Technological Discontinuities and Complementary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance

References

• Abernathy W. J., Clark K. B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy (1985) 14:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams W., Brock J. W.The Structure of American Industry (1995) 9th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Tushman M. L. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:604–633Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N., Katz J. What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data in comparative politics. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1995) 89:634–647Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-David D., Papell D. H. The great wars, the great crash, and steady state growth: Some new evidence of an old stylized fact. J. Monetary Econom. (1995) 36:453–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger A. M., Nalebuff B. J.Co-opetition (1996) (Currency Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Caves R. E. Mergers, takeovers, and economic efficiency. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1989) 7:151–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma. When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cohen S. N., Chang A. C. Y., Boyer H. W., Helling R. B. Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids. in vitro. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA (1973) 70:3240–3244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. (1989) 99:569–596Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D., Hardy C. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:1120–1153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrnberg E., Sjöberg N. Technological discontinuities, competition and firm performance. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management (1995) 7:93–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster R. N.Innovation. The Attacker's Advantage (1986) (Summit Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Freiberger P., Swaine M.Fire in the Valley (2000) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Giovannetti G. T., Morrison S. W.Convergence. The Biotechnology Industry Report (2000) (Ernst & Young, Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1997) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Grove A. S.Only the Paranoid Survive (1996) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res. Policy (2002) 31:477–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J. A., Taylor W. E. Panel data and unobserved individual effects. Econometrica (1981) 49:1377–1398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Firm-specificity in corporate R&D. Organ. Sci. (1994a) 5:173–184Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. (1994b) 40:1720–1747Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:339–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Cockburn I. Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27:32–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C. W. L. Strategies for exploiting technological innovations: When and when not to license. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:428–441Link, Google Scholar
• Hill C. W. L., Rothaermel F. T. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:257–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Gimeno J., Hoskisson R. E. Current and future research methods in strategic management. Organ. Res. Methods (1998) 1:6–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C.Analysis of Panel Data (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:323–329Google Scholar
• King A. A., Tucci C. L. Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48:171–186Link, Google Scholar
• Kmenta J.Elements of Econometrics (1986) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Merges R. P. The control of technology alliances: An empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. J. Industrial Econom. (1998) 46:125–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Shane H., Tsai A. Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances. J. Financial Econom. (2003) 67:411–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majewski S. E.Causes and Consequences of Strategic Alliance Formation: The Case of Biotechnology (1998) (University of California, Berkeley, CA) . Unpublished Ph.D. thesisGoogle Scholar
• Majumdar B. A.Innovations, Product Developments and Technology Transfers: An Empirical Study of Dynamic Competitive Advantage (1982) (University Press of America, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:208–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C. The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940. Explorations Econom. History (1983) 20:351–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park R. Efficient estimation of a system of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1967) 62:500–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:179–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P. The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative agreements in the biotechnology industry. Res. Policy (1991) 20:237–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quandt R. E. Tests of hypothesis that a linear regression system obeys two separate regimes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1960) 55:324–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T. Technological discontinuities and the nature of competition. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management (2000) 12:149–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T. Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent's advantage: An empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry. Res. Policy (2001a) 30:1235–1251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. (2001b) 22:687–699Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:135–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer F. M., Ross D.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (1990) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:315–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stundza T. Don't call them “mini” mills anymore. Purchasing (1997) 123:34B1–34Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Competition, cooperation, and innovation. Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1992) 18:1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G. P., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas L. G. The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:221–242Link, Google Scholar
• Tilton J. H.International Diffusion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors (1971) (Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogelsang T. J. Wald-type tests for detecting breaks in the trend function of a dynamic time trend. Econometric Theory (1997) 13:818–849Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:185–203Crossref, Google Scholar