When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0096

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Allen M., Stiff J. Testing three models for the sleeper effect. Western J. Speech Comm. (1989) 53:411–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews K. M., Delahaye B. L. Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. J. Management Stud. (2000) 37(6):797–810CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argyris C., Schon D. A.Organizational Learning (1978) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Armor D. J., Costner H. L. Theta reliability and factor scaling. Sociological Methodology 1973–1974 (1974) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 17–50Google Scholar
  • Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barber B.The Logic and Limits of Trust (1983) (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S.Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (1989) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Belliveau M., O'Reilly C., Wade J. Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(6):1568–1593CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger C., Kellerman K., Bostrom R. To ask or not to ask: Is that a question? Communication Yearbook 7 (1983) 342–368Google Scholar
  • Bohn R. E. Measuring and managing technological knowledge. Sloan Management Rev. (1994) 36(1):61–73Google Scholar
  • Boisot M.Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations Institutions, and Culture (1995) (Routledge, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Brooks F. P.The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering (1995) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. A theory of group stability. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1991) 56(3):331–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmines E. G., Zeller R. A.Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll J. S. Organizational learning activities in high-hazard industries: The logics underlying self-analysis. The J. Management Stud. (1998) 35(6):699–717CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information procesing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 39:752–766CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curall S., Judge T. Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1995) 64:151–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):450–467LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg E., Phillips S., Coupland N., Giles H., Wiermann J. Miscommunication in organizations. “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 244–258Google Scholar
  • Financial Times Xerox makes copies. Financial Times (1997) Google Scholar
  • Gerbing D. W., Anderson J. C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Marketing Res. (1988) XXV(May):186–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golden B. R. The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(4):848–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Great Harvest Bread Co.Apprenticeship Agreement (1999) . 2. Great Harvest Bread CoGoogle Scholar
  • Haleblian J., Finkelstein S. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):29–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hovland C., Lumsdaine A., Sheffield F.Experiments in Mass Communication (1949) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Iansiti M.Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • King A. W., Zeithaml C. P. Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(1):75–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T., Roth K. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):215–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:569–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langfred Claus W. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy on self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(3):385–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(3):248–266LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):438–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis J., Weigert A. Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces (1985) 63:967–985CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., Rumelt R. P. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:418–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Main J. How to steal the best ideas around. Fortune (1992) October:86–89Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):1–13LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J., Schoorman F. An integration model of organizational trust. The Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAllister D. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundation for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):24–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):91–103LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociology (1977) 83:340–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. The architecture of simplicity. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(1):116–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muchinsky P. An intraorganizational analysis of the Roberts and O'Reilly organizational communication questionnaire. J. Appl. Psych. (1977) 62:184–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Noteboom N., Berger H., Noorderhaven N. Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(2):308–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • O'Dell C. S., Grayson C. J., Essaides N.If Only We Knew What We Know: The Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice (1998) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Perry D. K.Theory and Research in Mass Communication: Contexts and Consequences (1996) (L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T.Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (1996) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociology (1993) 98(4):829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1962) (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Prahalad C. K., Doz Y. L.The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision (1987) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Roberts K., O'Reilly C. Measuring organizational communication. J. Appl. Psych. (1974) 59:321–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):393–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon C. E., Weaver W.The Mathematical Theory of Communication (1949) (University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Roth N. L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:367–392LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stohl C., Redding C., Jablin F., Putnam L., Roberts K., Porter L. Messages and message exchange process. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1987) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 451–502Google Scholar
  • Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler T. R., Degoey P., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions in willingness to accept decisions. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organization. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):98–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton R. E. The diffusion of new work structures: Explaining why success didn't take. Organ. Dynamics (1975) Winter3:3–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb G., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Trust and crises. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Teece D. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge-Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 159–184Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(6):730–743LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):141–159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeller R. A., Carmines E. G.Measurement in the Social Sciences: The Link Between Theory and Data (1980) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.