A Model of the Effects of Reputational Rankings on Organizational Change

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0144

References

  • Aiken L., West S.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Albert S., Whetten D., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior (1985) 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 263–295Google Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:91–120Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Lant T. K., Baum J. A. C., Sorenson O. Hits and misses: Managers’ (mis)categorization of competitors in the Manhattan hotel industry. Advances in Strategic Management (2003) 20(JAI/Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 118–155Google Scholar
  • Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. M. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(3):563–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown B., Perry S. Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “Most Admired” companies. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1347–1359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannella A. A., Rowe W. G. Performance leads to reputation, which leads to performance: A theoretical and empirical examination of reputation as an outcome and an antecedent. (1994) Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of ManagementDallas, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Chronicle of Higher Education (1997) February 14):A35–A36466 college and university endowmentsGoogle Scholar
  • Cleaver J. Lust for lists. Workforce (2003) 82(5):44–48Google Scholar
  • Connolly T., Conlon E., Deutsch S. Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5:211–217Google Scholar
  • Cooley C. H.Human Nature and the Social Order (1902) (Scribner, New York) Google Scholar
  • Corley K. G., Gioia D. A. The rankings game: Managing business school reputation. Corporate Reputation Rev. (2000) 3(4):319–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darby M. R., Karni E. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econom. (1973) 16:67–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse D. L. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. J. Management (2000) 26(6):1091–1112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dichev I. D. How good are business school rankings? J. Bus. (1999) 72(2):201–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Zucker L. G. Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 3–21Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Introduction. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:517–554CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Staw B. M., Sutton R. I. An expanded model of organizational identification. Res. Organ. Behavior (1999) 21:163–200Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Kramer R. M. Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:442–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erez M., Earley P. C.Culture, Self-Identity, and Work (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M. Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. J. Management (2001) 27:691–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fombrun C. J.Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (1996) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fombrun C. J., Shanley M. What’s in a name? Reputation-building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33:233–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gales R. Who’s on top? The game of ranking business schools. Across the Board (1995) 32:16–21Google Scholar
  • Ginsberg A., Venkatraman N. Investing in new information technology: The role of competitive posture and issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:37–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Chittipeddi K. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:433–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Corley K. Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Acad. Management Learning Ed. (2002) 1:107–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Thomas J. B. Institutional identity, image and issue interpretation: Sense-making during strategic change in academia. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:370–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Schultz M., Corley K. G. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):63–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodstein J. D. Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work/family issues. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:350–382CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodstein J., Gautam K., Boeker W. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:241–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goolsbee A. How rankings rate. New York Times (2004) April 12):A19Google Scholar
  • Groysberg G., Nanda A., Nohria N. The risky business of hiring stars. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(5):1–8Google Scholar
  • Hatch M. J., Schultz M. Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. Eur. J. Marketing (1997) 31(5/6):356–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatch M. J., Schultz M., Larsen M. H.The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hayward M., Boeker W. Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jick T. D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:602–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerlinger F. N.Foundations of Behavioral Research (1986) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kreiner G. E., Ashforth B. E. Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behavior (2004) 25:1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labianca G., Fairbank J. F., Thomas J. B., Gioia D. A., Umphress E. E. Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markus H. R., Wurf E. The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. (1987) 38:299–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer A. Adapting to environmental jolts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:515–537CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken F. J. Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators’ interpretation of changing demographics. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33:42–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken F. J., Martins L. L., Morgan H. Explaining organizational responsiveness to work-family issues: The role of human resource managers as issue interpreters. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(5):580–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer Special Issue):187–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):145–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peter J. P., Churchill G. A., Brown T. J. Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 19:655–662CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pollock T., Rindova V. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(5):631–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt M., Foreman P. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:18–42Google Scholar
  • Rao H. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:29–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reger R. K., Gustafson L. T., Demarie S. M., Mulane J. V. Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(3):565–584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindova V., Kemf-Leonard K. Social measures of firm value. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (2004) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) Google Scholar
  • Rindova V., Fombrun C. J. Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:691–710CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindova V. P., Williamson I. O., Petkova A. P., Sever J. M. Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J.48(6). In pressGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P., Wright J. D., Anderson A. B.Handbook of Survey Research (1983) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schatz M. What’s wrong with MBA ranking surveys? Management Res. News (1993) 16(7):15–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlenker B. R., Weingold M. F. Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Rev. Psych. (1992) 43:133–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Segev E., Raveh A., Farjoun M. Conceptual maps of the leading MBA programs in the U.S.: Core courses, concentration areas, and the ranking of the school. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:549–565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shellenbarger S. Those lists ranking best places to work are rising in influence. Wall Street Journal (1998) August 26):B1Google Scholar
  • Srivastava R. K., McInish T. H., Wood R. A., Capraro A. J. The value of corporate reputation: Evidence from the equity markets. Corporate Reputation Rev. (1997) 1:62–68Google Scholar
  • Taylor M. S., Fisher C. D., Ilgen D. R. Individuals’ reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. Res. Personnel Human Resources Management (1984) 2:81–124Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Zimmerman J. L. (2001) . Can American business schools survive? Financial Research and Policy Working Paper FR 01-16, The Bradley Policy Research Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.