The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context

References

• Abbott A., Ragin C., Becker H. What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. What is a Case? Exploring Foundations of Social Inquiry (1992) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 53–82Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency: A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Fried Y. The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations (1988) 41:305–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashmos D. P., Duchon D., McDaniel R. M. Participation in strategic decision making: The role of organizational predisposition and issue interpretation. Decision Sci. (1998) 29:25–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Tolbert P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18:93–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogner W. C., Barr P. S. Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:212–226Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Creed W., Scully M., Austin J. Clothes make the person?: The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:475–496Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:554–568Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Introduction: The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 1–22Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton J., Heaphy E., Cameron K., Dutton J., Quinn R. Coming to life: The power of high quality connections at work. Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003) (Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:685–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M., Mische A. What is agency? Amer. J. Sociology (1998) 103:962–1023Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12:727–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:295–309Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory (2001) 19:105–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C. J., Hackman J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1990) 47:65–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.New Rules of Sociological Method (1993) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
• Hargadon A. B., Douglas Y. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:476–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott A. M. The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. (2001) 47:430–448Link, Google Scholar
• Langer E. J., Berkowitz L. Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness/mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1986) 22(Academic Press, New York) 137–173Google Scholar
• Lave J.Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner R.Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life (1993) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Louis M. R., Sutton R. L. Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations (1991) 44:55–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. (2004) . Forthcoming in Acad. Management J.Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Narduzzo A., Rocco E., Warglien M., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Talking about routines in the field: The emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) 27–50Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Numagami T. The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:2–15Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T. Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:541–556Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Rueter H. H. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:484–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sewell W. H. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociology (1992) 98:1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Victor B., Boynton A., Stephens-Jahng T. The effective design of work under total quality management. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:102–117Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Res. Organ. Behavior (1999) 21:81–123Google Scholar
• Yates J., Orlikowski W. J. Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communication norms. J. Bus. Comm. (2002) 39:13–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:339–351Link, Google Scholar