Contextualizing Patterns of Work Group Interaction: Toward a Nested Theory of Structuration

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0097

References

  • Argote L., Turner M. E., Fichman M. To centralize or not to centralize: The effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1989) 43(1):58–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Kunda G. Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):76–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Orr J. E. Introduction: The neglected workforce. Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in U.S. Settings (1997) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 1–19Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Tolbert P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18(1):93–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bavelas A. Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoustical Soc. America (1950) 22:725–730CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D.The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (1973) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bendix R.Work and Authority in Industry (1956) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Bond R., Smith P. B. Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's line judgment task. Psych. Bull. (1996) 119(1):223–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown T. M., Miller C. E. Communication networks in task-performing groups: Effects of task complexity, time pressure, and interpersonal dominance. Small Group Res. (2000) 31(2):131–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke R. J., Weir T., Duncan G. Informal helping relationships in work organizations. Acad. Management J. (1976) 19(3):370–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole R. The macropolitics of organizational change: A comparative analysis of the spread of small group activities. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(4):560–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N., Cross R. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Soc. Networks (2003) 25(3):197–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeMatteo J. S., Eby L. T., Sundstrom E., Staw Barry M., Cummings L. L. Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 141–183Google Scholar
  • Dore R.British Factory-Japanese Factory (1973) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Earley P. C. East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(2):319–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):128–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):727–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske A. P., Kitayama S., Markus H. R., Nisbett R. E., Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. The cultural matrix of social psychology. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 915–981Google Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1408–1426LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. R. Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. J. Organ. Behavior (2003) 24(8):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton G. G., Biggart N. W. Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. Amer. J. Sociology (1988) 94:S52–CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences (1980) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • House R. J., Hanges P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla S. A., Dorfman P. W., Javidan M., Dickson M. Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project Globe. (1999) . Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 170 GLOBE Country co-investigatorsGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
  • IDCOverview of the Hungarian Software and Services Industry (1995) (IDC, Kronberg, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Johns G. In praise of context. J. Organ. Behavior (2001) 22(1):31–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kozlowski S. W., Klein K. J., Klein K., Kozlowski S. A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 3–90Google Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Leavitt H. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1951) 46:38–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F. When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1997) 72(3):336–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln J. R., Kalleberg A. L.Culture, Control, and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Mann L., Triandis H. C., Brislin R. W. Cross-cultural studies of small groups. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (1980) (Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA) 155–209Google Scholar
  • March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley ' Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Maurice M., Sorge A., Warner M. Societal differences in organizing manufacturing units: A comparison of France, West Germany, and Great Britain. Organ. Stud. (1980) 1:59–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods (1984) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Monge P. R., Contractor N. S., Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L. The emergence of communication networks. The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods (2001) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 440–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L.Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • NASSCOMThe Software Industry in India: Strategic Review 1997–98 (1997) (NASSCOM, New Delhi, India) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W., Yates J. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(4):541–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):527–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow L. A. The time famine: Towards a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):57–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poole M. S., Seibold D. R., McPhee R. D., Hirokawa R. W., Poole M. S. The structuration of group decisions. Communication and Group Decisionmaking (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 114–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranson S., Hinings B., Greenwood R. The structuring of organizational structures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M., Fried Y. Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. J. Organ. Behavior (2001) 22(1):1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory.”. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(3):349–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seers A., Petty M., Cashman J. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management. Group Organ. Management (1995) 20(1):18–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw M. E., Rothschild G. H. Some effects of prolonged experience in communication nets. J. Appl. Psych. (1956) 40:218–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sparrowe R. T., Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Kraimer M. L. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):316–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stokols D., Magnusson D. Group x place interactions: Some neglected issues in psychological research on settings. Toward a Psychology of Situations: An Interactional Perspective (1981) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 393–415Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A.Winning Through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamagishi T. Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1988) 24(6):530–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.