Firm- and Country-Level Trade-offs and Contingencies in the Evaluation of Foreign Investment: The Semiconductor Industry, 1994–2002

References

• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:487–515Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J., Chung W. Knowledge sources and foreign investment location in the U.S. (2002) . Wharton School Working Paper 1–32, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Allison P. D.Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data (1984) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–155Link, Google Scholar
• Barkema H. G., Bell J.H.J., Pennings J. M. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(2):151–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastos P. V., Greve H. R., Baum J. A. C., Sorensen O. Interorganizational learning and the location of manufacturing subsidiaries: Is chain migration also a corporate behavior. Advances in Strategic Management (2003) Vol. 20(JAI Press, Oxford, U.K) 159–191Google Scholar
• Boudreau J. Taiwan chip companies make big investment in China. (2002) . siliconvalley.com, Vol. 12/29/2002Google Scholar
• Branstetter L. Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? (2000) 1–38NBER Working Paper 8015, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Buckley P. J., Casson M. C.The Future of the Multinational Enterprise (1976) (Homes and Meier, London, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantwell J.Technological Innovations and Multinational Corporations (1989) (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cantwell J., Janne O. Technological globalisation and innovation centres: The role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Res. Policy (1999) 28(2, 3):119–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves R. E.Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (1996) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Chang S. J. International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(2):383–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S. J., Rosenzweig P. M. The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:747–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung W., Alcacer J. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Sci. (2002) 48(12):1534–1554Link, Google Scholar
• Delios A., Henisz W. J. Japanese firms' investment strategies in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(3):305–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delios A., Henisz W. J. Political hazards, experience and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(11):1153–1164Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1983) 48(April):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D., Argote L., Devadas R. Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:58–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg S. E., Gupta A. K. Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management J. (2003) 25(8):823–845Google Scholar
• Feinberg S. E., Majumdar S. K. Technology spillovers in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2001) 32:421–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J. L., Porter M. E., Stern S. The determinants of national innovation capacity. Res. Policy (2002) 31:899–933Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gastanaga V. M., Nugent J. B., Pashamova B. Host country reforms and FDI inflows: How much difference do they make? World Development (1998) 26(7):1299–1314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:967–988Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. Market niche entry decisions: Competition, learning and strategy in Tokyo banking, 1894–1936. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(5):816–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen M. F. Structural inertia, imitation and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(3):509–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Ziedonis R. H. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(1):101–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J., Hall B. H., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with application to patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. A. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:564–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes R. H., Pisano G. P., Upton D. M.Strategic Operations: Competing through Capabilities (1996) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Henisz W. J. The institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2000a) 16(2):334–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W. J. The institutional environment for economic growth. Econom. Politics (2000b) 12(1):1–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W. J., Delios A. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(3):443–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W. J., Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization within and between countries. Bus. Politics (1999) 1(3):261–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W. J., Zelner B. A. The institutional environment for telecommunications investment. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2001) 10(1):123–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• ICE (Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation)Status 2000: A Report on the Integrated Circuit Industry (2001) (Scottsdale, AZ)Google Scholar
• Knickerbocker F. T.Oligopolistic Reaction and the Multinational Enterprise (1973) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobrin S. Political risk: A review and reconsideration. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1979) 11:32–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Kindleberger C. P. Foreign direct investment as a sequential process. The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s (1983) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 35–56Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Chang S. J. Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1991) 73(3):401–413Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Steinmueller W. E. Strategy and circumstance: The response of American firms to Japanese competition in semiconductors, 1980–1995. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10, 11):1163–1173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy B., Spiller P. T. The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1994) 10(2):201–246Google Scholar
• Macher J. T., Mowery D. C., Simcoe T. S. E-business and the disintegration of the semiconductor industry value chain. Indust. Innovation (2002) 9(3):155–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E. Intellectual property protection, direct investment and technology transfer: Germany, Japan and the United States. (1995) . International Finance Corporation, Discussion Paper 27Google Scholar
• Markusen J. R., Maskus K. E. Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. (1999a) 1–28NBER Working Paper 7164, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Martin X., Salomon R. Tacitness, learning and international expansion: A study of foreign direct investment in a knowledge-intensive industry. Organ. Sci. (2003) 17(3):297–311Link, Google Scholar
• Martin X., Swaminathan A., Mitchell W. Organizational evolution in the interorganizational environment: Incentives and constraints on international expansion strategy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(September):566–601Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKendrick D. G., Doner R. F., Haggard S.From Silicon Valley to Singapore—Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry (2000) (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
• Methe D. T. The influence of technology and demand factors on firm size and industrial structure in the dram market—1973–1988. Res. Policy (1992) 21:13–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W., Shaver J. M., Yeung B. Getting there in a global industry: Impacts on performance of changing international presence. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(6):419–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell A., Shaver J. M., Yeung B. Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies' experience in the United States medical sector marts. Strategic Management J. (1994) 17(3):555–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R.Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Rosenberg N., Nelson R. R. Technological innovation and national systems. National Innovation Systems (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) 3–21Google Scholar
• Oxley J. E. Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1999) 38(3):283–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver J. M., Flyer F. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1175–1193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver J. M., Mitchell W., Yeung B. The effect of own-firm and other-firm experience on foreign direct investment survival in the United States. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:811–824Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith P. G., Reinertsen D. G.Developing Products in Half the Time (1991) (Ban Nowstrand Reinhold Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Tilton J. E.International Diffusion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors (1971) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quart. J. Econom. (1966) 80:190–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei S. J. How taxing is corruption on international investors. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2000) 82(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler D., Mody A. International investment location decisions: The case of U.S. firms. J. Internat. Econom. (1992) 33:57–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• World BankWorld Bank Development Indicators (2001) (World Bank, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Zaheer S. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(2):341–363Crossref, Google Scholar