Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions

References

• Armstrong D. J., Cole P., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA) 167–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Humphrey R. H. Labeling processes in the organization: Constructing the individual. Research in Organizational Behavior (1995) 17(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 413–461Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Mael F. A. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):20–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker J. R., Tomkins P. K. Identification in the self-managing organization: Characteristics of target and tenure. Human Comm. Res. (1994) 21:223–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettenhausen K., Murnighan J. K. The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:350–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouas K. S., Arrow H. The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership changes. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (1996) 4:153–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M., Harasty A. S., Sorrentino R. M., Higgins E. T. Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, 3: The Interpersonal Context. (1996) (Guilford Press, New York) 347–370Google Scholar
• Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. J. Personality (1962) 30:29–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheney G.Rhetoric in an Organizational Society: Managing Multiple Identities (1991) (University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC) Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Res. Organ. Behavior. (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Dukerich J. M., Golden B. R., Shortell S. M. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(3):507–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol C. M. Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):653–666Link, Google Scholar
• Fiol C. M., O'Connor E. J. Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:54–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frenkel-Brunswick E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. J. Personality (1949) 18:108–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gossett L. M. Kept at arm's length: Questioning the organizational desirability of member identification. Comm. Monographs (2002) 69(4):385–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Meader D. K., Pauleen D. Prelude to virtual groups: Leadership and technology in semi-virtual groups. Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols and Processes (2004) (Idea Group, Hershey, PA) 231–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Neale M. A., Staw B. M., Sutton R. I. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior (2001) 23(JAI, Stamford, CT) 379–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., Cohen S. G., Gibson C. B. Conflict in virtual teams. Virtual Teams that Work (2003a) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 335–352Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Sawyer J. E., Neale M. A. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. (2003b) 27:265–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Bailey D. E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Sedikides C., Brewer M. B. Social identity and the sovereignty of the group. Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self (2001) (Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA) 123–143Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Mullin B.-A., Abrams D., Hogg M. A. Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. Social Identity and Social Cognition (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.) 249–279Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Social identity theory and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(4):741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai P., Yoo Y. Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2002) 11:187–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kayworth T. R., Leidner D. E. Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 18(3):7–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Cummings J. N., Hinds P., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Distributed Work (2002) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA) 57–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Sproull L. Group decision making and communication technology. Org. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1992) 52:96–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior (1991) 13(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 191–228Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fussell S. R., Brennan S. E., Siegel J., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed Work (2002) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA) 137–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski A. W., Sorrentino R. M., Higgins E. T. A motivated gatekeeper of our minds: Need-for-closure effects on interpersonal and group processes. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Interpersonal Context (1996) 3(Guilford Press, New York) 465–496Google Scholar
• Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lea M., Spears R. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. J. Organ. Comput. (1992) 2:321–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipnack J., Stamps J.Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology (2000) 2nd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A., Griffith T. L., Neale M. A., Hinds P., Kiesler S. The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. Distributed Work (2002) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA) 213–233Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., Arrow H. Introduction: The JEMCO-2 study of time, technology, and groups. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (1996) 4:107–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M., Hinds P. J. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Internat. J. Conflict Management (2001) 12(3):212–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M., Hinds P., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Fuzzy teams. Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams. Distributed Work (2002) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA) 283–308Google Scholar
• Newman O.Defensible Space (1972) (MacMillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Polzer J. T., Crisp C. B., Jarvenpaa S. L., Kim J. W. Geographically-colocated subgroups in globally dispersed teams: A test of the faultline hypothesis. (2004) . Working Paper 04-007, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Postmes T., Spears R., Lea M. Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Comm. Res. (1998) 25(6):689–715Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Whetten D., Godfrey P. To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. Identity in Organizations: Developing Theory through Conversations (1998) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 171–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Hogg M., Terry D. J. Social identity dynamics in modern organizations: An organizational psychology/organizational behavior perspective. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (2001) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA) 13–30Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Fuller M. A., Northcraft G. B., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., Griffith T. L. Media selection and identification in distributed groups: The potential costs of “rich” media. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (2000) 3(JAI, Stamford, CT) 231–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rennecker J. A. The myth of spontaneous connection: An ethnographic study of the situated nature of virtual work. (2001) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Rock K., Pratt M. G., Northcraft G. B. The effects of faultlines and communication media on identification in virtual teams. (2003) . Working paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
• Schlenker B.Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations (1980) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) Google Scholar
• Scott C. R. Identification with multiple targets in a geographically dispersed organization. Management Comm. Quart. (1997) 10(4):491–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stark R., Mandl H., Gruber H., Renkl A. Conditions and effects of example elaboration. Learn. Instruction (2002) 12:39–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H.Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Thalbourne M. A., Houran J. Transliminality, the mental experience inventory and tolerance of ambiguity. Personality Individual Differences (2000) 28:853–863Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher S. M. B., Jehn K. A., Zanutto E. Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision Negotiation (2003) 12:217–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J. C.Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (1987) (Basil Blackwell, New York) Google Scholar
• Turner J. C., Oakes P. J., Haslam S. A., McGarty C. Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 20(5):454–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):186–203Link, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Comm. Res. (1996) 23(1):3–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Comm. Res. (1997) 23(3):342–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weary G., Edwards J. A., Sorrentino R. M., Higgins E. T. Causal-uncertainty beliefs and related goal structures. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Interpersonal Context (1996) 3(Guilford Press, New York) 148–181Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld B. M., Raghuram S., Garud R. Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. J. Management (2001) 27:213–229Google Scholar
• Wilson J. K., George J., Wellins R. S., Byham W. C.Leadership trapeze: Strategies for Leadership in Team-based Organizations (1994) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar