Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries

References

• Allen T.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ancona D., Caldwell D. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona D., Okhuyson G., Perlow L. Time-out: Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26:512–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
• Arrow K. Methodological individualism and social knowledge. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(2):1–9Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K.Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on the production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:312–330Link, Google Scholar
• Black L., Carlile P. R., Repenning N. Expanding theoretical insights from ethnographic evidence: Building on Barley's study of CT-scanning implementations. (2004) . Pending publicationGoogle Scholar
• Bourdieu P.The Logic of Practice (1980) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P., Wacquant L.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (1992) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:198–213Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Lowenstein G., Weber M. The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. J. Political Econom. (1989) 97:1232–1254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P., Lucas W. Taking care of complex boundaries: Knowledge and boundary activities on technology development teams. (2003) . Working paper, Sloan, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Carlile P., Rebentisch E. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. (2003) 49:1180–1195Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. The mutual knowledge problem. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Crowston K. A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:157–175Link, Google Scholar
• Cruse D.Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Davenport T., Prusak L.Working Knowledge (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Foucault M.Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (1980) (Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex, U.K) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galison P.Images and Logic: A Material Culture of Micro-Physics (1999) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Gittell J. Supervisory span, relational coordination and flight departure performance: A reassessment of postbureaucracy theory. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:468–483Link, Google Scholar
• Grant R. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy S., Clegg S., Clegg S., Hardy C., Nord C. Some dare call it power. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Hargadon A., Sutton R. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson K.On Line and on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 44:83–111Google Scholar
• Hinds P. The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and de-biasing methods on predictions of novice performance. J. Experimental Psych. (1999) 5:205–221Google Scholar
• James W.Pragmatism (1907) (The American Library, New York) Google Scholar
• Lave J.Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organizations and Environments: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G., Scott W. R., Blake J. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology (1988) 319–340Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Well Springs of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Litwak E., Hylton L. F. Interorganizational analysis: A hypothesis on coordination agencies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1962) 6:395–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(March):87–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. Model bias in social action. Rev. Ed. Res. (1972) 44:413–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins L., Kambil A. Looking back and thinking ahead: Effects of prior success on managers' interpretations of new information technologies. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:652–661Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:14–37Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi I.The Knowledge-Creating Organization (1995) (Oxford Press, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Orr J.Talking About Machine (1996) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
• Perrow C. Accidents in high risk systems. Tech. Stud. (1994) 1:1–38Google Scholar
• Polyani M.The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Anchor Day Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Reddy M. J., Ortony A. The conduit metaphor. Metaphor and Thought (1979) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Schank R. C., Abelson R.Scripts, Plans, and Goals (1977) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Schrage M.Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Shannon C., Weaver W.The Mathematical Theory of Communications (1949) (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) Google Scholar
• Spender J. C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star S. L., Huhns M., Gasser L. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (1989) (Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring external stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Shuen G. Pisano. A. Dynamic capability and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. Re-viewing organisation. Human Relations (2001) 54:7–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Nadler D. Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3:613–624Google Scholar
• Tyre M., von Hippel E. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:71–83Link, Google Scholar
• Victor B., Blackburn R. S. Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12:486–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. The impact of sticky data on innovation and problem solving. Management Sci. (1994) 40:429–439Link, Google Scholar
• Weber M., Henderson A. H., Parsons T.The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (1924/1947) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
• Weick K., Sutcliffe K., Obstfeld D., Staw B., Sutton R. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational behavior (1999) (JAI Press Inc., Stamford, CT) 81–117Google Scholar
• Wenger E.Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S., Clark K.Leading Product Development: The Senior Manager's Guide to Creating and Shaping the Enterprise (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Winter S., Teece D. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar