A Model of the Effects of Reputational Rankings on Organizational Change
Published Online:1 Dec 2005https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0144
References
- Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
- , Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior (1985) 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 263–295Google Scholar
- Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:91–120Google Scholar
- , Baum J. A. C., Sorenson O. Hits and misses: Managers’ (mis)categorization of competitors in the Manhattan hotel industry. Advances in Strategic Management (2003) 20(JAI/Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 118–155Google Scholar
- Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(3):563–589Crossref, Google Scholar
- Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “Most Admired” companies. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1347–1359Crossref, Google Scholar
- Performance leads to reputation, which leads to performance: A theoretical and empirical examination of reputation as an outcome and an antecedent. (1994) Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of ManagementDallas, TXGoogle Scholar
- Chronicle of Higher Education (1997) February 14):A35–A36466 college and university endowmentsGoogle Scholar
- Lust for lists. Workforce (2003) 82(5):44–48Google Scholar
- Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5:211–217Google Scholar
- Human Nature and the Social Order (1902) (Scribner, New York) Google Scholar
- The rankings game: Managing business school reputation. Corporate Reputation Rev. (2000) 3(4):319–333Crossref, Google Scholar
- Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econom. (1973) 16:67–86Crossref, Google Scholar
- Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. J. Management (2000) 26(6):1091–1112Crossref, Google Scholar
- How good are business school rankings? J. Bus. (1999) 72(2):201–213Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Zucker L. G. Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 3–21Google Scholar
- , Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Introduction. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
- Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:517–554Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Staw B. M., Sutton R. I. An expanded model of organizational identification. Res. Organ. Behavior (1999) 21:163–200Google Scholar
- Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:442–476Crossref, Google Scholar
- Culture, Self-Identity, and Work (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. J. Management (2001) 27:691–699Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (1996) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
- What’s in a name? Reputation-building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33:233–258Crossref, Google Scholar
- Who’s on top? The game of ranking business schools. Across the Board (1995) 32:16–21Google Scholar
- Investing in new information technology: The role of competitive posture and issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:37–53Crossref, Google Scholar
- Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:433–448Crossref, Google Scholar
- Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Acad. Management Learning Ed. (2002) 1:107–120Crossref, Google Scholar
- Institutional identity, image and issue interpretation: Sense-making during strategic change in academia. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:370–403Crossref, Google Scholar
- Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):63–81Crossref, Google Scholar
- Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work/family issues. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:350–382Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:241–250Crossref, Google Scholar
- How rankings rate. New York Times (2004) April 12):A19Google Scholar
- The risky business of hiring stars. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(5):1–8Google Scholar
- Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. Eur. J. Marketing (1997) 31(5/6):356–365Crossref, Google Scholar
- Hatch M. J., Schultz M., Larsen M. H.The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
- Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
- Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:602–611Crossref, Google Scholar
- Foundations of Behavioral Research (1986) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) Google Scholar
- Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behavior (2004) 25:1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
- Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):312–330Link, Google Scholar
- The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608Crossref, Google Scholar
- Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
- The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. (1987) 38:299–337Crossref, Google Scholar
- Adapting to environmental jolts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:515–537Crossref, Google Scholar
- Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators’ interpretation of changing demographics. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33:42–63Crossref, Google Scholar
- Explaining organizational responsiveness to work-family issues: The role of human resource managers as issue interpreters. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(5):580–592Crossref, Google Scholar
- Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer Special Issue):187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
- Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):145–179Crossref, Google Scholar
- Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
- Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 19:655–662Crossref, Google Scholar
- The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
- Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(5):631–642Crossref, Google Scholar
- Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:18–42Google Scholar
- The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:29–44Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(3):565–584Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Kemf-Leonard K. Social measures of firm value. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (2004) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) Google Scholar
- Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:691–710Crossref, Google Scholar
- Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J.48(6). In pressGoogle Scholar
- Handbook of Survey Research (1983) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
- What’s wrong with MBA ranking surveys? Management Res. News (1993) 16(7):15–18Crossref, Google Scholar
- Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Rev. Psych. (1992) 43:133–168Crossref, Google Scholar
- Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
- Conceptual maps of the leading MBA programs in the U.S.: Core courses, concentration areas, and the ranking of the school. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:549–565Crossref, Google Scholar
- Those lists ranking best places to work are rising in influence. Wall Street Journal (1998) August 26):B1Google Scholar
- The value of corporate reputation: Evidence from the equity markets. Corporate Reputation Rev. (1997) 1:62–68Google Scholar
- Individuals’ reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. Res. Personnel Human Resources Management (1984) 2:81–124Google Scholar
- Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
- (2001) . Can American business schools survive? Financial Research and Policy Working Paper FR 01-16, The Bradley Policy Research Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar

