervin B., Voigt M. An exploration of confirmatory factor analysis. Progress in Communication Sciences (1985) 6:167–197Google Scholar
• Flanagin A. J., Monge P. R., Fulk J. The value of formative investment in organizational federations. Human Comm. Res. (2001) 27:69–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J., DeSanctis G., DeSanctis G., Fulk J. Articulation of communication technology and organizational form. Shaping Organizational Form: Communication, Connection and Community (1999) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 5–32Google Scholar
• Fulk J., Flanagin A., Kalman M., Monge P. R., Ryan T. Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Comm. Theory (1996) 61:60–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Griffith T. L. Process approach to implementation of new technology. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1991) 8:261–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T., Northcraft G. Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):272–286Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic documentation in a management consulting firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science (1968) 162:1243–1248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin R.Collective Action (1982) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Head A. J. Demystifying intranet design: Five guidelines for building usable sites. Online (2000) 24:36–42Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B., Fulk J., Monge P. R., Kiesler S., Hinds P. Fostering intranet knowledge-sharing: An integration of transactive memory and public goods approaches. Distributed Work: New Research on Working Across Distance Using Technology (2002) (MIT Press, Boston, MA) 335–355Google Scholar
• Jackelen G. The need for a useful lessons learned database. Crosstalk: The J. Defense Software Engrg. (2000) . http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalkGoogle Scholar
• Joreskog K. G., Sorbom D.LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications (1988) (SPSS, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Joreskog K. G., Sorbom D.LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide (1996) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Kalman M., Monge P. R., Fulk J., Heino R. Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Comm. Res. (2002) 2:125–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim W. C., Mauborgne R. Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 74(4):65–75Google Scholar
• Korth H. F., Silbershatz A. Database research faces the information explosion. Comm. ACM (1997) 40(2):139–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 194–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G., Oliver P.The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-social Theory (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller G. J.Managerial Dilemmas (1992) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Fulk J., Kalman M., Flanagin A., Parnassa C., Rumsey S. Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:411–433Link, Google Scholar
• National Research CouncilThe Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age (2000) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Oliver P., Marwell G. Whatever happened to critical mass theory: A retrospective and assessment. Sociological Theory (2001) 19(3):292–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action (1965) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W., Turner J., Kraut R. E. Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. CSCW'92 Proc. Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (1992) (ACM Press, New York) 362–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., MacKenzie S., Lee J., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice R., Aydin C. Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):219–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1954) 36:387–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schriesheim C. A., Schriesheim J. F. Development and empirical verification of new response categories to increase the validity of multiple response alternative questionnaires. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1974) 34:877–884Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schriesheim C. A., Schriesheim J. F. The invariance of anchor points obtained by magnitude estimation and pair-comparison treatment of complete ranks scaling procedures: An empirical comparison and implications for validity of measurement. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1978) 38:977–983Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Simon A. R., Marion W.Workgroup Computing: Workflow, Groupware, and Messaging (1996) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Sweeney J. W. An experimental investigation of the free-rider problem. Social Sci. Res. (1973) 2:277–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon P., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 16(4):145–173Crossref, Google Scholar