Intrafirm Competition and Charter Evolution in the Multibusiness Firm

References

• Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80(7):40–47Google Scholar
• Amit R., Schoemaker P. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:33–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. I.Corporate Strategy (1965) (McGraw, New York) Google Scholar
• Arrow K. J. Control in large organizations. Management Sci. (1959) 10(3):397–408Link, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J., Hood N. Multinational subsidiary development: Capability evolution and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):773–795Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J. M. Strategies for managing internal competition. California Management Rev. (2001) 44:21–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois L. J. On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6:29–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower J. WPP: Integrating icons to leverage knowledge. (1996) . Teaching case 9-396-249, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Bower J. L., Irwin Richard D.Managing the Resource Allocation Process (1970) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. M.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Acad. Management Rev. (1983) 8:61–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:239–262Link, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T., Barringer H. R., Blanksten C. I., Mack R. W. Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory (1965) (Schenkman, Cambridge, MA) 19–49Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Chen M.-J. Competitor analysis and inter-firm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):100–135Google Scholar
• Conner K. R. Strategies for product cannibalism. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:9–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crookell H. H., Etemad H., Dulude L. S. Specialization and international competitiveness. Managing the Multinational Subsidiary (1986) (Croom Helm, London, UK) 102–111Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and organizational design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. P. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy (1982) 11:147–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality and organizational effectiveness: A test. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz Y. L., Prahalad C. K. Headquarters influence and strategic control in MNCs. Sloan Management Rev. (1981) 23(1):15–30Google Scholar
• Dutton J., Ashford S., O’Neill R., Lawrence K. Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 44(4):716–737Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles R. G.The Transfer Pricing Problem: A Theory for Practice (1985) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Galunic D. C. Coevolving: At last, a way to make synergies work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(1):91–102Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1105–1125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S., Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):159–173Link, Google Scholar
• Etzioni A.Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (1961) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Felsenthal D. S. Applying the redundancy concept to administrative organizations. Public Admin. Rev. (1980) 40:247–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn J. General Electric Co. PLC of Britain prepares for makeover, with brand new name, focus. Wall Street J. (1999) August 6):A8Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:255–282Link, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1229–1249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaynor M. Competition with the firm: Theory plus some evidence. RAND J. Econom. (1989) 20(1):59–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Ricart I Costa J. E. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:59–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Nohria N. Internal differentiations within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:323–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. Understand strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(5):1052–1082Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halal W. E. From hierarchy to enterprise: Internal markets are the new foundation of management. Acad. Management Executive (1994) 8:69–84Google Scholar
• Hamel G., Prahalad C. K. Strategic intent. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1989) 67(3):63–77Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociology (1977) 82:929–964Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedlund G. The hypermodern HNC: A heterarchy? Human Resource Management (1986) 25(1):9–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart J.-F. Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of “market” and “hierarchy.”. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:529–547Link, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A. Divisional multimarket contact within and between multiunit organizations. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(1):117–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kekre S., Srinivasan K. Broader product line: A necessity to achieve success? Management Sci. (1990) 36:1216–1231Link, Google Scholar
• Kidder T.The Soul of a New Machine (1981) (Avon Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Liebenstein H. Allocative efficiency vs. “X-efficiency.”. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1966) 56:392–415Google Scholar
• Lerner A. W. There is more than one way to be redundant. Admin. Soc. (1987) 18(3):334–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine S., White P. E. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 6:583–601Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Markides C., Pettigrew A., Thomas H., Whittington R. Corporate strategy: The role of the centre. Handbook of Strategy and Management (2001) (Sage Publications, London, UK) 98–112Google Scholar
• Mason C. H., Milne G. R. An approach identifying cannibalization within product line extensions and multi-brand strategies. J. Bus. Res. (1994) 31:163–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociology (1977) 83:340–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S., Png I. P. L. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. (1992) 38:345–360Link, Google Scholar
• Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L. The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organ. Dynam. (1999) 47:45–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nault B. R., Vandenbosch M. B. Eating your own lunch: Protection through preemption. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:342–359Link, Google Scholar
• Nayyar P. R. Performance effects of information asymmetry and economies of scope in diversified service firms. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(1):28–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 39:1245–1264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 23:293–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panzar J. C., Willig R. D. Economies of scope. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1981) 71:268–272Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A., Bergen M. E. Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A market-based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1027–1041Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters T. J., Waterman R. H.In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies (1982) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I.The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Phelps N., Fuller C. Multinationals, intra-corporate competition and regional development. Econom. Geography (2000) 76:224–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Bettis R. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and perfomance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:485–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puffer S. M. CompUSA’s CEO James Halpin on technology, rewards, and commitment. Acad. Management Executive (1999) 13:29–37Google Scholar
• Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., Turner C. Dimensions of organization structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1968) 13(1):65–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn J. B., Tushman M., Moore W. Innovation and corporate strategy: Managed chaos? Readings in the Management of Innovation (1988) 2nd ed.(Harper Collins, New York) 123–137Google Scholar
• Rumelt R.Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance (1974) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility and knowledge management in product and organizational design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwenk C. R. Devil’s advocacy and the board: A modest proposal. Bus. Horizons (1989) 32:22–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:125–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solomon J., Hymonitz C. Procter and Gamble makes changes in the way it develops and sells its products. Wall Street J. (1987) August 11):1, 12Google Scholar
• Sorenson O. Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:577–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spender J. C.Industry Recipes: An Enquiry into the Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement (1989) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1980) 1:223–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J.Organizations in Action (1967) (Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback J. M.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1976) 41:322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J., Schein E. H., Staw B. M. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behaviour (1979) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 209–264Google Scholar
• Viswanath P. V., Frierman M. Asset fungibility and equilibrium capital structures. J. Econom. Bus. (1995) 47(4):319–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:75–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Teece D. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge—Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 159–184Google Scholar