Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication

References

• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong D. J., Cole P., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Aron A., Aron E. N., Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63:596–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51:1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Miller N.Intergroup Relations (1996) (Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Brockhoff K.Internationalization of Research and Development (1998) (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg and New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmel E.Global Software Teams Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones (1999) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Attribution in distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Res. Organ. Behavior (2005) 26:231–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50:352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N., O’Leary M. B. The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in work teams. (2002) . Working Paper 148, Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://ebusiness.mit.edu/research/papers-number.htmlGoogle Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. R. Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:741–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L., Shachter S., Back K.Social Pressures in Informal Groups (1950) (Harper, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fussell S. R., Krauss R. M. Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about what others know. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 62:378–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Cohen S. G.Virtual Teams That Work (2003) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Vermeulen F. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinter R. E., Herbsleb J. D., Perry D. E. The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Proc. Internat. ACM SIGGROUP Conf. Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’99) (1999) Phoenix, AZ(ACM Press, NY) 306–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R.Groups that Work (and Those that Don’t) (1990) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Bailey D. E. Out of sight, out of synch: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Abrams D.Social Identification (1988) (Routledge, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Social identity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B., Neale M. A., Mannix E. A., Gruenfeld D. H. Distributed knowledge and transactive processes in decision-making groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (1998) 1(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 105–125Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 89(1):85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1994) 5:223–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):256–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:530–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):238–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Chadwich C., Thatcher S. To agree or not to agree: Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1997) 8:287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Cummings J. N., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 57–80Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fussell S. R., Brennan S. E., Seigel J., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 137–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Rice R. E., Cool C., Fish R. S. Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(4):437–453Link, Google Scholar
• Levine J. M., Moreland R. L., Masters J. S., Smith W. P. Social comparison and outcome evaluation in group contexts. Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Perspectives (1987) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 105–127Google Scholar
• Lovelace K., Shapiro D., Weingart L. R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):779–794Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A., Griffith T. L., Neale M. A., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The phenomenology of conflict in virtual work teams. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Marks M. A., Mathieu J. E., Zaccaro S. J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(3):356–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonough E. F., Kahn K. B., Barczak G. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(2):110–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• McLeod P., Liker J. Electronic meeting systems: Evidence from a low structure environment. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3:195–223Link, Google Scholar
• Monge P., Kriste K. Measuring proximity in human organizations. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1980) 43:110–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris M., Nadler J., Kurtzberg T., Thompson L. Schmooze or lose: Social friction and lubrication in email negotiations. Group Dynam. (2002) 6:89–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M., Hinds P. J. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Internat. J. Conflict Management (2001) 12(3):212–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nardi B., Whittaker S., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Olson G. M., Olson J. S. Distance matters. Human Comput. Interaction (2000) 15:139–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson J. S., Teasley S. D. Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation. Proc. Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (1996) Boston, MA(ACM Press, NY) 419–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson J. S., Teasley S. D., Covi L., Olson G., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C. A., Caldwell D. F., Barnett W. P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(1):21–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C. A., Williams K. Y., Barsade S. G., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A. Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? Research in the Management of Groups and Teams (1997) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 183–207Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H. Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1996) 7(3):230–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Adler P. S. Antecedents of intergroup conflict in multifunctional product development teams: A conceptual model. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1994) 41(1):21–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarbaugh-Thompson M., Feldman M. S. Electronic mail and organizational communication: Does saying “hi” really matter? Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:685–698Link, Google Scholar
• Schober M. F., Fussell S. R., Kreuz R. J. Different kinds of conversational perspective-taking. Social and Cognitive Psychological Approaches to Interpersonal Communication (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 145–174Google Scholar
• Simons T. L., Peterson R. S. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(1):102–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L. S., Kiesler S. B.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 53:81–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straus S. G., McGrath J. E. Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(1):87–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Soc. Sci. Inform. (1974) 13(2):65–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H.Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology (1981) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Thomas K. W., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) 3(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 651–717Google Scholar
• Tinsley C. Models of conflict resolution in Japanese, German and American cultures. J. Appl. Sci. (1998) 83:316–323Google Scholar
• Tsui A. S., O’Reilly C. A. I. Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(2):402–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui A. S., Egan T. D., O’Reilly C. A. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):549–579Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior (1999) 21(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 201–246Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1976) 41:322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:186–203Link, Google Scholar
• Weisband S., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 311–333Google Scholar
• Williams K. Y., O’Reilly C. A. I., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 77–140Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum G. M., Stasser G., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Management of information in small groups. What’s Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 3–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zack M. H. Interactivity and communication-mode choice in on-going management groups. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4:207–239Link, Google Scholar
• Zack M. H., McKenney J. L. Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:394–422Link, Google Scholar