Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments

References

• Amabile T. Motivatial synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Rev. (1993) 3(3):185–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M., Dejong W., Lepper M. R. Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34:92–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong A., Hagel J. The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(3):134–141Google Scholar
• Armstrong S. J., Overton T. S. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Kunda G. Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):76–95Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R., Tirole J. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2003) 70:489–520Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135Link, Google Scholar
• Deci E. L.Intrinsic Motivation (1975) (Plenum Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E. L., Ryan R. M.Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (1985) (Plenum Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin N.The Research Act, A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–551Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enos J. L.Petroleum Progress and Profits: A History of Process Innovation (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Franke N., Shah S. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy (2003) 32(1):157–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N., von Hippel E. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1199–1215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman C. Chemical process plant: Innovation and the world market. National Inst. Econom. Rev. (1968) 45:2957Google Scholar
• Frey B. S.Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation (1997) (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
• Frey B. S., Oberholzer-Gee F. The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(4):746–755Google Scholar
• Garud R., Kumaraswamy A. Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of Sun Microsystems’ open system strategy. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(5):351–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glazer A., Konrad K. A. A signaling explanation for charity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(4):1019–1028Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1997) 3rd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Henkel J., Thies S. Customization and innovation—User innovation toolkits for simulator software. Proc. 2nd Interdisciplinary World Congress Mass Customization Personalization (2003) Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Henkel J., von Hippel E. Welfare implications of user innovation. J. Tech. Transfer (2005) 30(1–2):73–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herstatt C., von Hippel E. From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a low “tech” field. J. Product Innovation Management (1992) 9:213–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1159–1177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., MacCormack A. A developing products on Internet time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(5):108–118Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B. User toolkits for innovation: Consumers support each other. J. Product Innovation Management (2005) 22(4):347–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B., Molin M. J. Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management (2003) 15(3):363–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick T. D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(4):602–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight K. E. A study of technological innovation: The evolution of digital computers. (1963) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Koestner R., Ryan R. M., Bernieri F., Holt K. Setting limits on childrens behavior: The differential effects of controlling versus information styles on intrinsiv motivation and creativity. J. Personality (1984) 52:129–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozinets R. V. On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Adv. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(1):366–372Google Scholar
• Kreps D. M. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives: The interaction between norms and economic incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(2):359–364Proc. 104th Annual Meeting Amer. Econom. Assoc.Google Scholar
• Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K. R., Wolf R. G. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation effort in free/open source software projects. (2003) . Working Paper 4425-03, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lepper M. R., Greene D.The Hidden Costs of Rewards: New Perspectives on Psychology of Human Motivation (1978) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NY) Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien G., Morrison P. D., Searls M., Sonnack E., von Hippel K. Performance assessment of the lead user generation process for new product development. Management Sci. (2003) 48(8):1042–1060Link, Google Scholar
• Lüthje C. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation (2004) 24(9):683–695Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lüthje C., Herstatt E., von Hippel C. The dominant role of “local” information in user innovation: The case of mountain biking. (2002) . Working paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• MacCormack A., Verganti R., Iansiti M. Developing products on “Internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):133–150Link, Google Scholar
• Moon J. Y., Sproull L. Essence of distributed work. The case of the Linux kernel. First Monday (2000) 5Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon J. Y., Sproull L. Turning love into money: How some firms may profit from voluntary electronic customer communities. (2001) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Morrison P. D., Roberts J. H., Midgley D. F. The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Res. Policy (2004) 33(2):351–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison P. D., Roberts E., von Hippel J. H. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1513–1527Link, Google Scholar
• Muniz A. M., O'Guinn T. Brand community. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 27(4):412–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1179–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Williamson O. Incentives in organizations. Organization Theory (1990) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Reeve J., Deci E. L. Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1996) 22:24–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N.Perspectives on Technology (1976) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothwell C., Freeman C., Horlsey A., Jervis V. T. P., Robertson J., Townsend A. B. Sappho updated—Project Sappho Phase II. Res. Policy (1974) 3(3):258–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roztocki N. Using Internet-based surveys for academic research: Opportunities and problems. Proc. 2001 Amer. Soc. Engrg. Management (ASEM), National Conference (2001) Huntsville, AL:290–295Google Scholar
• Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psych. (2000) 25(1):54–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah S. K. Sources and patterns of innovation in a consumer product field: Innovation in sporting equipment. (2000) . Working Paper 4105, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Shah S. K. Community-based innovation and product development: Findings from open source software and consumer sporting goods. (2003) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S. Computers, network and work. Sci. Amer. (1991) 265:116–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke S., von Hippel E. Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(4):5–11Google Scholar
• Urban G., von Hippel E. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Sci. (1988) 35(5):569–582Link, Google Scholar
• VanderWerf P. A. Part suppliers and innovators in wire termination equipment. (1982) . Working paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• von Hippel E. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy (1976) 5(3):212–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. (1986) 32(7):791–805Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 42(4):82–86Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., Katz R. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):821–833Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., von Hippel E. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. R. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1217–1241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:171–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R. L., Cothrel J. Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 41(4):81–91Google Scholar
• Wimmer R. D., Dominick J. R.Mass Media Research: An Introduction (1994) (Wadsworth, CA)Google Scholar
• Yin R.Applications of Case Study Research (1993) (Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar