Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams

References

• Agrell A., Gustafson R., West M. A. Innovation and creativity in work groups. Handbook of Work Group Psychology (1996) (Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) 317–343Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behavior (1988) 10:123–167Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M.Creativity in Context (1996) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Barrett F. Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):543–555Link, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psych. Bull. (1990) 107:238–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bontis N., Crossan M., Hulland J. Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. J. Management Stud. (2002) 39(4):437–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Caldwell D. F., O’Reilly C. A. The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations. Small Group Res. (2003) 34:497–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E.Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training (1998) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E., Converse S., Castellan N. J. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Individual and Group Decision Making (1993) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 221–246Google Scholar
• Chow G. C. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica (1960) 28(3):591–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claxton G.Live and Learn: An Introduction to the Psychology of Growth and Change in Everyday Life (1984) (Harper and Row Publishers, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management (1997) 23(3):239–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cook S. D. N., Yanow D. Culture and organizational learning. J. Management Inquiry (1993) 2(4):373–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossan M. Improvise to innovate. Ivey Bus. J. (1997a) 62(1):36–42Google Scholar
• Crossan M.Improvise to Innovate Training Program (1997b) (Ivey Business School, London, Ontario, Canada) Google Scholar
• Crossan M. Improvisation in action. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):593–599Link, Google Scholar
• Crossan M., Hurst D. Strategic renewal as improvisation: Reconciling the tension between exploration and exploitation. (2003) . Working paper, Ivey Business School, London, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Crossan M., Sorrenti M., Walsh J., Huff A. Making sense of improvisation. Advances in Strategic Management (1997) 14(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 155–180Google Scholar
• Crossan M., Lane H., White R. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):522–538Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossan M., Cunha M., Vera D., Cunha J. Time and organizational improvisation. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):129–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunha M., Cunha J., Kamoche K. Organizational improvisation: What, when, how, and why. Internat. J. Management (1999) 1(3):299–341Google Scholar
• De Bono E.Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step By Step (1973) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy A., Somech E. Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structure. Group Dynam. (2001) 5:111–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Glynn M. A., Kazanjian R. K. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(2):286–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmonson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(3):543–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Frost A., Yarrow R.Improvisation in Drama (1990) (St. Martin’s Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Fry A. The Post-It Note: An intrapreneurial success. SAM Adv. Management J. (1987) 52:4–9Google Scholar
• Gardner H.Art, Mind, and Brain: A Cognitive Approach to Creativity (1982) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Gerbing D. W., Anderson J. C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25:186–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson L. L., Shalley C. E. A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. J. Management (2004) 30:453–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory K. L. Native-view paradigms: Multiple cultures and culture conflicts in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:359–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Morris C. G., Berkowitz L. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1975) 8(Academic Press, New York) 45–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halpern C., Close D., Johnson K.Truth in Comedy (1994) (Meriwether Publishing Ltd., Colorado Springs, CO) Google Scholar
• Hanlon S. C., Taylor R. R. An examination of changes in work group communication behaviors following installation of a gain-sharing plan. Group Organ. Stud. (1991) 16(3):238–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatch M. J., Walsh J., Huff A. Jazzing up the theory of organizational improvisation. Advances in Strategic Management (1997) 14(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 181–191Google Scholar
• Hatch M. J. Jazz as a metaphor for organizing in the 21st century. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:556–557Link, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Group and individual training: The impact of practice on performance. Small Group Res. (1998) 29:254–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E. Organizing work by adaptation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:14–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ. Res. Methods (1984) 3(3):211–236Google Scholar
• Johnstone K.Improv: Improvisation and the Theatre (1979) (Theatre Arts Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom. Lisrel VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood and Least Square Methods (1986) (Scientific Software Inc., Mooresville, IN) Google Scholar
• Kamoche K., Cunha M. Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organ. Stud. (2001) 22(5):733–764Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamoche K., Cunha M., Cunha J. Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the jazz metaphor. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40:2023–2051Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda G.Engineering Culture (1992) (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
• Lawrence K. Playing by the rules: A role for improvisation in groups. (2001) . Working paper, University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsay R. M. Incorporating statistical power into the test of significance procedure: A methodological and empirical inquiry. Behavioral Res. Accounting (1993) 5:211–236Google Scholar
• Lipsky M.Street-Level Bureaucracy (1980) (Russel Sage, New York) Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Martin J., Siehl C. Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organ. Dynam. (1983) 12(2):52–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody S., Musheno M.Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service (2003) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. Organizing for improvisation: The backstage story of the Vancouver jazz concert and symposium. Organ. Sci. (1998) 18:511–522Google Scholar
• Miner A., Bassoff P., Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:304–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mirvis P. H. Practice improvisation. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:586–592Link, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S., Dumville B. C. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. J. Organ. Behavior (2001) 22:89–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon J., DeLeon P. Municipal reinvention: Managerial values and diffusion among municipalities. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory (2001) 11(3):327–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:91–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1998a) 23(4):698–724Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. J. Marketing (1998b) 62(3):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R. A., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7:63–92Link, Google Scholar
• Pascale R. T. Perspectives on strategy: The real story behind Honda’s success. California Management Rev. (1984) 26(3):47–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poolton J., Ismail H. New developments in innovation. J. Managerial Psych. (2000) 13:795–811Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pressman J. L., Wildavsky A.Implementation (1973) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Preston A., Mangham I. L. Improvising order. Organization Analysis and Development (1991) 22(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 308–325Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M.The Flexible Thinker (1998) (Orange You Glad Inc., Brampton, Canada) Google Scholar
• Roth A., Swartz T. A., Bowen D. E., Brown S. W. Performance dimensions in services: An empirical investigation of strategic performance. Advances in Services Marketing and Management (1993) 2(JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT) 1–47Google Scholar
• Rousseau D., Sitkin S., Burt R., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):393–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer K. The emergence of creativity. Philos. Psych. (1999) 12(4):447–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer K. Improvisation and the creative process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity. J. Aesthetics Art Criticism (2000) 58(2):149–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein E. H.Organizational Culture and Leadership (1992) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Seham A.Whose Improv is it Anyway? Beyond Second City (2001) (University Press of Mississippi, Jackson, MS) Google Scholar
• Shalley C. E., Zhou J., Oldham G. R. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management (2004) 30:933–958Google Scholar
• Spolin V.Improvisation for the Theatre (1963) (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL) Google Scholar
• Sternberg R.Handbook of Creativity (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Tierney P., Farmer S. M., Graen G. B. An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psych. (1999) 52(3):591–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker L., Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika (1973) 38:1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unger L. S., Kernan J. B. On the meaning of leisure: An investigation of some determinants of the subjective experience. J. Consumer Res. (1983) 9(March):381–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Wart M., Berman E. Contemporary public sector productivity values. Public Productivity Management Rev. (1999) 22(3):326–347Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vera D., Crossan M. Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organ. Stud. (2004) 25(5):727–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Rivera G. Organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):57–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. J., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1987) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(4):628–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):543–555Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:357–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M. A., West M. A., Farr J. L. The social psychology of innovation in groups. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (1990) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) 309–333Google Scholar
• West M. A.Effective Teamwork (1994) (British Psychological Society, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Zack M. H. Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):227–234Link, Google Scholar