Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0103

References

  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Auer T. Quality of IS use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1998) 7:192–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:78–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:61–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett M., Walsham G. Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10:1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:102–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creswell J. W.Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbayer M., Mische A. What is agency? Amer. J. Sociology (1998) 103:962–1023CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fuchs S. Beyond agency. Sociological Theory (2001) 19:24–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hirsch P. Sociology without social structure: Neoinstitutional theory meets brave new world. Amer. J. Sociology (1997) 102:1702–1723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:47–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jessop B. Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. Environ. Planning A (2001) 33:1213–1235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson B. M., Rice R. E.Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information Systems (1987) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jones M., Larsen T. J., Levine L., DeGross J. I. Information systems and the double mangle: Steering a course between the Scylla of embedded structure and the Charybdis of strong symmetry. Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes (1999) (IFIP, Laxenburg, Austria) 287–302Google Scholar
  • Kallinikos J. Deconstructing information packages: Organizational and behavioural implications of ERP systems. Inform. Tech. People (2004) 17:8–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein H. K., Myers M. D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. (1999) 23:67–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kling R. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Comput. Surveys (1980) 12:61–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut R., Dumais S., Koch S. Computerization, productivity, and quality of work-life. Comm. ACM (1989) 32:220–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leanna C. R., Barry B. Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:753–759CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K. Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? J. Management Inquiry (1996) 5:239–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Laubacher R., Scott Morton M. S.Inventing the Organizations of the 21st Century (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994) 12:119–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. J. Inform. Tech. (2004) 19:3–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L., Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. (1988) 34:583–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Bassoff P., Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:304–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C., Miner A. S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:698–723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicholson N. A theory of work role transitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:172–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7:63–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Barley S. R. Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quart. (2001) 25:145–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Robey D. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2:143–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J. E.Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (1996) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Piderit S. K. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:783–794CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poole M. S., DeSanctis G., Whitman M. E., Woszczynski A. B. Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. The Handbook of Information Systems Research (2004) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) 206–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed M. I. The problem of human agency in organizational analysis. Organ. Stud. (1988) 9:33–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Boudreau M.-C. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10:167–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Sahay S. Transforming work through information technology: A comparative case study of geographic information systems in county government. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7:93–110LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Boudreau M.-C., Rose G. M. Information technology and organizational learning: A review and assessment of research. Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. (2000) 10:125–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Ross J. W., Boudreau M.-C. Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19:17–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultze U., Orlikowski W. J. A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15:87–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stolz S., Paine S. C., Bellamy G. T., Wilcox B. L. Dissemination of standardized human service models: A behavior analyst's perspective. Human Services that Work: From Innovation to Standard Practice (1984) (Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD) 235–245Google Scholar
  • Strauss A. L., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Strauss A. L., Corbin J., Denzin K., Lincoln Y. S. Grounded theory methodology: An overview. Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Walsham G.Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations (1993) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Walsham G., Lee A. S., Liebenau J., DeGross J. I. Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman & Hall, New York) 466–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:628–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E. Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:543–555LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winner L.Autonomous Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wrzesniewski A., Dutton J. E. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26:179–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zack M. H. Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:227–234LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.