As the Twig Is Bent: How Group Values Shape Emergent Task Interdependence in Groups

References

• Blasi J.The Communal Experience of the Kibbutz (1986) (Transaction Books, New Brunswich, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Halverson R. R. Group consensus and psychological well-being: A large field study. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1998) 28:563–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breer P. E., Locke E. A.Task Experience as a Source of Attitudes (1965) (Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Brown K. A., Mitchell T. R. Influence of task interdependence and number of poor performers on diagnoses of causes of poor performance. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:412–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers J. E., Salas E., Converse S., Castellan J. Shared mental models in expert team decision-making. Individual and Group Decision-Making: Current Issues (1993) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Barsade S. G. Personality, organizational culture, and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:423–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford J. L., Haaland G. A. Predecisional information-seeking and subsequent conformity in the social influence process. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1972) 23:112–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutcher-Gershenfeld J., Kochan T. A., Gleason S. Dispute resolution and team-based work systems. Workplace Dispute Resolution (1997) (Michigan State University Press, Lansing, MI) Google Scholar
• Deutsch M.Distributive Justice (1985) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Northcraft G. B., Rahim M. A. Goal-setting, resource interdependence, and conflict management. Managing Conflict (1987) (Praeger, New York) Google Scholar
• Erez M., Earley P. C.Culture, Self-Identity, and Work (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12:727–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franz R. S. Task interdependence and personal power in teams. Small Group Res. (1998) 29:226–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R., Lorsch J. Organization design. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Leyden D. P. Familiarity and group productivity. J. Applied Psych. (1991) 76:578–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Shah S., Wood Worchel W., Simpson J. A. Familiarity and group productivity. Group Processes and Productivity (1992) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 578–586Google Scholar
• Gordon F., Welch K., Offringa G., Katz N. The complexity of social outcomes from cooperative, competitive, and individualistic reward systems. Soc. Justice Res. (2000) 13(3):237–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunnigle P. Collectivism and the management of industrial relations in greenfield sites. Human Resource Management J. (1995) 5:24–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R. A set of methods for research on work teams. (1982) . Technical report 1, Group Effectiveness Research Project, School of Organization and Management, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Hackman J. R., O’Connor M. What makes for a great analytic team? Individual vs. team approaches to intelligence analysis. (2004) . Intelligence Science Board, Office of the Director of Central Intelligence, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Weiss A., Brousseau K. Effects of task performance strategies on group performance effectiveness. (1974) . School of Organization and Management, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Jecker J., Landy D. Liking a person as function of doing him a favor. Human Relations (1969) 22:371–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson D. W., Johnson R. T. Effects of cooperative and individualistic instruction on handicapped and non-handicapped students. J. Soc. Psych. (1980) 118:257–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson D. W., Johnson R. T.Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research (1989) (Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN) Google Scholar
• Kroll Y., Davidovitz L., Yassour J. Selected level of risk taking among communal and non-communal societies: An experimental approach. (1984) . Unpublished manuscript, Ruppin InstituteGoogle Scholar
• Kroll Y., Davidovitz L., Yassour J. Risk-taking and alttuism. Kibbutz Trends (1996) 21:51–55Google Scholar
• Lew M., Mesch D., Johnson D. W., Johnson R. Positive interdependence, academic and collaborative-skills group contingencies and isolated students. Amer. Ed. Res. J. (1986) 23:476–488Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Bradway L. K. Task interdependence as a moderator of the relation between group control and performance. Human Relations (1997) 50:169–181Google Scholar
• Mesch D., Johnson D. W., Johnson R. Impact of positive interdependence and academic group contingencies on achievement. J. Soc. Psych. (1988) 128:345–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller L., Hamblin R. Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1963) 28:768–778Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearce J. L., Gregersen H. B. Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76:838–844Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow L. A., Gittell J. H., Katz N. Contextualizing patterns of work group interaction: Toward a nested theory of structuration. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:520–536Link, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Seibold D. R., McPhee R. D. Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quart. J. Speech (l985) 71:74–102Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Seibold D. R., McPhee R. D., Hirokawa R. Y., Poole M. S. A structurational approach to theory-building in group decision-making research. Communication and Group Decision-Making (l986) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 237–264Google Scholar
• Ranson S., Hinings B., Greenwood R. The structuring of organizational structures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saavedra R., Earley P. C., Van Dyne L. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78:61–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B. The people make the place. Personnel Psych. (1987) 40:437–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B., Goldstein H. W., Smith D. B. The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psych. (1995) 48:747–773Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K., Johnson D. W., Johnson R. T. Can conflict be constructive? Controversy versus concurrent seeking in learning groups. J. Ed. Psych. (1981) 73:651–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart G. L., Barrick M. R. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Vegt G., Emans B., van de Vliert E. Effects of interdependencies in project teams. J. Soc. Psych. (1999) 139:202–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L.Measuring and Assessing Organizations (1980) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L., Saavedra R. A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict, and originality in work groups. British J. Soc. Psych. (1996) 35:151–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:145–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Turner M. The meaning of interdependence. Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wright J. C., Mischel W. A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53:1159–1177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager S., Johnson D. W., Johnson R. T. Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups. J. Ed. Psych. (1985) 77(1):60–66Crossref, Google Scholar